Livspace raises Rs100 crore from existing investors

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

Design and furniture start-up Livspace, owned by Home Interior Designs E-commerce Pvt. Ltd, has raised Rs.100 crore from existing investors Bessemer Venture Partners, Hellion Venture partners and Jungle Ventures, said three people aware of the development on condition of anonymity.

The firm, loosely based on US-based home design firm Houzz, was founded by Anuj Srivastava and Ramakant Sharma, former senior executives at Google Inc. and Myntra Designs Pvt. Ltd respectively, along with Shagufta Anurag, founder of architectural design consultancy Space Matrix.

The firm has already raised about $12.6 million in two rounds between December 2015 and August 2016 from Helion Venture Partners, Bessemer Venture Partners and Jungle Ventures.

Livspace co-founder Anuj Srivastava confirmed the development.

Livspace not only offers home interior design solutions and fulfils the order, it also sells furniture across categories such as living, dining and bedrooms. The company also runs a modular kitchen and wardrobe business.

The company has also acquired two start-ups in quick succession to fuel growth. The company acquired YoFloor, a mobile platform that offers a virtual trial room for home design in September 2015. In May last year, Livspace acquired Dwll, a curated online network of online designers. In March 2015, the company acquired DezignUP, an online community and marketplace for designers and consumers.

Livspace launched a home design automation platform, which will connect the designers on board with customers in real time and speed up the process of overall delivery, two months ago.

It essentially competes with the likes of Sequoia Capital-backed Homelane (Homevista Décor and Furnishing Pvt. Ltd), other than Urban Ladder Home Décor Solutions Pvt. Ltd, another Sequoia Capital portfolio and Pepperfry (Trendsutra Platform Services Pvt. Ltd), backed by Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

Urban Ladder, which has so far raised about $77 million from venture capital firms, and Pepperfry, the most well-capitalised online furniture store with about $128 million in its, initially started out by selling furniture. Both firms have, however, launched home interior solutions, modular furniture and kitchen in the last 12-15 months to compete with younger rivals such as Homelane and Livspace.

The investment in Livspace comes at a time when venture capital investment in India plummeted 58% in the June quarter over the previous three-month period, according to a report by KPMG and CB Insights, mirroring increasing investor caution towards funding start-ups.

VC firms ploughed $583 million into India in April-June, down from $1.4 billion in January-March, said the report. VC investments in India have been on a decline since October-December. Investments in the December quarter halved to $1.5 billion from $2.9 billion in July-September.

The online furniture segment has barely seen any big ticket investment in the last 12 months.

Among the bigger start-ups, Pepperfry last raised $100 million in July 2015, while Urban Ladder mopped up $50 million in April Last year. Urban Ladder raised debt capital of $3 million from Trifecta Capital, Mint reported on 24 August.

Source: http://www.livemint.com/Companies/1hDRCEVatp1asPhIuZXtuO/Livspace-raises-Rs100-crore-from-existing-investors.html

