Rs 4,000-crore investments in wind energy on brink of becoming NPAs

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0
“All these developers face this threat, even if they have been paying interest on their loans. This will affect their credit worthiness for future bank loans.”

Investment of Rs 4,000 crore in wind energy projects is on the verge of becoming non-performing assets, as over 550 MW of projects that are ready to generate electricity are stranded because a state utility has refused to sign power purchase agreements (PPA) or issue commissioning certificates.

 

Projects of Tata Power, ITC, Jindal Steel subsidiary Maharashtra Seamless, Hero Future Energies, Green Infra Wind Energy and Continuum Wind Energy are facing the risk. “Wind energy projects, which do not start generating power within two years of taking loans can be declared ‘non-performing’ by the RBI,” said Sunil Jain, President, Wind Independent Power Producers Association. “All these developers face this threat, even if they have been paying interest on their loans. This will affect their credit worthiness for future bank loans.”

Project developers are waiting for action from the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co Ltd (MSEDCL), which has refused to sign PPAs or issue commissioning certificates.

Jain said 364.15 MW of wind projects were ready in 2014-15 and another 192.05 MW were completed in 2015-16.

The distribution company defended its position. “We are working in accordance with the state’s new renewable energy policy,” said MSEDCL Chairman Sanjeev Kumar, unwilling to go into details. The Maharashtra Energy Development Agency (MEDA), which handles nonconventional energy in the state, did not respond to queries.

Maharashtra released a new renewable energy policy in July last year, which said “a total of 5,000 MW capacity of wind energy projects shall be commissioned. Out of that, an initial 1,500 MW will be used to fulfill RPO (renewable purchase obligations) of distribution companies, and the rest, 3,500 MW capacity of wind projects, can be utilised as open access for inter-state/ intra-state open access/captive consumption/REC (renewable energy certificates), etc.”

MSEDCL, however, has conveyed to developers that the 1,500 MW of installed capacity from which it will accept wind power, will be from 2011 and not from the time of release of the new policy. Between 2011 and July 2015, when the new policy was unveiled, MSEDCL had already signed PPAs for around 1,000 MW of wind power, which meant it would accept only 500 MW more.

In practice, it has not done even that, developers said. “Not a single PPA with a wind energy producer has been signed since the new policy came out,” said Jain. “Besides, it is absurd to apply a policy retrospectively. We have projects ready to start generating at the press of a button, but we are not being allowed to do so.”

As of December 2014, Maharashtra had 3052.7 MW of installed wind capacity.

“We have complained to the Maharashtra chief minister, the Prime Minister’s Office, the finance ministry and the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy,” said Jain. “Every investor and developer in wind energy in Maharashtra is suffering.”
Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/51576997.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

 

New bankruptcy bill to speed up shutdown of failed businesses

by | posted in: Company Incorporations, e-filing of MCA Returns, Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0
Panel has sought the overhaul of the bankruptcy framework to allow the speedy winding up of failed businesses to protect shareholders and lenders, aiming to modernise an outdated system.

A government panel has sought the overhaul of the bankruptcy framework to allow the speedy winding up of failed businesses to protect shareholders and lenders, aiming to modernise an outdated system that drags out closure proceedings.

It has recommended new institutions and structures for a fresh regime that will encourage entrepreneurship and foster a startup culture, among the stated objectives of the Narendra Modi administration. The government has indicated it will move a Bill in the winter session of Parliament to give effect to the recommendations, addressing one of the key issues that has kept India low on the ease of doing business rankings.

The Bankruptcy Law Reform Commission headed by former law secretary TK Viswanathan has proposed insolvency resolution within 180 days and a new regulator to oversee the process. It’s also laid down a clear and speedy system for early identification of financial distress and revival of companies.

The timelines are on par with international norms for insolvency resolution. “The endeavour would be to introduce the Bill in the next session of Parliament,” Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said at the World Economic Forum in the Capital on Wednesday. Viswanathan submitted the report to the minister later in the day. The report, along with the draft legislation, has been made public for feedback. “The Bill seeks to improve the handling of conflicts between creditors and debtors, avoid destruction of value, distinguish malfeasance vis-a-vis business failure and clearly allocate losses in macroeconomic downturns,” the report said.

The World Bank has ranked India at 136 out of 189 countries in ‘resolving insolvency,’ estimating that it takes 4.3 years on average in Mumbai to settle a case.

Jaitley had identified bankruptcy law reform as a key priority for improving ease of doing business in his February budget speech. He said that a comprehensive bankruptcy code, meeting global standards and providing the necessary judicial capacity, would be unveiled in the fiscal year. Under the current system, proceedings take several years, hurting investors and lenders besides costing taxpayers crores of rupees.

Banks are groaning under bad debt stemming from projects that have got stuck, drawing the Reserve Bank of India’s concern. “We need a bankruptcy code. We need equity to be seen as equity and debt to be seen as debt. Today there’s a lot of confusion… We need that confusion to be changed,” RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan has said previously.

90 Days for Key Categories. The prescribed resolution timeline of 180 days can be cut further to 90 days from the trigger date for key categories. The proposed insolvency regulator will cover professionals and agencies specialising in the field.

The proposals include information utilities that will collect, authenticate and disseminate financial information from listed companies. An Insolvency Adjudicating Authority will hear cases by or against debtors. The Debt Recovery Tribunal should be the adjudicating authority with jurisdiction over individuals and unlimited liability partnership firms, it said. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) should be the adjudicating authority with jurisdiction over companies and limited liability entities, it added.

The draft bill has consolidated existing rules relating to insolvency of companies, limited liability entities, unlimited liability partnerships and individuals, all of which are currently scattered across a number of laws, into a single legislation.

According to the draft bill, during the transition phase, the Centre will exercise all regulatory powers until the agency is established. The panel’s report suggests that an insolvency resolution plan prepared by a resolution professional has to be approved by a majority of 75% of the voting share of financial creditors. As part of the insolvency resolution process, creditors and debtors will engage in negotiations to arrive at agreeable repayment plans.

The draft proposes that any proceeding pending before the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR) or the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) before the new law goes into force should stand abated or stopped.

“However, a company in respect of which such proceeding stands abated may make a reference to Adjudicating Authority within 180 days from the commencement of this law,” the recommendation said, keeping in view continuity of the process. Minister of State for Finance Jayant Sinha said the required infrastructure needed to be put in place.

“We also have to ensure that necessary judicial capacity is available,” he said. “We also need to resolve many of the situations immediately because they are short of cash in most of these bankruptcy types of cases.” The minister said the government was trying to put together a comprehensive solution where “we can resolve default and bankruptcy cases as quickly and efficiently possible.”

Industry feels the new system will create a robust and globally competitive insolvency regime. This will significantly reduce the time taken for insolvency proceedings in India, which at present, on an average basis is estimated at about 4.3 years as against only 1.7 years in high-income OECD countries,” said Chandrajit Banerjee, director general of the Confederation of Indian Industry.

“The architecture proposed by the Viswanathan committee of establishing an insolvency regulator to have oversight of the new class of insolvency professionals, agencies and information utilities will enhance the systemic efficiency of dealing with insolvency cases in a timebound manner,” he said.

Source: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-11-05/news/68043912_1_bankruptcy-framework-new-bankruptcy-bill-180-days

Mallya default singes top auditing companies

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0

Some of world’s top auditing firms, including Price Waterhouse, Grant Thornton, Deloitte LLP and Walker Chandiok & Co, are under scrutiny with a slew of regulators seeking answers on their valuation, auditing and due diligence of UB Group companies over the last few years.

Deloitte LLP conducted the financial and tax due diligence for Diageo of United Spirits Ltd (USL) which led to the $2.1 billion acquisition of the company, but could not detect the problems in annual accounts. These accounts, in turn, were prepared by PW, which was the auditor for USL between 2010 and 2011, and later by Walker & Chandiok & Co.

The accounts were disputed by Diageo in April 2015 after it found a Rs 2,100 crore hole and sought Vijay Mallya’s ouster from the USL board. Questions have also been raised by lenders on what basis Grant Thornton valued the Kingfisher brand at Rs 4,100 crore. This is now being probed by the Serious Fraud Investigation office (SFIO).

When contacted, a Grant Thornton spokesperson said the firm fully stood by its brand valuation report on Kingfisher. “We believe it was appropriate in the context of when it was done and the purpose for which it was done,” the spokesperson said.

PW declined comment but an external spokesperson said the firm had not received any communication from either the Securities and Exchange Board of India or the Enforcement Directorate. “Deloitte does not comment on client confidential matters,” its spokesperson said.

Diageo had invested in USL after the British company was given express representations that all of the receivables from Mallya entities were recoverable in full. The fund diversion worth Rs 2,100 crore from USL was later raised when KPMG, the new auditor appointed by Diageo, discovered discrepancies when it was finalising USL’s 2014 accounts. All the three years’ accounts will now have to be re-stated, according to listing norms.

In the same year, the new USL management called in PW UK for a forensic audit of the previous three years (which included auditing by its own India unit) and passed on the reports to the regulators including the Sebi, the ministry of corporate affairs and the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

The ICAI, sources said, had asked both PW and Walker Chandiok to explain the discrepancy. An ED official said it was surprising that none of the auditors or valuers for Diageo raised flags over the accounts manipulation or the Rs 4,000 crore diversion by USL to the British Virgin Islands in 2007.

While the auditors of USL are in the dock for cooking accounts, another marquee auditing firm — Grant Thornton is under investigation by the SFIO for its Rs 4,100 crore brand valuation of Kingfisher Airlines. It was based on this brand valuation in 2011 that Mallya raised Rs 9,100 crore from government-owned banks by offering the brand as collateral. The lenders are now holding a dud Kingfisher brand, which is finding no takers.

Sources in the ICAI said it was a redux of the Satyam scam, when some of the world’s top auditors overvalued assets before the Maytas and Satyam merger, which led to the unravelling of the scam. In the Satyam case, the ICAI had debarred two auditors from Price Waterhouse who were found guilty of professional misconduct. S Gopalakrishnan and T Srinivas were struck off the ICAI’s rolls and fined Rs 5 lakh each. A Central Bureau of Investigation court later convicted them of fraud.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/mallya-default-singes-top-auditing-companies-116031900495_1.html

The Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2016 introduced in Loksabha

by | posted in: Company Incorporations, e-filing of MCA Returns, Corporate Updates | 0

On 16th March 2016 Lok Sabha has passed the Companies (Amendment) Bill 2016 to further amend the Companies Act, 2013

The Act introduced significant changes related to disclosures to stakeholders, accountability of directors, auditors and key managerial personnel, investor protection and corporate governance. However, Government received number of representations from industry Chambers, Professional Institutes, legal experts and Ministries/Departments regarding difficulties faced in compliance of certain provisions. Amendments of the Act were carried out through the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015 to address the immediate difficulties arising out of the initial experience of the working of the Act, and to facilitate “ease of doing business”.

The changes introduced are broadly aimed at addressing difficulties in implementation owing to stringency of compliance requirements; facilitating ease of doing business in order to promote growth with employment; harmonization with accounting standards, the regulations of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 and the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; rectifying omissions and inconsistencies in the Act, and carrying out amendments in the provisions relating to qualifications and selection of members of the National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the directions of the Supreme Court.

The Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2016, inter alia, proposes the following, namely:—

  • Simplification of the private placements: Simplification of the private placement process by doing away with separate offer letter, by making filing of details or records of applicants to be part of return of allotment only, and reducing number of filings to Registrar;

Earlier, there was significant difficulty was created by the Companies Act, with the unduly restrictive set of provisions pertaining to private placements. This over-ambitious scheme of regulation was a direct result of some incidents in the past. One such provision requires every private placement to be routed through a separate bank account opened for this purpose, and a bar on utilization of the money until allotment. More often than not, the amount received in private placement is large, and companies cannot afford to keep the amount idle.

Now, this private placements process has been simplified with the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2016.

