New Year GIFT for MNC law and audit firms

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

Foreign law and accountancy firms now have a chance to operate in India on their own. On January 3, the ministry of commerce and industry amended a rule allowing such foreign firms to set up offices and advise clients from SEZs. The move will initially benefit Gujarat International Finance Tec-City (GIFT).

Current regulations so far do not permit multinational law firms to operate in the country. Indian law and accountancy firms were also not allowed to operate from any of the SEZs. That rule has now been amended which would benefit financial centres.

The notification, dated January 6 but issued on January 3, by the department of commerce allows foreign law and accountancy firms to be established in SEZs. The earlier version of the rule, prior to the amendment, had excluded legal services and accounting.

“This will be the big enabler for the legal and accounting firms to expand their services in multi-services SEZ with IFSC (International Finance Service Centre) and thereby export their services to various global players,” said Nitin Potdar, partner, J Sagar, a law firm. As of now, only GIFT is a multi-services SEZ with an IFSC in India.

“Until now, no foreign law firm could operate in India and not even Indian firms were allowed to provide their services in any of the SEZs. The new amendment allows not only Indian law or accountancy firms to set up a base in GIFT, but even multinationals can directly advise upon international disputes or arbitration by setting up a base there,” Dipesh Shah, head, IFSC at GIFT, told ET.

While many foreign professional services firms such as Deloitte, PwC, KPMG and EY are present in India, they cannot directly operate as auditors and require an Indian affiliate. This amendment does away with that requirement at least in the case of GIFT.

Many Indian law firms have been opposing the entry of multinational law firms in India for some time. Going ahead, many multinationals could set up base in India but they will only be able to advise on cross-border transactions or disputes. Some are also looking to quickly take advantage of this and set up base in GIFT.

“Allowing law firms in GIFT for arbitration or other work would work as a catalyst for economic activities in the country. We ourselves are in discussions to set up an office in GIFT,” said Nishith Desai, founder of law firm Nishith Desai Associates.

But the amendment does not permit foreign law firms to advise Indian clients on local businesses and regulations. Their advice and help would be strictly restricted to arbitrations fought in GIFT, international mergers and acquisitions, international taxation or any other advice for operations outside India.

Industry experts say some foreign law firms may consider partnerships with Indian firms under the arrangement. There could also be stiff competition as both Indian and foreign firms would compete for the same clients in GIFT.

“Many law firms may set up their base in GIFT but that would take some time. And I am a firm believer that it would only lead to betterment of all law firms,” said Desai.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/56529046.cms

Rotation of auditors and its side effects

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

The Companies Act, 2013, has introduced important audit reforms. One of the important reforms is rotation of the auditor.

Important provisions under this reform

  • All listed companies; unlisted public limited companies having paid-up share capital of Rs 10 crore or more; all private limited companies having paid-up share capital of Rs 20 crore or more, and all companies having public borrowings from financial institutions, banks or public deposit of Rs 50 crore or more are required to rotate their auditor.
  • An individual cannot continue as an auditor for more than one term of five years and an audit firm cannot continue as an auditor for more than two terms of five years
  • The cooling off period is five years.
  • The provision must be complied by April 1, 2017.

Benefits of this reform

  • This is expected to improve audit quality, resulting in improved financial reporting.
  • Would give local auditors more leverage, if implemented properly along with some other measures.

Local auditors v/s the Big Four

  • Local firms dominate the Indian audit market. However, the presence of the Big Four audit firms (Deloitte, PWC, E&Y and KPMG) cannot be ignored.
  • The Big Four are the largest professional service network in the world. They provide audit, assurance, tax, consulting, advisory, actuarial, corporate finance and advisory services. In India, they cannot provide audit services directly.
    • It is alleged that they flout rules while providing audit and assurance services. Many foreign investors put a condition that the auditor of their choice should be appointed. This helps the Big Four audit firms to grow in India.
    • There is an apprehension that many companies that get their accounts audited by local firms will appoint one of the Big Four or another large international professional service network as auditors.
    • Hence, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs had notified the constitution of a three-member expert group to look into the complaint that the Big Four are circumventing rules and to find ways to help local firms.

Should the government intervene?

  • Local auditors are mostly present in tier 2 and tier 3 cities and audit 62 % of the companies listed on BSE 500.
  • They provide a variety of services to small companies. They lack aspiration to become big.
  • Therefore, it is debatable whether there is a case for government’s intervention to protect local audit firms

Way ahead and Conclusion

Chartered accountants are prohibited from soliciting professional work through advertisement or otherwise. But they can respond to tenders.

  • The practice of issuing a tender for the appointment of internal auditors is quite common among public enterprises. Such a practice is not common among private-sector companies.
  • Tendering is the right method to search for the right audit firm. This increases choice and reduces auditing cost through competition.
  • Companies should not limit their choice to the Big Four and other international firms or a few large local audit firms.
  • There are local firms that have capabilities to audit large and complex transactions. Search through tendering process would help to identify such firms.

It will be interesting to see how the new rules regarding rotation of auditors will actually impact the auditing profession.

 

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/rotation-of-auditors-and-its-side-effects-116100900736_1.html

Workflow boost for accountants, advisory firms

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
Plans are afoot to train 20,000 chartered accountants by March 2017 in different aspects of the GST
Corporate India is just about getting started to get their businesses ready for the goods and services tax ( GST) regime. This has opened up a sizable business opportunity for tax experts, advisory firms, and law firms. What has come as a shot in the arm for chartered accountants and cost accountants is the mandatory need for tax audits for certain companies under the GST regime.
Under Section 42 ( 4) of the draft Model GST Law, businesses with to- be- prescribed turnover have to get their accounts audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant. Accordingly, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India ( ICAI) is preparing to boost training for its members to enable them to make the most out of the opportunity. “ Plans are afoot to train 20,000 chartered accountants by March 2017 in different aspects of the GST for conducting impact studies and filing of GST returns,” says Madhukar N Hiregange, senior partner, Hiregange & Associates, and chairman of indirect tax committee at the ICAI. To start with, over the next two months, around 500 trainers will go through the GST programme.
In the coming months, some key areas of work for accountancy professionals would relate to conducting impact studies for clients, taking companies through GST registration and the transition process, filing taxes and getting tax refunds, ensuring there are no mismatches in the tax input- output chain. Even though the new indirect tax system will come into effect from April 2017, tax experts expect the transition opportunity to last for the next two years.
“Compliance will become a major area of practice for accountants,” says Hiregange. He expects many companies to outsource their tax compliance work to tax consultancies and chartered accountancy firms.
In the coming months, businesses would have to re- jig their IT systems and also make businesses of their suppliers, distributors and sellers GSTcompliant.
The challenge for small and mid- sized companies would be to come up to speed with technology requirements under the GST regime. “ Many companies would need hand- holding while interacting with the GST Network, the IT backbone, in filing tax returns and in claiming returns,” says Hiregange. That may spawn small firms specialising in GST- related compliance issues. The ICAI is also looking at revising its syllabus by November this year in keeping with the latest changes in the indirect tax system.
Sensing the business opportunity that is up for grabs, most corporate law firms are ramping up their indirect tax practice. For instance, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, a law firm that has been advising the GST Network, has put in place a special team of 20- odd tax experts to tackle GST- related issues. “ In addition, there are 150- 200 tax lawyers across the country taking up sector- specific indirect tax related issues,” says a spokesperson from the law firm.
Similarly, accounting and advisory firms, especially the ‘big four’, are betting big on the opportunity. EY, for instance, has a team of 800- odd tax and advisory professionals working on GST. “ This year, we anticipate an increase of 25 per cent in our current headcount for GST,” said a company spokesperson. Many of these professionals come with expertise in supply chain, analytics, technology and processes.
According to Nitin Atroley, partner and head of sales & markets at KPMG, the firm set up a special team with members from different countries like Malaysia, Singapore and Australia that have earlier gone through the process of adopting GST.
Prashant Raizada, partner, indirect tax, BDO India, feels the challenge to transition to the new tax regime would be most felt by small and mediumsized enterprises. “ In Tier2and – 3 cities, businesses may not be that well versed in use of technology,” said Raizada. It will be busy days ahead for tax experts, accountants and consultants, as well as their clients as they get up to speed with the GST regime.

Government may offer foreign auditors direct access

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate Updates, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

In a move that signals the government’s intent to allow foreign audit firms to register and operate directly in the Indian market, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs has written to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) to seek its views and recommendations on the government proposal.

Currently, Indian laws don’t allow any multinational accounting firm to be registered in India as auditors. The thinking within the government is that as part of an ongoing reforms process, the services sector should also be liberalised and global auditing firms could be allowed to operate directly here to make the profession more competitive and robust.

The ministry has written to the institute on August 10, said ICAI president M Devaraja Reddy . The institute is set to discuss this proposal in a meeting to be held on August 24 and then respond to the the request, he added.

The government will have to amend the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 that regulates the accounting profession in India to allow foreign firms to operate in India.

Currently, MNC professional services firms that offer auditing services in India, including the Big Four – EY, PwC, Deloitte and KPMG – audit Indian companies through a bunch of their network or affiliate firms.

Though for all internal purposes, the accounting practice in any of the Big Four is treated just as any other practice area like tax, transactions, or advisory , but on paper, the affiliate firms are run as separate partnerships.

If the Indian government does allow direct entry, more global firms are likely to invest big in their India network and also the market could see the entry of new players.

“Given the significant exposure of global investors in Indian firms, it’s natural to ask for an auditor who they are more comfortable with. More global players will mean more choice and better quality of services. It will also enhance the credibility of Indian markets,” says the CEO of a global firm.

For Indian audit firms, the move could spell further trouble, as they have been steadily losing the most lucrative audit assignments to the Big Four over the past two decades.The four global firms now dominate the book-keeping business in India. As it is, the mandatory audit rotation brought in by the Companies Act 2013, is set to kick off from April 1, 2017 and that will further see a movement of big accounts away from Indian firms towards the Big Four and other two prominent network firms, Grant Thornton and BDO.

