Total bad loans seen at whopping $130 bn; as defaults rise, cases at NCLT accumulate

Stressed loans near $10-billion mark; total bad loans seen at over $130 billion; 250 NCLT cases across 10 benches
While many of the loan exposures had turned toxic in 2015 and 2016, bankers were looking to recover their dues via other schemes such as the strategic debt restructuring or the S4A (scheme for sustainable structuring of stressed assets ) and 5/25.

While many of the loan exposures had turned toxic in 2015 and 2016, bankers were looking to recover their dues via other schemes such as the strategic debt restructuring or the S4A (scheme for sustainable structuring of stressed assets ) and 5/25.

With defaults on loans and corporate bonds nudging $10 billion in 2017 so far and the total quantum of bad loans estimated to have crossed $130 billion, the number of cases at the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has jumped to around 250 across 10 benches. At the end of March, fewer than 40 cases had been referred to the tribunal. Banks are hoping to recover their loans via the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code(IBC) and have already referred a dozen large accounts to the tribunal following a recommendation from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). They are expected to approach the tribunal for another two dozen accounts.

Apart from banks, also knocking on the doors of the NCLT are other creditors such as non-banking financial companies and asset reconstruction companies. A few corporate debtors too have approached the tribunal.

While many of the loan exposures had turned toxic in 2015 and 2016, bankers were looking to recover their dues via other schemes such as the strategic debt restructuring or the S4A (scheme for sustainable structuring of stressed assets ) and 5/25.

Consequently, several of the exposures had not been classified as non-performing assets. With the RBI asking banks to refer the cases to the NCLT, the tribunal has been inundated with cases.

Industry watchers believe that given the quality of the fixed assets — plant and machinery — at many of the companies is of good quality, the firms are unlikely to be liquidated. However, buyers will come in only if banks take big haircuts since just about 45-50% of the debt is believed to be sustainable.

Of the 12 cases referred to the NCLT, 11 have been admitted. While some of the companies — Essar Steel, Bhushan Steel and Monnet Ispat — raised objections, the tribunal overruled these.

Bhushan Steel, which owes banks a whopping Rs 44,447 crore, had earlier objected to the insolvency proceedings alleging that State Bank of India (SBI) had inflated the dues by around Rs 100 crore.

Nonetheless, SBI’s petition was admitted by the NCLT, which ordered the interim resolution professional (IRP) to take charge of the company. The IRP, along with a committee of creditors, is currently working on a resolution plan.

The central bank has recently sent a second list of defaulters like Videocon Industries, IVRCL and Visa Steel that banks must take to the bankruptcy court if stress is not resolved by December 13.

These defaults, in turn, have put pressure on banks’ balance sheets which have reported a remarkable rise in bad loans in the June quarter of FY18. India’s largest bank SBI saw its gross bad loan ratio — total non-performing loans as a percentage of its total loans — rise 86 basis points sequentially to 9.97%.

SBI has an exposure of Rs 50,247 crore to the 12 accounts referred to the NCLT and the total provision on those accounts stood at Rs 19,943 crore. SBI chairman Arundhati Bhattacharya told reporters during the results press conference that the bank requires incremental provision of Rs 8,571 crore with respect to the 12 accounts in FY18.

Source: Financial Express

 

Bad loan crisis: Crackdown by banks sends borrowers scrambling to offer solutions

Tough stance taken by govt, RBI makes borrowers cautious

Indian banks are beginning to spot a welcome change in their customers’ behaviour: borrowers who have seen their accounts classified as stressed or non-performing are approaching the lenders with proposals to resolve such accounts in a time-bound manner.

The tough stance taken by the central government and the Reserve Bank of India to end the festering bad loan crisis in the Indian banking sector has caught many borrowers by surprise and they are scrambling to put together resolution plans to avoid harsher penalties including insolvency proceedings, bankers said. Even a couple of months ago, it was difficult to get these clients to the negotiation table.

“I can definitely say that we are in a much better position than even six months ago. We are seeing traction from a section of our borrowers to come up with proposals for resolution of stressed accounts,” said Rajkiran Rai G, managing director and CEO, Union Bank of India. “However, it is too early to say if this is the end of the problem. We will have to see how the discussions shape up,” he added.

Borrowers with outstanding amounts between Rs 500-1,500 crore are the most active in trying to resolve their stressed accounts, and they are looking at various options including scouting for investors and sale of non-core assets, two senior bankers with state-run banks said on conditions of anonymity. A large number of these borrowers are from the steel, power and telecom sectors. Some of the larger corporates with outstanding amounts between Rs 1,500-5,000 crore have also taken initiative to resolve their stressed accounts. On an average, these account for about 50% of the current gross non-performing assets of the banking system, the bankers said.

