Private equity investors bring in deals worth $983 mn in January: Thornton

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0
January was dominated by investments in start-ups which contributed to 52% of total investment volumes

Private equity (PE) investors announced deals worth $983 million in January, a 23 per cent rise in value terms over last year, driven by big ticket transactions, says a Grant Thornton report.

According to the assurance, tax and advisory firm, in January, there were 84 PE deals worth $983 million, against 81 such transactions worth $796 million in January 2017.

“Private equity deals recorded 4 per cent increase in deal volumes and 23 per cent increase in deal value in January 2018 as compared to January 2017,” said Pankaj Chopda Director at Grant Thornton India LLP.

January was dominated by investments in start-ups which contributed to 52 per cent of total investment volumes. On the other hand, energy & natural resources and real estate sectors witnessed big-ticket PE investment over $100 million together capturing 39 per cent of total PE deal values.

Altico Capital’s investment of $195 million across five realty projects in Hyderabad and Pune was the top PE deal in January.

Other major transactions include Canada Pension Plan Investment Board’s 6 per cent stake acquisition in ReNew Power Ventures for $144 million and Warburg Pincus and SAIF Partners’ $50 million investment in Rivigo Services.

Going forward, the PE deal outlook looks bullish especially for the start-up sector.

“Increasing customer penetration in online transactions and increasing solutions to simplify online transactions offered by start-ups will attract interest in start-ups engaged in retail, fintech, foodtech, on demand services and travel and logistics,” Chopda said.

“Government reforms such as RERA, focus on cleantech and on increasing digital financial transactions will drive the momentum in banking and financial, real estate and energy and natural resources.

India-specific strategies by global and already present PE firms and funds raised by new players will act as catalyst for PE transactions,” he added.

Source: Business Standard

 

Central Board of Direct Taxes cuts profit margin for safe harbour rules

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies, India & International - Corporate updates | 0
Safe harbour rules are defined as circumstances under which the income-tax authorities accept the transfer pricing declared by the assessee.

Given the lukewarm response to the safe harbour mechanism for transfer pricing, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) on Thursday cut the operating profit margin for information technology-enabled services, knowledge process outsourcing services (KPOs) and research and development (R&D) related to software and generic pharmaceutical drugs companies.

The new rules will apply to transactions of up to Rs 200 crore. Safe harbour rules, a dispute-avoidance mechanism, are defined as circumstances under which the income-tax authorities accept the transfer pricing declared by the assessee. The rule provides the minimum operating profit margin in relation to operating expenses that a taxpayer is expected to earn for certain categories of international transactions. The same is acceptable to the income tax authorities as arm’s length price (ALP). The rules are applicable for transactions between group companies based in different countries so that a fair price or ALP is arrived at by the tax authorities. The rules have come into effect from April 1 this year and will continue to remain in force for two successive years up to assessment year 2019-2020, the board said in a statement

For software development services, safe harbour margins have been reduced to a peak rate of 18% from 22% in the previous regime. Similarly, for KPOs, a graded structure of three different rates of 24%, 21% and 18% has been provided, based on employee cost to operating cost ratio, replacing the single rate of 25% earlier. For the third category of R&D services, the margins have been reduced to 24% from 30% and 29%, respectively, earlier. “The lukewarm response to the earlier safe habour scheme was on account of the high rates. Thus, taxpayers opted for unilateral APA process instead. The revised scheme has been designed to attract small to medium business, especially in the IT/ITeS segment, so as to give them a viable alternative to APA regime, which is both time consuming and expensive. The rates for IT/ITeS segment are more or less in line with the APAs being settled and hence the safe harbour scheme, this time, should get a positive response,” Arun Chhabra, director, Grant Thornton Advisory, said.

