The Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) hit by Covid pandemic may have something to cheer at last.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has formulated a Special Resolution Process (SRP) for MSMEs who find their financial position unmanageable due to Covid crisis.


While presenting the ‘Atma Nirbhar Bharat’ package Finance Minister had announced to come out with a Special insolvency resolution framework for MSMEs under section 240A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

According to sources close to the development, the scheme would be available to corporate MSMEs, that is, units incorporated as Companies or LLP.

The salient features of the scheme are proposed to be:

  —   If an MSME finds it unable to meet its financial obligations, the insolvency resolution process could be initiated on the occurrence of default of at least Rs.1 lakh

  —   It can be triggered by the MSME promoter/ owner only (not by the Financial or other creditors)

  —   During the process of resolution, the MSME owner remains in control and keeps running the unit but all legal proceedings to take control of assets by creditors are stopped.

  —   It provides first right of offer to promoters of the MSME to submit resolution plans

  —   It proposes a simplified claim verification process and preparation of information memorandum

  —   It expands the scope of interim finance to facilitate rescue financing of the CD during COVID-19 with the approval of 3/4th financial creditors in value.

Federation of Indian Micro and Small & Medium Enterprises (FISME) which facilitated a consultation round of MSME associations with IBBI shared that most participants found the scheme potentially useful.

According to Lucknow based V K Agarwal Managing Director of Shashi Cables Ltd and former FISME President, the scheme seemed to be modelled on insolvency provisions under US chapter-11, was very promising indeed but some way needed to be found to make financial creditors to come on board and cooperate.

The scheme envisages appointment of an Insolvency Professional (IP) as Resolution Professional to conduct the process, with the consent of the unrelated financial creditors having at least 25% of the outstanding financial claims.

The scheme is under final stages of approval and is expected to be announced soon.

IBBI proposes to limit cases with insolvency professionals

The IBBI’s discussion paper said that the processes under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) require a unique combination of skill sets in terms of subject matter knowledge and management skills for an IP and at different stages of transactions, different sets of skills are called for.

In what may bring about major reform and efficiency in the insolvency regime in India, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has proposed to limit the number of cases an insolvency professional can handle to five as it noted that few insolvency professionals (IP) are handling too many cases

In a recent discussion paper, the board noted the “skewed” work allocation and has come up with a matrix for allocation of cases.

Citing observations by courts and  tribunals, the paper said: “Keeping in mind the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, the skewed work allocation amongst the IPs and the observations of the Supreme Court or Adjudicating Authority, and given the expansive and intense responsibilities of an IP in corporate processes, it is proposed to issue necessary guidelines to IPs advising them to limit the maximum number of assignments handled by them, to five, at a given point of time.”

As per the proposed matrix an insolvency resolution professional (IRP) can handle a total of five cases of resolution or liquidation, including voluntary liquidation, wherein the turnover of the corporate debtors is less than or equal to Rs 1,000 crore. As the matrix progresses, an IRP handling the case of a corporate debtor with the turnover of Rs 50,000 crore would be able handle only that very case, and no more.

“On the basis of information available, it is observed that a few IPs are handling too many assignments under the Code, which is detrimental to the institution of IP in the long run,” it noted.

The IBBI’s discussion paper said that the processes under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) require a unique combination of skill sets in terms of subject matter knowledge and management skills for an IP and at different stages of transactions, different sets of skills are called for.

A spike in one area of expertise will not be sufficient to create a uniform experience for stakeholders. Further, it cannot be ignored that no two IPs possess identical sets of qualification, experience, skills and expertise, it said.

“Similarly, no two CIRPs are same as it involves diverse businesses, complex corporate structures, varied stakeholders. The said restriction on an IP will put a check on undesirable instances of delay and disturbance to the processes led by IPs while simultaneously handling too many assignments under the Code.”

The Board was of the view that with limits in place, quality of output is expected to improve and it will facilitate the realisation of the objective of value maximisation as enshrined in the Code.

The major inputs for violation will be through complaints and therefore, the cost of surveillance for the Board may not be significant. Further, this will be conducive for development of the market for professionals as more talent will be drawn towards IP profession, it added.

The IBBI has sought public comments on the proposal till July 25, 2020.

Source: Economic Times

Govt suspends IBC provisions that trigger fresh insolvency proceedings

As per existing norms, if a payment default exceeds 90 days then the lender concerned has to refer the account for resolution under IBC or any other mechanism permitted by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The lender does not have the option to restructure the loan.

The government has decided to suspend insolvency and bankruptcy proceedings for at least six months owing to challenges businesses are facing due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

A new Section is likely to be added to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

It will suspend Sections 7, 9, and 10, which are used to trigger insolvency proceedings for six months or a period not exceeding one year from the date they commence, the official said.

A new Section is likely to be added to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

It will suspend Sections 7, 9, and 10, which are used to trigger insolvency proceedings for six months or a period not exceeding one year from the date they commence, the official said.

