Amazon India sees 250% annual growth in sellers

US-based Amazon on Friday said it had witnessed a 250 per cent year-on-year growth in bringing new sellers on board, as it looks to tap into the booming e-commerce market in India.

The company, which is making multi-billion dollar investments in India, has about 85,000 sellers on board.

“We started with 100 sellers three years ago and now we have about 85,000 sellers growing at 250 per cent year-on-year and adding nearly 90,000 products a day,” an Amazon India spokesperson stated.

Amazon, which competes with the likes of Flipkart and Snapdeal, has cut its commissions by 25-30 per cent across categories such as mobile phones, PCs, electronic devices and personal care appliances.

“We think these revised rates can significantly help sellers to perform even better and succeed in their business. In addition, we continue to innovate and offer best in class services such as Fulfilment by Amazon, Easy Ship, Seller Flex, etc, to help them with fulfilment/logistics, so that they can focus on their business,” the Amazon spokesperson said.

Flipkart, on the contrary, had recently increased its commissions across key segments and asked sellers to bear the costs of logistics in case of returns.

Recently, Amazon Chief Executive Officer Jeff Bezos had said the company will invest $3 billion in India. This is in addition to the American e-commerce giant’s $2-billion infusion in 2014, taking its total investments here to over $5 billion.

The funds will be channelled towards enhancing customer and seller experience, Amazon India managing director Amit Agarwal had told PTI.

“India is a key market for Amazon and we will work towards continuing to reduce operating costs for sellers backed by good logistics and fulfilment capabilities,” he had added.

 

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/amazon-india-sees-250-annual-growth-in-sellers-116061700852_1.html

Indian real estate may attract $2 bn investment from Japan

JapanJapanese developers and private equity investors are looking to enter Indian property market and could invest at least USD 2 billion over the next three years in residential as well as industrial projects, says JLL.

 

Realty consultant JLL India said in a report that the country is emerging as major investment destination for Chinese and Japanese developers.

 

China’s biggest developer Wanda has signed an MoU with Haryana government earlier this year and more developers from China and Japan are expected to enter the Indian realty market, it said.

 

Private equity investors from these two countries are also looking at entering India’s real estate sector, it added.

 

“Japanese developers are keen to explore strategic partnerships and enter into joint ventures with Indian builders, and are particularly interested in industrial projects. There is likely to be an inflow of at least USD 2 billion in investments from Japan into the Indian real estate market over the next three years,” JLL India Chairman and Country Head Anuj Puri said.

 

After 100 per cent foreign direct investment (FDI) was allowed into the real estate industry, it was only a matter of time before foreign developers made big investment announcements, he said.

 

“One of China’s most prominent developers, Dalian Wanda Group, signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) earlier this year with the northern state of Haryana to develop Wanda Industrial New City’. The investment of USD 10 billion, phased out over the next decade, is a very significant outlay by any Chinese company in India,” Puri said.

 

Other Chinese developers are also interested in India and most likely to follow suit, he added.

The RICS-JLL survey this January had shown that 62 per cent of the respondents felt that institutions from Japan and China could come knocking to the Indian real estate market in 2016.

 

Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Indian-real-estate-may-attract-2-bn-investment-from-Japan/articleshow/52763657.cms

FIPB clears FDI proposals worth Rs 710 crore

The proposals approved included Advanced Enzyme Technologies’ foreign investment worth Rs 480 crore, a Finance Ministry official said.

Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) today approved four FDI proposals entailing overseas investment of about Rs 710 crore.

The proposals approved included Advanced Enzyme Technologies’ foreign investment worth Rs 480 crore, a Finance Ministry official said.

The Board also cleared proposals of Corona Remedies, Macmillan Publishers International and Ordain Health Care Global.

The FIPB, headed by Economic Affairs Secretary Shaktikanta Das, today considered 14 investment proposals.

Three proposals, which were rejected included that of Flag Telecom Singapore Pte Ltd and Star Den Media Services Pvt Ltd.

Also, eight proposals, including that of IBM India Ltd, were deferred.

FIPB can clear FDI proposals envisaging investment of up to Rs 5,000 crore and those involving higher investment are approved by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA).

FDI in most sectors are allowed through an automatic route but in certain sectors proposals have to go through the FIPB.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/52690601.cms

US firm 8minutenergy to build solar facility in India

A US renewable energy company, 8minutenergy Renewables LLC, will set up 4 GW of solar power capacity in India.“8minutenergy Renewables will pursue a 4 GW solar photovoltaic project pipeline in India,” a statement from the White House said. “These utility-scale solar projects are expected to generate over 10,000 jobs in the construction phase in India.”

Founded in 2009 by Martin Hermann and Tom Buttgenbach, the California-based company has 330 MW of operating solar plants. Plants of total capacity of 400 MW are under construction, while another 3,000 MW are in the pipeline. These include an 800 MW solar farm at Mount Signal in California, claimed to be the world’s largest.

Another US company, SunLink Corporation “is partnering with Indian companies to deploy 1.4 GW of solar projects over the next five years,” the statement said. SunLink manufactures solar racking systems, or the frames on which modules are mounted. It also provides performance monitoring solutions.

In the meantime, the US has announced the setting up of a Clean Energy Finance Hub, which “will serve as a coordinating mechanism to focus US Government effort that, in partnership with leading Indian financial institutions, will increase renewable energy investment in India,” the statement said.

Source: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/companies/us-firm-8minutenergy-to-build-solar-facility-in-india/article8714858.ece

India Agri Business Fund invests Rs 100 crore in Parijat Ind

Rabobank-promoted private equity fund ‘India Agri Business Fund II’ has invested around Rs 100 crore in agrochemical firm Parijat Industries to acquire a minority stake.

Rabo Equity Advisors, the investment advisors for PE fund ‘India Agri Business Fund II’, announced an “undisclosed investment” into Parijat Industries to acquire minority stake. Sources said that an investment of about Rs 100 crore has been made in Parijat Industries.

This is the second investment by India Agri Business Fund II, Rabo Equity advisors said in a statement. The first investment, which was also of about Rs 100 crore, was announced last week in Cremica Food Industries.

India Agri Business Fund II is a USD 200 million private equity fund targeted at expansion/growth of Indian food and agri-business companies in India across the value chain.

The fund sponsored by Rabobank along with pedigreed anchors namely CDC Group and Asian Development Bank.

Commenting on the investment, Rabo Equity Advisors CMD Rajesh Srivastava said that it expects Parijat to be a leading agrochemical player in the high potential sector. “We are especially excited at the company’s export forays and new products expected to be launched in the domestic market over the next few years,” he added.

Parijat is looking to achieve sales of Rs 1,500 crore by 2021 and also expand its domestic distribution network to 10,000 retail points in three years from 4,500 at present. “Our team at Parijat is committed to exponentially growing its domestic presence besides the international footprint. We are delighted to have Rabo Equity as our partner and hope to leverage their extensive domain knowledge and global outreach in the food and agri sector,” said Keshav Anand, Chairman & Managing Director, Parijat Industries.

Rabo Equity Advisors currently advises two funds in India, IABF-I and IABF-II. India Agri Business Fund I, a USD 120 million fund which is invested in 10 companies across sectors like biotechnology, warehousing, edible oils, dairy and basmati rice.

 

Source: http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/india-agri-business-fund-invests-rs-100-croreparijat-ind_6839841.html

Japan banks enter ranks of biggest energy lenders

JapanJapanese banks, known for the risk-aversion that spared them the worst of the credit crisis, have quietly grown into some of the world’s largest energy lenders.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc (MUFG), Japan’s largest bank, disclosed last month it has become one of the biggest oil and gas lenders with 9.2 trillion yen, or about $85 billion, in exposure – $45 billion more than it had reported at the end of the year. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc is not far behind with about $77 billion and Mizuho Financial Group Inc has about $48 billion, calculations based on the companies’ websites show.

The megabanks sought profits in the oil patch during the boom as Japan’s shrinking population and years of economic stagnation sapped the profitability of domestic lending. While energy is only a fraction of their business, souring loans have been a drag on earnings. MUFG sees full-year profit falling 11 per cent as negative interest rates squeeze loan profitability and bad-loan costs increase.

“Japanese banks were thought to have no exposure at all and all of a sudden they’re some of the most exposed companies around the world,” said Nicholas Smith, a strategist at brokerage CLSA Ltd in Tokyo who has covered Japanese equities for over 25 years. “Perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised, given their scramble to get overseas exposure.”

The longer oil remains around $50 a barrel, the worse it gets. MUFG and Sumitomo Mitsui reported in May that the cost of bad energy loans rose in the past 12 months to a combined $994 million. Sumitomo Mitsui said that number could rise in the next year. Mizuho didn’t disclose energy-related credit costs.

Brent gained 14 cents, or 0.3 per cent, to $52.65 a barrel on the London-based ICE Futures Europe exchange at 12:28 pm Singapore time.

“Considering that we have downgraded more than 100 rated energy companies globally since December 2015, the banks’ energy and resource-related exposures in this uncertain environment could create losses that would reduce their capital,” Raymond Spencer, an analyst for Moody’s Investors Service in Tokyo, wrote in a May 19 note.

With defaults on the rise, bank investors around the world have been demanding more information about energy lending. MUFG’s exposure jumped after the bank expanded its most recent disclosure to include refineries and pipelines, borrowers that were left out of previous reports.

“I don’t believe that proactively lending to the natural resource and energy sector is in itself a mistake,” said Nobuyuki Hirano, president of MUFG, at a May 16 briefing discussing the company’s financial results. He said the company has prepared “appropriately” for potential losses. One concern for Japanese lenders is the deteriorating finances of the US shale industry. During the boom, drillers that outspent cash flow even when oil was $100 a barrel tapped credit from Japanese banks that were pushing to expand overseas lending.

Then prices plummeted below $30. Since the start of 2015, 142 oilfield service companies and oil and gas producers have gone bankrupt, owing almost $62 billion, according to law firm Haynes & Boone.

Sumitomo Mitsui is among the lenders to Stone Energy Corp., which is in restructuring talks. MUFG and Mizuho are among Linn Energy LLC,’s creditors, company records show. Linn owed $2.55 billion on two credit lines when it filed for bankruptcy May 11. Mizuho was also a lender to Breitburn Energy Partners LP, which owed $1.2 billion on its credit line when it filed for bankruptcy May 15.

While these credit lines are split up among a dozen or more lenders, and collateral in the form of oil and gas reserves may mitigate any losses, the risk is adding up. MUFG said in April that its North American subsidiary has made $5.52 billion in loans to exploration and production companies. Almost half of those loans are now marked as “criticised,” a regulatory designation that means that, at best, the loans exhibit potential weaknesses and at worst will result in losses.

The size of Sumitomo Mitsui’s total oil and gas-related exposure to non-Japanese borrowers, which is the area most vulnerable to changes in oil prices, is 6 per cent of its total portfolio, Koichi Miyata, president of the group holding company, said at a results briefing in Tokyo on May 13. “And this is a diverse mix including oil majors, 85 per cent of which I think is fair to say is extremely good credit,” he said.

Mizuho said its bad debts in the energy and resource sector totalled about $279 million as of March. “Even based on oil prices at the moment, we’re absolutely not seeing the recording of any major concentration of credit costs,” Mizuho’s President Yasuhiro Sato said at a May 13 briefing on the bank’s financial results.

“I don’t think we need to be worried at the current point in time,” said Nana Otsuki, chief analyst at Monex Group Inc, a Tokyo-based online securities firm. “But we’ll need to watch risks more carefully next year, particularly if there are any movements in the price of oil.”

 

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/international/japan-banks-enter-ranks-of-biggest-energy-lenders-116060901307_1.html

SEBI to make it easier for fund managers to move to India

To make it easier for the foreign fund managers keen to relocate to India, markets regulator SEBI is considering allowing them to function as ‘Portfolio Managers’ under an easier regulatory regime.

The move assumes significance in the wake of the government already having announced taxation incentives for the offshore fund managers willing to relocate to India.

A new section in the Income Tax Act provides that the fund management activity carried out through an Eligible Fund Manager (EFM) located in India and acting on behalf of an Eligible Investment Fund (EIF) would not constitute business connection in India of such a fund.

Following the issuance of notification by the tax department in this regard, SEBI held meetings with various stakeholders to discuss the registration framework for EFMs, during which several impediments were pointed out in the existing regulations for Investment Advisers and Portfolio Managers.

Subsequently, SEBI has decided to initiate a consultation process for changes to its norms for Portfolio Managers while putting in place a framework for allowing EFMs to act as Portfolio Managers to their EIFs.

A proposal in this regard would be put up for approval of SEBI’s board next week, a senior official said.

Among the proposed measures, an existing SEBI-registered Portfolio Manager will also be allowed to act as EFM with prior intimation from SEBI and subject to certain conditions.

SEBI also plans to put in place a procedure for registration of an existing foreign-based fund manager desirous of relocating to India, or as a fresh applicant.

Such applicants will be granted registration as Portfolio Managers to act as an EFM, provided they meet existing eligibility norms of being a body corporate, having net worth of Rs 2 crore, appointment of a Principal Officer and minimum two employees with requisite credentials.

The EFMs would be required to segregate the funds and securities of the EIFs from that of other clients, provide information to Sebi on a half-yearly basis, ensure compliance to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and other regulations.

However, EFMs would be exempted from several provisions of the PMS Regulations with respect to the EIF, and would have to comply with the applicable regulatory and disclosure requirements of the jurisdiction of the EIF.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/52640330.cms