Parliament passes bill for easier debt recovery

Parliament today passed a bill which empowers banks to confiscate security in the case of loan default, a development that assumes significance in view of the episode surrounding industrialist Vijay Mallya.
The Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Bill, 2016, will not, however, apply to loans for agricultural land as well as student loans.
The bill, approved by Lok Sabha last week and cleared by Rajya Sabha today, amends four laws — Sarfaesi Act, DRT Act, Indian Stamp Act and Depositories Act. Replying to a debate on the bill, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley emphasised the need for “firmness coupled with fairness” in recovering bad loans. He said the banks must be empowered to take effective legal action against defaulters and the insolvency law, securitisation law and DRT law are steps in that direction.
“So far the laws were in favour of the defaulters. We tried to correct the balance. There should be firmness, coupled with fairness in recovery of loans,” he said. He said banks should take a “compassionate view” on education loan defaults but there will be no waiver and somebody will have to pay. The Minister further said that fears regarding farm and education loans are “exaggerated”.
Jaitley said banks are supposed to give loans and “if banks start squeezing loans”, there will be no economic growth.
“The cause of worry is when loan becomes either NPA or stressed asset or the activity in which the loans are invested is not generating money,” he said adding in some cases there will be willful default.
The development assumes significance as it comes against the backdrop of the episode involving Mallya, who owes Rs 9,000 crore to banks, but has left the country to take refuge in England.
Jaitley said if loan has been taken it must be repaid. The Minister said stressed assets were mostly in sectors such as steel, power and textile.
The law simplifies the procedure which ensures quick disposal of pending cases of banks and financial institutions by Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT). DRTs will have to dispose a case in 180 days and the affected party will have to deposit 25 per cent of the amount if he or she chooses to appeal against the order.

There are around 70,000 loan related cases pending in the DRTs. To further stress his point, he said 20 people sitting on bank money prevent the lender from giving credit to another 20,000 people. It should not happen that a bank manager has to keep awake all night after he clears a loan, he said.

Source : http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/economy/parliament-passes-bill-for-easier-debt-recovery_7238101.html?utm_source=ref_article

Stressed asset business ready to take off

Companies in the distressed assets business have patiently waited for close to a decade to strike gold but got regularly sidestepped by banks that won’t part with their lemons at a reasonable rate.

The wait could come to an end soon, as the burgeoning bad debt burden and their humongous provisioning requirement is putting capital-starved banks in serious jeopardy, with no resolution in sight. The word has spread, bringing in its wake an army of globally savvy vulture funds that are sweeping down to get a chunk of the share.

These investors have ready cash and the government is on their side, allowing the sponsors to hold 100 per cent in a fund, and arming them with the Bankruptcy Code that would give the firms and banks power to wind down a company in mere 180 days, say sector watchers.
Banks, though, are still resisting, sometimes with such unreasonable demands like asking for 100 per cent of the principal amount or more, to offload the bad debt. But, experts say, unless banks become experts in recovering their dues themselves, the lenders won’t be able to hold for long.

“Banks have to offload the bad debts in the market but it remains to be seen how the market emerges,” said Birendra Kumar, managing director (MD) of International Asset Reconstruction Co.

Following the Reserve Bank’s (RBI’s) asset classification norm, a bank has to categorise a stressed loan as a loss and provide an amount equal to it on their books if it remains so for more than three years (provisions increase progressively from 15 per cent to 25 per cent, 40 per cent and then 100 per cent, depending on the age of the bad debt).

“Banks know they can hold the assets for one or two years only. After three-four years, they will have to get rid of it anyway. Otherwise, they not only incur heavy provisions; the assets also lose their viability,” said Siby Antony, MD at Edelweiss ARC.

Bad debts in Indian banks have worsened progressively in the past few years and are now at about Rs 6 lakh crore, up from Rs 4.5 lakh crore in December 2015 and Rs 2.52 lakh crore in December 2013. In the interim, the minimum provisioning requirement has gone up from five per cent to 15 per cent, and capital infusion by the government is not even enough to cover the total capital erosion that banks have witnessed.

TIME TO CLEAR DEBTS
  • Banking sector NPA stood at Rs 5.94 lakh crore in March 2016
  • There are 15 asset reconstruction companies in India; 10, or more  applications awaiting approval
  • RBI directed asset reconstruction companies to pay 15% in cash and rest in security receipts
  • Experts predict emergence of  cash deals
  • Recently, Brookfield and SBI floated $1-billion stressed funds
  • The govt has also directed banks to float distressed funds
  • Bankruptcy Code will give more teeth to recovery

While it is true that Indian banks have managed to recover and upgrade some of the loans, this is not even 15 per cent of the total stress. And, much of the book clean-up has been done by selling the assets to asset reconstruction companies (ARCs).

Typically, ARCs issue security receipts (SRs) to banks and pay about 15 per cent of the asset price upfront. They then act as an agent for banks to recover the dues, earning a spread. ARCs can also buy assets upfront and recover the dues for themselves but that is hardly followed in India. However, this practice could change, with distress funds from round the world setting up shop in India with a deep pocket, ready to buy assets in all-cash deals. According to Birendra Kumar, banks are now reluctant on selling assets on SR basis, as it takes years to recover the due, but the cash discounts offered by the banks is not good enough to attract buyers of stressed assets.

“It would continue to be a mix of SRs and cash. Global players would generally prefer to buy on cash basis, and banks in such situations will have to offer a higher discount,” said Kumar.

According to various estimates, in India, banks sell stressed assets at not more than a 40-45 per cent discount. In the case of a cash deal, globally the practice is to sell assets at not more than 25-30 per cent of the value. “The current size of the ARC industry is a matter of conjecture, given the lack of authoritative data. However, based on the agency’s discussions with market participants, it is understood that SRs are outstanding to the tune of Rs 60,000 crore, backed by NPAs (non-performing assets) close to Rs 1 lakh crore as at end-March 2016,” says a report from India Ratings (Ind-Ra).

About 71.4 per cent of the SRs rated by Ind-Ra belong to the small and medium enterprises segment. Large corporates constitute 9.6 per cent and retail (individuals) account for 19 per cent.So far, 15 ARCs have been given a licence by RBI and at least 10 more are pending with the central bank. Global vulture funds and stressed fund specialists like JC Flowers & Co, Eight Capital Management LLC, SSG and KKR are partnering with domestic firms such as Ambit Holdings, Piramal, etc, for the ARC business. Besides, Brookfield Asset Management, a stressed funds specialist, in partnership with the country’s largest lender, State Bank of India (SBI), is floating a fund to take advantage of the distressed market. The Brookfield-SBI venture has committed $1 billion to start with, underscoring the market’s potential.

Meanwhile, the existing ARCs continue to suffer from lack of capital and the stipulation that assets can be purchased only after paying up at least 15 per cent upfront. This has limited their ability to take large exposure.

“The challenges the older ARCs face are inadequate capital and specialist management expertise to drive turnarounds of acquired stressed assets. The ARC industry has capital of $400-500 million, with the total of stressed assets in the banking sector estimated to be $130 billion,” said Nikhil Shah, the MD at Alvarez & Marsal India, a turnaround specialist. Shah says the new funds that are coming to India will change the game in favour of asset resolution.

“The older ARCs have not demonstrated capability in reviving acquired stressed businesses. The new entrants are expected to be more aggressive in implementing measures like management changes and deploying significant primary capital in the businesses to improve value,” he added.

“The Bankruptcy Code, with its time-bound resolution, will provide ARCs and stressed assets funds more teeth to execute changes in a shorter time frame.”

However, Antony of Edelweiss ARC does not believe the new stressed fund managers would do something drastically different. “With the new relaxation in the Budget, where the government allowed sponsors to hold up to 100 per cent stake in an ARC and allowing 100 per cent foreign direct investment in ARCs via automatic route, the capital issue of ARCs have been addressed,” said Siby of Edelweiss, adding the legal structure is also getting fixed and that will allow stressed funds to grow exponentially. Now, if only banks would listen to reason and lower their prices for stressed funds, a flurry of activity in India’s stressed assets market would become the norm.

 

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/finance/stressed-asset-business-ready-to-take-off-116072801716_1.html

JPMorgan Chase & Co gets RBI approval to open 3 new branches

JPMorgan Chase & Co today said it has received Reserve Bank’s approval to open three more branches in the country.

The bank will open new branches at New Delhi, Devanahalli (near Bengaluru) and Paranur (near Chennai) in the next few months, it said in a statement.

“We are seeing an increasing level of cross-location and cross-border activity among our clients as they capture business opportunities driven by the country’s economic growth.

These branches will further enhance our capability to better serve our clients in India and overseas,” JPMorgan Chase Bank India MD and CEO Madhav Kalyan said.

JPMorgan will provide all existing products and services through these new branches, including cash management, trade finance and foreign-currency payments.

At present, the bank serves its clients from Mumbai branch.

“Our strategy is to follow our clients’ priorities. The expansion endorses our long-term commitment to India, a key market for JPMorgan, as well as for many of our clients,” JPMorgan South & South East Asia CEO Kalpana Morparia said.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/53008936.cms

Submit data on loan defaulters to credit information firms, RBI tells banks

The Reserve Bank of India has advised banks and financial institutions to submit data on defaulting borrowers from December 2014 onwards to Credit Information Companies (CICs) and not to the RBI.

Releasing this information, obtained through a portal complaint, Delhi-based Right to Information activist Subhash Chandra Agrawal said on Friday that it is significant to note that the RBI has not so far complied with the Supreme Court order of December 12, 2015, in the RBI vs PP Kapoor (Civil 94 of 2015) case, where it wanted the RBI to make public details of the top 100 loan defaulters among industrialists.

The details required including the names of the businessmen, firm name, principal amount, interest amount, date of default, and date of availing the loan.

In a June 24 letter addressed to Agrawal in response to his PG Portal complaint dated April 24, the RBI said it has submitted to the Supreme Court a list of defaulters above Rs. 500 crore in a sealed cover and claimed that the said information is confidential and requested that it may not be revealed to the public.

The matter is still under consideration of the Supreme Court.

Source: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/money-and-banking/submit-data-on-loan-defaulters-to-credit-information-firms-rbi-tells-banks/article8797928.ece

HDFC Bank launches SME e-bank

HDFC Bank, the country’s second largest private sector lender, has launched a digital bank for its small and medium enterprises  (SME) customers. It aims to grow its market share in the hinterlands with this.

“It takes away the hassle of physical availability of a relationship manager and makes banking process faster. We expect this service to take off in a much better way in smaller towns and the hinterlands, as it will save time and manpower. It will help people live in the areas where there is no bank branch close to their home,” said Aseem Dhru, head, business banking. This comes at a time when the bank, traditionally known for its retail  (individual) offerings, has started focusing  on growing its corporate book. With this, the bank has managed to cross the Rs 1-lakh-crore mark in its corporate book for the first time in FY16, more than double the Rs 47,000 crore three years ago.  However, on the business banking side, the bank had seen some pressure on asset quality and had checked the growth in the last few quarters.  Dhru said despite this, the bank has been growing its business banking book at a faster pace than its peers.

“At the end of December 2015, lending to SME sector has seen de-growth by five per cent but HDFC Bank has grown its SME lending by 29 per cent. So, we are very bullish on this segment and looking at increasingly reaching out to rural and semi-urban areas in a big way.”

With credit growth in the corporate sector around single digits annually, banks had reduced lending to the the sector because of their dependency on large companies for payments.

However, bankers say SME players have started reducing concentration risk by focusing on only a few corporate players and have been broad-basing their growth , giving the banks the ability to lend to them more comfortably.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/finance/hdfc-bank-looks-to-grow-market-share-in-hinterland-with-its-sme-e-bank-116061900519_1.html

Cash crunch: How customers came to owe banks more than what they were loaned

More than a thousand borrowers have outstandings that are substantially larger than the amounts sanctioned to them by banks, data sourced from Reserve Bank of India (RBI) shows. The total outstandings of 1,131 borrowers, at Rs 1,09,909 crore, were 150% more than the amount sanctioned, as on March 2016, data accessed by FE reveal. At the end of December 2015, the outstandings were Rs 90,235 crore.

Bankers and ex-bankers that FE reached out to attributed the pile-up in outstandings to short-term requirements of borrowers that were met by banks to help them tide over a cash crunch. Overdue interest, they said, could be another cause for the high outstandings. One senior banker observed that there were occasions when the capacity of the borrower to repay the additional amount was not assessed properly. “At times, limits get exceeded without a proper assessment of the customer’s ability to service the loan,” he said.

A former executive director of a public sector bank said one reason for the actual outstanding exceeding the permitted limits was that lenders tended to sanction ad hoc non-funded letters of credit (LC) even before the limits were okayed by the consortium. “Sometimes ad hoc LCs are opened for amounts which are bigger than those agreed to by the consortium. Since consortiums take anywhere between six months and a year to sanction limits, the money is disbursed since business cannot wait,” he explained, adding that such loans serve as working capital.

A former chairman of a state-owned bank said if the customer was unable to service the loan, the interest piled up pushing up the outstanding amount. “If the interest hasn’t been paid for three or four years, the amounts can become large,” he pointed out.

An RBI document on the Central Repository of Information on Large Credits notes that if outstanding loans exceed 150% of the limit, a “warning message should be displayed to the user on generation of the instance document”.

Ashvin Parekh, managing partner, Ashvin Parekh Advisory Services, observed the main reason for the outstandings surpassing the sanctions was “temporary accommodation and loans against receivables”.

Parekh explained that at times borrowers approached banks for funds to be able to take delivery of imports. “The customer promises to pay back the amount from receivables so bankers do accommodate such requests,” he said.
Total non-performing assets (NPAs) of the banking system stood at Rs 5.8 lakh crore at the end of March 2016 and total provisions were Rs 1.43 lakh crore.

The central bank has been trying to help banks tackle bad loans by allowing them to convert debt into equity and more recently into convertible redeemable preference shares. However, banks have not been able to find buyers for any of the assets under strategic debt restructuring scheme.

FE had earlier reported that bank loans that aren’t NPAs just yet but could turn toxic amount to over Rs 6 lakh crore or close to 9% of total advances, citing RBI data. The total troubled loans of Rs 6,24,119 crore at the end of December 2015 were 9% higher than the Rs 5, 73,381 crore at the end of June 2015.

While Rs 3,06,180 crore worth of loans were classified in the SMA-1 category where repayments are overdue between 30 and 60 days, another Rs 3,17,939 crore was in the SMA-2 category where repayments are overdue between 60 and 90 days. These Special Mention Accounts follow a fiat from the RBI in 2014 asking banks to put in place a mechanism to red-flag troubled loan accounts early in the day so that these could be dealt with speedily. If the loan is not serviced after 90 days it must be classified as an NPA.

 

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/article/industry/banking-finance/cash-crunch-how-customers-came-to-owe-banks-more-than-what-they-were-loaned/285239/

After Italy & Greece, PE seeks to partner Indian lenders for bad loan portfolio

Storied asset manager KKR & Co has approached lenders like State Bank of India and ICICI Bank with a proposal to manage and create value from their loan portfolios to under-performing Indian companies. The American private equity investor will build a platform to deploy fairly long-term capital and operational expertise to turnaround troubled assets, with banks on board sharing the future upsides.

 

The proposal – discussed with a few public and private sector banks – is modelled on Pillarstone, a similar European platform created by KKR for stressed loans in markets like Greece and Italy . India’s central bank governor Raghuram Rajan has pushed lenders to purge bad loans and has urged global alternate asset managers to play a bigger role in easing India Inc’s bad loan crisis. But most Indian banks have opted for ‘fire sale’ of stressed assets to rival corporate houses rather than staying on course with a turnaround plan, though it would help these lenders unlock better value eventually.

“They are talking about jointly managing a portfolio of loans to these stressed companies as against acquiring a one-off asset. It involves sweating underlying assets to generate more value rather than writing down. This is also different than the prevailing approach by the under-capitalized asset reconstruction companies, which is more focused on asset-stripping,” said a source directly familiar with the matter. The discussions are ongoing but may not lead to any conclusive agreement with KKR, a second source cautioned.

When contacted, KKR declined to comment on the story. SBI and ICICI Bank too offered no comments. Traditionally, India’s public sector banks have stayed away from dealing with foreign investors in the stressed loan market.

Bulge-bracket global funds such as KKR, Brookfield Asset Management and Apollo Global management have looked at opportunities to acquire stressed assets put on the block by lenders. KKR was in contention to acquire Jaypee’s cement units, which was clinched by Aditya Birla-led UltraTech Cements for Rs 16,000 crore, mostly through a refinancing deal. KKR’s offer centred around acquiring 51% ownership (leaving the rest with lenders) and turning around operations under a new management team. The lenders would recoup a part of the loan upfront, while waiting for future upsides riding on a business rejig. The banks preferred a one-time deal offered by Birla’s UltraTech.

Brookfield’s acquisition of debt-laden Gammon’s road and power assets is one of the few recent instances where a global investor acquired assets of a stressed entity. “Indian lenders have opted for selling assets in distress rather than exploring ways to shore up value on troubled loans. Yesterday’s lenders have become today’s collectors. Hopefully, there will be a time when bankers will behave like bankers,” Anil Singhvi, a shareholder activist and co-founder of proxy advisory firm Institutional Investor Advisory Services (IIAS), said.

Last year, KKR along with Italian lenders UniCredit and Intesa Sanpaolo launched Pillarstone as a platform to help big corporate borrowers recover and grow. It later signed up with lenders such as Alpha Bank and Eurobank to expand the platform into Greece. Both Italian and Greek lenders have agreed to pool in about EUR 1 billion of loans each as part of the engagement with Pillarstone. KKR has said European Bank for Reconstruction and Development is also considering co-investing in the platform, which is planning to start operations into other European markets.

KKR has argued that Pillarstone is a “timely intervention” in European markets where hefty bad loans are hampering a broader economic recovery, a concern shared by policymakers in India as well. In recent weeks, the top 20 public sector banks have reported a cumulative loss of almost Rs 15,000 crore in the fourth quarter of the last fiscal. This was triggered by an unprecedented surge in provisioning for bad loans following the RBI’s asset quality review. The non-performing assets on their balance sheets is estimated at Rs 3 lakh crore.

“Nearly 15% of system assets are stressed and even if we optimistically assume that only a third of these stressed assets are going to be ultimately written off, that still means that nearly 30% the shareholders’ equity in the banking system is currently at serious risk,” Saurabh Mukherjea of Ambit Capital said in his latest research report. “The problem-facing public sector banks is more serious as 17% of their assets are stressed. It would imply that nearly 50% of the shareholders’ equity of PSBs will be written off by the end of FY18, requiring $30 billion (equivalent to nearly 1.5% of our GDP) in equity infusion. It is unlikely the government will find resources to recapitalize these ailing public sector banks,” Mukherjea added.

Source:http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/52634610.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst