Now, India Inc vendors under I-T lens, firms asked to give payment details

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0

The income-tax (I-T) department has asked large corporate entities, including multinational firms, to furnish details of employees off the payroll to check whether they are filing tax returns after deduction at source, or TDS.

According to I-T officials, many lawyers, chartered accountants, consultants, and designers — not on the payroll of companies — have not filed I-T returns (ITR), fearing they would have to disclose their full income.

The move is part of the government’s efforts to increase the tax base and nab potential evaders. The deadline for filing returns for the assessment year (AY) 2017-18, to track income in the fiscal year 2016-17 (FY17), is July 31.

Such professionals who could be potential evaders have been identified through a complete tax profiling, by linking their banks and transaction details.

The tax department, through its non-filer monitoring system, has identified about 13.7 million people with potential tax liabilities who have not filed returns. A preliminary examination of the data has revealed that many third-party vendors in different tax brackets have not been filing returns, while some have been inconsistent in doing so.

“Such measures are part of the second phase of the tax department’s Operation Clean Money, to bring those who have declared unaccounted cash and deposits after demonetisation under the tax net,” said a senior official of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). Sources said the CBDT had set the target of adding 10 million taxpayers in the current financial year (FY18).

Under provisions of Section 194 (C) of the I-T Act, a company has to deduct tax at source at the rate of 10 per cent on payments made to professionals or for technical services, if their bill is Rs 30,000 or more.

“The efforts of the tax department to expand the taxpayer base are understandable. Tracking TDS is an important tool to check whether people have filed their taxes,” said Sanjay Sanghvi, partner, Khaitan & Co.

During 2015-16, there were only 55.9 million people in the country who paid income tax. Last year, the tax department had added 9.1 million taxpayers, expanding the base to 65 million.

The government had recently amended the provisions in the I-T rules dealing with the filing of returns. Those not filing on time will have to pay a fine.

For instance, for people earning below Rs 5 lakh annually, missing the deadline will make them liable to a fine of Rs 1,000; those with earnings above Rs 5 lakh annually will have to cough up Rs 5,000 as penalty.

At present, there is no fine if the returns are filed with a delay within the AY. Official data suggest that about 5 million companies registered in the country, of which only 690,000 filed I-T returns last year.

Source: Business Standard

Directorate set up under CBEC for data analytics and nabbing evaders

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
The data analytics and processing coupled with intelligence inputs would inter-alia provide CBEC national and sub-national perspective for policy formulation

The government has set up a new wing under the indirect taxes body to provide intelligence inputs and carry out big data analytics for taxmen for better policy formulation and nabbing evaders.

The Directorate General of Analytics and Risk Management (DGARM) will be under the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC), mainly to use internal and external sources for detailed data mining to generate actionable inputs, the revenue department said in an office memorandum. The DGARM, set up on July 1, coinciding with the roll-out of the GST regime, has four verticals headed by an official of rank of additional director general or principal ADG. It will function as an apex body of CBEC for data analytics and risk management, and report to the CBEC chairman.

Incidentally, the CBEC is to be renamed as the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) after excise duty along with service tax and a dozen other central and state levies were subsumed into GST.

“The data analytics and processing coupled with intelligence inputs would inter-alia provide CBEC national and sub-national perspective for policy formulation. The field formations of CBEC are expected to gainfully and effectively utilise the data and other inputs shared by the DGARM,” the memorandum said.

As part of the DGARM, a National Targeting Centre has been set up, which is responsible for application of a nationally coordinated approach to risk analysis and targeting of risky goods and passengers crossing the borders of the country. “It shall provide 24×7 operational risk interdiction supports to field formations of the CBIC,” it said.

The centre in question will institutionalise coordination with other government departments and other stakeholders for sharing databases, information, intelligence and reports to build risk profile of entities. A Centre for Business Intelligence and Analytics has also been set up and will be responsible for identification of information requirements of the CBEC. It will utilise data feeds from internal sources.

It shall be responsible for providing analytical inputs to support identification, targeting and risk management functions of the National Targeting Centre, the Risk Management Centre for Goods and Services Tax, and the Risk Management Centre for Customs.

The third vertical of the DGARM is the Risk Management Centre for Goods and Services Tax, which will institutionalise mechanism to collect necessary inputs, adopt coordinated approach and share the outcome for risk-based identification for the purpose of scrutiny, audit and enforcement functions.

Besides, the Risk Management Centre for Customs will be responsible for assessment and targeting of risky cargo crossing the borders through sea, air and land. The DGARM will do detailed data mining and analysis to generate outputs for focused and targeted action by field formations and investigation wings of the CBEC.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/59577530.cms

Central Board of Direct Taxes cuts profit margin for safe harbour rules

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies, India & International - Corporate updates | 0
Safe harbour rules are defined as circumstances under which the income-tax authorities accept the transfer pricing declared by the assessee.