In June, the RBI’s Internal Advisory Committee (IAC) had said 12 accounts totaling about 25% of the current gross NPA of the banking system would qualify for immediate reference under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). At present, proceedings against all the 12 accounts are on in various benches of the National Company Law Tribunal across the country. For accounts that do not qualify under the above criterion, IAC had recommended that banks should finalise a resolution plan within six months. “In cases where a viable resolution is not agreed upon within six months, banks should be required to file for insolvency proceedings under IBC,” the RBI had said.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/bad-loan-crisis-crackdown-by-banks-sends-borrowers-scrambling-to-offer-solutions/769027/

Bankruptcy Code: Banks to refer Essar Steel, Electrosteel, Bhushan Steel to NCLT

The fate of three near-bankrupt steel companies — Essar Steel, Bhushan Steel and Electrosteel Steels — which together owe lenders nearly Rs.1 lakh crore will now be decided by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).

The fate of three near-bankrupt steel companies — Essar Steel, Bhushan Steel and Electrosteel Steels — which together owe lenders nearly `1 lakh crore will now be decided by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). Having failed to recover their dues or rope in either strategic or financial investors, lenders to these companies finally agreed on Thursday to resort to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), bankers familiar with the development said. The decision follows a directive by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on June 13 to banks asking them to refer a dozen troubled companies — with a combined debt of close to Rs.2.4 lakh crore — to the tribunal.

Corporate watchers said a new chapter was unfolding for India Inc, traditionally unfamiliar with insolvencies and, more often than not, able to wrangle concessions and bailouts, often with the help of those in power. Both the RBI and the government are attempting a speedy resolution to the problem of non-performing assets (NPAs) that is paralysing banks and stymieing investments.
While it has been known for several years now that many of the country’s top corporates are financially fragile, it was former RBI governor Raghuram Rajan who first forced banks to accept the reality and classify assets correctly in December 2015.

Bankers have been given a fortnight within which to move the tribunal. Among the other companies that have been refereed to the NCLT are Jyoti Structures, Lanco Infratech, Monnet Ispat and JP Infratech. The 12 accounts identified by the central bank are those to which banks have an exposure of more than Rs 5,000 crore, more than 60% of which has been recognised as NPAs. Once these cases are with the NCLT, the lenders need to set up a committee of creditors that will come up with a plan on how the asset will be tackled. If the committee is unable to find a solution within 180 days — this can be extended to 270 days — the borrowing entity will go into liquidation.

The three steelcos — Essar, Bhushan and Electrosteel — together have a manufacturing capacity of close to 18 million tonnes per annum. The total debt of the Essar Group is estimated at Rs.1.17 lakh crore. Most private banks have sold off their Essar Steel exposure to asset reconstruction companies, taking a haircut of more than 50%; most PSU banks have declared Essar Steel an NPA.
Essar Steel, promoted by the Ruias, had at a meeting last year requested banks to convert Rs.12,200 crore of loans into preference capital and equity shares.

While Rs.9,000 crore was sought to be converted into preference shares, to be redeemed after 12-18 years, the company had requested the remaining Rs 3,200 crore be converted into common equity. For the balance Rs 31,800 crore, the company had sought a prolonged repayment period. Senior bankers had told FE such a deep restructuring proposal, if approved by the consortium, would amount to taking a haircut of nearly 30%.

Bhushan Steel, promoted by the Singals, has been unable to service its loans for several years now thanks to the stress on cash flows, partly the result of large steel imports into the country which drove down prices. While banks had been monitoring the company’s operations and financials, they were unable to come up with a solution. In August 2014, a senior company executive was arrested around the time the former chairman and managing director of Syndicate Bank SK Jain was arrested in an alleged case of bribery.

In the case of Electrosteel Steels, banks decided to initiate a strategic debt restructuring, with a view to roping in a new investor and beefing the equity capital of the company. However, despite many attempts, banks were unable to find a buyer within the stipulated 18 months, and were compelled to classify the account as an NPA.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/bankruptcy-code-banks-to-refer-essar-steel-electrosteel-bhushan-steel-to-nclt/731747/

Stressed assets open floodgates for insolvency professionals

State Bank of India seeks applications for empanelment, sets stiff conditions

The Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI’s) move to push 12 large non-performing assets (NPAs) of the banking system into the insolvency process has created a massive business opportunity of up to Rs.2,500 crore for insolvency professionals.

