IT raid cases not to be processed under e-assessment: CBDT

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0

The soon-to-be rolled out pan India e-assessment system for scrutiny cases of taxpayers will not be applicable to instances where a raid has been conducted against an assessee by the Income Tax (IT) department, the CBDT has said.

It has added that the current system of manual assessment will continue in cases, where the books of accounts or original documents have to be examined, the taxman has to conduct a third-party investigation and where the tax officer has to examine a witness.

It will also be applicable to cases where the taxman has issued a show-cause notice to the assessee, “contemplating any adverse view”, and cases where the taxpayer has requested for a “personal hearing” to explain the matter to the assessing officer.

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), the policy- making body of the IT department, issued an instruction yesterday to further explain how the system would work, once fully operational.

“…It is hereby directed that except for search-related assessments, proceedings in other pending scrutiny assessment cases shall be conducted only through the e-proceeding facility…,” the instruction said.

It added that in ranges where the IT offices were not equipped with computer infrastructure and Internet services as of now, the taxman should “complete only 10 per cent of the scrutiny cases having the potential to effect recovery during the current year itself”.

If an assessee objects to the electronic assessment, it may be “kept on hold” for the time being, the instruction said.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had, in his budget speech, announced that the process of electronic assessment of tax returns would be launched in the country, which would “almost eliminate person-to-person contact, leading to greater efficiency and transparency”.

CBDT Chairman Sushil Chandra, during a recent interview with , had said the e-assessment procedure would henceforth be handled by two officers, instead of the current system involving a single assessing officer (AO).

The functionality to conduct the e-proceedings would be available for all types of notices, questionnaires and letters issued under various sections of the I-T Act, the CBDT had said earlier.

Source: Times of India

Deposited ‘large amount of cash’ during note ban? File ITR by March 31

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
The department said it was the final call for filing of belated or revised ITRs for assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18

The Income Tax Department on Friday urged those who deposited “large amounts of cash” post demonetisation and all companies to file their returns by March 31, failing which they may face penalty and prosecution.

 

It also cautioned eligible trusts, political parties and associations to file their income tax returns by this final deadline and “come clean”.

 

The department, in public advertisements issued in leading dailies, said it was the final call for filing of belated or revised ITRs for assessment years 2016-17 and 2017 -18.

 

It underlined that there was still time for these categories of taxpayers and that they should avoid last minute rush and file the ITRs well before the deadline.

 

“If you have deposited large amounts of cash in your bank account/made high value transactions, please consider the same while filling your ITRs.

 

“Non-filing or incorrect filing of return of income may result in penalty and prosecution,” the public advisory said. It said all companies, firms and limited liability partnership concerns were also required to do so.

 

The deadline is also applicable, it said,to trusts, associations and political parties whose income prior to claim of exemptions exceeds the minimum chargeable to tax. Individuals and Hindu Undivided Families having income more than Rs 2.5 lakh and senior citizens with income of over Rs 3 lakh (60-80 years of age) and Rs five lakh (over 80 years of age) too need to file their returns for the mentioned assessment years, it said.

 

Source: Business Standard

Filing of final GST returns deadline extended till Jan 10

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
The GST Council had in November allowed businesses with turnover of up to Rs. 1.5 crore to file final returns GSTR-1 quarterly

The government has extended by 10 days the last date for filing of final sales return GSTR-1 till January 10 under the Goods and Services Tax, sources said.

Businesses with turnover of up to Rs. 1.5 crore will have to file GSTR-1 for July-September by January 10, 2018, as against December 31, 2017 earlier. For businesses with turnover of more than Rs. 1.5 crore GSTR-1 has to be filed for the period July-November by January 10.

Earlier these businesses were required to file GSTR-1 return for July-October by December 31 and that for November by January 10. For the month of December, GSTR-1 is to be filed by February 10 and for subsequent months, it would be 10th day of the succeeding month.

The GST Council had in November allowed businesses with turnover of up to Rs. 1.5 crore to file final returns GSTR-1 quarterly. Businesses with turnover of up to Rs. 1.5 crore will have to file returns by February 15 for the period October- December and that for January-March by April 30.

