Tax resolution scheme: CBDT to write to 2.59 lakh taxpayers

Keen to bring down the number of tax litigations, the Income Tax Department will soon write to over 2.59 lakh taxpayers asking them to avail the one-time dispute resolution scheme to settle their cases.

And to cut down on communication time, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) will use email to communicate with the appellants.

“We have estimated that each Commissioner of I-T (appeal) would have about 300-400 litigations pending before them. We will send these assessees emails informing about the benefits of the dispute resolution scheme,” an official told PTI.

The direct tax dispute resolution scheme, introduced from 1 June, seeks to address the issue of pending litigation before commissioner of I-T (appeal). The scheme is open till 31 December.

As per I-T department data, there were 73,402 appeals with tax effect above Rs.10 lakh and 1,85,858 appeals with tax effect below Rs.10 lakh which are pending before commissioner of I-T (appeal) as on 29 February.

Thus, 2,59,260 appellants are eligible for the benefit of this scheme. “The publicity drive will not be as massive as the IDS. Since we know who our target assessees are, we will send them pamphlets and also emails. Also we will paste some pamphlets outside the CIT (appeals) office,” the official added.

Armed with a Rs.100 crore budget for advertisement of income disclosure scheme (IDS) and disputes resolution scheme, the tax department will now launch a publicity drive for entities which are locked in a litigation. Besides, the CBDT will soon come out with over two dozen FAQs based on the queries it has received from various stakeholders, including chartered accountants and industry chambers.

As per the scheme, a taxpayer who has an appeal pending before the CIT (appeals) can settle his/her case by paying the disputed tax and interest up to the date of assessment. No penalty in respect of cases with disputed tax up to Rs.10 lakh will be levied. For cases exceeding Rs.10 lakh, 25% of penalty would be levied and any pending appeal against a penalty order can also be settled by paying 25% of the minimum of the imposable penalty.

“Litigation is a scourge for a tax-friendly regime and creates an environment of distrust in addition to increasing the compliance cost of the taxpayers and administrative cost for the government,” finance minister Arun Jaitley had said in his budget speech.

In a first-of-its-kind nationwide publicity drive, the I-T department had tied up with seven airlines including Air India and Vistara to publicise one-time black money compliance window by printing the scheme’s details on the back of boarding passes.

Source: http://www.livemint.com/Politics/s28nm7vx4fQrNG3ldoqm0L/Tax-resolution-scheme-CBDT-to-write-to-259-lakh-taxpayers.html

I-T returns: Top 1% earned 18% of income

The top 1 per cent of earning individuals who filed tax returns earned about 18 per cent of the total income in financial year 2011-12, according to the latest data on income tax released by the income-tax department recently.

The bottom half of the earning individuals earned just about 21 per cent of the total income shown in the returns, the data showed, highlighting stark income inequality. However, in between there is a big chunk of middle class. It is this class, which was addressed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his Independence-Day speech when he said he would further mitigate their problems with the income-tax department.  The top 1 per cent of the individuals were those who earned Rs 25 lakh and above, while the bottom 50 per cent made up of those who earned up to Rs 2.5 lakh. In between, there was a middle class, constituting about 49 per cent of the total tax payees. Their income was around 61 per cent of the total.

Three individuals filed returns showing income of more than Rs 500 crore in the financial year 2011-12. About 35,616 individuals earned more than Rs 1 crore as taxable income during that year.  These individuals  made it to the super-rich category, for which an additional surcharge of 10 per cent was introduced in the financial year 2013-14. The super-rich surcharge imposed on taxable income of more than Rs 1 crore, has since then been raised to 15 per cent.

India’s Gini Coefficient, a measure of inequality, stands at 0.38. The higher the coefficient, ranging between zero and one, the higher is inequality. However, it should be noted that agriculture income is exempted from income tax.

As many as 1,33,000 individuals reported zero taxable income in 2011-12.  Maximum individuals or about 38 per cent individual return filers (10.8 million individuals) were in the taxable income bracket of Rs 1.5-2.5 lakh.

About 33 per cent of the 46.5 million taxpayers in the country paid taxes but did not file returns in assessment year 2012-13.

For individuals, salary income constituted about half the total income, while business income represented 33.4 per cent. Of the 31.2 million returns filed, 28.9 million or 92 per cent were individual taxpayers.

Amid pressure from celebrated economist Thomas Piketty and Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramanian, the revenue department has released the revised set of income tax data for assessment year 2012-13, omitting about 150,000 returns to bring consistency of data within various categories. In cases where more than one returns were submitted, the values of the latest returns have been considered.

Income tax deductions totalling Rs 1.35 lakh crore significantly lowered taxable income of individuals, making up for 11 per cent of total gross income for individuals. For companies, the deductions were about 7.1 per cent of total gross income.

According to a recent write up by Revenue Secretary Hasmukh Adhia and CEA Subramanian, the total tax foregone on all income taxes amounted to 0.4 per cent of gross domestic product in 2011-12. The government had in the Budget announced a plan to phase out corporate tax deductions and exemptions, putting a sunset date in most cases. It plans to reduce corporate tax to 25 per cent from 30 per cent currently by 2019.

With the government taking efforts to encourage individuals to file returns, about 155,000 filed zero-income returns in 2011-12. Filing of returns is mandatory to avail loans.

About 3.7 per cent of the population and 9.1 per cent of the workforce were part of the individual income-tax system the assessment year 2012-13. There were 44 million individual income taxpayers and 0.65 million corporate taxpayers that year. These include those tax payers also who did not file returns but paid tax through tax deducted at source (TDS).