Given the lukewarm response to the safe harbour mechanism for transfer pricing, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) on Thursday cut the operating profit margin for information technology-enabled services, knowledge process outsourcing services (KPOs) and research and development (R&D) related to software and generic pharmaceutical drugs companies.

The new rules will apply to transactions of up to Rs 200 crore. Safe harbour rules, a dispute-avoidance mechanism, are defined as circumstances under which the income-tax authorities accept the transfer pricing declared by the assessee. The rule provides the minimum operating profit margin in relation to operating expenses that a taxpayer is expected to earn for certain categories of international transactions. The same is acceptable to the income tax authorities as arm’s length price (ALP). The rules are applicable for transactions between group companies based in different countries so that a fair price or ALP is arrived at by the tax authorities. The rules have come into effect from April 1 this year and will continue to remain in force for two successive years up to assessment year 2019-2020, the board said in a statement

For software development services, safe harbour margins have been reduced to a peak rate of 18% from 22% in the previous regime. Similarly, for KPOs, a graded structure of three different rates of 24%, 21% and 18% has been provided, based on employee cost to operating cost ratio, replacing the single rate of 25% earlier. For the third category of R&D services, the margins have been reduced to 24% from 30% and 29%, respectively, earlier. “The lukewarm response to the earlier safe habour scheme was on account of the high rates. Thus, taxpayers opted for unilateral APA process instead. The revised scheme has been designed to attract small to medium business, especially in the IT/ITeS segment, so as to give them a viable alternative to APA regime, which is both time consuming and expensive. The rates for IT/ITeS segment are more or less in line with the APAs being settled and hence the safe harbour scheme, this time, should get a positive response,” Arun Chhabra, director, Grant Thornton Advisory, said.

Assessees eligible under the present safe harbour regime up to AY 2017-18 shall also have the right to choose the safe harbour option most beneficial to them, the board said. It added that a new category of transactions being “Receipt of Low Value-Adding Intra-Group Services” has been introduced. “The revised safe harbour rules are a welcome step towards making safe harbour a viable alternate dispute resolution mechanism. Key highlights are: Reduction of margins for service units, introduction of safe harbour rate for low-valued services (in line with BEPS recommendation) and well-thought scheme for knowledge process outsourcing companies. Overall, it’s a welcome step towards strengthening the safe harbour option for small and mid size companies,” Kunj Vaidya, leader transfer pricing, Price Waterhouse & Co, said.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/central-board-of-direct-taxes-cuts-profit-margin-for-safe-harbour-rules/708984/

One nation, one tax department: I-T takes cue from GST

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
The move, which will require a change in the income tax law, would also end the relevance of various geographic divisions in the form of wards and circles.

The one-nation, one-tax principle that underlines the goods and services tax (GST), set to be rolled out on July 1, could be adopted in a much more broader sense by the income tax department through a path-breaking initiative on jurisdiction-free assessment.

This would mean that a taxpayer in Mumbai could be assessed by an income tax officer located in Patna, a significant leap toward eradicating corruption by reducing the need for face-to-face contact between citizens and tax officials to the absolute minimum besides speeding up processing.

The move, which will require a change in the income tax law, would also end the relevance of various geographic divisions in the form of wards and circles with the whole country becoming one jurisdiction. This, it is hoped, will put an end to a system in which bribery is said to be used as a tool to ease processes through human intervention.


A high-level internal report of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) recommended the move, which is under active consideration, a senior official told Economic Times.

“We are looking at it,” the CBDT official said.

The government may consider implementing the process in the next financial year.

 

The Catalyst
The key catalyst for such a significant reform is the massive shift toward e-filing of returns, which is already jurisdiction-free with returns going to the Central Processing Centre in Bengaluru.

In the last financial year, over 42.1 million tax returns had been filed online by February. The number of e-returns processed by then was 43 million, which included some backlog from previous years.

Multiple Benefits
In line with this move towards e-processing, the income tax department may even opt for e-scrutiny for all limited scrutiny cases where assesses can explain the transactions in question over email, the official said.

A complete jurisdiction-free environment would make geography redundant and the income tax department completely faceless for taxpayers. Any review or scrutiny of return could happen anywhere in India through an electronic interface, ensuring that the payee is not forced to interact with officials. “A taxpayer would not need to have any physical interface with his assessing officer,” said the official cited above.

CBDT had earlier constituted a seven-member committee to formulate a Standard Assessment Procedure for e-scrutiny to promote greater certainty, transparency and accountability. The board has in recent times taken a number of initiatives to reduce the face-to-face contact between tax officials and assessees and make the system non-adversarial.

These include directing field offices to raise only specific queries in income tax assessment cases picked up for scrutiny. It also directed the expeditious completion of those scrutiny cases where income concealed is up to Rs 5 lakh. “Jurisdiction-free assessment will help the tax department plan and allocate assessment work across the country,” said Jiger Saiya, partner, direct tax, BDO India.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/59026099.cms