(b) Allow unrestricted object clause in the Memorandum of Association dispensing with detailed listing of objects, self-declarations to replace affidavits from subscribers to memorandum and first directors;

(c) Provisions relating to forward dealing and insider trading to be omitted from the Act;

(d) Requirement of approval of the Central Government for Managerial remuneration done away with:

Requirement of approval of the Central Government for Managerial remuneration above prescribed limits is replaced by approval through special resolution by shareholders;

Central Government control on managerial remuneration is eliminated. Section 197, which places limits on managerial remuneration, will now require special resolution only, if the limits placed under the law are exceeded.

(e) Loans to entities in which directors are interested:

A company may give loans to entities in which directors are interested after passing special resolution and adhering to disclosure requirement;

 (f) Provisions easing business by overseas entities

In support of the “Make in India” policy, it is quite appropriate that the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2016 must have enabled foreign owned businesses to form companies in India. Accordingly, there are several provisions to facilitate foreign-owned businesses:

– EGM of a wholly-owned subsidiary of a foreign company may be called anywhere in India.

– The requirement for a resident director provided in section 149 is sought to be amended to provide that in case of newly incorporated companies the condition may be satisfied subsequent to incorporation, rather than before incorporation.

– Remove restrictions on layers of subsidiaries and investment companies

(g) Allow for exempting class of foreign companies from registering and compliance regime under the Act;

(h) Align prescription for companies to have Audit Committee and Nomination and Remuneration Committee with that of Independent Directors;

(i) Test of materiality to be introduced for pecuniary interest for testing independence of Independent Directors;

(j) Disclosures in the prospectus required under the Companies Act and the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 and the regulations made thereunder to be aligned by omitting prescriptions in the Companies Act and allowing these prescriptions to be made by the Securities and Exchange Board of India in consultation with the Central Government;

(k) Provide for maintenance of register of significant beneficial owners by a company, and filing of returns in this regard to the Registrar;

(l) Removal of requirement for annual ratification of appointment or continuance of auditor;

(m) Amend provisions relating to Corporate Social Responsibility to bring greater clarity.

http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Companies,%202016/Companies%20bill,%202016.pdf

SEBI board clears wilful defaulter rules; clarifies on definition of control

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates | 0

SEBI says wilful defaulters would also be not allowed to take control of any other listed company.

India’s market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), on Saturday, tightened the rules for so-called wilful defaulters preventing them from raising funds through public issues. The rules, however, are applicable prospectively which suggests that those who have already been termed wilful defaulters may not come within the ambit of these strictures.

Following a board meeting in Delhi, on Saturday, SEBI said that entities declared as wilful defaulters will not be allowed to raise money through sale of shares, debt securities and non-convertible preference redeemable shares to the public.

“No issuer shall make a public issue of equity securities/debt securities/non-convertible redeemable preference shares, if the issuer company or its promoter or its director is in the list of the wilful defaulters,” said a press release issued by SEBI.

Such entities will not be allowed to take control of another listed entity, SEBI said. These firms will also not be allowed to set up market entities like mutual funds. The rules are applicable prospectively, said the regulator.

At a press conference in New Delhi, UK Sinha, chairman of SEBI said that all rules made by the regulator are prospective in nature.

In January 2015, SEBI issued a draft paper proposing that wilful defaulters would not be allowed to sell shares, debt securities and non-convertible preference redeemable shares to the public. The paper had suggested that wilful defaulters be barred from taking control of another listed entity, but that they be allowed to participate in counter offers to deal with hostile takeover bids. Each of these restrictions would be applicable if the issuer, its promoter, group company or director of the issuer of such securities were in the list of wilful defaulters published by RBI, the stock market regulator had said.

The final regulations announced on Saturday are along the same lines.

Policy makers have toughened their stance against wilful defaulters as they try and improve the asset quality of the banking sector. While defaulters who are hit by external factors such as weakness in economic conditions may deserve some help from the system, policy makers feel that wilful defaulters must not be spared.

RBI has been asking banks to get tough on wilful defaulters and has a tough set of rules in place which say that anyone tagged a wilful defaulter cannot raise fresh funds from the banking system. The banking regulator, however, has been of the view that such defaulters also need to have their access to capital markets restricted. This has now happened with SEBI tightening its rules as well.

While RBI has not disclosed the quantum of loans that fall under the wilful default category, data has emerged from some large public sector banks.