To put the numbers in perspective, the RBI list comprises four companies with dues of over Rs.35,000 crore each. Even if one puts together all the few hundred cases handled by the six-month old framework, it would be a struggle to cross Rs.20,000 crore.

While the huge influx is likely to test the capacity of most players who are literally months old in the profession and present a steep learning curve, it will be a great stimulus for entry of stronger hands and investment in the segment.

According to the insolvency law, the entire process of corporate insolvency needs to be managed by a resolution professional appointed by a committee of creditors. The resolution professional, who will effectively become the chief executive officer of the business during the process period of 180 days, can charge a fee for his services. Besides, banks are also looking to appoint insolvency professionals to populate committees of creditors, which need to be formed for each of these companies.

With over Rs. 2.5 lakh crore debt coming in the top 12 companies in the first list, a one per cent charge works out to Rs. 2,500 crore. While this would be a ballpark figure, regulations do not prescribe a limit or range of fees, leaving a free hand for market forces. Globally, insolvency professionals work on various structures such as a fixed fee, time and effort-based charges, or a percentage of realisation. In some cases, a combination of these three methods could also be used. Banks would have pricing power, but good insolvency professionals would have their levers to charge a decent number, given the complexities involved and short supply.

Pavan K Vijay, managing director of Corporate Professionals, a Delhi-based firm that is looking at this opportunity, says the move gives a big boost to the nascent profession. “Even if the one per cent number does not work out, as there are bound to be negotiations, it could be around Rs.1,500 crore to Rs.2,000 crore. It is not small.”

The State Bank of India (SBI), the country’s largest lender, which also has the lion’s share of these 12 large accounts, has begun the process of empanelling insolvency professionals by issuing advertisements recently.

“The bank (SBI) seeks to empanel IRPs (insolvency resolution professionals) as resolution professionals in applications filed before the National Company Law Tribunal for resolution and/or liquidation proceedings, including for representing the bank in the committee of creditors as per the provisions of the code/and the regulations,” said the advertisements issued early last week.

Other banks are likely to follow similar processes in selecting insolvency professionals, as the public sector is generally process driven, regulatory officials say.

According to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) website, there were some 977 registered insolvency professionals in the inaugural limited period criteria and another 350 in the regular category, which requires passing the national insolvency examination. Lawyers, chartered accountants, and company secretaries form a majority. However, not all of them might be able to handle the large mandates. Given the large accounts it handles, the SBI has set stiff eligibility criteria for the applicants. It wants people with experience in debt restructuring, who are also experts in company law, etc. The application window closes early next week. Since the big accounts bring with them a lot of complexities, individual professionals might not be able to handle the entire task, Vijay said.

Several top lawyers such as Shardul Shroff and Pallavi Shroff of Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas, Alok Dhir of Dhir & Dhir, Bahram Vakil and Dushyant Dave are among the registered insolvency professionals. These would have established infrastructure and people to support their functions.

Also, the insolvency law provides for Insolvency Professional Entities (IPEs), which are corporate structures where two or more professionals can come together as partners or directors. However, there are only seven such registered IPEs as of today, according to the IBBI website. These are IRR Insolvency Professionals, a firm floated by Delhi-based lawyer Alok Dhir, AAA Insolvency Professionals, Witworth Insolvency Professionals, Gyan Shree Insolvency Professionals, A2Z Insolvency Services, Turnaround Insolvency and Nangia Insolvency Professionals.

Sandeep Gupta of Witworth, which is already handling a few mandates, feels while the opportunity is big, capacity and capabilities also need to be built up. “It is the beyond the means of an individual to handle a book size of several thousand crores. A company of such a size would have numerous non-financial creditors as well. These need to be handled in a given time frame. The resolution professional would need adequate support in terms of people and infrastructure,” he said.

For instance, Gupta said, he might hire a few freelance chief financial officers to manage one of the big accounts. Considering all this, calculating fee on a percentage basis could be misleading. It should be calculated, based on time and effort put in by the insolvency professional, he argued.

The SBI advertisement asks applicants to provide “tentative fees proposed to be charged” for various roles such as interim resolution professional, resolution professional on behalf of the committee of creditors or for being appointed as an insolvency professional to represent the bank in the committee of creditors. The bank also wanted to know whether the applicant would be “willing to abide by the fees decided by the bank.”

Source: https://www.pressreader.com/india/business-standard/20170619/281479276408067

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Code will drive creation of a new debt market

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Code will drive growth of debt market in India, which hardly exists in corporate and business financing, Dr. MS Sahoo, Chairman, Bankruptcy Board of India

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Code will drive growth of debt market in India, which hardly exists in corporate and business financing, Dr. MS Sahoo, Chairman, Bankruptcy Board of India told Fe. While the country has a matured and bullish equity market, the debt market in India was yet to develop. The board was not concerned with default in bank credits or about the rising NPAs. It would mainly look into private creditors interest if their money got locked.

“Banks have some protection in the areas of corporate financing but non banking debt is non existent. Bankruptcy and Insolvency Code would be instrumental in the growth of non bank debt financing, which would lead to reduce dominance of banks in areas of credit.

With a debt market created, debt supplies would ease out and lending rates both for the non banking creditors as well as for the banks would be market driven. “At present demand is chasing supplies but it will be other way round with supplies chasing demand,” Mamata Binani, chairperson, Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI) said at an interactive session organised by the MCC Chamber of Commerce.

She said the code will enable to solve problems of many assets lying dead for years in dispute. Such assets could be quickly liquidated without the judiciary’s intervention and unsecured creditors will always have the first chance to realize its money from the business. The board has estimated that Rs 25,000 crore, which is locked in dead assets, is going to get unlocked in next five years.

While Sahoo made clear that the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Board would not deal with corporate frauds and inter managerial disputes, a creditor who has given unsecured loans should trigger the first available opportunity if he sees his credit at risk.

It will be a creditors committee, which will work on a strict time line, to resolve insolvency. The creditors will not be bound by any set rules to resolve insolvency or debtors problem. They will have flexibility to take their own decision and find a way out and that might come in the form debt restructuring or liquidation. However, if liquidation is unable to recover a debt, it may be a loss for both the creditor and the debtor, Alok Dhir, founder and and managing partner of Dhir & Dhir Associates said.

“But working with this code will gradually prove what is the right approach and there may be changes brought in the law,” Sahoo said adding that the board was also working on a framework for direct liquidation by passing insolvency resolution and the framework would be ready by February- March. But to begin the process on code a company has to address to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), while for personal insolvency, a claimant will have to go to the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT). But the framework for personal insolvency was not yet ready and it would take some time before a party could move the DRT, Sahoo said.

However, the NCLT with 11 benches across the country was already functional with the code and there were chances that 93,000 pending BIFR cases could be referred to the board, many of which might not have to begin the process on code but through pre- pack solutions, Sahoo felt. He said the board has selected 974 insolvency professionals on a temporary basis and would begin certification through tests for inducting regular professionals.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/market/bankruptcy-and-insolvency-code-will-drive-creation-of-a-new-debt-market/506028/

Company Law Tribunal benches ‘will be fully functional’ in next few days

All the 11 benches of the newly constituted National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) will be fully functional in the next “couple of days”, a top Corporate Affairs Ministry (MCA) official said.

Infrastructure is ready in all the 10 cities where the NCLT benches are being set up. The human resources aspect has also been taken care of and adequate steps are being taken to start work immediately.

To begin with, NCLT will handle all pending cases before the Company Law Board and other matters not assigned to any other Court, the official said.

“There will be no transition problem for existing CLB cases,” the official added.

As on date, as many as eight members have joined NCLT, out of approved 25 members. “The remaining members are expected to join in the next few days. They will be posted in various benches,” the official said.

The MCA has also planned a 10-day colloquium in July for the NCLT members, the official added. Asked about the status of cases before High Courts (company cases), the MCA official said the High Court will be the second stage of transfer.

“We will let the CLB cases transition to stabilise for some time and then, in discussion with NCLT Chairman, decide on the High Courts related matter,” the official said.

The creation of NCLT from June 1 is expected to speed up delivery of justice in corporate cases. Sai Venkateshwaran, Partner and Head, Accounting Advisory Services, KPMG in India, hailed the MCA move to set up NCLT and NCLAT.

“We can expect to see the new Companies Act become a reality in its entirety in the coming months,” Venkateshwaran said. The time required for setting up of the NCLT and NCLAT was one of the key reasons for the Companies Act 2013 not being fully operationalised, he said.

However, with the setting up of these tribunals, the way has been paved for operationalising most of the remaining parts of the Companies Act 2013, he added. .

Meanwhile, the Company Law Board hearing in the Financial Technologies’ Board removal case did not take place on Thursday as the CLB stood dissolved on May 31 by virtue of the government move to set up NCLT from June 1.

Indications are that an NCLT bench will hear this matter in the coming days, sources said.

Source: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/tp-news/company-law-tribunal-benches-will-be-fully-functional-in-next-few-days/article8688161.ece

New bankruptcy bill to speed up shutdown of failed businesses

Panel has sought the overhaul of the bankruptcy framework to allow the speedy winding up of failed businesses to protect shareholders and lenders, aiming to modernise an outdated system.

A government panel has sought the overhaul of the bankruptcy framework to allow the speedy winding up of failed businesses to protect shareholders and lenders, aiming to modernise an outdated system that drags out closure proceedings.

It has recommended new institutions and structures for a fresh regime that will encourage entrepreneurship and foster a startup culture, among the stated objectives of the Narendra Modi administration. The government has indicated it will move a Bill in the winter session of Parliament to give effect to the recommendations, addressing one of the key issues that has kept India low on the ease of doing business rankings.

The Bankruptcy Law Reform Commission headed by former law secretary TK Viswanathan has proposed insolvency resolution within 180 days and a new regulator to oversee the process. It’s also laid down a clear and speedy system for early identification of financial distress and revival of companies.

The timelines are on par with international norms for insolvency resolution. “The endeavour would be to introduce the Bill in the next session of Parliament,” Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said at the World Economic Forum in the Capital on Wednesday. Viswanathan submitted the report to the minister later in the day. The report, along with the draft legislation, has been made public for feedback. “The Bill seeks to improve the handling of conflicts between creditors and debtors, avoid destruction of value, distinguish malfeasance vis-a-vis business failure and clearly allocate losses in macroeconomic downturns,” the report said.

The World Bank has ranked India at 136 out of 189 countries in ‘resolving insolvency,’ estimating that it takes 4.3 years on average in Mumbai to settle a case.

Jaitley had identified bankruptcy law reform as a key priority for improving ease of doing business in his February budget speech. He said that a comprehensive bankruptcy code, meeting global standards and providing the necessary judicial capacity, would be unveiled in the fiscal year. Under the current system, proceedings take several years, hurting investors and lenders besides costing taxpayers crores of rupees.

Banks are groaning under bad debt stemming from projects that have got stuck, drawing the Reserve Bank of India’s concern. “We need a bankruptcy code. We need equity to be seen as equity and debt to be seen as debt. Today there’s a lot of confusion… We need that confusion to be changed,” RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan has said previously.

90 Days for Key Categories. The prescribed resolution timeline of 180 days can be cut further to 90 days from the trigger date for key categories. The proposed insolvency regulator will cover professionals and agencies specialising in the field.

The proposals include information utilities that will collect, authenticate and disseminate financial information from listed companies. An Insolvency Adjudicating Authority will hear cases by or against debtors. The Debt Recovery Tribunal should be the adjudicating authority with jurisdiction over individuals and unlimited liability partnership firms, it said. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) should be the adjudicating authority with jurisdiction over companies and limited liability entities, it added.

The draft bill has consolidated existing rules relating to insolvency of companies, limited liability entities, unlimited liability partnerships and individuals, all of which are currently scattered across a number of laws, into a single legislation.

According to the draft bill, during the transition phase, the Centre will exercise all regulatory powers until the agency is established. The panel’s report suggests that an insolvency resolution plan prepared by a resolution professional has to be approved by a majority of 75% of the voting share of financial creditors. As part of the insolvency resolution process, creditors and debtors will engage in negotiations to arrive at agreeable repayment plans.

The draft proposes that any proceeding pending before the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR) or the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) before the new law goes into force should stand abated or stopped.

“However, a company in respect of which such proceeding stands abated may make a reference to Adjudicating Authority within 180 days from the commencement of this law,” the recommendation said, keeping in view continuity of the process. Minister of State for Finance Jayant Sinha said the required infrastructure needed to be put in place.

“We also have to ensure that necessary judicial capacity is available,” he said. “We also need to resolve many of the situations immediately because they are short of cash in most of these bankruptcy types of cases.” The minister said the government was trying to put together a comprehensive solution where “we can resolve default and bankruptcy cases as quickly and efficiently possible.”

Industry feels the new system will create a robust and globally competitive insolvency regime. This will significantly reduce the time taken for insolvency proceedings in India, which at present, on an average basis is estimated at about 4.3 years as against only 1.7 years in high-income OECD countries,” said Chandrajit Banerjee, director general of the Confederation of Indian Industry.

“The architecture proposed by the Viswanathan committee of establishing an insolvency regulator to have oversight of the new class of insolvency professionals, agencies and information utilities will enhance the systemic efficiency of dealing with insolvency cases in a timebound manner,” he said.

Source: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-11-05/news/68043912_1_bankruptcy-framework-new-bankruptcy-bill-180-days