Assessees eligible under the present safe harbour regime up to AY 2017-18 shall also have the right to choose the safe harbour option most beneficial to them, the board said. It added that a new category of transactions being “Receipt of Low Value-Adding Intra-Group Services” has been introduced. “The revised safe harbour rules are a welcome step towards making safe harbour a viable alternate dispute resolution mechanism. Key highlights are: Reduction of margins for service units, introduction of safe harbour rate for low-valued services (in line with BEPS recommendation) and well-thought scheme for knowledge process outsourcing companies. Overall, it’s a welcome step towards strengthening the safe harbour option for small and mid size companies,” Kunj Vaidya, leader transfer pricing, Price Waterhouse & Co, said.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/central-board-of-direct-taxes-cuts-profit-margin-for-safe-harbour-rules/708984/

India Inc’s March M&A deal tally jumps 4-fold to $28 billion

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

India Inc’s M&A deal tally in March rose four-fold to $27.82 billion, led by the Vodafone-Idea merger, taking the overall figure to $31.54 billion in the first quarter of 2017, says a report.

Overall deal activity in the January-March quarter witnessed an unprecedented three-fold year-on-year rise in value terms, driven solely by the Vodafone-Idea mega merger, which accounted for 80 per cent of the total values.

“The Indian deal activity was dominated by big-ticket mergers and acquisitions (M&As) this quarter. The quarter witnessed one of the largest deals in the country with Vodafone and Idea’s merger, which is estimated at around $27 billion,” Grant Thornton India LLP Partner Prashant Mehra said.

The January-March quarter recorded $33.7 billion across 300 deals marking a sharp increase in value as compared to $10.9 billion in the same period last year while volumes declined by 27 per cent.Without the Vodafone-Idea mega merger, estimated to be a $27 billion transaction, the deal activity would have recorded 39 per cent decline in values, assurance, tax and advisory firm Grant Thornton said.

M&A market activity has so far been driven solely by the big-ticket deals, while on the other hand number of transactions continued to slip for the third straight quarter.

“Primary driver for M&A growth was consolidation in the domestic market with deal values growing by 10 times on the back of healthy capital markets and easing credit conditions. This enabled companies strike big ticket deals either to slash debt or consolidate market share,” Mehra said.

Meanwhile, the cross-border deal activity is yet to pick up pace in 2017 as compared to previous quarters due to looming uncertainties in the global economy.

Going forward M&A activity this year is expected to stay positive owing to the sustained interest in Indian economy.

Mehra believes consolidation and expansion is set to be the major theme that will drive the deal activity, especially in healthcare, telecom, e-commerce and infrastructure sectors.”In financial services sector, the possibility of new business models emerging post demonetisation, continued fund raising by NBFCs and a consolidation push by micro finance firms will play a big role,” he added.

Source:   http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/58160464.cms

With GST on its way, India rises to second spot on global biz optimism index

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0

India improved its ranking by one spot in a global index of business optimism, with policy reforms and Goods and Services tax (GST) expected to become a reality soon, says a survey.

According to the latest Grant Thornton International Business Report, India was ranked second on the optimism index during the third quarter (July-September 2016).

Indonesia took the top spot, with the Philippines coming in third.

India was ranked third during the April-June period after being on top for two consecutive quarters.

“The improvement in the optimism ranking in the recent past clearly reflects that the reform agenda of the government and its efforts on improving the climate for doing business are having an impact,” Grant Thornton India LLP Partner – India Leadership Team Harish H V said.

High business optimism was also complimented by the rise of employment expectations. India regained its top position on this parameter, from second position in the April-June period, while profitability expectations also moved up.

“…all the programs and initiatives of the government as well as its focus on building relationships with all major economic powers has made India a bright spot in the global economy,” Harish said, adding the recent push for GST augurs well and should give a further boost to business optimism.

While India continues to be amongst the top five countries citing regulations and red tape as a constraint on growth, for the first time in the year, the country’s ranking on this parameter has dropped from second to fourth.

As per the survey, 59 per cent of the respondents have quoted this as an impediment in the growth prospects compared to 64 per cent in the previous quarter.

The report is prepared on the basis of a quarterly conducted global business survey of 2,500 businesses across 36 economies.

Meanwhile, in terms of revenue expectations, India slipped to third position from top in the previous quarter.

In spite of the downturn, India is much ahead of China where only 30 per cent respondents expect an increase in revenue, whereas in India, 85 per cent respondents have voted in favour of increasing revenue.

The survey further noted that 68 per cent of respondents have voted for an upsurge in selling prices. On this parameter too, China lags India with only 10 per cent of respondents expecting an upsurge in selling prices. The global average is 19 per cent.

Globally, business optimism stands at net 33 per cent, rising 1 percentage point from the previous quarter but falling 11 percentage points over the year.

“Political events such as Brexit and the US presidential election understandably rattle the global economy and test the resilience and elasticity of businesses worldwide. In general, businesses do not like uncertainty, and that is what is happening,” Grant Thornton Global CEO Ed Nusbaum said.

Source : http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/55277143.cms

 

With GST on its way, India rises to second spot on global biz optimism index

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies, India & International - Corporate updates | 0
High business optimism was also complimented by the rise of employment expectations. India regained its top position on this parameter

India improved its ranking by one spot in a global index of business optimism, with policy reforms and Goods and Services tax (GST) expected to become a reality soon, says a survey.

According to the latest Grant Thornton International Business Report, India was ranked second on the optimism index during the third quarter (July-September 2016).Indonesia took the top spot, with the Philippines coming in third.

India was ranked third during the April-June period after being on top for two consecutive quarters.

“The improvement in the optimism ranking in the recent past clearly reflects that the reform agenda of the government and its efforts on improving the climate for doing business are having an impact,” Grant Thornton India LLP Partner – India Leadership Team Harish H V said.

 

High business optimism was also complimented by the rise of employment expectations. India regained its top position on this parameter, from second position in the April-June period, while profitability expectations also moved up.

“…all the programs and initiatives of the government as well as its focus on building relationships with all major economic powers has made India a bright spot in the global economy,” Harish said, adding the recent push for GST augurs well and should give a further boost to business optimism.

While India continues to be amongst the top five countries citing regulations and red tape as a constraint on growth, for the first time in the year, the country’s ranking on this parameter has dropped from second to fourth.

As per the survey, 59 per cent of the respondents have quoted this as an impediment in the growth prospects compared to 64 per cent in the previous quarter.

The report is prepared on the basis of a quarterly conducted global business survey of 2,500 businesses across 36 economies.

Meanwhile, in terms of revenue expectations, India slipped to third position from top in the previous quarter.

In spite of the downturn, India is much ahead of China where only 30 per cent respondents expect an increase in revenue, whereas in India, 85 per cent respondents have voted in favour of increasing revenue.

The survey further noted that 68 per cent of respondents have voted for an upsurge in selling prices. On this parameter too, China lags India with only 10 per cent of respondents expecting an upsurge in selling prices. The global average is 19 per cent.

Globally, business optimism stands at net 33 per cent, rising 1 percentage point from the previous quarter but falling 11 percentage points over the year.

“Political events such as Brexit and the US presidential election understandably rattle the global economy and test the resilience and elasticity of businesses worldwide. In general, businesses do not like uncertainty, and that is what is happening,” Grant Thornton Global CEO Ed Nusbaum said

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/55277143.cms

 

Government may offer foreign auditors direct access

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate Updates, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

In a move that signals the government’s intent to allow foreign audit firms to register and operate directly in the Indian market, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs has written to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) to seek its views and recommendations on the government proposal.

Currently, Indian laws don’t allow any multinational accounting firm to be registered in India as auditors. The thinking within the government is that as part of an ongoing reforms process, the services sector should also be liberalised and global auditing firms could be allowed to operate directly here to make the profession more competitive and robust.

The ministry has written to the institute on August 10, said ICAI president M Devaraja Reddy . The institute is set to discuss this proposal in a meeting to be held on August 24 and then respond to the the request, he added.

The government will have to amend the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 that regulates the accounting profession in India to allow foreign firms to operate in India.

Currently, MNC professional services firms that offer auditing services in India, including the Big Four – EY, PwC, Deloitte and KPMG – audit Indian companies through a bunch of their network or affiliate firms.

Though for all internal purposes, the accounting practice in any of the Big Four is treated just as any other practice area like tax, transactions, or advisory , but on paper, the affiliate firms are run as separate partnerships.

If the Indian government does allow direct entry, more global firms are likely to invest big in their India network and also the market could see the entry of new players.

“Given the significant exposure of global investors in Indian firms, it’s natural to ask for an auditor who they are more comfortable with. More global players will mean more choice and better quality of services. It will also enhance the credibility of Indian markets,” says the CEO of a global firm.

For Indian audit firms, the move could spell further trouble, as they have been steadily losing the most lucrative audit assignments to the Big Four over the past two decades.The four global firms now dominate the book-keeping business in India. As it is, the mandatory audit rotation brought in by the Companies Act 2013, is set to kick off from April 1, 2017 and that will further see a movement of big accounts away from Indian firms towards the Big Four and other two prominent network firms, Grant Thornton and BDO.

In major markets, the global giants have a monopoly over the audit business – 99 per cent of companies in FTSE are audited by the Big Four firms, while 86 per cent of those listed on the NYSE work with these audit firms.

But in India, 62 per cent of the BSE 500 companies, including some of India Inc’s biggest firms, are still not audited by the Big Four.For example, Reliance has had Chaturvedi & Shah as auditors for decades, L&T books have been audited by Sharp & Tannan and Hindalco had stayed on with Singhi & Co for long time.In China, the Big Four lost domination to local firms after the government brought in regulations that were unfavourable for the global players. Indian accounting firms are also betting on government regulations that will keep their interests protected.

“The government will have to find a middle ground. It will have to create a regulatory framework that allows the global firms to invest and practice, also keeping in mind the concerns of the Indian accounting firms which service a large section of Indian companies, both big and small,” said the CEO of a leading Indian accounting firm.

Audit giants see dominance waning

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0

India’s audit landscape is undergoing a quiet change as the new rules for time-based rotation of auditors gather pace.

Early audit changes this year indicate the larger entities, such as Deloitte’s network, could face some pressure on their dominance. And, those lower down the order could gain ground. Leading firms are looking at increasing the focus on quality and are exploring new opportunities, such as private equity-backed ones in the unlisted space. Smaller entities such as Walker Chandiok, part of the Grant Thornton network, have ramped up their staff strength to handle new clients.

Close to 400 companies listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) have already changed auditors over the past three years, with clients changing hands among top audit firms. There is also pressure on pricing as the war for market share begins to intensify among top audit firms. This has resulted in a spike in demand for experienced auditors, with joining remuneration seeing 20-30 per cent jumps.

Audit giants see dominance waning
The revamped Companies Act of 2013 said every Indian company with a paid-up equity capital of Rs 20 crore or more was required to replace auditors after two five-year terms in succession. The law had given a three-year transition period for those which had to change auditors, ending March 2017. In the current financial year, 2016-17, around 40 NSE-listed companies have already switched to new auditors. More announcements are expected over the coming three months, shows data from Prime Database. In 2014-15 and 2015-16, a total of 339-NSE listed companies had settled for new auditors.

“We will be rotating off some of the larger companies. Simply because of the number and size of listed companies we audit, there will be changes in our audit market share,” said Shyamak Tata, partner, Deloitte Haskins Sells. He said large-scale changes in their portfolio were only expected from the third year onwards.

The Deloitte group’s network of audit companies is expected to see the largest churn. It has the biggest number of marquee audit clients. The network earned Rs 300 crore in fees for the year 2014-15, representing 15 per cent of the total pie of the Rs 2,000 crore audit fee market for 1,451 NSE-listed firms. It also audited the highest number of listed entities, at 149. The EY network made Rs 121 crore from the 108 companies. The PwC network audited 65 listed ones but had the lowest fee income among the ‘Big Four’ in audit, of Rs 65.6 crore. The KPMG network audited the lowest number of listed entities, at 58; however, it earned more than PwC at Rs 99.4 crore. Companies are still in the process of reporting the FY16 numbers.