Loans worth Rs.11,700 crore given by State Bank of India have been locked up as non-performing assets as nearly 1,160 defaulters have wilfully decided not to repay, PTI reported on 24 February.

Another state-owned lender, Punjab National Bank (PNB), declared 904 borrowers who owed it a combined Rs.10,869.71 crore as of December-end as wilful defaulters. PNB added 140 companies to the list of wilful defaulters in the December quarter alone.

The most prominent case in this regard is the attempt by banks and investigative agencies to recover dues from UB Group chairman Vijay Mallya, who has been declared a wilful defaulter by lenders like State Bank of India. The country’s largest lender had moved the Bangalore debt recovery tribunal (DRT) seeking an arrest warrant against Mallya. On Friday, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) issued summons to Mallya, asking him to be personally present before it on 18 March. The summons is part of ED’s probe into a money laundering case against the former liquor baron.

Definition of control

Separately, the market regulator clarified what the term ‘control’ means in the context of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) by pegging the shareholding threshold of an acquirer at 25%.

“Considering the international practices and the current regulatory environment in India, the definition of control may be amended such that control is defined as (a) the right or entitlement to exercise at least 25% of voting rights of a company irrespective of whether such holding gives de facto control and/or (b) the right to appoint majority of the non-independent directors of a company,” said SEBI in its press release.

The move is aimed at removing ambiguities that companies currently confront during takeovers. Currently, the definition of ‘control’ under the Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers (SAST) Regulations, 2011—popularly known as the Takeover Code—doesn’t specify a threshold for shareholding.

The current takeover code states that an acquirer is in ‘control’ only if the board of the company that’s being acquired gives the former the right to appoint a majority of the directors, and have the final say on management and policy decisions.

The control of management or policy decisions is through shareholding or management rights or shareholders’ agreement or voting agreements.

SEBI has also cleared a framework for protective rights with an exhaustive list of rights that do not lead to acquisition of control.

“An illustrative list of protective rights which would not amount to acquisition of control may be issued. Grant of such protective rights to an investor may be subject to obtaining the public shareholders’ approval (majority of minority),” SEBI said.

Somasekhar Sundaresan, partner, J Sagar Associates, said “The company that is declared to be a willful defaulter ought to be left out of the severity of SEBI’s measures, and instead those in control of the company alone should have been targeted. A defaulter, whether willful or not, requires restructuring, and imposing prohibitions on the business entity could in fact hurt lenders for whose benefit the policy on willful defaulters has been developed. Expanding the scope to directors would also mean that turning around a company that is accused of being a willful defaulter would become impossible since no one would join the board even after throwing out the old promoters. Detailed provisions on when a borrowing entity ceases to be a willful defaulter would be needed—it cannot be after the board is replaced since, so long as it is a willful defaulter, no one would be able to join the board.”

“The move to allow shareholders to confer the power to exercise veto rights to selected investors without getting into whether they mean “control” is a positive measure. Open offers are for the benefit of public shareholders and they must have the power to waive an open offer. This is a very mature measure of reform. Market players would keenly await what SEBI puts out as a list of veto rights aimed at investor protection will not constitute control,” added Sundaresan.

Source: http://www.livemint.com/Money/LSmk1XiZ26pZnyGj5m4ufP/Sebi-bars-wilful-defaulters-from-markets-posts-at-listed-fi.html

Canadian fund commits Rs 1012 crore for renewable energy in India

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0

CDPQ, which deals primarily in public and para-public pension and insurance plans, also announced the establishment of its Indian office in New Delhi.

Canada’s institutional fund manager Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec (CDPQ) on Wednesday said it has committed an investment of $150 million (Rs 1012.05 crore) in the Indian renewable energy sector. CDPQ, which currently manages $248 billion (Rs 16.73 lakh crore) in net assets, invests globally in major financial markets, private equity, infrastructure and real estate.

“CDPQ plans to commit $150 million to renewable energy investments in India,” the company said in a statement.

Over the next 3-4 years, CDPQ will use its commitment to target hydro, solar, wind and geothermal power assets with investments likely to take the form of select partnerships with leading Indian renewable energy companies, it added.

“We believe that India stands out as an exceptional country to invest in, given the scope and quality of investment opportunities, the potential for strategic partnerships with leading Indian entrepreneurs and the current government’s intention to pursue essential economic reforms,” CDPQ President and CEO Michael Sabia said.

CDPQ, which deals primarily in public and para-public pension and insurance plans, also announced the establishment of its Indian office in New Delhi. It appointed Anita Marangoly George managing director of its South Asia operations.

George, who joins the company from the World Bank where she was working on the global practice on energy, had helped finance the first commercial solar project in the country, the statement said. She will be taking up the new assignment from April 1 this year, it added.

 

Source: http://www.dnaindia.com/money/report-canada-s-fund-manager-commits-rs-1012-crore-investment-in-indian-renewable-energy-2187291

Paragon Partners launches $200M India-focused mid-market PE fund

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0

Indian private equity investor Siddharth Parekh and entrepreneur Sumeet Nindrajog are launching a $200 million India focused fund. The duo announced today that they have raised $50 million in commitments, marking the first close of their $200 million private equity fund, Paragon Partners Growth Fund I (PPGF-I). Established in August 2015, PPGF is an Alternative Investment Fund(AIF)-Category II Private Equity fund looking to invest in high growth mid-market private companies in India.

 

The fund will focus on five core sectors, including consumer discretionary, financial services, infrastructure services (capex light), industrials and healthcare services. The fund claims to have an advanced pipeline of investment opportunities across these sectors and plan to invest in 10-15 mid-market companies in India, with an average deal size of $10-20 million.

 

In line with this, Paragon Partners plans to pursue an active investment approach, contributing to the advancement of its portfolio companies in three core areas: business development, organizational development, and operational efficiency.

 

Paragon Partners’ Advisory Board will also work hand-in-hand with its investment and operations professionals to drive value in its portfolio companies. The board includes Deepak Parekh (Chairman, HDFC Ltd.), Harsh Mariwala (Chairman, Marico Ltd. & Founder Member), Sunil Mehta, (Chairman, SPM Capital Advisors Pvt Ltd) and Jeff Serota (ex Sr. Partner at Ares Private Equity) amongst others. Siddharth, Co-Founder, Paragon Partners, commenting on the first close, said,

 

We believe the next decade in India will see a strong resurgence of growth in key sectors such as manufacturing, financial services and infrastructure.

 

With its first close, PPGF-I has invested $10 million as growth capital in Capacite Infraprojects Limited, a Mumbai based firm which is engaged in the construction of buildings (including super high rise structures) and factories, for large real estate developers, corporates and institutions  across the Mumbai, NCR and Bengaluru regions.

 

Established in August 2012, Capacite is promoted by Rahul Katyal, Rohit Katyal, and Subir Malhotra. It will look to grow and expand to more locations on a selective basis moving forward. Commenting on the investment, Rohit, Director at Capacite said,

 

Within a span of three years, Capacite has achieved significant scale with an expected top line of ~Rs 1,000 cr for the current financial year, backed by a gross order book of  Rs 5,400 cr. We are delighted to partner with Paragon Partners, as Capacite embarks on its next wave of growth.

 

PPGF-I claims to have seen interest from onshore and offshore institutions, family offices and HNI’s. Domestic investors include India Infoline, Edelweiss Group and Infina Finance Private Limited (an associate of Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited).  The fund also claims to have received a significant commitment from the Fairfax group based in Canada. With additional discussions in progress, the fund expects to close on further commitments in coming months.

 

The Indian startup ecosystem has seen an uprising in the past few years and there is now both internal and external interest in investing in early and mid-stage companies. In September 2015, Kalaari Capital had raised a $290 million India focused fund. In December 2015, Blume Ventures had raised $30 million for its Fund II to invest in 35-45 startups. In February 2016, early stage investor, Kae Capital too raised $30 million for its second fund, with an aim to allocate 10% of the fund to cater to non-tech start-ups.

 

Reports also suggest that Sequoia Capital had closed a $920 million India focussed fund in February 2016, though Sequoia is yet to confirm the same. Other marquee investors like SAIF Partners, Accel Partners, and Lightspeed India, have racked up fresh funds in the recent past.

Source: