ClearTax raises $2 million from FF Angel and Sequoia Capital

Financial technology startup Defmacro Software , which owns and operates online tax returns filing platform ClearTax , has raised $2 million (Rs 13.3 crore) from FF Angel , the angel investing arm of Peter Thiel-led Founders Fund , and Sequoia Capital .

The five year-old company will use the proceeds from the round to launch a slew of consumer-focused tax-saving products, including mutual funds and other equity-linked saving schemes. It will also be adding to its leadership team, said Archit Gupta , chief executive of ClearTax.

“We have taken the long route, and now we are extremely excited to have some of the biggest thought leaders and investors on board as our partners,” Gupta said. “We are an instrument-agnostic platform that will allow consumers to choose their rate of return and select what to have in their tax savings basket.”

The transaction, which closed last week, marks FF Angel’s first investment in India, and comes a month after Bengaluru-based ClearTax secured $1.3 million in a seed funding round from a group of Silicon Valley investors including PayPal cofounder Max Levchin and Scott Banister, an early investor in Facebook and Uber.

Silicon Valley venture capitalists raise more money, give less away

Venture capitalists are raising money at the fastest rate in a decade, raking in about $13 billion in the first quarter of 2016.

But much of that cash won’t flow into new startups anytime soon. Rather, venture firms are bracing for a downturn and boosting reserves to keep companies they have already backed from going bust, said venture capitalists and limited partners.

“They are squirrels trying to pack their cheeks full of nuts,” said Ben Narasin, a partner at Canvas Ventures. “Everyone has been waiting for winter to start for a long time.”

The paradox of rising venture fundraising and falling venture investing is the latest sign of a tectonic shift in the tech startup realm. The extraordinary growth of so-called “unicorn” companies such as Uber and Airbnb – now valued at tens of billions of dollars, based on venture investments – has left many high-value startups with no “exit strategy,” in Silicon Valley parlance.

Burned by previous busts, Wall Street has lost its appetite for initial public offerings from money-losing companies. No venture-backed tech startup has gone public this year, and the few that did last year – including enterprise storage company Pure Storage, and cloud storage and file-sharing firm Box – have seen their share prices steadily sink. High valuations have also scared off potential acquirers.

Scale Venture Partners exemplifies the cautious approach taking hold in the VC industry. It chose to do one fewer investment from its last fundraising round and to increase its reserves by more than 10 percent.

“We will have to support our companies longer,” said Rory O’Driscoll, a partner at the firm, which raised a $335 million fund in January.

Accel Partners has reduced its pace of new investments since the middle of last year, while increasing its follow-on funding for portfolio companies, according to an analysis by venture capital database CB Insights.

The venture firm raised $2 billion in March, but it won’t tap into the new fund until late fall, said managing director Richard Wong.

Total U.S. venture investment fell to $12.1 billion in the first quarter – down 30 percent from the most recent peak of $17.3 billion in the second quarter of last year.

Chris Douvos, managing director of Venture Investment Associates, an investor in early-stage venture funds, says the funds he backs are increasing their reserves by 10 percent to 25 percent over what they had in previous funds.

The $13 billion raised by VCs is the third-largest quarter for fundraising since the dot-com peak in 2000, according to Thomson Reuters data. There is now $382 billion of dry powder – cash available to spend – held by both venture capital and private equity firms that invest in technology companies, according to investment banking and consulting firm Bulger Partners.

“It’s fast, and it’s a lot of dollars this year,” said Beezer Clarkson, managing director at Sapphire Ventures, which invests in early-stage venture funds.

Many VCs believe that more reserves will be needed for the big cash infusions that startups often need after establishing themselves but before turning a profit.

VCs are also seeing mutual funds retreat from late-stage startup financing deals. Mutual funds led just eight deals in the fourth quarter of last year, down from 26 in the second quarter, according to the research firm CB Insights.

The confluence of trends means that money-losing startups likely will struggle more for venture capital. That, in turn, could lead to more companies failing or cutting staff, cooling the red-hot market for tech talent. It could also strengthen the hand of dominant tech companies, who may face fewer disruptive rivals and attract employees tired of volatile startup life, according to tech recruiters.

CASH BURN

Until recently, many venture capitalists have had a land-grab mentality, even with more obscure startups such as Magic Leap – an augmented reality company that raised about $800 million in February – or Social Finance, a startup in the highly scrutinized fintech sector that raised $1 billion in September.

Investors competed fiercely to finance hot companies they believed could be the next Google or Facebook. Higher prices for smaller stakes drove up valuations in companies, including many who burned cash quickly in a quest for growth. Many venture capitalists say they overpaid by 20 to 30 percent, and now have to keep those companies afloat.

Over the past six months, however, nervous whispers about a tech bubble have sparked rising skepticism of venture-dependent startups with stratospheric price tags.

The same venture capitalists who jousted in bidding wars for the next great deal just six months ago are now fending off appeals.

Canvas Ventures, Norwest Venture Partners and Accel Partners – among Silicon Valley’s more prominent firms – say they are getting more calls from peers asking them to join a late-stage round for companies running out of cash.

“We get a lot more ‘special opportunities, just for you,'” said Wong, of Accel Partners. “We get the phone calls, along with everyone else.”

PAPER GAINS

For now, venture capitalists have little problem raising money, despite their new hesitance to spend it and the inability of many startups to turn profits or go public.

That’s in part because many VC firms are currently showing huge paper gains in the value of their portfolios. Many firms are raising as much as possible now, in case valuations drop in so-called “down rounds,” when later stage investors pay less for company stakes than earlier ones, and the returns on their investments plummet, according to limited partners.

Signs of falling returns are already emerging. Cambridge Associates, an investment advisor, measured a -0.4 percent return on the U.S. Venture Capital Index for the third quarter of last year, the first down quarter since 2011.

First Round Capital, an early-stage venture firm, warned its limited partners in a letter a year ago that the seed-stage venture capital deals will see much lower returns in the next several years.

But that warning didn’t scare Douvos, an investor in First Round, which was an early backer of Uber and made a bundle on the IPOs of Square and OnDeck Capital.

“Fund performance will soften,” Douvos said. But, he said, “The returns from First Round are so good that nothing else really matters.”

Read Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-venture-fundraising-idUSKCN0Y41DQ

 

Facebook revenue smashes expectations, rises more than 50 per cent as mobile ad sales surge

Riding on advertisement growth, social media giant Facebook on Wednesday reported a stellar $1.5 billion first-quarter profit or 52 cents per share in 2016

Facebook Inc’s quarterly revenue rose more than 50 per cent, handily beating Wall Street expectations as its wildly popular mobile app and a push into live video lured new advertisers and encouraged existing ones to boost spending.

The company’s shares rose 9.5 per cent in after-hours trading on Wednesday to $118.39, setting it on track to open at a new high on Thursday, at nearly triple its initial public offering four years ago.

Facebook also announced it will create a new class of non-voting shares in a move aimed at letting Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg give away his wealth without relinquishing control of the social media juggernaut he founded.

The company plans to create a new class of non-voting shares, which would be given as a dividend to existing shareholders. That would allow Zuckerberg, who wants to give away 99 per cent of his wealth, to sell non-voting stock to fund philanthropy and keep the voting stock that assures his control.

Alphabet Inc passed a similar proposal in 2014 that ensured its founders’ control by creating new non-voting shares.

Some 1.65 billion people used Facebook monthly as of March 31, up from 1.44 billion a year earlier. Zuckerberg said users were spending more than 50 minutes per day on Facebook, Instagram and Messenger, a huge amount of time given the millions of apps available to users.

Advertisers are shifting money from television to web and mobile platforms, and Facebook is one of the biggest beneficiaries. It faces fierce competition in the mobile video market, where rivals Snapchat and YouTube also garner billions of video views every day.

Facebook recently expanded its live video product, rolling out several new features and making it more prominent on the app to encourage users to create videos and share them. The quarterly results showed success attracting advertisers with the move, and the company was able to expand its operating profit margin to 55 per cent from 52 per cent a year earlier.

“The company consistently ‘warns’ about higher spending, but they consistently manage their spending to deliver earnings upside. They’re an impressive company, and they leave very little room for criticism,” said Wedbush Securities analyst Michael Pachter, who called the operating margin a good surprise.

Facebook did not offer details on sales of its Oculus Rift virtual reality headset, but emphasized that it was early days and said that sales would not significantly impact 2016 revenue.

The results come after disappointments for investors from several major Silicon Valley firms.

“After Intel and IBM last week, and then Twitter and Apple yesterday, this is by far the best number I’ve seen in technology,” said Daniel Morgan, senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust Company which owns about $40 million worth of Facebook shares, commenting specifically about Facebook ad revenue.

Facebook has not begun advertising on some of its most popular apps. “They haven’t yet turned on the monetization spigot for Messenger or WhatsApp, so there should be significant headroom still,” said Jan Dawson, chief analyst at Jackdaw Research.

The company’s net income attributable to common shareholders nearly tripled to $1.51 billion, or 52 cents per share, in the first quarter from $509 million, or 18 cents per share, a year earlier.

Excluding items, the company earned 77 cents per share, beating Wall Street’s 62-cent consensus.

Total revenue rose to $5.38 billion from $3.54 billion, with ad revenue increasing 56.8 per cent to $5.20 billion. Mobile ad revenue accounted for about 82 per cent of total ad revenue, compared with about 73 per cent a year earlier.

Analysts on average had expected revenue of $5.26 billion.
If the stock proposal is approved – and Zuckerberg has a majority of voting stock – the company will effectively carry out a 3-for-1 stock split, issuing two shares of non-voting Class C capital stock as a one-time stock dividend for each share of Class A and Class B common stock.

Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, announced last year that they would give away 99 per cent of their Facebook shares to fund charitable endeavors.

Investors said they were not concerned that Zuckerberg would have increasing control, pointing to the company’s consistent ability to grow and exceed expectations.

“I honestly don’t think anyone cares if he has more power, since he’s done everything right since they went public,” said Pachter.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/52020175.cms