SEBI set to block P-Note route for NRIs to prevent laundering of black money

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0
The regulator wants to tighten the rules amid concerns that various variants of P-Notes have been floated since the implementation of GAAR on April 1.

The regulator plans to put in place a clear bar on non-resident Indians (NRIs) and entities owned by them and resident Indians subscribing to participatory notes, a move aimed at preventing possible round-tripping or laundering of black money.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is set to tweak its regulations to this effect at its upcoming board meeting on April 26 after the finance ministry recently wrote to the regulator. Such a restriction is already implied through the answer to a frequently asked question (FAQ) but the regulator feels this lacks legal sanctity.

“Most of Sebi’s FAQs themselves clearly state that they should not be regarded as interpretation of law, and that they should not be treated as a binding opinion or guidance from SEBI,” said Moin Ladha, associate partner, Khaitan & Co. “Therefore, in case of any contradictions between the regulations and FAQs, the regulations would prevail. While FAQs do indicate the position SEBI is taking, they cannot be said to override or expand the scope of the regulations.”

P-notes are a derivative instruments issued offshore to those who want to bet on the country’s stocks and bonds without registering themselves with SEBI. The regulator wants to tighten the rules amid concerns that various variants of P-notes have been floated since the implementation of General Anti Avoidance Rules (GAAR) on April 1.

Investments via P-notes had declined to a 43-month low of Rs 1.57 lakh crore in December but rebounded in January to Rs 1.75 lakh crore before dropping again to Rs 1.70 lakh crore in February. There could be a resurgence in P-note issuance as these are exempted from capital gains tax under the amended tax treaties with Singapore and Mauritius that took effect on April 1.

Legal experts said the concept of NRI itself is a grey area and defining it would be crucial for regulators. They said the prohibition should be strictly enforced to prevent round-tripping of Indian money. “The concern of round-tripping of Indian money, particularly when leading industrialists may have a foreign passport, was always a concern,” said Sandeep Parekh, founder, Finsec Law Advisors. SEBI relies on the income tax definition on what constitutes an NRI.

“The concept of who is an NRI itself is a grey zone ranging from income tax definition which is based on residency to citizenship laws which are typically drafted very broadly to include any person of Indian origin and their kith and kin who are born abroad,” Parekh said. “Defining an NRI within this spectrum would be crucial to allow legitimate money in from immigrants who have left India several generations ago and are doing exceedingly well.”

In recent discussions with a leading custodian, the latter gathered the impression that the regulator was not comfortable with NRIs as a group holding a majority interest in a Category II foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) even though regulations do not restrict this. Rules require Category II FPIs to be broad-based — the minimum number of investors should be 20 and no single investor can hold more than 49%. However, NRIs as a group cannot hold more than 49% in Category III FPIs.

Source :  http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/sebi-set-to-block-p-note-route-for-nris-to-prevent-laundering-of-black-money/articleshow/58215743.cms

Transfer pricing treaty for investors from cyprus

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

The government on Monday afternoon clarified that according to the amended Cyprus treaty, investors need to pay only 10% tax with retrospective effect from November 1, 2013, instead of the 30% tax they have already paid. While bringing in clarity on this matter, a lacunae as far as transfer pricing still remains.

The genesis of the problem lies in 2013. The government had, on November 1, 2013, blacklisted Cyprus as an investment destination through a notification. So, investments made through Cyprus attracted 30% tax (TDS) instead of 10% tax under the original India-Cyprus treaty.

The government had blacklisted Cyprus after the island country had refused to share some data related to investors with India.

The government also said that transfer pricing could also apply on returns given to Cyprus investors by Indian companies.

However, the government later amended the treaty (through a notification on December 14, 2016) after Cyprus agreed to co-operate on sharing investor data. Under the amended treaty, the higher taxation part was rescinded. But the transfer pricing portion still remains unclear.

What led to a cause of worry was the fact that many private equity investors had paid 30% tax between 2013 and 2016 on returns from Indian investments. The government clarification on Monday came as many foreign investors were worried that the 10% tax would not be applicable for the three years between 2013 and 2016. However, following Monday’s clarification, they can now claim refunds from the tax department.

Most of the investors used Cyprus as a pooling vehicle to invest in Indian real estate. Most of the investments were in debt vehicles. In some cases, while the equity investment were made either in listed or unlisted companies through Mauritius or Singapore, debt investments were made through Cyprus.

Transfer pricing conundrum
Transfer pricing is normally only applied in cases where two companies— one an Indian and another multinational— do a merger or acquisition. People close to the development said that some of the transfer pricing adjustments could be made in the coming months. In cases where the tax officers have already gone ahead with the transfer pricing procedures, it may not be possible to undo it, say experts.

Treat for genuine investors, though need for clarity in Tax Rules
This reworked Tax Treaty comes very much after India demonstrated flexibility and lifted the so called sanctions after Cyprus agreed to share information on tax evaders. The reworked tax treaty between India and Cyprus for effective information sharing is also a step towards global cooperation on tax transparency. It will provide relief to genuine investors in Cyprus. But investors loathe uncertainty. The need is for stability and certainty in the tax system, and therefore tax rules must be clear.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/56073396.cms

Foreign direct investment jumps 77.5% to $5.15 billion in September

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

With the government relaxing FDI policy and taking steps to improve ease of doing business, the Foreign Direct Investment in the country increased by 77.5 percent to USD 5.15 billion in September this year.

In September 2015, the FDI had stood at USD 2.9 billion, according to the data of the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP).

During April-September period of this fiscal, FDI in the country grew by 30 percent to USD 21.62 billion as compared to USD 16.63 billion in the same period last year.

Among the top 10 sectors, services received the maximum FDI of USD 2.29 billion during the first half of this fiscal, followed by telecommunications (USD 2.78 billion), trading (USD 1.48 billion), computer software and hardware (USD 1.03 billion) and automobile (USD 729 million).

During the period, India received the maximum FDI from Mauritius (USD 5.85 billion) followed by Singapore (USD 4.68 billion), Japan (USD 2.79 billion), the Netherlands (USD 1.61 billion) and the US (USD 1.43 billion).

During financial year 2015-16, foreign fund inflows grew at 29 percent to USD 40 billion as against USD 30.93 billion in 2014-15.

The government relaxed FDI norms in various sectors, including defence and civil aviation to boost FDI in the country.

Foreign investments are considered crucial for India, which needs around USD 1 trillion to overhaul its infrastructure sector such as ports, airports and highways to boost growth.

Growth in foreign investments helps improve the country’s balance of payments (BoP) situation and strengthen the rupee.

Source: http://www.firstpost.com/business/foreign-direct-investment-jumps-77-5-to-5-15-billion-in-september-3101162.html

FDI inflows rise 7% to $10.55 bn in Q1

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows grew 7 per cent to $10.55 billion during the first quarter against $9.88 billion in January-March 2015.

According to the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) data, the sectors, which attracted maximum FDI during the period, include computer hardware and software, services, telecommunications, power, pharmaceuticals and trading business.

In terms of countries, India received maximum overseas inflows from the US, Singapore, Mauritius, Japan and the Netherlands.

An official said with the government further liberalising foreign investment policies for services sector in the Budget, more inflows would come.

The government has recently relaxed FDI norms in about eight sectors, including defence, civil aviation, food processing, pharmaceuticals and private security agencies.

Foreign investment is considered crucial for India, which needs around $1 trillion for overhauling infrastructure sector such as ports, airports and highways to boost growth.

A strong inflow of foreign investments will help improve the country’s balance of payments situation and strengthen the rupee value against other global currencies, especially the US dollar.