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/i-t-returns-top-1-earned-18-of-income-116081601347_1.html

CBDT signs bilateral APAs with Japanese trading firm arm

The Central Board of Direct Taxes has signed bilateral advance pricing agreements with Indian arm of a Japanese trading company, a move that will help bring down transfer pricing disputes relating to intra-group transactions.

“The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) entered into a bilateral advance pricing agreement (APA) on August 2, 2016, with Indian subsidiary of a Japanese trading company. This is the first bilateral advance pricing agreement with a Japanese company having a rollback provision in it,” a finance ministry statement said today.
Overall, it is fourth bilateral APA signed by CBDT.

Signing of the pact is an important step towards ascertaining certainty in transfer pricing matters of MNC cases and dispute resolution, the statement noted.

The APA scheme was introduced in the Income-Tax Act in 2012 and the rollback provision in 2014.

The scheme intends to provide certainty to taxpayers in the domain of transfer pricing by specifying methods of pricing and setting the prices of international transactions in advance.

Its progress strengthens the government’s mission of fostering a non-adversarial tax regime, the statement said.

CBDT expects more APAs to be concluded and signed in the near future.

An APA, usually for multiple years, is signed between a taxpayer and the tax authority (CBDT in India) on an appropriate transfer pricing methodology for determining the price and ensuing taxes on intra-group overseas transactions.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/cbdt-signs-bilateral-apas-with-japanese-trading-firm-arm-116080400879_1.html

Extension of Due Date – Filing of Income Tax Return for Assessment Year 2016-17

 

Income tax department has issued order that due date of filing of returns of income for the Assessment Year 2016-17 has been extended from July 31, 2016 to August 5, 2016, for those assessees, whose due date was originally 31 July 2016.

 

The relevant circular issued by CBDT in this regard is available at http://incometaxindia.gov.in/Lists/Latest%20News/Attachments/54/order-extension-india-2016.pdf  for ready reference.

 

Please visit http://incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/ for filing your ITR.

 

Tax return filing is mandatory for Individuals whose income is above the taxable limit.

 

As per CBDT Notification number 225/195/2016 dated 29.07.2016, due date is extended from 31.07.2016 to 05.08.2016 in case of tax payers, not liable for audit, as per the revised due date  August 5, 2016.

 

CBDT to issue refunds less than Rs. 5,000 by month-end

In a bid to spruce up its tax-payer-friendly image, the Central Board of Direct Taxes has asked its officers to ensure that refunds less than Rs. 5,000 are issued by the month-end.

“It has been decided that refunds up to Rs. 5,000, as also refunds in cases where arrear demand is up to Rs. 5,000 in non-computer aided scrutiny selection (CASS) cases, may be issued expeditiously without any adjustment of outstanding demand,” it said in a recent directive to field formations, asking them to complete the exercise by July 29.

Sources said the CBDT wants to ensure that all refund backlogs from previous years for small amounts should be fully cleared this fiscal. “With more returns being filed online and processed electronically, the department wants to ensure that refunds are also given out on time,” said an official.

The CBDT directive also noted there is a large pendency of refunds of small amounts relating to non-CASS cases that are pending for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16.

The CBDT has also called for “expeditious” clearing of refunds where notices were issued for adjustment but there was no response from the tax payer. “Such cases be treated as though the taxpayer had “no-objection”…,” it said. The reminder to field offices comes at a time when the CBDT is trying to clear a backlog in processing of refunds as well as income tax returns. In 2015-16, the CBDT had issued 1.61 crore refunds worth Rs. 1.71 lakh crore.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley too has stressed on the need for faster refunds to ensure that taxpayers are not put to inconvenience.

 

Source: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/tp-news/cbdt-to-issue-refunds-less-than-rs-5000-by-monthend/article8883185.ece

CBDT tightens scrutiny rules for assessing officers

If you have received an income-tax scrutiny notice, there’s no need to be unduly fearful as the government has sought to protect you against possible harassment.

That’s in line with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent message to the tax department that people should not fear such persecution.

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has made it more difficult for assessing officers to expand the scope of a ‘limited’ scrutiny to a complete one.

They will also have to substantiate any contention of possible under-reporting of income and loss of taxes, apart from requiring approval of senior officers.

The guidelines issued recently by the apex direct taxes body call for assessing officers to form a “reasonable view” that there is a possibility of income under-assessment, said an official aware of the move.

Besides, when manually selecting cases for scrutiny in the current financial year, the threshold for metros has been raised to Rs 25 lakh from Rs 10 lakh for instances involving additions in the earlier year.

That is, if an assessing officer finds that some income should have been added to the declaration, the return can’t be opened for scrutiny if the incremental amount is less than Rs 25 lakh.

In the past two years, the government has sought to make the department’s revenue collection efforts less aggressive and move away from what’s been dubbed by some as tax terrorism.

Modi delivered much the same message to tax officials at a meeting last month. Processes are being made less discretionary and increased reliance is being placed on information technology.

E-scrutiny, which allows payees to reply to scrutiny questions over email in metros, has also been started. These latest directives add to measures aimed at ensuring that tax officers don’t embark on fishing expedition even in cases of limited scrutiny under the Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection (CASS) where the perceived risk area is limited to only that particular transaction.

Tax experts welcomed the move. Together with the new scrutiny formats, this will lead to greater accountability of the tax department, said Amit Maheshwari, partner, Ashok Maheshwary & Associates LLP, chartered accountants.

“This would help save precious resources of the department, lead to early closure of assessments and prevent unnecessary harassment,” he said.

Source :  http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/53257731.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst