“There is a need to create a regulator or authority for data business, which provides centralized regulation for all non-personal data exchanges,” the government-appointed panel said in the report. Such a regulator would be armed with legal powers to request data, supervise data sharing requests and settle disputes“.
A formal Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed today between the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for data exchange between the two organizations.
The MoU was signed by Smt. Anu J. Singh, Pr. DGIT (Systems), CBDT, and Smt. MadhabiPuri Buch, Whole Time Member, SEBI in the presence of senior officers from both the organizations via video conference.
The MoU will facilitate the sharing of data and information between SEBI and CBDT on an automatic and regular basis.
In addition to regular exchange of data, CBDT and SEBI will also exchange with each other, on request and suo moto basis, any information available in their respective databases, for the purpose of carrying out scrutiny, inspection, investigation and prosecution,” SEBI said in a statement.
In addition to regular exchange of data, SEBI and CBDT will also exchange with each other, on request and Suo moto basis, any information available in their respective databases, for the purpose of carrying out their functions under various laws.
The MoU comes into force from the date it was signed and is an ongoing initiative of CBDT and SEBI, who are already collaborating through various existing mechanisms.
A Data Exchange Steering Group has also been constituted for the initiative, which will meet periodically to review the data exchange status and take steps to further improve the effectiveness of the data-sharing mechanism.
The MoU marks the beginning of a new era of cooperation and synergy between SEBI and CBDT.
In the past, SEBI has cracked on several entities who had manipulated the stock prices of listed companies. The regulator had observed in the penny stock scam that promoters and market operators were using the stock exchange platform to evade taxes and launder black money.
The finance minister heads the Economic Task Force that was set up by the Prime Minister.
Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced a slew of measures for extension of statutory and regulatory compliances in view of the corona virus pandemic spreading its wings and impacting the economy.
Allaying fears that there is no economic emergency in the country, FM said that the Economic Task Force will soon announce an economic relief package to deal with the impact of the corona virus pandemic on the economy.
These are largely in the area of ease of doing business, by providing reliefs in extension of due dates for compliances and reliefs from late fee and penalties, in view of the lock downs announced in several states and districts.
Income Tax
The last date for filing income tax returns for Financial Year 2018-19, extended from 31st March, 2020 to 30th June, 2020.
Aadhaar-PAN linking date extended from 31st March, 2020 to 30th June, 2020.
Vivad se Vishwas scheme – no additional 10% amount, if payment made by June 30, 2020.
Due dates for issue of notice, intimation, notification, approval order, sanction order, filing of appeal, furnishing of return, statements, applications, reports, any other documents and time limit for completion of proceedings by the authority and any compliance by the taxpayer including investment in saving instruments or investments for roll over benefit of capital gains under Income Tax Act, Wealth Tax Act, Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act, Black Money Act, STT law, CTT Law, Equalization Levy law, Vivad Se Vishwas law where the time limit is expiring between 20th March 2020 to 29th June 2020 extended to 30th June 2020.
For delayed payments of advanced tax, self-assessment tax, regular tax, TDS, TCS, equalization levy, STT, CTT made between 20th March 2020 and 30th June 2020, reduced interest rate at 9% instead of 12 %/18 % per annum ( i.e. 0.75% per month instead of 1/1.5 percent per month) will be charged for this period. No late fee/penalty shall be charged for delay relating to this period.
Necessary legal circulars and legislative amendments for giving effect to the aforesaid relief shall be issued in due course.
GST/Indirect Tax
Last date for filing GSTR-3B in March, April and May 2020 extended till the last week of 30th June, 2020 for those having aggregate annual turnover less than Rs. 5 Crore. No interest, late fee, and penalty to be charged.
For any delayed payment made between 20th March 2020 and 30th June 2020 reduced rate of interest @9 % per annum ( current interest rate is 18 % per annum) will be charged. No late fee and penalty to be charged, if complied before till 30th June 2020.
Date for opting for composition scheme is extended till the last week of June, 2020. Further, the last date for making payments for the quarter ending 31st March, 2020 and filing of return for 2019-20 by the composition dealers will be extended till the last week of June, 2020.
Date for filing GST annual returns of FY 18-19, which is due on 31st March, 2020 is extended till the last week of June 2020.
Due date for issue of notice, notification, approval order, sanction order, filing of appeal, furnishing of return, statements, applications, reports, any other documents, time limit for any compliance under the GST laws where the time limit is expiring between 20th March 2020 to 29th June 2020 extended to 30th June 2020.
Necessary legal circulars and legislative amendments to give effect to the aforesaid GST relief shall follow with the approval of GST Council.
Payment date under Sabka Vishwas Scheme extended to 30th June, 2020. No interest for this period shall be charged if paid by 30th June, 2020.
Customs
Custom clearance will operate 24X7 till June 30, 2020.
Due date for issue of notice, notification, approval order, sanction order, filing of appeal, furnishing applications, reports, any other documents etc., time limit for any compliance under the Customs Act and other allied Laws where the time limit is expiring between 20th March 2020 to 29th June 2020 shall be extended to 30th June 2020.
Financial Services
Relaxations for 3 months
Debit cardholders to withdraw cash for free from any other banks’ ATM for 3 months
Waiver of minimum balance fee
Reduced bank charges for digital trade transactions for all trade finance consumers
Corporate Affairs
No additional fees shall be charged for late filing during a moratorium period from 01st April to 30th September 2020, in respect of any document, return, statement etc., required to be filed in the MCA-21 Registry, irrespective of its due date, which will not only reduce the compliance burden, including financial burden of companies/ LLPs at large, but also enable long-standing non-compliant companies/ LLPs to make a ‘fresh start’;
The mandatory requirement of holding meetings of the Board of the companies within prescribed interval provided in the Companies Act (120 days), 2013, shall be extended by a period of 60 days till next two quarters i.e., till 30th September;
Applicability of Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2020 shall be made applicable from the financial year 2020-2021 instead of from 2019-2020 notified earlier. This will significantly ease the burden on companies & their auditors for the year 2019-20.
As per Schedule 4 to the Companies Act, 2013, Independent Directors are required to hold at least one meeting without the attendance of Non-independent directors and members of management. For the year 2019-20, if the IDs of a company have not been able to hold even one meeting, the same shall not be viewed as a violation.
Requirement to create a Deposit reserve of 20% of deposits maturing during the financial year 2020-21 before 30th April 2020 shall be allowed to be complied with till 30th June 2020.
Requirement to invest 15% of debentures maturing during a particular year in specified instruments before 30th April 2020, may be done so before 30th June 2020.
Newly incorporated companies are required to submit commencement of Business certificate within 6 months of incorporation. This is now extended to 12 months.
Non-compliance of minimum residency in India for a period of at least 182 days by at least one director of every company, under Section 149 of the Companies Act, shall not be treated as a violation.
Due to the emerging financial distress faced by most companies on account of the large-scale economic distress caused by COVID 19, it has been decided to raise the threshold of default under section 4 of the IBC 2016 to Rs 1 crore (from the existing threshold of Rs 1 lakh). This will by and large prevent triggering of insolvency proceedings against MSMEs. If the current situation continues beyond 30th of April 2020, we may consider suspending section 7, 9 and 10 of the IBC 2016 for a period of 6 months so as to stop companies at large from being forced into insolvency proceedings in such force majeure causes of default.
Detailed notifications/circulars in this regard shall be issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs separately.
Department of Commerce
Extension of timelines for various compliance and procedures will be given. Detailed notifications will be issued by Ministry of Commerce.
Taxpayers get one more chance to clear their tax dues.
The CBDT has extended till January 31 the last date for taxpayers to avail a “one-time” facility to apply for compounding of income tax offences, an order issued on Friday said.
The earlier deadline was December 31, 2019.
In I-T parlance, compounding means that the taxman does not file a prosecution case against the offender or tax evader in court in lieu of payment of due taxes and surcharges.
The decision to extend the last date was taken “in view of references received from field formations, including requests made by ICAI (Institute of Chartered Accountants of India) chapters wherein it has been brought to the notice of the CBDT that the taxpayers could not avail the benefit of the one-time relaxation window due to genuine hardships,” the order issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxation (CBDT) said.
The order was accessed by PTI.
Final opportunity
Hence, the order stated, the date has been extended to give a final opportunity to such taxpayers and reduce the pendency of existing prosecution cases before the courts.
Applications, as per the procedure of the scheme, are to be filed before the appropriate competent authority that is either a principal chief commissioner or a chief commissioner or a principal director general or director general of the Income-Tax Department “on or before” January 31, 2020.
The CBDT, while launching the scheme in September last year, had said that this “one-time measure” is being undertaken to mitigate unintended hardship to taxpayers in deserving cases and to reduce the pendency of existing prosecution cases before the courts.
“Cases have been brought to the notice of CBDT where the taxpayers could not apply for compounding of the offence as the compounding application was filed beyond 12 months,” it had said.
The riders
The relaxation, however, shall not be available in respect of an offence which is generally or normally not compoundable, indicating instances of serious tax evasion, financial crime, terror financing, money laundering, possession of illegal foreign assets, benami properties or conviction by a court in the past.
The CBDT circular added that application for compounding of an income tax offence can be filed in cases where: Prosecution proceedings are pending before any court of law for more than 12 months or any compounding application for an offence filed previously was withdrawn by the applicant solely for the reason that such application was filed beyond 12 months or any compounding application for an offence had been rejected previously solely for technical reasons.
The CBDT, which frames policy for the tax department, had earlier said that compounding of offences is “not a matter of right” and the department can extend such a relief only in certain cases.
This will be done keeping in view factors like “conduct of the person, the nature and magnitude of the offence on the context of the facts and circumstances of each case,” it had said.
The income-tax (I-T) department is estimating tax recovery of over Rs 100 billion from companies that have been struck off from records of the Registrar of Companies (RoC) last year.
The tax department is in the process of filing a petition before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for restoration of registration in as many as 50,000 such companies.
The RoCs had struck off 300,000 companies after it was found they had not filed their statutory returns. Directors of these companies have been prohibited from holding directorships in any other company.
The move follows Central Board of Direct Taxes’ (CBDT) directive to identify, process and file petition to restore these companies by August 31. The board also asked the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) not to oppose the restoration application in the tribunal, as such a move would refrain them from launching tax recovery proceedings against these firms.
“Several of these companies are restricted to operate their bank accounts and movable and immovable properties until they are restored. The restoration will compel these firms to make relevant disclosures of credentials under Companies Act, and then accordingly tax proceeding will be initiated for tax recovery,” said an I-T official.
Tax industry experts, too, believe that restoration is essential to recover taxes due from these firms.
“The tax department is contesting the strike off of so-called companies as in several cases there would be pending tax demands that cannot be recovered if the company is not active. Also, even in cases where genuine companies have been struck off, with the best intentions, the companies would not be able to pay the tax dues as all their assets including bank accounts would be non-operational,” said Amit Maheshwari, partner at Ashok Maheshwary & Associates LLP.
The I-T department is of the view that these companies abused their corporate structure by creating multi-layering during demonetisation for cash deposits. I-T probe also reveals that many individuals have used these firms for siphoning money or converting undisclosed cash to legitimate money post the note ban.
Official data say that 35,000 companies deposited and withdrew cash worth over Rs 170 billion after the note ban, through about 60,000 bank accounts.
It was noticed that the accounts that had negligible balance on November 8, 2016, have seen significant cash deposits and withdrawal during this period.
According to people with knowledge of the matter, along with restoration, the I-T department will also start issuing notices to these firms under Section 179 of the I-T Act, which makes the company’s directors/promoters liable to pay dues on behalf of the firm, without adjudication by the court.
Further, tax recovery officers have been asked to conduct survey operations on select firms where the tax demand is high. In cases where assets or bank accounts are lying abroad, the department will seek the foreign tax authority’s assistance to recover tax claims with the provisions in the relevant treaty, said another senior official.
Sources said that in a meeting of a task force on shell companies set up by the Prime Minister’s Office, on November 30 last year, the director general of corporate affairs (DGCoA) had suggested that the tax department approach RoCs for taking up the matter of reviving these companies. It was also suggested that revenue considerations should weigh in favour of restoring them.
Apart from these companies, another set of above 200,000 firms have been sent notices and action will soon be taken against them. However, the tax department wants MCA to keep them posted before striking off any company, since there could be tax dues.
Taxing Affair
I-T pursuing restoration of 50,000 struck-off companies
RoCs had struck off 300,000 companies, prohibited their directors from holding directorship in other firms
Tax industry experts believe that restoration is essential for recovery of taxes from these firms
Restoration will allow companies to operate bank account, assets
After restoration, I-T to issue notices under Section 179 of I-T Act
Directors/promoters would be liable to pay tax dues
These firms abused corporate structure to facilitate significant cash transactions post note ban
MCA extends due date of DIR -3 / E-KYC of Directors
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, 30th April, 2019
MCA has notified that the Deadline for Annual Filing of Form DIR 3 ((KYC of Directors) has been Extended from 30 April to 30 June, of the immediately next financial year, i.e. the due date for filing of DIR 3 (KYC of Directors) for Financial Year 2018-19 has been extended from 30 April 2019 to 30 June 2019.
G.S.R.-(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by the second proviso to sub-section (1), sub-section (4), clause (f) of sub-section (6) of section 149, sub-sections (3) and (a) of section 150, section 151, sub-section (5) of section 152, section 153, section 154, section 157, section 160, sub-section (1) of section 158 and section 170 read with section 469 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014, namely: –
1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Amendment Rules, 2019.
(2) ‘They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
2. In the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014, in rule 12A, for the words and figures “on or before 30th, April of immediate next financial year”, the words and figures “on or before 30th June of immediate next financial year” shall be substituted.
[F. N o. 1/22/2013-CL-V]
(K.V.R. Murty)
Joint Secretary to the Government of India
Note: – The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, section 3, sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 259(E) dated the 31st March, 2014 and subsequently amended vide the following notifications:-
A non-compliant company would not be able to amend its capital structure or carry out any merger or amalgamation.
The Government of India, through the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, has made it mandatory for to file ACTIVE eForm or INC-22A. The due date for filing INC-22A was 25th April 2019.
There have been representations made to the MCA for Form INC-22A due date extension.
News coming that government has extended the deadline of filing form INC 22A (ACTIVE) to June 15, gives companies more time to comply, with a provision aimed at spotting shell companies.
The disclosure requirement, which came into effect from February, makes it mandatory for registered companies to upload pictures of their business premises and at least one director.
The last date for filing FORM INC 22A (ACTIVE),which was Thursday, April 25 is now extended till 15th June 2019.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs have received many representations from industry associations for Extension of the Due date with many companies yet to comply thereafter Ministry of Corporate Affairs decided to Extend the Due date of form INC 22A.
Startups have, in particular, pointed out that many of them operate out of homes or shared premises or office suites.
The government had launched a crackdown on shell companies as part of the anti-black money drive and these norms were follow-up measures to establish existence of registered entities. Names of thousands of shell companies were struck off as part of this drive.
This new electronic form INC 22A, which is also known as e-Form ACTIVE (Active Company Tagging Identities and Verification), was notified as part of the Companies (Incorporation) Amendment Rules, 2019 in February.
MCA VPD Service
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs on 24/04/2019 has announced the following on their homepage “VPD service will be unavailable from 8:00AM to 08:00PM IST on 24th – 25th Apr 2019 for system maintenance. Stakeholders are requested to plan accordingly.”
With VPD Service being taken down on the same last date for filing of INC22A ACTIVE eForm, there are more chances for the due date being extended for INC-22A filing.
Representation from ICSI
The Institute of Companies Secretaries of India has made a representation to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs on 22nd April 2019. In the letter, the Institute explains the difficulty faced by certain stakeholders while filing Form INC22A-ACTIVE as below:
The Auditors’ details not getting prefilled in certain cases.
Compliance by dormant companies.
Companies in management disputes.
Issues faced by corporates having a different financial year.
As the difficulties are still unresolved as on 22nd April 2019, the ICSI has requested the MCA to extend the due date for filing of Form INC-22A.
A non-compliant company would not be able to amend its Capital Structure, Change in Directorship or carry out any Merger or Amalgamation, as per the various provisions listed below:
Changes in authorized capital (Form SH-07)
Changes in paid-up capital (Form PAS-03)
Changes in Director (Form DIR-12) (cessation would be allowed).
Changes in Registered Office (Form INC-22)
Amalgamation or Merger (INC-28)
If the form is filed within the due date, there is no fee, while late filing will attract a fine of Rs 10,000.
An income tax tribunal has barred auditors from issuing valuation certificates to the companies they are auditing. This is set to impact several tax disputes around valuations in companies including angel tax disputes involving start-ups.
The Bangalore Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) said that auditors of a company cannot double up as accountants especially in situations while dealing with “share valuation for the purpose of excess share-premium taxability.”
In several cases the income tax department has disputed valuations of companies around the time of investments.
The ITAT ruling came in a case where the tax department had challenged valuation of a company by its auditor.
In most cases, valuations of startups were challenged by the tax department, leading to “angel tax.” The angel tax controversy surrounds the valuations during various rounds of startup funding. In several cases, the revenues at startups kept reducing or remained stagnant, but their valuations increased. The taxman is questioning the premiums paid by the investors and wants to categorise them as income that would be taxable at 30%. In most cases, the investments made by angel investors, venture capital funds or any other investor have been challenged by the taxman.
Many accountants and valuers are already facing heat from the tax department. ET had, on December 25, reported that the tax department has started issuing show-cause notices to valuation experts, questioning the premiums several startups fetched during their investments rounds.
Valuation experts, however, say that they merely projected and calculated future growth, using the facts and figures provided by the startups. Many tax experts point out that the tax department’s approach to the fair value as a benchmark for calculating premiums may not be accurate in the context of startups.
Income tax officers claim that the scrutiny on startups is mainly due to concerns that black money may have changed hands.
The Tribunal, while considering an appeal filed by the assessee-Company, held that the auditors of a company cannot double up as accountants especially in situations while dealing with “share valuation for the purpose of excess share-premium taxability.”
The Assessing Officer, while completing assessment against the assessee, had noted that the person who is said to have valued the share of the assessee company as on 15.11.2013 and 02.05.2014 respectively is none other than the person who has signed the Audit report under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act.
He further ignored the valuation report submitted by the assessee because the same is not as per Rule 11UA and therefore, determined the fair market value on the basis of NAV.
The Tribunal noted that the purposes of sub-rule (2) of rule 11UA, the auditor cannot be an accountant for the purposes of Rule 11UA (2).
Dismissing the appeal, the Tribunal held that “the AO has worked out the fair market value of assessee company at Rs. 714.38/- on the basis of NAV in the absence of any valuation report of any valuer who can be accepted as an Accountant as per Rule 11U(a) and taxed the excess amount of premium received by assessee over and above the permissible amount at Rs. 714.38/- per share in respect of 36957 shares and taxed the excess amount received of Rs. 1,32,29,088/- u/s. 56(2)(viib) of IT Act.
In the facts of the present case, I find no reason to interfere in the order of CIT(A) on this issue in this year also.” Before concluding, the Tribunal also held that “when an auditor cannot be accepted as an accountant for the purposes of Rule 11UA (2) read with Rule 11U(a), there is no option available to the AO but to accept the earlier report in A. Y. 2014 – 15 valuing the shares at Rs.100/- per share instead of Rs. 400/- per share as per a certificate by the auditor who cannot be accepted as an accountant for the purposes of Rule 11UA (2) read with Rule 11U(a), and adopt NAV method in A. Y. 2015 – 16.
This is very important to note that when a Chartered Accountant who can be accepted as an Accountant as per Rule 11UA (2) read with Rule 11U(a) certifies the value, the value certified as on 02.02.2012 is Rs. 100/- per share and when the auditor certifies such value on 15.11.2013 (just after 21 months approx), the value certified rises four times to Rs. 400/- per share.
These facts also suggest that such restriction as per Rule 11U(a) on the auditor’s acceptance as Accountant for the purposes of Rule 11UA (2) is well founded.”
Earlier, there were reports that the tax department has started issuing show-cause notices to valuation experts, questioning the premiums several startups fetched during their investments rounds.
