SEBI extends deadlines for filing financial results for Indian listed firms due to COVID-19

SEBI made multiple relaxations for Indian firms, including market intermediaries and depositories, in terms of filing of financial details, disclosure on fund utilization and updating client records

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), on Thursday, relaxed the deadline for listed Indian firms to announce their financial results in the wake of surging covid-19 cases in the so-called second wave of the pandemic in the country.

SEBI made multiple relaxations for Indian firms, including market intermediaries and depositories, in terms of filing of financial details, disclosure on fund utilization and updating client records.

In a circular, SEBI said listed Indian companies, which are currently required to announce their quarterly financial results within 45 days from the end of the quarter or by 15 May, 2021, are now allowed to file their March quarter results for fiscal 2021 by 30 June.

The deadline for filing annual audited financial results too has been extended by the markets regulator. Currently all companies are required to file their audited financials within 60 days from the end of the financial year, i.e. by 30 May. This deadline has been extended till 30 June, 2021 by SEBI.

“SEBI is in receipt of representations from listed entities, professional bodies, industry associations, market participants etc. requesting extension of timelines for various filings and relaxation from certain compliance obligations under the LODR (listing obligations and disclosure regulations) norms due to ongoing second wave of the CoVID-19 pandemic and restrictions imposed by various state governments,” said SEBI in its circular.

So far, 170-odd listed companies in India have announced their financial results for the March quarter and fiscal year 2021.

SEBI has also extended the deadline for companies to file their annual secretarial compliance report by a month till 30 June, 2021.

Also, the deadline for submitting the statement of deviation or variation in use of funds (along with the financial results) has been extended by a month till 30 June, 2021.

Source:SEBI Circular dated 29 April, 2021

SEBI extends deadline for filing April-June corporate financial results to September 15

In a major relief to companies, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) today extended the deadline for submission of financial results for the quarter, half-year, and financial year ended 30 June 2020 to September 15. The SEBI circular said that it has received representations requesting an extension of time for submission of financial results for the quarter or half year-ended 30 June 2020, due to the shortened time gap between the extended deadline for submission of financial results for the period-ended 31 March 2020 and the quarter or half year-ended June 30, 2020.

Under Regulation 33 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (‘LODR Regulations’), a listed entity is required to submit its quarterly, half-yearly, or annual financial results within 45 days or 60 days, as applicable, from the end of each quarter, half year, or financial year.

Accordingly, listed entities were required to submit the financial results for the quarter, half-year-ended 30 June 2020 on or before 14 August 2020.

Earlier, the regulatory body had also extended the timeline for submission of financial results by listed entities for the quarter, half-year, or financial year-ended 31 March 2020 to 31 July 2020, due to the impact of the coronavirus pandemic.

SEBI further said that today’s announcement shall come into force with immediate effect and advised all stock exchanges to bring the provisions of this circular to the notice of all listed entities.

It has asked the stock exchanges to bring the provisions of the circular to the notice of all listed entities and also disseminate on their websites.

Meanwhile, SEBI’s move to relax the deadlines is expected to give more time to companies already struggling with operations part amid the pandemic.

In-line with the efforts to provide relief to the sagging businesses, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman earlier announced to decriminalise some offences under the Companies Act.

The SEBI has also introduced new norms to give more fund-raising flexibility to stressed firms.

The amendments can help promoters get financial investors on board without losing control of the company.

SEBI signs MoU with CBDT for Data Exchange

There is a need to create a regulator or authority for data business, which provides centralized regulation for all non-personal data exchanges,” the government-appointed panel said in the report. Such a regulator would be armed with legal powers to request data, supervise data sharing requests and settle disputes“.
A formal Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed today between the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for data exchange between the two organizations.
 
The MoU was signed by Smt. Anu J. Singh, Pr. DGIT (Systems), CBDT, and Smt. MadhabiPuri Buch, Whole Time Member, SEBI in the presence of senior officers from both the organizations via video conference.

The MoU will facilitate the sharing of data and information between SEBI and CBDT on an automatic and regular basis.

In addition to regular exchange of data, CBDT and SEBI will also exchange with each other, on request and suo moto basis, any information available in their respective databases, for the purpose of carrying out scrutiny, inspection, investigation and prosecution,” SEBI said in a statement.

In addition to regular exchange of data, SEBI and CBDT will also exchange with each other, on request and Suo moto basis, any information available in their respective databases, for the purpose of carrying out their functions under various laws.

The MoU comes into force from the date it was signed and is an ongoing initiative of CBDT and SEBI, who are already collaborating through various existing mechanisms.

A Data Exchange Steering Group has also been constituted for the initiative, which will meet periodically to review the data exchange status and take steps to further improve the effectiveness of the data-sharing mechanism.

The MoU marks the beginning of a new era of cooperation and synergy between SEBI and CBDT.

In the past, SEBI has cracked on several entities who had manipulated the stock prices of listed companies. The regulator had observed in the penny stock scam that promoters and market operators were using the stock exchange platform to evade taxes and launder black money.

Read the Press Release: SEBI signs MOU with CBDT for Data Exchange

Govt approval must for all FDIs from neighboring countries including China, in same lines as made by several countries

ASSOCHAM Secretary said that by amending the FDI rules through the Press Note No 3 , the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, has not only brought the FDI proposals for greenfield investments but also infusion into the existing projects, under the ‘government route’

The government has amended the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policy to discourage opportunistic investment in Indian companies by neighbouring countries in the midst of the Coronavirus pandemic.

This comes after China’s central bank recently raised stake in Housing Development Finance Corporation (HDFC) to a little over 1 percent.

As per the new amendment, FDI investments into Indian companies from the neighbouring countries will now require a nod from the government. This will be applicable to all countries that share a land border with India – such as China among others.

The amendment specifies that transfer of ownership of Indian companies arising out of FDI investments from neighbouring countries will now also be subject to government approval.

Similar FDI restrictions were earlier placed on Pakistan and Bangladesh.

These changes were notified via a Press Note by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT).

As per the note, “Government has reviewed the FDI policy for curbing opportunistic takeovers or acquisitions of Indian companies due to the current COVID-19 pandemic.”

The note states: “A non-resident entity can invest in India, subject to the FDI Policy except in those sectors/activities which are prohibited. However, an entity of a country, which shares land border with India or where the beneficial owner of an investment into India is situated in or is a citizen of any such country, can invest only under the Government route.”

“Further, a citizen of Pakistan or an entity incorporated in Pakistan can invest, only under the Government route, in sectors/activities other than defence, space, atomic energy and sectors/activities prohibited for foreign investment,” it said.

“In the event of the transfer of ownership of any existing or future FDI in an entity in India, directly or indirectly, resulting in the beneficial ownership falling within the restriction/purview of the mentioned sectors, such subsequent change in beneficial ownership will also require Government approval,” it added.

The decision will take effect from the date of Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) notification.

Earlier, reports said that market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) was monitoring equity transactions in India by Chinese companies and banks. Such transactions have come under the scanner at a time when the share prices of companies have dropped due to the economic impact of the coronavirus pandemic.

Globally, transactions by Chinese firms and institutions have come under scrutiny recently since the assets are being purchased at low valuations. Nations such as the US, Japan and Australia have already placed restrictions on Chinese companies buying assets.

Source:Amendment of FDI Policy

Large unlisted companies face quicker disclosure rule

Large unlisted companies may have to make quarterly or half-yearly filings, like their listed counterparts, as the government is considering amendments to the Companies Act to mandate more frequent disclosures in the aftermath of the IL&FS collapse.

The ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) is expected to prescribe a threshold for the disclosure requirement as it does not want to burden all companies, as a bulk of them are small companies, sources told TOI. The idea is to track the systemically important companies, which pose a risk to the entire system. “It will be an enabling amendment and MCA will decide on timing and extent of disclosures later,” said a source.

The assessment in the government is that there is a massive lag, often up to 18 months related to annual filings by companies, many of which have been non-compliant in the past. An entity like the beleaguered IL&FS was not on the radar till it collapsed and MCA is hoping that periodic disclosures would reduce the chances of such failures going undetected. Currently, companies are required to annually file the consolidated financial statement, balance sheet, profit & loss account, annual returns, directors’ report and certified true copy of board resolution with the designated RoC.

The proposal to increase disclosures is expected to be part of a set of amendments to be taken up by a group of ministers chaired by home minister Amit Shah, with defence minister Rajnath Singh, finance & corporate affairs minister Nirmala Sitharaman, commerce & industry minister Piyush Goyal and law & justice minister Ravi Shankar Prasad among the nine members of the committee, sources told TOI.