In major markets, the global giants have a monopoly over the audit business – 99 per cent of companies in FTSE are audited by the Big Four firms, while 86 per cent of those listed on the NYSE work with these audit firms.

But in India, 62 per cent of the BSE 500 companies, including some of India Inc’s biggest firms, are still not audited by the Big Four.For example, Reliance has had Chaturvedi & Shah as auditors for decades, L&T books have been audited by Sharp & Tannan and Hindalco had stayed on with Singhi & Co for long time.In China, the Big Four lost domination to local firms after the government brought in regulations that were unfavourable for the global players. Indian accounting firms are also betting on government regulations that will keep their interests protected.

“The government will have to find a middle ground. It will have to create a regulatory framework that allows the global firms to invest and practice, also keeping in mind the concerns of the Indian accounting firms which service a large section of Indian companies, both big and small,” said the CEO of a leading Indian accounting firm.

Multipurpose Empanelment Form for the year 2016-17

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate Updates | 0

Multipurpose Empanelment Form of ICAI (MEF-ICAI), an online application, is meant for allotment of Bank / Branch Audits to the ICAI Members/ CA Firms, which can be filled and submitted at the MEFICAI website directly.

Online Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF) for the year 2016-17 is live at www.meficai.org. The last date for submission of online MEF Form for the year 2016-17 is 31st August, 2016 and for submission of hard copy of “DECLARATION FOR MEF 2016-17” is 12th September, 2016.

In case, an applicant faces any problem regarding MEF, complaint may be lodged by accessing complaint-box link available on www.meficai.org

 

In case, the complaint is not resolved or replied within a week, members can call at 011-30110444, 30110411, 30110440, 30110480, 30110438, 30110451 and 30110508 (between 3.00 PM to 5.00 PM on all working days).

 

With kind regards,

Prafulla Premsukh Chhajed

Chairman, Professional Development Committee

 

ADVISORY FOR FILLING MULTIPURPOSE EMPANELMENT FORM 2016-17

Submit data on loan defaulters to credit information firms, RBI tells banks

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0

The Reserve Bank of India has advised banks and financial institutions to submit data on defaulting borrowers from December 2014 onwards to Credit Information Companies (CICs) and not to the RBI.

Releasing this information, obtained through a portal complaint, Delhi-based Right to Information activist Subhash Chandra Agrawal said on Friday that it is significant to note that the RBI has not so far complied with the Supreme Court order of December 12, 2015, in the RBI vs PP Kapoor (Civil 94 of 2015) case, where it wanted the RBI to make public details of the top 100 loan defaulters among industrialists.

The details required including the names of the businessmen, firm name, principal amount, interest amount, date of default, and date of availing the loan.

In a June 24 letter addressed to Agrawal in response to his PG Portal complaint dated April 24, the RBI said it has submitted to the Supreme Court a list of defaulters above Rs. 500 crore in a sealed cover and claimed that the said information is confidential and requested that it may not be revealed to the public.

The matter is still under consideration of the Supreme Court.

Source: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/money-and-banking/submit-data-on-loan-defaulters-to-credit-information-firms-rbi-tells-banks/article8797928.ece

CBDT clears the air on tax collection at source

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate Updates, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has made it clear that the 1 per cent tax collection at source (TCS) — introduced in this year’s Budget — will apply only to the cash component and not the entire sale consideration. This has been conveyed in a clarificatory circular issued by the CBDT on Friday.

To curb the cash economy, Budget 2016 had introduced a provision in income tax law requiring the seller to collect 1 per cent tax at source from the purchaser on the sale in cash of certain goods or provision of services in excess of ₹2 lakh.

Q&A format

The circular — in the form of question and answer — has been issued to clarify the applicability of the provision where the sale consideration received is partly in cash and partly in cheque

TCS will be applicable only on the cash component of the sales amount, and not on the whole of sales consideration, the CBDT circular said.

For instance, if goods worth ₹5 lakh are purchased for ₹2 lakh in cheque and ₹3 lakh in cash, 1 per cent tax will be levied only on ₹3 lakh.

Also, in cash-and-cheque transactions where the cash component is less than ₹2 lakh, there won’t be any TCS, the CBDT clarified. Further, TCS will not be levied if the cash receipt does not exceed ₹2 lakh, even if the sale consideration exceeds ₹2 lakh, said the circular.

Amit Maheshwari, Partner at CA firm Ashok Maheshwary & Associates, said the CBDT has rightly restricted the 1 per cent TCS to the cash component. This is in line with the Centre’s objective to curb the cash economy and target the expenditure side of black money, he noted.

Rahul Jain, Partner, Nangia & Co, said the Centre’s constant efforts to clarify the law and avoid possible disputes are heartening. In the absence of clarification, various local trade associations, head offices of stores selling high value items, etc had taken a conservative position.

“While it is excellent to see the Centre pulling all stops to nip disputes in the bud, one wishes the law was drafted better to avoid confusion in the first place,” he added.

Source: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/policy/cbdt-clears-the-air-on-tax-collection-at-source/article8775966.ece