 

Source: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/fdi-inflows-rise-7-to-1055-bn-in-q1/article8916909.ece

Intangible MNC assets may be taxed in case of a global merger and acquisition

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

A recent clarification by the government has created a stir among some multinationals which are concerned that their Indian entities might be taxed even in case of a global merger and acquisition with another global company.

More so, the worry is in case of multinationals that hold intangible assets in India, either through research and development centres, or are engaged in businesses where it is tough to value assets.

This is mainly because tax component, if at all, would be decided on valuation of the Indian entity, and whether valuation (Indian entity) accounts for more than half the holding entity outside India. This comes in the wake of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) announcing rules for determining fair market value in case of indirect transfer of shares of an Indian entity. Rules specify a method for determination of “fair market value” of foreign target company shares and Indian company shares. In case of an indirect transfer of shares or transaction, if the value of Indian assets is more than 50% of the foreign target company, this could lead to taxation in India.

So if an US-headquartered company invests in India through a Mauritius company and at any point in time there’s a change in ownership, the tax could be applied. The tax would be triggered in India if the ownership of the Mauritius company is changed, and if more than 50% of the total assets of this company (Mauritius company) are in India.

“If a multinational has a presence in India through an intermediate holding vehicle in a third country, and if there is an M&A deal at the intermediate holding entity level, the Indian entity can attract taxation in India,” said Amit Singhania, Partner at Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas.

“While the 50% rule applies, valuing the Indian assets, particularly the right of management or control in an unlisted Indian company would be challenging,”  Singhania said.

Many multinationals are now rushing to their Indian tax consultants to find out which transactions could attract tax here. “Many multinationals that have a presence in India through Mauritius could face some tax in India even if there is an offshore M&A deal, especially where the seller is based in a country whose treaty does not exempt capital gains tax in India,” said Rajesh H Gandhi, partner, tax, Deloitte Haskins and Sells.

“However, more importantly, it could be challenging to identify and value some of the assets and determine the place where they are situated. This would be more relevant for assets like human resources, contractual rights and intangibles such as mobile applications, results of R&D or patents developed in India but registered elsewhere,” said Gandhi.

Industry trackers say that in case of an M&A at an international level, the shares of holding companies are transferred or merged, which is where the problem lies. Many experts also point out that information and documentation required to ascertain the valuation of Indian as well as an intermediary is not just complicated but tough to come by in many cases.

“If so, income tax would assume the Indian entity’s valuation is more than 50% of the holding entity,” said a consultant currently advising such a client. Experts point out that patents held by the Indian company, and some other assets too have to be valued. Not only valuing these intangible assets could have different views, in some cases, these patents or other intangible assets are developed in India but sit on the balance sheet of other group companies outside India.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/52474147.cms

India, Mauritius to amend tax treaty

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

India will levy capital gains tax on investments routed through Mauritius from April 1 next year, bringing down the curtains on a contentious three decade-old rule that allowed companies to bring in billions of dollars by paying negligible taxes.

The taxes on capital gains will apply to investments made from April 1, 2017 and will be imposed at 50% or half of the domestic rate until March 31, 2019, and at the full rate thereafter.

How do people use tax havens to avoid paying taxes?

Through “round tripping” or “treaty shopping”.

How does round tripping work?

Round tripping refers to routing of investments by a resident of one country through another country back to his own country.

You get money out of India and transmit it to a tax haven with whom India has a bilateral tax avoidance treaty such as the double-taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA). In the tax haven, this money is treated as capital of a registered corporate entity. You now invest this money back in an Indian company as foreign direct investment (FDI) by buying stakes or invest it in Indian equity markets.

How does this help in avoiding taxes?

The entire purpose of this exercise is to window-dress as foreign capital your original money that you had taken out from India.

In the entire process, you end up paying zero or negligible taxes. In India, you can claim tax exemption citing the DTAA arguing that you have paid taxes in the source country. In the source country, taxes are negligible since it is a tax haven.

What is DTAA?

These are bilateral treaties signed between governments to prevent companies from being taxed twice over.

So, what was the problem with Mauritius?