 

Source: The Hindu Business Line

Non-compliance to be ‘very costly’ for companies: Government

by | posted in: Company Incorporations, e-filing of MCA Returns, Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0
Last week, the Parliament cleared a bill to further amend the Companies Act.

Sending out a strong message to corporates, the government has said non-compliance will be “very costly” and strong deterrents will be there to curb the dangerous adventure of using companies for wrongful purposes.

Continuing the clampdown on illicit fund flows, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs has already struck off more than 2.24 lakh companies that have not been doing business for long and has disqualified over three lakh directors associated with such entities.

Against this backdrop, Corporate Affairs Secretary Injeti Srinivas said things are being simplified for legitimate businesses while checks are being strengthened against illegal business activities.

Highlights

  • Ministry of Corporate Affairs has already struck off more than 2.24 lakh companies that have not been doing business for long
  • It has also disqualified over three lakh directors associated with such entities

“It should be very easy to be compliant and very costly to be non-compliant. We want this… There should be a strong deterrent against illegal business. People using the company for wrong purposes, that should be a very dangerous adventure,” he told PTI in an interview.

About the ongoing action with respect to suspected shell companies, he said investigations are being carried out with urgency.

“When you go for prosecution, it should serve as a deterrent. Imprisonment option should essentially be confined to violations involving criminality and fraud,” Srinivas said.

On the scenario of certain genuine entities also facing the heat in the clampdown, Srinivas said every effort is made to ensure that “innocent companies are not inconvenienced”, adding that investigations are carried out only after preliminary scrutiny.

“In any such large exercise, it is not unusual that there could be some collateral damage. It cannot be so perfect but effectively, it is very focused and every effort is made that innocent companies are not inconvenienced,” he noted.

To provide a three-month window for defaulting companies to submit their filings, the ministry would be coming out with the Condonation of Delay Scheme. It is to be in place from January 1 to March 31, 2018.

While making it clear that a law should not be too onerous, he said there is a continuous effort to simplify the law “but non-negotiable in terms of essential compliance”.

Last week, the Parliament cleared a bill to further amend the Companies Act.

The bill would bring about some far reaching changes, Srinivas said, adding that almost 100 sections would get revised and many would contribute towards the ease of doing business.

“At the same time, there is also strengthening of provisions relating to areas such as identification of mismanagement, fraud detection, disclosures and related party transactions,” he said.

The MCA 21 system — which is used by the companies to submit their filings to the ministry — is a strong technology platform that is well entrenched, he noted.

“It is a very robust platform for regulation of companies. It is a huge resource of filings from more than 1.5 million companies. It is user-friendly… It also facilitates better enforcement without being unduly invasive,” Srinivas said.

At the end of November 30, there were a little over 17.12 lakh companies and out of them more than 11.36 lakh entities were active.

Source: Times of India

You can shift residence, fudge address but you can’t avoid income tax notice anymore

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0

Avoiding income tax notices by fudging addresses or shifting residence will now become difficult. Income tax rules have been amended that will allow the tax department to deliver notices to assessees at addresses given by them to banks, insurance companies, post offices etc in case the notice is undeliverable at the address supplied to the tax department.

The government issued a notification dated December 20, 2017 amending the Income Tax Rules to ensure that all notices, summons, requisitions or any other communication issued in your name is delivered to you either via post or e-mail.

As per the notification, in case the communication or notice to be served to the assessee cannot be delivered/transmitted to the available address, as per Rule 127 of the Income Tax Rules, the government may use the address mentioned in the following databases to deliver the communication:
a) Address given by you to the bank;
b) Address given by you to the insurance company;
c) Address given by you to the post office while investing in the Post Office schemes;
d) Address as available in government records;
e) Address available in the records of local authorities;
f) Address of the assessee as furnished in Form 61 to the income tax department under Rule 114D;
g) Address as furnished in Form 61A to the tax department under rule 114E.