The ministerial panel, referred to as alternate mechanism by the Narendra Modi administration, will largely look at the recommendations of the company law panel, which submitted its report. While MCA was pushing for the introduction of the Bill during the recently concluded Winter Session, the legislation will now be placed before the Parliament as soon as it is cleared by ministers. The ministry is hoping to introduce the Bill during the budget session.

Source: Times of India

SEBI action against auditors not ‘turf war’: Ajay Tyagi

Capital markets regulator Sebi on Wednesday said its actions against auditors for faulty audits are within its “Parliamentary mandate”, and there is no question of “turf wars” on this issue.
SEBI Chairman Ajay Tyagi said the watchdog is working only to protect the interests of investors and limiting its actions to auditors of publicly listed firms.

In 2018, the regulator banned Price Waterhouse for two years from auditing any listed firm for its role in the Satyam Computer Services scam. However, the audit firm had successfully challenged the same in the Securities Appellate Tribunal and got the order quashed.

“It is our parliamentary mandate I would say to see that it is done and there is no trouble there. It goes to the basic issue of investor protection being the parliamentary mandate of Sebi,” he noted.

In November, the Supreme Court stayed a SAT order which had held that Sebi does not have the power to bar auditors.

“Our position is very simple — if they’re auditing listed companies based on which investors are investing, and if we find that that work has not been done properly and in investors’ interest, some audit firms should not be allowed to audit for sometime of the listed companies,” Tyagi said at an event here.

According to Tyagi, audit firms are important gatekeepers who help companies put out results and financial performance to the stock exchanges, based on which investors take the call whether to invest or not.

“It is not our case that Sebi is the agency which registers or regulates the auditors. It is nothing like that… We are not de-registering auditors. We don’t have the authority and we don’t wish to have that authority,” he said.

He also made it clear that Sebi’s expectation is that faulty audits should not lead to inflated profits or dividends.

Regarding IPO market, Tyagi said there has been an improvement in activities lately and that nearly a dozen issues of over Rs 15,000 crore are in the pipeline.

The regulator has given its wish-list for the budget to the finance ministry, includes ways to increase the activities in the corporate bond market, he said.

As SEBI reforms startup listing, SMEs must ensure funds are not misused

SME ExchangeAmid SEBI banning as many as 239 entities for alleged money laundering, taxation consultancy PwC has called for a three-year locking-in for the entire pre-listing capital held by promoters to curb tax evasion and other illegal activities through market platforms.

The agency has called for imposing a similar lock-in even for preferential allotments, as prescribed under the capital and disclosure requirement (ICDR) norms so that only serious investors access the market. The PwC report is part of a BSE-mandated review of SME listing process.

The premier bourse last week said that 100 entities were trading on its SME platform. The regulator Securities and Exchange Board (SEBI) on June 29 banned four publicly traded SMEs and 235 other related entities for alledgely misusing the exchange’s platform for money laundering and tax evasion.

The SEBI, in an interim order alleged that these entities made Rs 614 crore in illegal gains through suspected money laundering and tax evasion activities. The four companies banned are EcoFriendly Food Processing Park, Esteem Bio Organic Food Processing, Channel Nine Entertainment and HPC Biosciences. These are traded on the BSE SME Platform.

“The institutional trading platform (ITP) could be utilised as a tool for tax planning by staying invested in an SME for a period more than 12 months and exiting at a very high stock price thereby making huge gains with no tax liability,” PwC said in the report.

Accordingly, the report has suggested that the entire pre-listing capital held by promoters should be locked in for three years as “such restrictive conditions would discourage people from accessing the platform only for tax planning”. The BSE had launched ITP for its SME platform to facilitate start-ups and other SMEs to list without the mandatory IPO process which is time-consuming and capital intensive that small companies can hardly afford.

According to PTI, in addition to allowing SMEs and start-up companies to raise capital, the BSE SME platrfom also provides easier entry and exit options for informed investors like angel investors, venture capitalists and private equity players, apart from offering better visibility and wider investor base and tax benefits to long-term investors.

Meanwhile, the report also called for a reduction in trading lot size and shorter interval for review of lot size after many SMEs, merchant bankers and market-makers cited this as a disincentive for entering the market. The report said market participants want the timeframe to review the lot size to be reduced from the current six months and lower the trading lot requirement of Rs 1 lakh to attract retail investors to the segment.

As SEBI continues to make business easier, it is important SMEs do not eye illegal gains through suspected money laundering and tax evasion activities.