Foreign investment quality improves substantially with PM Narendra Modi’s Make in India push

The quality of foreign investment coming into the country has improved substantially, according to Reserve Bank of India data.

Much of this is foreign direct investment (FDI) materialised in the September 2014-November 2015 period after Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched the Make in India campaign and bettered portfolio inflows during the period.

Gross FDI inflows amounted to $62.6 billion, 31% higher than $47.6 billion in the preceding 15 months.

This is more than triple the amount of net portfolio inflows of $14.3 billion in the same period. An analysis of the monthly trend in foreign investment inflows shows that in most months stable long-term FDI has been more than portfolio inflows, which have been more volatile in the period.

Economists say the surge in FDI is largely due to several initiatives by the government to attract investment in the manufacturing sector. “FDI and portfolio flows over the past year-and-a-half suggest that conscious efforts of the government to encourage more stable direct investments are yielding results,” said Saugata Bhattacharya, chief economist at Axis Bank. “At a time when global capital markets have become volatile, FDI flows reduce uncertainty about foreign capital outflows and, consequently, currency volatility.”

The surge in FDI in India is significant given that investment across the world has fallen by 16%, said Amitabh Kant, secretary at the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, at a recent event.

Though a sizeable amount is estimated to have gone to the manufacturing sector, including consumer goods and food processing, among others, a section of the market feels that a portion of the FDI inflows could have come through the private equity route.

This seldom finds its way into greenfield projects but at the same time provide an important source of finance for entrepreneurs.

“A significant part of the higher FDI has come in as PE and VC funding, which helps finance entrepreneurs,” said Bhattacharya.

Prime Minister Modi’s Make in India initiative is aimed at turning the country into a global manufacturing hub to generate jobs, raise incomes and drive growth.

The government has been seeking to drum up investment as part of this effort. India’s growth is being driven by public spending and consumption with private investment yet to kick in substantially.

Source:  http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/50764021.cms

Make in India: DIPP looks to include micro, small and medium industries in startup definition

A clear definition is imperative for the government to decide which companies can draw the benefits of any scheme for startups.

The government is considering a proposal to include micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in its definition of startups to help boost the Make in India campaign. Various government departments have held a series of brainstorming sessions to discuss the definition so that the policy can be formalised. A clear definition is imperative for the government to decide which companies can draw the benefits of any scheme for startups.

The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) is spearheading the exercise of formulating the startup policy, along with ministries such as finance, skill development and MSME among others. The Start-Up India initiative is scheduled to be announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in January 2016 and the policy needs to be finalised by then. Progress on the initiative is being monitored directly by the Prime Minister’s Office. India wants to create an ecosystem that encourages entrepreneurship and is collecting suggestions from the startup community for steps that need to be taken to ensure that the Start-Up India initiative is a success.

Including MSMEs, collectively one of the biggest employers of people in India, is seen as positive for manufacturing and therefore employment generation, key aims of the Make in India programme. Officials are also discussing specific criteria that would make an MSME eligible to be called a startup. This would determine eligibility for incentives such as fewer compliance conditions, cheaper credit and tax benefits.

“Defining (startups) is the most complex issue. It involves technology companies MSMEs and so many other sectors. We should be able to finalise something soon,” a senior government official said.

To qualify as a startup, an entity would also have to meet certain financial standards besides having a level of innovation in its product or service. “It is better to have a broader definition of startups, so MSMEs and tech-based startups can both take advantage. The moment one leaves things for interpretation, corruption will seep in,” said Gaurav Kachru, founder, 5ideas Startup Superfuel. Startups are expected to create 250,000 jobs in India by 2020, up from 80,000 now, according to a Nasscom report. The Start-Up India initiative announced by Modi in his Independence Day speech assumes significance given the thrust by the government toward employment generation.

Economic Times View: Start Up On the Ease of Doing Business Front

A wider definition of startups should broad-base attention across industries. In tandem, we need to boost knowledge-creation, innovation and entrepreneurship to better coagulate resources for startups. Otherwise, we will fail to develop a thriving ecosystem, complete with conducive state policy support. In parallel, we need suitable tax treatment and attendant rules so that startups do not see the need to go abroad to do business here in India. We need ease of doing business with the startup economy in mind

 

Source:http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/50179566.cms

 

Singapore pips Mauritius as India’s top FDI source

Singapore has replaced Mauritius as the top source of foreign direct investment (FDI) into India during the first half of the current financial year.

During April-September 2015, India has attracted $6.69 billion (Rs 43,096 crore) FDI from Singapore while from Mauritius, it received $3.66 billion (Rs 23,490 crore), according to data from the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP).

Foreign investment from Singapore was $2.41 billion in the year-ago period.

According to experts, the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) with Singapore incorporates Limit-of-Benefit (LoB) clause, which has provided comfort to foreign investors based there to invest in India.

“Investors are preferring Singapore to Mauritius as the LoB clause in India-Singapore treaty provides substance and certainty,” said Krishan Malhotra, head of tax and an expert on FDI with corporate law firm Shardul Amarchand and Mangaldas.

FDI from Singapore during the first six months of the current financial year is also more than what it had invested in India for the whole of 2013-14 ($5.98 billion). India had attracted $6.74 billion foreign investment during 2014-15.

Overall, Singapore accounts for 15 per cent of the total FDI India received between April 2000 and September 2015. However, Mauritius makes up 34 per cent of FDI during the same period.

Sectors that attracted the highest foreign investment during April-September 2015 include computer software and hardware ($3.05 billion), trading ($2.30 billion), services and automobile ($1.46 billion each) and telecommunications ($659 million).

Foreign investment is crucial for India, which needs about $1 trillion by March 2017 to overhaul infrastructure such as ports, airports and highways, and to boost growth.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/singapore-pips-mauritius-as-india-s-top-fdi-source-115120700040_1.html