As per the earlier norms, the communication to the assessee was sent through post or email at the any of the following addresses:

a) Address available in the PAN database;
b) Address available in the income tax return (ITR) to which the communication pertains to;
c) Address as available in the previous year’s ITR;
d) E-mail address available in the ITR for which communication pertains to;
e) E-mail address as available in the last ITR;
f) Any e-mail address available with the income tax authority.

The notification has been published in the Gazette of India by the Minsitry of India vide Notification No. 98/2017/F. No. 370142/36/2017-TPL

Link: Economic Times

MCA introduces Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018 for defaulting companies

by | posted in: Company Incorporations, e-filing of MCA Returns, Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0
MCA introduces Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018 (CODS-2018) for defaulting companies to file its overdue returns/documents due for filing till 30.06.2017 by temporarily activating DIN of disqualified directors

 

 

 

General Circular No………./2017

File No. 02/04//2017

 

Ministry of Corporate Affairs

5thFloor,‘A’ Wing, Shastri Bhawan

Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road,

NewDelhi-110001.

 

To

 

All Regional Directors,

All Registrar of Companies,

All Stakeholders.

 

Sir,

 

Subject: Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018

Whereas,companies registered under the Companies Act,2013 (or its predecessor Act) are inter-alia required to file their Annual Financial statements and Annual Returns with the Registrar of Companies and non-filing of such reports is an offence under the said Act.

 

Whereas, section 164(2) of the Act read with section 167 of the Companies Act, 2013 [the Act], which provisions were commenced with effect from 01.04.2014, provide for disqualification of a director on account of default by a company in filing an annual return or a financial statement for a continuous period of three years.

 

Whereas, Rule 14 of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014 further prescribes that every director shall inform to the company concerned about his disqualification, if any, under section 164(2), in form DIR-8.

 

Whereas, consequent upon notification of provisions of section 164(2), Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) had launched a Company Law Settlement Scheme 2014 providing an opportunity to the defaulting companies to clear their defaults within the time period specified therein and following the due process as notified.

 

 

Whereas, MCA in September 2017, identified 3,09,614 directors associated with the companies that had failed to file financial statements or annual returns in the MCA21 online registry for a continuous period of three financial years 2013-14 to 2015-16 in terms of provisions of section 164(2) r/w 167(1)(a) of the Act and they were barred from accessing the online registry and a list of such directors was published on the website of MCA.

 

Whereas, as a result of above action, there have been a spate of representations from industry, defaulting companies and their directors seeking an opportunity for the defaulting companies to become compliant and normalize operations.

 

Whereas, certain affected persons have also filed writ petitions before various High Courts seeking relief from the disqualification.

 

Whereas, with a view to giving an opportunity for the non-compliant, defaulting companies to rectify the default, in exercise of its powers conferred under sections 403, 459 and 460 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Central Government has decided to introduce a Scheme namely “Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018” [CODS-2018] as follows.

 

  1. The scheme shall come into force with effect from 01.01.2018 and shall remain in force up to 31.03.2018

 

  1. Definitions – In this scheme, unless the context otherwise requires, –

 

(i) “Act” means the Companies Act, 2013 and Companies Act, 1956 (where ever applicable);

 

(ii) ‘overdue documents’ means the financial statements or the annual returns or other associated documents, as applicable, in the case of a defaulting company and refer to documents mentioned in paragraph 5 of the scheme.

 

(iii) “Company” means a company as defined in clause of 20 of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013;

 

(iv)  “Defaulting company” means a company which has not filed its financial statements or annual return as required under the Companies Act, 1956 or Companies Act, 2013, as the case may be, and the Rules made thereunder for a continuous period of three yea

 

(v) “Designated authority” means the Registrar of Companies having jurisdiction over the registered office of the company.

 

  1. Applicability: – This scheme is applicable to all defaulting companies (other than the companies which have been stuck off/whose names have been removed from the register of companies under section 248(5) of the Act). A defaulting company is permitted to file its overdue documents which were due for filing till 30.06.2017 in accordance with the provisions of this Scheme.

 

  1. Procedure to be followed for the purposes of the scheme:– (1) In the case of defaulting companies whose names have not been removed from register of companies,-

 

(i) The DINs of the disqualified directors de-activated at present shall be temporarily activated during the validity of the scheme to enable them to file the overdue documents.

 

(ii) The defaulting company shall file the overdue documents in the respective prescribed eForms paying the statutory filing fee and additional fee payable as per section 403 of the Act read with Companies (Registration Offices and fee) Rules, 2014 for filing these overdue documents.

 

(iii) The defaulting company after filing documents under this scheme, shall seek condonation of delay by filing form e-CODS 2018 attached to this scheme along with a fee of 30,000/- (Rs. Thirty Thousand only) as prescribed under the Companies (Registration Offices and Fee) Rules, 2014 well before the last date of the scheme.

 

(iv) The DINs of the Directors associated with the defaulting companies that have not filed their overdue documents and the eform CODS, and these are not taken on record in the MCA21 registry and are still found to be disqualified on the conclusion of the scheme in terms of section 164(2)(a) r/w 167(1)(a) of the Act shall be liable to be deactivated on expiry of the scheme period.

 

(2) In the event of defaulting companies whose names have been removed from the register of companies under section 248 of the Act and which have filed applications for revival under section 252 of the Act up to the date of this scheme, the Director’s DIN shall be re-activated only NCLT order of revival subject to the company having filing of all overdue documents.

 

  1. Scheme not to apply for certain documents – This scheme shall not apply to the filing of documents other than the following overdue documents:

(i) Form Number 20B/MGT-7- Form for filing Annual return by a company having share capital.

(ii) Form 21A/MGT-7- Particulars of Annual return for the company not having share capital.

(iii) Form 23AC, 23ACA, 23AC-XBRL, 23ACA-XBRL, AOC-4, AOC-4(CFS), AOC (XBRL)    and     AOC-4(non-XBRL)   –     Forms     for     filing     Balance Sheet/Financial Statement and profit and loss account.

(iv) Form 66-  Form  for  submission  of  Compliance  Certificate  with  the Registrar.

(v) Form 23B/ADT-1- Form for intimation for Appointment of Auditors.

 

  1. The Registrar concerned shall withdraw the prosecution(s) pending if any before the concerned Court(s) for all documents filed under the scheme. However, this scheme is without prejudice to action under section 167(2) of the Act or civil and criminal liabilities, if any, of such disqualified directors during the period they remained disqualified.

 

  1. At the conclusion of the Scheme, the Registrar shall take all necessary actions under the Companies Act, 1956/ 2013 against the companies who have not availed themselves of this Scheme and continue to be in default in filing the overdue documents

 

Yours faithfully,

 

(KMS. Narayanan)

 

Assistant Director (Policy)

MCA-CODs-2018.

GST return filings for October rise 11% to 4.4 million

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0

Around 56% of the registered taxpayers have filed their GSTR-3B returns for October by 20 November, says GSTN

Over 3.9 million assessees filed the summary return for September and over 2.8 million for August.

Taxpayer compliance under the goods and services tax (GST) system is steadily improving with 4.4 million assessees filing summary of the transactions made in October, an improvement of 11% from the filings reported for the previous month, said an official statement from GSTN, the company that processes tax returns.

The statement said the number of taxpayers filing their GSTR 3B returns showed a “marked improvement” with the highest number of assessees filing returns for October till 20th November 2017.

Around 56% of the registered taxpayers have filed their GSTR-3B returns for October by 20 November, it said. The “steady increase” in filings is encouraging, the statement said further, citing chairman Prakash Kumar.

“The trend of taxpayers filing their returns on the last day continues though. Taxpayers are urged to file their returns early to avoid last minute hassles” Kumar said.

Over 3.9 million assessees filed the summary return for September and over 2.8 million for August.

Close to 1.5 million taxpayers filed their returns on 20 November, the highest number of filings in a day.

Punjab topped the list of states in compliance. About 73% of taxpayers in Punjab filed their GSTR 3B returns for October by the deadline.

Federal indirect tax body, the GST Council, has taken a series of steps including deadline relaxations, waiver of late fee, suspension of invoice matching and simplification of forms to encourage voluntary compliance under the new indirect tax regime.

 

Source: Live Mint