Workflow boost for accountants, advisory firms

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
Plans are afoot to train 20,000 chartered accountants by March 2017 in different aspects of the GST
Corporate India is just about getting started to get their businesses ready for the goods and services tax ( GST) regime. This has opened up a sizable business opportunity for tax experts, advisory firms, and law firms. What has come as a shot in the arm for chartered accountants and cost accountants is the mandatory need for tax audits for certain companies under the GST regime.
Under Section 42 ( 4) of the draft Model GST Law, businesses with to- be- prescribed turnover have to get their accounts audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant. Accordingly, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India ( ICAI) is preparing to boost training for its members to enable them to make the most out of the opportunity. “ Plans are afoot to train 20,000 chartered accountants by March 2017 in different aspects of the GST for conducting impact studies and filing of GST returns,” says Madhukar N Hiregange, senior partner, Hiregange & Associates, and chairman of indirect tax committee at the ICAI. To start with, over the next two months, around 500 trainers will go through the GST programme.
In the coming months, some key areas of work for accountancy professionals would relate to conducting impact studies for clients, taking companies through GST registration and the transition process, filing taxes and getting tax refunds, ensuring there are no mismatches in the tax input- output chain. Even though the new indirect tax system will come into effect from April 2017, tax experts expect the transition opportunity to last for the next two years.
“Compliance will become a major area of practice for accountants,” says Hiregange. He expects many companies to outsource their tax compliance work to tax consultancies and chartered accountancy firms.
In the coming months, businesses would have to re- jig their IT systems and also make businesses of their suppliers, distributors and sellers GSTcompliant.
The challenge for small and mid- sized companies would be to come up to speed with technology requirements under the GST regime. “ Many companies would need hand- holding while interacting with the GST Network, the IT backbone, in filing tax returns and in claiming returns,” says Hiregange. That may spawn small firms specialising in GST- related compliance issues. The ICAI is also looking at revising its syllabus by November this year in keeping with the latest changes in the indirect tax system.
Sensing the business opportunity that is up for grabs, most corporate law firms are ramping up their indirect tax practice. For instance, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, a law firm that has been advising the GST Network, has put in place a special team of 20- odd tax experts to tackle GST- related issues. “ In addition, there are 150- 200 tax lawyers across the country taking up sector- specific indirect tax related issues,” says a spokesperson from the law firm.
Similarly, accounting and advisory firms, especially the ‘big four’, are betting big on the opportunity. EY, for instance, has a team of 800- odd tax and advisory professionals working on GST. “ This year, we anticipate an increase of 25 per cent in our current headcount for GST,” said a company spokesperson. Many of these professionals come with expertise in supply chain, analytics, technology and processes.
According to Nitin Atroley, partner and head of sales & markets at KPMG, the firm set up a special team with members from different countries like Malaysia, Singapore and Australia that have earlier gone through the process of adopting GST.
Prashant Raizada, partner, indirect tax, BDO India, feels the challenge to transition to the new tax regime would be most felt by small and mediumsized enterprises. “ In Tier2and – 3 cities, businesses may not be that well versed in use of technology,” said Raizada. It will be busy days ahead for tax experts, accountants and consultants, as well as their clients as they get up to speed with the GST regime.

Government may offer foreign auditors direct access

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate Updates, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

In a move that signals the government’s intent to allow foreign audit firms to register and operate directly in the Indian market, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs has written to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) to seek its views and recommendations on the government proposal.

Currently, Indian laws don’t allow any multinational accounting firm to be registered in India as auditors. The thinking within the government is that as part of an ongoing reforms process, the services sector should also be liberalised and global auditing firms could be allowed to operate directly here to make the profession more competitive and robust.

The ministry has written to the institute on August 10, said ICAI president M Devaraja Reddy . The institute is set to discuss this proposal in a meeting to be held on August 24 and then respond to the the request, he added.

The government will have to amend the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 that regulates the accounting profession in India to allow foreign firms to operate in India.

Currently, MNC professional services firms that offer auditing services in India, including the Big Four – EY, PwC, Deloitte and KPMG – audit Indian companies through a bunch of their network or affiliate firms.

Though for all internal purposes, the accounting practice in any of the Big Four is treated just as any other practice area like tax, transactions, or advisory , but on paper, the affiliate firms are run as separate partnerships.

If the Indian government does allow direct entry, more global firms are likely to invest big in their India network and also the market could see the entry of new players.

“Given the significant exposure of global investors in Indian firms, it’s natural to ask for an auditor who they are more comfortable with. More global players will mean more choice and better quality of services. It will also enhance the credibility of Indian markets,” says the CEO of a global firm.

For Indian audit firms, the move could spell further trouble, as they have been steadily losing the most lucrative audit assignments to the Big Four over the past two decades.The four global firms now dominate the book-keeping business in India. As it is, the mandatory audit rotation brought in by the Companies Act 2013, is set to kick off from April 1, 2017 and that will further see a movement of big accounts away from Indian firms towards the Big Four and other two prominent network firms, Grant Thornton and BDO.

In major markets, the global giants have a monopoly over the audit business – 99 per cent of companies in FTSE are audited by the Big Four firms, while 86 per cent of those listed on the NYSE work with these audit firms.

But in India, 62 per cent of the BSE 500 companies, including some of India Inc’s biggest firms, are still not audited by the Big Four.For example, Reliance has had Chaturvedi & Shah as auditors for decades, L&T books have been audited by Sharp & Tannan and Hindalco had stayed on with Singhi & Co for long time.In China, the Big Four lost domination to local firms after the government brought in regulations that were unfavourable for the global players. Indian accounting firms are also betting on government regulations that will keep their interests protected.

“The government will have to find a middle ground. It will have to create a regulatory framework that allows the global firms to invest and practice, also keeping in mind the concerns of the Indian accounting firms which service a large section of Indian companies, both big and small,” said the CEO of a leading Indian accounting firm.

India jumps 19 places in World Bank’s logistics performance index

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

India’s logistics performance at its key international gateways has improved in the last two years, according to a World Bank report released on Tuesday.

In the World Bank’s biennial measure of international supply chain efficiency, called Logistics Performance Index, India’s ranking has jumped from 54 in 2014 to 35 in 2016.

While Germany tops the 2016 rankings, India is ahead of comparatively advanced economies like Portugal and New Zealand. In 2016, India’s international supply chain efficiency was at 75% of top-ranked Germany, said the report titled Connecting to Compete: 2016 Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. This is an improvement over the 66% efficiency when compared to the leader (again Germany) in 2014.

Better performance in logistics will not only boost programmes, such as Make in India, by enabling India to become part of the global supply chain, it can also help increase trade. In 2015-16, India’s foreign trade shrank by around 15%.

The Logistics Performance Index analyses countries across six components: efficiency of customs and border management clearance, quality of trade and transport infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, competence and quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and the frequency with which shipments reach consignees within scheduled or expected delivery times.

It is computed from the survey responses of about 1,051 logistics industry professionals.

Programmes, such as Make in India, and improvements in infrastructure have helped India improve its logistical performance, said Arvind Mahajan, partner and national head (energy, infrastructure and government) at KPMG India, a consultancy. He also said that the emergence of skilled professionals and technological improvements that have enabled services such as track-and-tracing have helped India close the gap with leaders.

That said, Logistics Performance Index does not address how easy or difficult it is to move goods to the hinterland. For that, World Bank has another measure—a domestic LPI which analyzes a country’s performance over four factors: infrastructure, services, border procedures and supply chain reliability.

While not all yardsticks are comparable across countries, there are some which show that India still has some way to go.

For instance, only 69% of shipments from India meet the quality criteria, compared to 72% for China and 77% for Kenya. On the other hand, it takes two and three days to clear shipments, without and with inspection, respectively—numbers comparable to China but longer than what it takes in top-ranked Germany.

Similarly, India has an average of 5 forms required for import or export, compared to 4.5 for China and 2 for Germany.

In this regard, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) has the potential to revolutionize the transport industry in India, said Capt. Uday Palsule, former managing director of Spear Logistics Pvt. Ltd. “Inter-state travel time will be drastically reduced if the hurdle of checking documents at every state border is done away with,” he said. It will also help boost the returns of the trucking industry and feed into better performance of the logistics sector, added Palsule.

Source: http://www.livemint.com/Politics/aqBXOSWqMObUMUAffuGH6I/India-jumps-19-places-in-World-Banks-logistics-performance.html

Audit giants see dominance waning

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0

India’s audit landscape is undergoing a quiet change as the new rules for time-based rotation of auditors gather pace.

Early audit changes this year indicate the larger entities, such as Deloitte’s network, could face some pressure on their dominance. And, those lower down the order could gain ground. Leading firms are looking at increasing the focus on quality and are exploring new opportunities, such as private equity-backed ones in the unlisted space. Smaller entities such as Walker Chandiok, part of the Grant Thornton network, have ramped up their staff strength to handle new clients.

Close to 400 companies listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) have already changed auditors over the past three years, with clients changing hands among top audit firms. There is also pressure on pricing as the war for market share begins to intensify among top audit firms. This has resulted in a spike in demand for experienced auditors, with joining remuneration seeing 20-30 per cent jumps.

Audit giants see dominance waning
The revamped Companies Act of 2013 said every Indian company with a paid-up equity capital of Rs 20 crore or more was required to replace auditors after two five-year terms in succession. The law had given a three-year transition period for those which had to change auditors, ending March 2017. In the current financial year, 2016-17, around 40 NSE-listed companies have already switched to new auditors. More announcements are expected over the coming three months, shows data from Prime Database. In 2014-15 and 2015-16, a total of 339-NSE listed companies had settled for new auditors.

“We will be rotating off some of the larger companies. Simply because of the number and size of listed companies we audit, there will be changes in our audit market share,” said Shyamak Tata, partner, Deloitte Haskins Sells. He said large-scale changes in their portfolio were only expected from the third year onwards.

The Deloitte group’s network of audit companies is expected to see the largest churn. It has the biggest number of marquee audit clients. The network earned Rs 300 crore in fees for the year 2014-15, representing 15 per cent of the total pie of the Rs 2,000 crore audit fee market for 1,451 NSE-listed firms. It also audited the highest number of listed entities, at 149. The EY network made Rs 121 crore from the 108 companies. The PwC network audited 65 listed ones but had the lowest fee income among the ‘Big Four’ in audit, of Rs 65.6 crore. The KPMG network audited the lowest number of listed entities, at 58; however, it earned more than PwC at Rs 99.4 crore. Companies are still in the process of reporting the FY16 numbers.

Churn on
Early numbers suggest this pecking order is already going through a churn. A Business Standard analysis of data provided by Prime Database showed of the 41 auditor changes reported so far this year in listed companies, the KPMG network was the biggest gainer, with 11 new firms for the financial year ending March 2017. It was rotated out of two existing clients, a net gain of eight for FY17. The EY network added six and lost two, while Walker Chandiok gained a lone company. The PwC and Deloitte networks have lost more than they’ve gained so far this year. At the end of the changes, other smaller audit firms had 23 clients, up from 18 in FY16, among these 40 companies.

Grasim, Cipla, Biocon, Vedanta, Hindustan Zinc, United Spirits and Century Textiles are some of the large companies that have reported auditor changes for the new financial year.  In FY16, as many as 168 listed companies changed their auditors. The Deloitte network was the top gainer among the first five, gaining 17 and losing 11. The KPMG network was also a net gainer, with seven gains and four losses. EY, PwC and Walker Chandiok lost more than they gained.

In FY15, when 171 companies changed auditors, Walker Chandiok’s client list swelled by eight. While the EY network and Deloitte registered a net gain of one each, the KPMG and PwC networks recorded a net loss of four and one, respectively.

Strategy
Deloitte, expecting a strong attack on its dominance, is looking for greener pastures. “We are large in the listed company space, and have a majority share across industry sectors.  Our audit breadth and experience in this changing regulatory environment provides us, currently and over the next two-three years, an opportunity to provide audit services to untapped listed and unlisted entities, with a bias in favour of unlisted clients,” said Tata.

Other large entities are also gearing up for the transition. Russell Parera, partner, Price Waterhouse Chartered Accountants LLP, said his network had embarked on a transformation programme focussing on people, technology and processes for close to two years. “We have taken significant efforts in training our people for this change. Also, with rotation kicking in, it is going to be important to focus on investing in relationship building.”

The PwC network also bets on technology as another aspect, which will go a long way in these ever-evolving market scenario. “Today, technology has become a crucial enabler, with more data audits getting conducted. It is also relevant in cross border and multi-location audits to ensure consistency. We as a firm have been preparing for this change,” Parera added.  Tata of Deloitte spoke of pricing pressure in certain pockets. “We are seeing this as a section of the market looks to gain market share.  There will be some short- term blips. However, with continuing investment in innovation and quality, which will lead to enhancing value to clients, over the short term, this will correct. We already have a large pool of audit talent. We are looking at consolidating and not dramatically increasing the headcount. Audit will remain the primary identity of our firm and, with our focus on quality, we will retain our leading position in the overall  space.”

Impact
According to Akhil Bansal, deputy chief executive of KPMG India, with European audit rotation also coming into effect, the impact of Indian mandatory company rotation regulations will be felt around the globe. “The choice of the audit firm in India might influence the choice in Europe and other geographies,” he added. Bansal said the impact of mandatory firm rotation will also be felt on other services, including internal audit, due to stringent independence requirements. “It is important that the companies make their choice of audit firm early, since the best resources will be committed to clients who are first off the block,” he said.

Audit companies have been preparing for this, with investment in personnel, training and ramping up headcount numbers. For instance, the Grant Thornton network plans to double its auditor numbers across its network from 1,500 to 3,000. Vishesh Chandiok, national managing partner, Grant Thornton India LLP, said: “Several local Indian firms are very competent and the belief that only us international firms are the option is misplaced. Not all 50,000 firms for each company but certainly 50 firms can audit most companies, not only four of five firms.”

The EY group, which has 3,000 auditors across its network, added 400 over the past 12 months. “Internally, our focus continues to be on strengthening our teams with more hiring, greater investments in training, sharpening technical and industry capabilities  and increasingly, using more technology and, data analytic tools when performing audits,” said  Sudhir Soni, national leader, SR Batliboi, the Indian member-firm of EY Global.

Most audit companies have resorted to internal promotions and inducting of new talent to expand resources.

With the threshold for audit rotation being low, most audit companies are looking at tapping the unlisted private audit space in a big way. That’s a space the Deloitte network companies plan to play the game hard, indicated Tata. The client churn among audit firms is expected to last over the next two-three years, before it stabilises.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/audit-giants-see-dominance-waning-116062600777_1.html

India opens Foreign Direct investment (FDI) floodgates

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0
In what showed a mindset shift among India’s policymakers, the government on Monday opened the floodgates for foreign direct investment (FDI) by easing the terms for nine sectors

In what showed a mindset shift among India’s policymakers, the government on Monday opened the floodgates for foreign direct investment (FDI) by easing the terms for nine sectors. Showing scant signs of legacy inhibitions, it virtually paved the way for even foreign airlines to acquire their Indian counterparts, removed the condition of domestic access to state-of-the-art technology for 100% FDI in the defence sector and put in abeyance the fractious 30% local sourcing norm for FDI in single-brand retail of advanced-technology products. graph 2

Despite the local pharma industry’s oft-expressed fear of being swamped by Big Pharma, foreign firms can now take majority (up to 74%) ownership in Indian drugmakers via the automatic route, which could again catalyse big-ticket M&A activity in the sector.

With the relaxations in the aviation sector, even a foreign airline could acquire 100% ownership in an India airline company by working in concert with a related party, according to some analysts. For example, a Qatar Airways could acquire a GoAir by directly picking up a 49% in the Indian firm and lapping up the balance equity through the West Asian nation’s sovereign wealth fund, Qatar Investment Authority.

Analysts, however, said the government seems to have tightened the sourcing rule in single-brand retailing, instead of giving a blanket exemption from such a rule for entities having “cutting-edge” technology, as was the case earlier. For instance, Apple will be exempted from the local sourcing rule for three years and have a relaxed sourcing regime for another five years if it wants to set up its own retail store, as its technology has already been described as “cutting edge” by a government panel. However, the company will still have to start local sourcing from the fourth year itself, thanks to the insistence of the finance ministry, which wanted that the Make in India programme get a boost. Similarly, Chinese company LeEco will be subjected to the same conditions if its claim of having “cutting edge” technology is endorsed by the panel headed by department of industrial policy and promotion secretary Ramesh Abhishek. However, another Chinese smartphone maker, Xiaomi, which recently withdrew its application for such a waiver, will have to comply with the mandatory 30% sourcing rule from the beginning should it wish to set up its own retail store.

graph

Commenting on the new FDI policy for airlines, Amber Dubey, partner and India head of aerospace and defence at KPMG in India, said: “The avoidable controversies on settling ‘ownership and control’ issue is now over. Foreign airlines can now focus on the customers and competition rather than wasting time on legal and regulatory issues.”

“The likely increase in competition will bring down prices and enhance air penetration in India, both international and domestic. Indian carriers can now look for enhanced valuations in case they wish to raise funds or go for partial or complete divestment,” he added.

Calling the new norms a “bit tricky”, Amrit Pandurangi, senior director, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India, said, “Foreign airline investment is restricted to 49% and FDI investment in this sector has been opened up to 100%, so if the beyond the portion of the equity is by a related entity, then that needs to be tested.”

Among domestic airlines, the Rahul Bhatia-controlled Interglobe Enterprises holds close to 43% in IndiGo, Ajay Singh has a 60% stake in SpiceJet and Naresh Goyal holds 51% in Jet Airways. While Tata Sons holds 51% in both Vistara Airlines and AirAsia India, GoAir is wholly owned by the Wadia Group.

In defence, the decision to scrap the condition of access to “state-of-the-art technology” for FDI beyond 49% (through government route) will make it easier for foreign investors to invest in India. Already, Russian firm Kalashnikov is reportedly looking for local partners for manufacturing in India. Similarly, Swedish defence major Saab is learnt to be looking at more than 49% FDI in defence in its joint venture with a local partner to make the Gripen aircraft in India.