Churn on
Early numbers suggest this pecking order is already going through a churn. A Business Standard analysis of data provided by Prime Database showed of the 41 auditor changes reported so far this year in listed companies, the KPMG network was the biggest gainer, with 11 new firms for the financial year ending March 2017. It was rotated out of two existing clients, a net gain of eight for FY17. The EY network added six and lost two, while Walker Chandiok gained a lone company. The PwC and Deloitte networks have lost more than they’ve gained so far this year. At the end of the changes, other smaller audit firms had 23 clients, up from 18 in FY16, among these 40 companies.

Grasim, Cipla, Biocon, Vedanta, Hindustan Zinc, United Spirits and Century Textiles are some of the large companies that have reported auditor changes for the new financial year.  In FY16, as many as 168 listed companies changed their auditors. The Deloitte network was the top gainer among the first five, gaining 17 and losing 11. The KPMG network was also a net gainer, with seven gains and four losses. EY, PwC and Walker Chandiok lost more than they gained.

In FY15, when 171 companies changed auditors, Walker Chandiok’s client list swelled by eight. While the EY network and Deloitte registered a net gain of one each, the KPMG and PwC networks recorded a net loss of four and one, respectively.

Strategy
Deloitte, expecting a strong attack on its dominance, is looking for greener pastures. “We are large in the listed company space, and have a majority share across industry sectors.  Our audit breadth and experience in this changing regulatory environment provides us, currently and over the next two-three years, an opportunity to provide audit services to untapped listed and unlisted entities, with a bias in favour of unlisted clients,” said Tata.

Other large entities are also gearing up for the transition. Russell Parera, partner, Price Waterhouse Chartered Accountants LLP, said his network had embarked on a transformation programme focussing on people, technology and processes for close to two years. “We have taken significant efforts in training our people for this change. Also, with rotation kicking in, it is going to be important to focus on investing in relationship building.”

The PwC network also bets on technology as another aspect, which will go a long way in these ever-evolving market scenario. “Today, technology has become a crucial enabler, with more data audits getting conducted. It is also relevant in cross border and multi-location audits to ensure consistency. We as a firm have been preparing for this change,” Parera added.  Tata of Deloitte spoke of pricing pressure in certain pockets. “We are seeing this as a section of the market looks to gain market share.  There will be some short- term blips. However, with continuing investment in innovation and quality, which will lead to enhancing value to clients, over the short term, this will correct. We already have a large pool of audit talent. We are looking at consolidating and not dramatically increasing the headcount. Audit will remain the primary identity of our firm and, with our focus on quality, we will retain our leading position in the overall  space.”

Impact
According to Akhil Bansal, deputy chief executive of KPMG India, with European audit rotation also coming into effect, the impact of Indian mandatory company rotation regulations will be felt around the globe. “The choice of the audit firm in India might influence the choice in Europe and other geographies,” he added. Bansal said the impact of mandatory firm rotation will also be felt on other services, including internal audit, due to stringent independence requirements. “It is important that the companies make their choice of audit firm early, since the best resources will be committed to clients who are first off the block,” he said.

Audit companies have been preparing for this, with investment in personnel, training and ramping up headcount numbers. For instance, the Grant Thornton network plans to double its auditor numbers across its network from 1,500 to 3,000. Vishesh Chandiok, national managing partner, Grant Thornton India LLP, said: “Several local Indian firms are very competent and the belief that only us international firms are the option is misplaced. Not all 50,000 firms for each company but certainly 50 firms can audit most companies, not only four of five firms.”

The EY group, which has 3,000 auditors across its network, added 400 over the past 12 months. “Internally, our focus continues to be on strengthening our teams with more hiring, greater investments in training, sharpening technical and industry capabilities  and increasingly, using more technology and, data analytic tools when performing audits,” said  Sudhir Soni, national leader, SR Batliboi, the Indian member-firm of EY Global.

Most audit companies have resorted to internal promotions and inducting of new talent to expand resources.

With the threshold for audit rotation being low, most audit companies are looking at tapping the unlisted private audit space in a big way. That’s a space the Deloitte network companies plan to play the game hard, indicated Tata. The client churn among audit firms is expected to last over the next two-three years, before it stabilises.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/audit-giants-see-dominance-waning-116062600777_1.html