Section 7 of the Code enables financial creditors to start insolvency proceedings against a company while Section 9 gives operational creditors these powers.

Under Section 10, the promoter of the company can trigger insolvency proceedings against his or her own concern.

All the three Sections will cease to be effective for six months or further.

The provision is likely to require a change in the Act, according to experts.

“This is a positive step for companies.

But for companies, which were otherwise already in stress and could have found resolution under the IBC, their resolution may also be delayed due to this suspension,” said Anshul Jain, partner, PwC India.

Jain also said it needed to be seen if this move would have a positive impact on privately negotiated transactions on mergers and acquisitions.

In March, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had indicated the government would consider suspending the IBC for a few months if the Covid situation persisted and caused stress to businesses.

Already, the default threshold for stressed companies facing insolvency has been increased from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 1 crore.

In March, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had indicated the government would consider suspending the IBC for a few months if the Covid situation persisted and caused stress to businesses. Already, the default threshold for stressed companies facing insolvency has been increased from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 1 crore.

Read the Original Notification:

IBBI Notification dated 20th April, 2020

MCA sees Rs 2.8 lakh cr recovery from IBC-led resolution process

Section 12 (A) of IBC allows for a withdrawal of an insolvency application if 90% of the creditors’ committee (CoC) by voting share approving it.

Terming the current insolvency process and its outcomes as ‘super success, Ministry of Corporate Affairs sees total recovery amount touching Rs 2.8 lakh crore through resolutions with the settlement of two key accounts, including some others — Essar Steel, where financial creditors have approved the resolution and Bhushan SteelNSE 5.27 % and Power.

“The 100 cases that have been settled through resolution accounts, Rs 1.8 lakh crore have been netted which is not a small amount and the accounts sitting on margin (Bhushan Steel and Power & Essar Steel), another Rs 1 lakh crore along with some other mid-sized resolutions can come, so Rs 2.8 lakh crore out of Rs 10 lakh crore of NPA that time is not a small amount, IBC is a super success”, says MCA senior officials on the insolvency processes

In case of Essar Steel, the CoC has approved the resolution process but the process got stuck after operational creditor Standard Chartered moved NCLAT for higher share from the funds. The debt-ridden steel firm had Rs 42,000 crore coming from the resolution plan of global steel major ArcelorMittal.

JSW Steel had revised its offer for Bhushan Power & Steel from Rs 11,000 crore to Rs18,000 crore and later to over Rs 19,000 crore which the CoC had approved.

And it is not just resolution process-led recoveries, the official said pre-resolution processes have also yielded results in 6,500 cases netting Rs 3 lakh crore on dead assets.

“6500 cases settled involving claims of close to Rs 3 lakh crore where they have been have settled before admission. And now after 12 (A) has been introduced, another 100 cases which are at stages of 90% CoC approval are moving towards out of court settlements. Both (in and outside resolutions and NCLT) are happening. About 500 cases have got settled through the court process and 6,500 cases settled even before admission”, said the officials.

Section 12 (A) of IBC allows for a withdrawal of an insolvency application if 90% of the creditors’ committee (CoC) by voting share approving it.

MCA officials dismissed the notion of high haircuts through resolution process. They said: “It (IBC) is super success. There should not be any brouhaha over haircuts. Will anybody pay more than what is the value? Suppose an asset is used for 20 years, there is nothing more to it, there is a Rs 50,000 crore loan, liquidation value is Rs 1,000 crore, so you get (the creditors) Rs 1,000 crore only.”

“Wherever a resolution has taken place, creditors are getting 200% of the liquidation value. So definitely value maximisation is the context, demand and supply will fix the value”, the officials said.

Source: Economic Times

Individual businesses to soon be under ambit of bankruptcy code

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India has published draft rules dealing with insolvency resolution process of individuals and firms on its website
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India has published draft rules dealing with insolvency resolution process of individuals and firms on its website .                                    The existing insolvency and bankruptcy code, at present, applies only to corporate defaulters

The government on Tuesday expanded the scope of the new insolvency rules to bring individual businesses under its purview.

On Tuesday, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) published the draft rules dealing with insolvency resolution process of individuals and firms on its website (www.ibbi.gov.in) ; public comments can be submitted till 31 October.

Once notified, even individual businesses such as proprietorships will come under the bankruptcy regime. This will enable an orderly bankruptcy resolution within the purview of a transparent rules-based regime. The existing insolvency and bankruptcy code, at present, applies only to corporate defaulters.

“These rules shall apply to matters relating to the insolvency resolution process for individuals and firms under Part III of the code,” said the draft rules issued by IBBI.

Part III of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, deals with insolvency and bankruptcy of individuals and partnership firms.

According to a statement issued by IBBI on Tuesday, the draft rules and regulations have been submitted by a working group which was formed to recommend the strategy and approach for implementation of the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, dealing with insolvency and bankruptcy in respect of guarantors to corporate debtors, i.e., personal guarantors, and individuals having businesses.

“So far, the rules were only in respect of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and the rules concerning individuals and partnership firms were yet to come,” said Satwinder Singh, partner at Vaish Associates, a law firm. “The jurisdiction for corporate, companies, limited liability partnership (LLP) lies before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and with the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) for individuals and firms. The provisions relating to insolvency and bankruptcy of individuals and firms had not been notified earlier, so now the IBBI has come out with the draft rules.”

Harsh Pais, partner at law firm Trilegal, said, “It is a positive step towards consolidating the bankruptcy regime for individuals, for whom there was no systematic approach previously. For companies, at least there was recourse to the Companies Act, whereas for individuals there were only some archaic laws from the early 1900s, which were hardly relied upon in practice.”

Most of the small and medium enterprises (SMEs) take the legal form of either partnership or proprietorship firms. Though the loans are smaller in value, SME borrowers far outnumber companies, resulting in their borrowings exerting a significant influence in the financial sector’s stability.

Bankruptcy resolution is high on the agenda of the central government, which is keen to improve the ease of doing business in India and attract more private investments from domestic and overseas sources. An efficient exit route from failed projects is an essential factor that lenders consider before participating in projects.

 

Source: Live Mint

Bankruptcy board to register 100 more insolvency professionals to add to 940

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), which has so far registered 940 insolvency professionals (IPs), is in the process of granting registration to about 100 more such professionals, according to its whole time member Navrang Saini.

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), which has so far registered 940 insolvency professionals (IPs), is in the process of granting registration to about 100 more such professionals, according to its whole time member Navrang Saini. “It is a continuous process, the applications come to us through insolvency professionals agencies, we examine the applications and carry out due diligence and then we grant registration to them,” said Saini while addressing an Assocham conference on IBC and RERA. The IBBI had received three applications for registration as information utility (IU) out of which two applicants have been granted in-principle approval and it is in the process of examining the third one.

“We are in the process of giving approval to one of the IU, we may give the final registration if they meet all criteria, we have already given in-principal approval to two IUs and out of that I hope one will start functioning by end of this month, the third application is still under examination with the board,” Saini said.

As on September 12, 3,437 cases have been filed out of which 354 cases have already been admitted by the various benches of NCLT. Out of these, 337 have already been rejected. “To deal with such a large number of insolvency related matters, we need institutional infrastructure,” he said.

Rules for registered valuers are to be made by ministry of corporate affairs which is in the process of notifying and issuing the same.

The board has already invited suggestions on the regulations which have already been notified by the board and it will receive the suggestions up to December 31 and come out with the amendments based on the suggestions received and advisory committees constituted for this purpose by March 31, 2018.

Source: Financial Express

Bad loan crisis: Crackdown by banks sends borrowers scrambling to offer solutions

Tough stance taken by govt, RBI makes borrowers cautious

Indian banks are beginning to spot a welcome change in their customers’ behaviour: borrowers who have seen their accounts classified as stressed or non-performing are approaching the lenders with proposals to resolve such accounts in a time-bound manner.

The tough stance taken by the central government and the Reserve Bank of India to end the festering bad loan crisis in the Indian banking sector has caught many borrowers by surprise and they are scrambling to put together resolution plans to avoid harsher penalties including insolvency proceedings, bankers said. Even a couple of months ago, it was difficult to get these clients to the negotiation table.

“I can definitely say that we are in a much better position than even six months ago. We are seeing traction from a section of our borrowers to come up with proposals for resolution of stressed accounts,” said Rajkiran Rai G, managing director and CEO, Union Bank of India. “However, it is too early to say if this is the end of the problem. We will have to see how the discussions shape up,” he added.

Borrowers with outstanding amounts between Rs 500-1,500 crore are the most active in trying to resolve their stressed accounts, and they are looking at various options including scouting for investors and sale of non-core assets, two senior bankers with state-run banks said on conditions of anonymity. A large number of these borrowers are from the steel, power and telecom sectors. Some of the larger corporates with outstanding amounts between Rs 1,500-5,000 crore have also taken initiative to resolve their stressed accounts. On an average, these account for about 50% of the current gross non-performing assets of the banking system, the bankers said.

In June, the RBI’s Internal Advisory Committee (IAC) had said 12 accounts totaling about 25% of the current gross NPA of the banking system would qualify for immediate reference under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). At present, proceedings against all the 12 accounts are on in various benches of the National Company Law Tribunal across the country. For accounts that do not qualify under the above criterion, IAC had recommended that banks should finalise a resolution plan within six months. “In cases where a viable resolution is not agreed upon within six months, banks should be required to file for insolvency proceedings under IBC,” the RBI had said.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/bad-loan-crisis-crackdown-by-banks-sends-borrowers-scrambling-to-offer-solutions/769027/