The government’s move to allow 100% FDI through the automatic route (earlier it was up to just 49%) in the broadcast carriage industry, comprising teleports, cable, direct-to-home (DTH) players, HITS (head-end-in-the sky) and mobile TV operators will provide a breather to the cable industry which has been struggling with the process of digitalisation of cable TV. The government has also allowed 74% FDI (49% under automatic route and through government approval beyond this ceiling) in private security agencies. Earlier, only 49% of FDI through government route was allowed.

Also allowed now is 100% FDI in animal husbandry (including breeding of dogs), pisciculture, aquaculture and apiculture under the automatic route under controlled conditions. It has been decided to do away with this requirement of ‘controlled conditions’ for FDI in these activities.

“For establishment of branch office, liaison office or project office or any other place of business in India if the principal business of the applicant is Defence, Telecom, Private Security or Information and Broadcasting, it has been decided that approval of Reserve Bank of India or separate security clearance would not be required in cases where FIPB approval or license/permission by the concerned Ministry/Regulator has already been granted,” a PMO statement said..

Monday’s is the second largest FDI liberalisation initiative by the Modi government, after the steps taken in November 2015. Prime Minister Narendra Modi tweeted: “In two years, Govt brings major FDI policy reforms in several key sectors… India now the most open economy in the world for FDI; most sectors under automatic approval route.” He added: “Today’s FDI reforms will give a boost to employment, job creation & benefit the economy.”

In what seemed to indicate that the government’s intention was indeed to let foreign airlines acquire Indian firms and thereby augment their capital and fleet strength for the benefit of air travellers, economic affairs secretary Shaktikanta Das said that Monday’s reforms in the sector were a “game changer”.

India’s FDI inflows increased to $55.5 billion in FY16 from $36 billion in FY14. Net FDI inflows stood at $36 billion in FY16 compared with $32.6 billion in FY15.

Commerce and industry minister Nirmala Sitharaman, however, rejected assumptions that the government decided to announce so many FDI policy reforms in one go to divert public attention from RBI governor Raghuram Rajan’s decision to not continue at the central bank after his current tenure ends on September 4. The reforms are a result of months of deliberations among various departments and are not announced in a hurry to divert attention, she affirmed.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/article/economy/india-opens-fdi-floodgates-apple-to-qatar-airways-gain-but-grey-areas-remain/291429/

Company Law Tribunal benches ‘will be fully functional’ in next few days

by | posted in: Company Incorporations, e-filing of MCA Returns, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0

All the 11 benches of the newly constituted National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) will be fully functional in the next “couple of days”, a top Corporate Affairs Ministry (MCA) official said.

Infrastructure is ready in all the 10 cities where the NCLT benches are being set up. The human resources aspect has also been taken care of and adequate steps are being taken to start work immediately.

To begin with, NCLT will handle all pending cases before the Company Law Board and other matters not assigned to any other Court, the official said.

“There will be no transition problem for existing CLB cases,” the official added.

As on date, as many as eight members have joined NCLT, out of approved 25 members. “The remaining members are expected to join in the next few days. They will be posted in various benches,” the official said.

The MCA has also planned a 10-day colloquium in July for the NCLT members, the official added. Asked about the status of cases before High Courts (company cases), the MCA official said the High Court will be the second stage of transfer.

“We will let the CLB cases transition to stabilise for some time and then, in discussion with NCLT Chairman, decide on the High Courts related matter,” the official said.

The creation of NCLT from June 1 is expected to speed up delivery of justice in corporate cases. Sai Venkateshwaran, Partner and Head, Accounting Advisory Services, KPMG in India, hailed the MCA move to set up NCLT and NCLAT.

“We can expect to see the new Companies Act become a reality in its entirety in the coming months,” Venkateshwaran said. The time required for setting up of the NCLT and NCLAT was one of the key reasons for the Companies Act 2013 not being fully operationalised, he said.

However, with the setting up of these tribunals, the way has been paved for operationalising most of the remaining parts of the Companies Act 2013, he added. .

Meanwhile, the Company Law Board hearing in the Financial Technologies’ Board removal case did not take place on Thursday as the CLB stood dissolved on May 31 by virtue of the government move to set up NCLT from June 1.

Indications are that an NCLT bench will hear this matter in the coming days, sources said.

Source: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/tp-news/company-law-tribunal-benches-will-be-fully-functional-in-next-few-days/article8688161.ece