Mauritius, and other tax havens, has almost negligible taxes. This was encouraging companies to route their investments in India through “shell” companies (those that exist only on paper) in Mauritius and avoid paying taxes.

How big was the problem?

At $94 billion, Mauritius has been the largest FDI source for India, accounting for 34% of total FDI in India between 2000 and 2015.

What are the changes that will plug this gap?

The changed DTAA will make it mandatory to pay capital gains tax on sale of shares in India by companies registered in Mauritius

When will the new rules kick-in?

Share sales in Indian companies by Mauritius-registered firms will be taxed at half of the applicable rate between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2019.

If the capital gains tax in India is 10% currently, Mauritius-registered companies will be taxed at 5% during the first two years beginning April 2017. Full capital gains tax will apply from April 1, 2019.

What about previous investments?

The new rules will not apply only to investments made before April 1, 2017, meaning share sale of investments made before this date will be exempt from capital gains tax.

Which companies will benefit from the reduced tax rates during the first two years?

The benefit of 50% reduction in tax rate during the transition period from April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2019 shall be subject to a limitation of benefit (LOB) Article.

A Mauritius-registered company (including a shell or conduit company) will not be entitled to lower tax rate, if it doesn’t spend at least Rs 27 lakh in Mauritius in the previous 12 months. This is called ‘purpose and bonafide business test’.

How will impact investors?

Many foreign investors will have to redraw their strategies. The incentive to route investments through Mauritius will cease to exist once the new rule kicks-in. This could raise their tax outgo.

What about markets?

It could hurt short-term foreign investor inflows into India, particularly from companies whose investment strategies are guided by minimising taxes. This could pull down markets initially.

Are these rules related to the general anti-avoidance rules (GAAR)?

GAAR are aimed at curbing tax avoidance and aim to give tax authorities the right to scrutinise transactions that they feel have been done to avoid taxes.

Under GAAR corporations may be forced to restructure salaries of employees if taxmen conclude that these were structured only to avoid taxes. Similarly, if a foreign investment transaction from Mauritius has taken place with an intent to exploit DTAA, it will come under GAAR.

Implementation of GAAR will take place from April, 2017.

Source: http://www.hindustantimes.com/business/india-mauritius-tax-treaty-all-you-need-to-know/story-QSOlvKyt6rrN7E00S7wp9K.html

Singapore pips Mauritius as India’s top FDI source

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

Singapore has replaced Mauritius as the top source of foreign direct investment (FDI) into India during the first half of the current financial year.

During April-September 2015, India has attracted $6.69 billion (Rs 43,096 crore) FDI from Singapore while from Mauritius, it received $3.66 billion (Rs 23,490 crore), according to data from the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP).

Foreign investment from Singapore was $2.41 billion in the year-ago period.

According to experts, the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) with Singapore incorporates Limit-of-Benefit (LoB) clause, which has provided comfort to foreign investors based there to invest in India.

“Investors are preferring Singapore to Mauritius as the LoB clause in India-Singapore treaty provides substance and certainty,” said Krishan Malhotra, head of tax and an expert on FDI with corporate law firm Shardul Amarchand and Mangaldas.

FDI from Singapore during the first six months of the current financial year is also more than what it had invested in India for the whole of 2013-14 ($5.98 billion). India had attracted $6.74 billion foreign investment during 2014-15.

Overall, Singapore accounts for 15 per cent of the total FDI India received between April 2000 and September 2015. However, Mauritius makes up 34 per cent of FDI during the same period.

Sectors that attracted the highest foreign investment during April-September 2015 include computer software and hardware ($3.05 billion), trading ($2.30 billion), services and automobile ($1.46 billion each) and telecommunications ($659 million).

Foreign investment is crucial for India, which needs about $1 trillion by March 2017 to overhaul infrastructure such as ports, airports and highways, and to boost growth.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/singapore-pips-mauritius-as-india-s-top-fdi-source-115120700040_1.html