E-filing of tax returns jumps 68.5% in April, 2016

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0

E-filing of tax returns witnessed a jump of 68.5% in the first month of the current fiscal year with over 8.32 lakh assessees filing ITRs electronically.

The number of e-filed returns recorded in April 2015-16 stood at 4.94 lakh. In all, 4.33 crore returns were electronically filed last fiscal.

As per the data of Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), a total of 8,32,499 assessees have filed returns in April 2016.

Unlike previous year, the CBDT had operationalised all the nine types of Income Tax Returns (ITRs) filed by different types of assesses from this fiscal.

Over the years, the e-filing process has been simplified and assessees can file returns even from the comfort of their homes.

As per the CBDT, there were over 5.25 crore registered users (on April 30, 2016) and about 49.54% of the returns were received outside office hours. Also, 35.27% of assesses used the utility provided by the department.

An online ‘tax calculator’ for filers is meant to help taxpayers assess tax liability.

Divya Baweja, Partner, Deloitte Haskins and Sells LLP said during the initial years, e-filing was considered to be an onerous task, but now the process has become a “simple affair”.

“In recent years, tax department has made a conscious effort to ease the e-filing procedure by simplifying the tax return forms and introducing tax utilities which automatically picks data from previous year’s tax return/tax credit statement, thereby making it much easier for a common individual to file his or her tax return,” she said.

The CBDT had notified the new forms on March 30, and ITRs can be filed till the stipulated deadline of July 31.

The data further said during April, the maximum returns were filed from Maharashtra followed by Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh.

People with an income of more than Rs 50 lakh per annum and who own luxury items like yacht, aircraft or valuable jewellery will have to disclose these expensive assets with the IT department in the new ITRs.

Last year, the e-filing commenced on July 1 following the controversy over a 14-page form requiring assessees to disclose bank account and foreign travel details.

Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/E-filing-of-tax-returns-jumps-68-5-in-April/articleshow/52277938.cms

India, Mauritius to amend tax treaty

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

India will levy capital gains tax on investments routed through Mauritius from April 1 next year, bringing down the curtains on a contentious three decade-old rule that allowed companies to bring in billions of dollars by paying negligible taxes.

The taxes on capital gains will apply to investments made from April 1, 2017 and will be imposed at 50% or half of the domestic rate until March 31, 2019, and at the full rate thereafter.

How do people use tax havens to avoid paying taxes?

Through “round tripping” or “treaty shopping”.

How does round tripping work?

Round tripping refers to routing of investments by a resident of one country through another country back to his own country.

You get money out of India and transmit it to a tax haven with whom India has a bilateral tax avoidance treaty such as the double-taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA). In the tax haven, this money is treated as capital of a registered corporate entity. You now invest this money back in an Indian company as foreign direct investment (FDI) by buying stakes or invest it in Indian equity markets.

How does this help in avoiding taxes?

The entire purpose of this exercise is to window-dress as foreign capital your original money that you had taken out from India.

In the entire process, you end up paying zero or negligible taxes. In India, you can claim tax exemption citing the DTAA arguing that you have paid taxes in the source country. In the source country, taxes are negligible since it is a tax haven.

What is DTAA?

These are bilateral treaties signed between governments to prevent companies from being taxed twice over.

So, what was the problem with Mauritius?

Mauritius, and other tax havens, has almost negligible taxes. This was encouraging companies to route their investments in India through “shell” companies (those that exist only on paper) in Mauritius and avoid paying taxes.

How big was the problem?

At $94 billion, Mauritius has been the largest FDI source for India, accounting for 34% of total FDI in India between 2000 and 2015.

What are the changes that will plug this gap?

The changed DTAA will make it mandatory to pay capital gains tax on sale of shares in India by companies registered in Mauritius

When will the new rules kick-in?

Share sales in Indian companies by Mauritius-registered firms will be taxed at half of the applicable rate between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2019.

If the capital gains tax in India is 10% currently, Mauritius-registered companies will be taxed at 5% during the first two years beginning April 2017. Full capital gains tax will apply from April 1, 2019.

What about previous investments?

The new rules will not apply only to investments made before April 1, 2017, meaning share sale of investments made before this date will be exempt from capital gains tax.

Which companies will benefit from the reduced tax rates during the first two years?

The benefit of 50% reduction in tax rate during the transition period from April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2019 shall be subject to a limitation of benefit (LOB) Article.

A Mauritius-registered company (including a shell or conduit company) will not be entitled to lower tax rate, if it doesn’t spend at least Rs 27 lakh in Mauritius in the previous 12 months. This is called ‘purpose and bonafide business test’.

How will impact investors?

Many foreign investors will have to redraw their strategies. The incentive to route investments through Mauritius will cease to exist once the new rule kicks-in. This could raise their tax outgo.

What about markets?

It could hurt short-term foreign investor inflows into India, particularly from companies whose investment strategies are guided by minimising taxes. This could pull down markets initially.

Are these rules related to the general anti-avoidance rules (GAAR)?

GAAR are aimed at curbing tax avoidance and aim to give tax authorities the right to scrutinise transactions that they feel have been done to avoid taxes.

Under GAAR corporations may be forced to restructure salaries of employees if taxmen conclude that these were structured only to avoid taxes. Similarly, if a foreign investment transaction from Mauritius has taken place with an intent to exploit DTAA, it will come under GAAR.

Implementation of GAAR will take place from April, 2017.

Source: http://www.hindustantimes.com/business/india-mauritius-tax-treaty-all-you-need-to-know/story-QSOlvKyt6rrN7E00S7wp9K.html

IMF: Global corruption costs trillions in bribes, lost growth

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

Public sector corruption siphons $1.5 trillion to $2 trillion annually from the global economy in bribes and costs far more in stunted economic growth, lost tax revenues and sustained poverty, the International Monetary Fund said on Wednesday.

In a new research paper, the IMF said that tackling corruption is critical for the achievement of macroeconomic stability, one of the institution´s core mandates.

The Fund argues that strategies to fight corruption require transparency, a clear legal framework, a credible threat of prosecution and a strong drive to deregulate economies.

“While the direct economic costs of corruption are well known, the indirect costs may be even more substantial and debilitating,” IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde wrote in an essay accompanying the paper. “Corruption also has a broader corrosive impact on society.

It undermines trust in government and erodes the ethical standards of private citizens,” Lagarde added.

The paper, titled “Corruption: Costs and Mitigating Strategies,” follows Lagarde´s warning to Ukraine in February that the IMF would halt its $17.5-billion bailout for the strife-torn eastern European country unless it takes stronger action to fight corruption, including new governance reforms.

Lagarde is due to participate in a British government-sponsored anti-corruption summit in London on Thursday that will include U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and other senior officials including the presidents of Nigeria and Afghanistan.

Extrapolating from 2005 World Bank research, the paper estimated that around 2 percent of global gross domestic product is now paid in bribes annually.

But it said corruption´s indirect costs are substantially higher, reducing government revenues by encouraging tax evasion and reducing incentives to pay taxes, leaving less money available for public investments in infrastructure, health care and education.

Source: http://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/119186-IMF-Global-corruption-costs-trillions-in-bribes-lost-growth

Income tax refunds worth Rs 1.22 lakh cr issued in FY’16: Govt

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0

The Income Tax department has issued 2.10 crore refunds totalling over Rs 1.22 lakh crore in 2015-16, which saw 94 per cent the returns being filed online.

“During FY 2015-16, more than 2.10 crore refunds amounting to Rs 1,22,425 crore were paid compared to Rs 1,12,188 crore in the Financial Year 2014-15 and Rs 89,664 crore in the Financial Year 2013-14,” a finance ministry statement said.

In 2015-16, more than 94 per cent of income tax returns were filed online and 4.14 crore returns were processed by the Central Processing Centre (CPC), Bengaluru, without any human intervention.

Both the Central Board of Director Taxes (CBDT) and Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) are making optimum use of technology for expeditious disposal of assessment and refunds as well as for addressing the issues relating to custom clearance and facilitating trade among others, it said.

As regards indirect tax collections last fiscal, the indirect tax to GDP ratio is about 5.17 per cent as compared to 4.36 per cent for FY 2014-15.

Indirect tax to GDP ratio for the current Financial Year 2016-17 is estimated to be 5.20 per cent, the ministry said.

E-payment of Central Excise and Service Tax refunds and rebates through RTEGS/NEFT has been implemented and 80 percent of the refund amount is granted within 5 days for service exporters.

Single Window Interface for Facilitating Trade (SWIFT) acts as a single point interface for over 50 offices of six government agencies for clearance of Exim Goods and reduces documentation and costs, thereby benefiting over 97 per cent of India’s imports, the ministry added.

Source: http://www.firstpost.com/business/income-tax-refund-financial-year-2768332.html

Ultra-rich must declare cost price of expensive assets: CBDT

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0

People with annual income of over Rs 50 lakh will have to disclose the acquisition cost of all the assets like land, building and jewellery in the Income Tax return forms for assessment year 2016-17.

The luxury items to be disclosed will also include utensils, apparels and furnitures studded with precious stones and ornaments made of gold, silver, platinum or any other precious metal or alloy.

“The amount in respect of assets to be reported will be the cost price of such assets to the assessee,” the Central Board of Direct Taxes ( CBDT) has said while issuing instructions on the new ITR forms.

In case the precious items had been received as gifts, the assessee will have to declare the cost of acquisition by the previous owner along with value additions.
“In case where the cost at which the asset was acquired by the previous owner is not ascertainable and no wealth-tax return was filed in respect of such asset, the value may be estimated at the circle rate or bullion rate, as the case may be, on the date of acquisition by the assessee as increased by cost of improvement, if any, or March 31, 2016,” the instructions said.

The assessee will also have to declare whether such items and their value were disclosed at the time of filing wealth tax returns earlier.

The tax department had in April notified the new ITR forms for assessment year 2016-17 and introduced a fresh reporting column in ITR-1, ITR-2 and 2A called ‘Asset and Liability at the end of the year’ which is applicable in cases where the total income exceeds Rs 50 lakh.

“There are only 1.5 lakh individuals whose total income would be above Rs 50 lakh. This schedule in ITR only applies to ultra-rich and will not affect the common man,” Revenue Secretary Hasmukh Adhia had earlier said.

As per the new schedule in ITR forms, individuals and entities coming under this total income bracket will have to mention the total cost of movable and immovable assets.

While immovable assets include land and building, movable assets to be disclosed were cash in hand, jewellery, bullion, vehicles, yachts, boats, aircraft etc.

ITR-1 can be filed by individuals having income from salaries, one house property and from other sources including interest. ITR-2 is filed by Individuals and HUFs not having income from business or profession. ITR-2A is filed by those individuals and HUFs who do not have income from business or profession and capital gains and who do not hold foreign assets.

Read Source:
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/52106652.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

 

Companies need not make adjustments in net profit for MAT under IndAS

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate Updates, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0

Giving some clarity to companies switching to the new accounting standards, an expert Committee of Finance Ministry has said that there may not be any rise in tax burden for them.

The committee, led by retired Indian Revenue Service Officer MP Lohia, has concluded that corporates will not have to make any adjustments to net profits while computing book profits to pay minimum alternate tax (MAT).

“…considering the implicit relation between distributable profits which is available for payment of dividend distribution tax, no further adjustments are required to be made to the net profits (Excluding net other comprehensive income) of India AS compliant companies, other than those already specified…,” the Committee report said.

The government had set up the expert panel in June last year to resolve the differences arising in the computation of MAT when companies with a turnover of over Rs. 500 crore adopt the Indian Accounting Standards (IndAS) from 2016-17.

A number of firms had expressed concerns over their tax liabilities rising significantly due to the new system of accounting.

Public comments sought

The Finance Ministry has now sought public comments on the report by May 10, before it finalises the guidelines.

“The Committee submitted its report on 18 March, 2016 after having consultation with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA),” it said in a statement on Thursday.

“The net profits under Ind AS may include a sizeable amount of notional or unrealised gains or losses. If the MCA prescribes any further adjustments to the current year profits for computation of distributable profits, the requirement for any additional adjustments to the book profit under section 115JB may be examined,” said the Committee in its report.

It also recommended that items that are a part of the net other comprehensive income should be included in book profits for MAT purposes at an appropriate point of time. These include changes in revaluation surplus, re-measurements of defined benefit plans, gains and losses from investments in equity instruments designated at fair value.

It further said those adjustments recorded in reserves and which would subsequently be reclassified to the profit and loss account, should be included in book profits in the year in which these are classified to the profit and loss account.

Positive response

Experts welcomed the report and said it is in harmony with the current structure.

“Industry can now start preparing themselves for the accounting standards. It has indicated that the same treatment would be carried forward,” said Vikas Gupta, Partner, Nangia & Co.

Sunil Shah, Partner, Deloitte, concurred, saying: “The usual adjustments will continue to be made.

But, there could be an impact in cases where unrealised gains and losses on fair value accounting are recorded in the profit and loss account, which is permissible under IndAS.”

 

Source: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/tp-news/companies-need-not-make-adjustments-in-net-profit-for-mat-under-indas/article8534184.ece

If you bought property but have not deposited TDS, you may get a tax notice

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
While the rule has been in effect since June 1, 2013, many buyers are unaware or often confused about how to calculate the tax.If you bought property worth more than Rs 50 lakh and did not deduct tax at source (TDS) or failed to deposit the amount with the income tax department on time, you may have to pay a penalty of up to Rs 1 lakh.

Several taxpayers recently received notices from the department for no t doing so. Anyone buying real estate worth more than Rs 50 lakh has to deduct 1% of the price of the property before paying the seller. That 1% TDS has to be deposited with the tax department using Form 26 QB.

“The income tax department recently matched the TDS data with the data they received from the property registrar for property transactions over `50 lakh. Wherever there was a discrepancy, either the buyers failed to deduct or deposit the TDS, a notice has been sent,” said Vaibhav Sankla, director, H&R Block.

While the rule has been in effect since June 1, 2013, many buyers are unaware or often confused about how to calculate the tax. TDS has to be calculated on the total sale price  and not the amount exceeding Rs 50 lakh.

“Sometimes total sale price, which exceeds `50 lakh in aggregate, may be payable in instalments. The TDS in that case must be deducted from each instalment no matter how small the instalment is. Most people fail to do that,” said Archit Gupta, founder, ClearTax.in.

In case the payment is made in instalments, then TDS needs to be deducted at the time of making each payment. This TDS, deducted each time while paying the instalment, is to be deposited with the department by way of return cum challan (Form 26QB) within seven days of the following month of making the payment. Failing to do so can, apart from the dues and late filing interest, attract a penalty under Section 271H of up to Rs 1 lakh.

For those who have received a notice, the immediate corrective step to avoid paying a penalty is to pay the TDS along with the applicable interest and late filing fee.

The interest payable under Section 201 is 1% per month if tax wasn’t deducted and 1.5% in case this was done but not paid.

“This interest is calculated on the TDS amount from the date of payment, whether paid in lump sum or in instalments,” said Sankla. Take the example of a property purchased in January 2015 worth Rs 60 lakh where the first Rs 20 lakh was paid that month and the rest in June that year. For the first instalment of Rs 20 lakh, the interest will be applicable from January onwards, while that on the second payment will be from June 2015. There is also a late filing fee under Section 234E for delaying the interest payment of `200 per day, subject to the maximum of taxes due. There may be some leniency if the seller has already paid capital gains tax or claimed capital gains exemption (on the sale of property).

“The intent of the department is that there is no tax evasion. So, if the seller has already paid the taxes, the buyer can submit Form 26A certificate from a chartered accountant and request that penalty under Section 234E should not be levied,” said Gupta. Though this will save you from the late filing fee, the interest under Section 201 will still apply.

Buyers should also remember to issue Form 16B. “It is generated via TRACES and the seller may not be able to take tax credit for TDS deducted in case of non-filing or latefiling of Form 26QB,” said Gupta. Penalties remain the same for failing to do so.

Source:http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/51901867.cms