GST: Filing returns will no longer be taxing

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
By Prakash Kumar, CEO, GSTN and Upender Gupta, Commissioner (GST Policy), Ministry of Finance

There is an excitement in the country about GST. People want to understand the process of GST. Through this article, we present some points about the process of filing returns.

Every trader will have to file returns once a month and pay tax. The input credits of taxes that have been paid on purchases will be automatic and will be available to every trader. The whole process of filing returns is online. If accounts are kept in the Excel sheet provided by GSTN, then the same account will automatically be converted into returns with the help of an offline tool every month.

If a trader sells all his merchandise only to retail customers, then the returns of such a trader will be very simple – the summary of rate-wise turnover will be shown. If a trader avails of the composition scheme and has a turnover of less than Rs.50 lakh, such a trader will not have to file returns every month, but every three months, showing the total turnover.

Traders selling business-to-business merchandise must give specific details for each sale invoice in their returns. When a trader’s sales details are entered into the form of returns on the GST website by the 10th of the month, the complete details of purchases made by his buyers will be seen in his GSTR-2 (GST Online Account). That means it will auto-populate.

With the purchasing buyer clicking okay, after looking at these details, the merchant’s GSTR-3 return will appear in the computer itself. The GSTN system will auto prepare and show the merchant’s tax liability and the complete details of the input tax credit, along with net tax liability. The trader would be required to deposit the difference between tax liability and input tax credit. Taxes must be deposited online or in the bank.

After this, the trader will have to submit the final return made by computer by clicking on GSTR-3 and submitting it by the 20th of the month. There is an arrangement in business-to-business transactions which we call the input tax credit reversal, which is to return the input tax credit taken. A lot of people have expressed concern about this, but if you understand the whole process, then you would fully support it.

If the trader from whom you buy goods has shown that transaction in his return by the 10th of the month, you will get input tax credit. Suppose the person selling the goods does not put that invoice in his returns, even then you will get an opportunity to show it in your GSTR-2 return by the 15th of the month, and by doing so, you will get full input tax credit.

After that, you have to contact the businessman (the supplier) and explain that he must show that transaction in his return so that there is no reversal of the input tax credit received in the next month. You will get 30 days for this and if even then the merchant who sells the merchandise does not accept this transaction and does not show it in his return, then the input tax credit tax that you got would be reversed in your returns next month.

It is the duty of every businessman to deal with such traders who have deposited the tax with the government after collecting the tax from you.On the basis of the default of each merchant, they will be given a compliance rating, which will be visible to all other traders so that you do not do business with frequent defaulters.

Source: http://blogs.economictimes.indiatimes.com/et-commentary/gst-filing-returns-will-no-longer-be-taxing/

High-value transactions by doctors, lawyers under income tax lens

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
Salaried individuals are not required to file the newly introduced statement of financial transactions (SFT).

Senior tax officials are reaching out to chartered accountants and CFOs to drive home the point that by May 31 business establishments, various financial institutions and professionals, including doctors, lawyers and architects, will have to report a slew of high-value transactions such as cash deposit, credit card payments, share sale, property deals, debentures and mutual fund units among others.

Salaried individuals are not required to file the newly introduced statement of financial transactions (SFT). Entities that will have to report are banks, professionals, fund houses, forex dealers, post office, nidhis, non-banking finance companies, property registrars, companies issuing bonds and debentures, and listed companies buying back shares from specific persons.

“Many are not fully aware of the new requirement. Under the modified rules, the earlier requirement of filing annual information return (AIR) has now been replaced by SFT. The changes have created new classes of first time filers who have to file SFT of specified transactions for FY 2016-17,” said Jai Raj Kajla, Director of Income Tax (Intelligence & Criminal Investigation) while addressing tax practitioners here on Friday.

The nature of transactions includes cash payment for purchase of demand drafts or pay orders of Rs 10 lakh or more in a year; cash payment of Rs 10 lakh or more for purchase of pre-paid RBI instruments, cash deposit or withdrawal of Rs 50 lakh or more from current account; one-time deposit of Rs 10 lakh or more with banks, nidhis, NBFCs and post offices; payment of Rs 1 lakh or more in cash and Rs 10 lakh or more by other mode against credit card bill issued to a person during the year; and property registrars for deals worth Rs 30 lakh or more.

Kajla and his colleagues met close to 300 tax practitioners and corporate CFOs to explain the new rules, which would require the reporting entity to register online with the tax office. SFTs have to be filed in separate form and not along with the regular Income tax returns.

“The Directorate is conducting workshops to address various categories of reporting entities like bullion dealers, stock brokers, and dealers of automobiles and luxury goods,” said Anu Krishna Aggarwal, Additional Director of Income Tax (I&CI).

As per the new requirements, apart from specific filers like banks which used to file similar AIR returns, SFT regulations would cover any person who is liable to audit under Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The particular section relates to audit of businesses and professions.

The purpose of the workshops was to spell out the rules to the chartered accountants who in turn can assist taxpayers in ensuring timely and accurate SFT compliance.

Laxman Singh Gurjar, Manpreet Singh Duggal, and Aastha Madhur – all deputy directors of Income Tax – and Vishnu Agarwal, chairman of the western India council of ICAI, participated in the discussions which also dealt with the finer points of compliance ..For instance, while reporting an entity will have to take into account all the accounts of the same nature maintained in respect of a person during a financial year; also, while attributing the entire value of the transactions to all the persons in cases where the account is maintained or transactions recorded in the name of more than one person.

Filing of inaccurate information will attract penalty of Rs 50,000.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/58651349.cms

As Narendra Modi government gets set to crack GST whip on tax evaders, India Inc voices concern

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
According to Section 132 of the Central GST Bill cleared by the Lok Sabha recently, the taxman can also proceed against anyone for wrongly availing input tax credits.

Many functionaries from corporate India and tax experts have voiced concerns over the government’s plan to give unprecedented teeth to the country’s indirect tax administrators by making tax evasion above `5 crore a “cognizable and non-bailable offence” in the upcoming Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime. According to Section 132 of the Central GST Bill cleared by the Lok Sabha recently, the taxman can also proceed against anyone for wrongly availing input tax credits or refunds above the same threshold, treating it as a cognizable and non-bailable offence, where the police have the authority to arrest the person concerned without warrant.

While non-remittance of tax deducted at source could lead to non-bailable warrant under the Income-Tax Act, this has been sparingly used – one recent instance was that of the Bengaluru High Court denying a request of the I-T department to issue a non-bailable warrant against the beleaguered businessman Vijay Mallya.  The punitive provisions under indirect tax laws have, however, been less biting.

The service tax department had invited the Delhi high court’s ire last September for arresting a senior executive of travel portal MakeMyTrip for failing to deposit tax after collecting it from those who booked hotel room nights via the portal. Disturbed over the fact that the arrest took place without even issuing a show cause notice to the firm and giving it an opportunity to defend itself, the court awarded costs to the travel portal and asked the taxman to refund the service tax collected after the arrest. The tax department went in appeal against the court’s decision and the matter is now before the Supreme Court.

“It may be reasonable to make “collection of tax but non-payment to government’ a non-bailable offence, as there is very little room here for interpretation in such case. But availing tax credits through wrong invoices or obtaining higher-than-admissible refunds are subject to technical interpretations in the early days of GST and it would be extremely stringent to make these non-bailable offences,” Bipin Sapra, Indirect Tax partner at EY said. Echoing the view, Anita Rastogi, partner-indirect tax, PwC India said the country’s indirect laws have never had such tough provisions against tax evasion.

Section 132 of the CGST Bill also spells out the punishment for tax evasions above Rs.1 crore: if the amount evaded exceeds Rs. 5 crore, imprisonment up to five years is possible along with fine, Rs. 2-5 crore evasion could lead to imprisonment extending to three years and fine, Rs.1-2 crore evasion could invite up to 1-year jail term and fine.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/as-narendra-modi-government-gets-set-to-crack-gst-whip-on-tax-evaders-india-inc-voices-concern/613908/

After PM Modi Order, Enforcement Directorate’s crackdown on Shell Companies begins across 100 cities

by | posted in: Company Incorporations, e-filing of MCA Returns, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0
Enforcement Directorate is carrying out searches at 100 locations to detect shell companies.

Weeks after the Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s office ordered a crackdown on shell companies used to launder money, the Enforcement Directorate on Saturday carried out nationwide searches across 100 locations targeting nearly 300 shell companies.

Sources said Saturday’s ED raids on shell firms across more than a dozen states was a direct fallout of the coordinated action against these firms. Among the cities where the Enforcement Directorate teams were conducting raids are Kolkata, Chennai, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Chandigarh, Patna and Bengaluru. In Chennai, officials said searches were being carried out at 13 locations linked to 8 companies.

The PMO had last month identified paper companies, which do not conduct any operations but are used to launder money and evade taxes by other firms, as a big challenge to PM Modi’s war against black money.

As part of this exercise, the government had also decided to create a database of shell companies and their directors. A task force chaired jointly by the Revenue Secretary and Corporate Affairs Secretary was mandated to coordinate action against these dubious companies.

That the 1,155 shell companies detected over the last three years had been used as conduits by over 22,000 beneficiaries to launder money, one government official said, indicated how important it was to target shell companies. These companies face charges of dubious transactions running into more than Rs. 13,300 crore.

It is not clear if today’s multiple ED raids on shell firms are linked to the government’s finding that over 550 people had laundered Rs. 3,900 crore through such companies after the November 8 ban on the high-denomination notes.

An official report had earlier pointed that only 6 lakh of the 15 lakh registered companies file annual return. While it was possible that many of them may be defunct, officials said it could be possible that some of these could be involved in dubious transactions.

The Special Investigation Team to fight Black Money set up on the Supreme Court’s directions had also pointed that proactive detection of shell companies was going to be a key to the success of the government’s campaign.

Source: http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/after-pm-order-crackdown-on-shell-companies-begins-across-100-cities-1676030

Fresh transfer pricing trouble for MNCs

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0

A new provision for secondary adjustment in transfer pricing, announced in the Union Budget for 2017-18, is likely to affect the cash flow of multinational corporations (MNCs) and the dividend distribution tax paid by their Indian subsidiaries. The provision has also sparked worry on Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) and service tax payable by the subsidiaries, as well as retrospective implementation from 2013-14.   Experts claim the provision is in line with the norms of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) —but its wording is giving rise to apprehension.

Transfer pricing is the value at which companies trade products, services or assets between units across borders, a regular part of doing business for a multinational.

A primary adjustment is made, by tax administration, to company´s taxable profits on transactions with an associated enterprise in a secondary jurisdiction.

At present, there is only primary adjustment on transfer pricing of an MNC´s subsidiary.

This means if the subsidiary concerned agrees to the tax adjustment provided by an assessment officer, or on its own makes such an adjustment, it will pay taxes on that amount.

For instance, a company claims it has earned Rs.400 crore, and the transfer pricing officer claims it has earned Rs.600 crore, using the arm´s length principle.

If the company agrees to the assessment and pays tax on this, it is called primary adjustment.

Under the existing law, the additional Rs.200 crore would not need to be shown in the books of the company.

A secondary adjustment arises when simultaneous changes are made in the books of accounts of the company as well. This is what new provision aims at —the additional Rs.200 crore would also have to be shown in the books of the Indian subsidiary of MNC concerned.

“The parent company might not want to part with this Rs.200 crore, as the subsidiary in India might not be significant for its strategy,” said Eric Mehta, partner, transfer pricing, PwC India.

“An MNC might have a global presence, with India only a small part of its affairs.” Sending the money to India would also face hurdles because of lack of a contractual arrangement, said Amit Maheshwari, partner, Ashok Maheshwary and Associates.

He added it would have an adverse effect on the cash flow and business operations of MNCs.

If the Indian subsidiary concerned does not get the required amount, say Rs.200 crore, within a stipulated period, it would be considered a loan to the parent or associate, attracting interest.

(The time period has not been specified in the Budget documents.) “In case, the total amount is brought to the books of the Indian company, it will give rise to higher dividend, which in turn, will give rise to higher dividend distribution tax,” said Mehta.

Also, if the payment is towards services rendered by Indian subsidiaries, the higher receipt in books will give rise to higher service tax liability, added Mehta.

Maheshwari said higher receipt and hence profit in the books would also give rise to MAT as profit on the additional income, in this case  Rs.200 crore, was not shown earlier in the books earlier.

It should be noted that MAT is applicable to book profits.

All this will, however, only apply if the primary adjustment of the Indian entity exceeds Rs.1 crore the previous year —along with other conditions.

The provision has also given rise to fear of retrospective application, as the condition of primary adjustment exceeding Rs.1 crore is effective from April 1, 2016 or previous years.

Currently, the assessment of 2013-14 is underway for transfer pricing purposes, said Mehta, pointing to the possibility of secondary adjustments made from that year.

He agreed the purpose of the provision might not be to have retrospective effect, but the wording does not prevent it.

I-T refunds rise by a whopping 41.5%, government issues 1.62 cr refunds worth Rs 1.42 lakh cr

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
The income tax department has issued refunds to the tune of Rs 1.42 lakh crore so far this fiscal till February 10, 41.5 per cent higher than last year’s.

The income tax department has issued refunds to the tune of Rs 1.42 lakh crore so far this fiscal till February 10, 41.5 per cent higher than last year’s. The Centralised Processing Centre (CPC) of the tax department has already processed over 4.19 crore income tax returns (ITRs) and issued over 1.62 crore refunds during the current financial year up to February 10, 2017.

“The amount of refunds issued at Rs 1.42 lakh crore is 41.5 per cent higher than the corresponding period last year,” an official statement said. As much as 92 per cent of the refunds issued are below Rs 50,000 due to the high priority given to expeditious issue of refunds to small taxpayers.

Only 2 per cent of refunds less than Rs 50,000 remain to be issued. A majority of these cases relate to recently-filed ITRs or where the taxpayer’s response to the department is awaited.

The department also advised taxpayers to verify and update their e-mail address and mobile number on the e-filing portal to receive electronic communication.

“CBDT is committed to ensuring best possible taxpayer services through its e-governance programmes and increasing the coverage and scope of electronic filing and processing of various forms and applications,” the statement said.

As a result of emphasis on expeditious issue of refunds, 92 per cent of all I-T returns were processed within 60 days, demonstrating the Central Board of Direct Taxes’ (CBDT) commitment to faster and more efficient taxpayer service.

As many as 4.01 crore ITRs were e-filed till February 10, 2017, an increase of 20 per cent over the previous year.

Also, more than 60 lakh other online forms were filed with an increase of nearly 41 per cent compared with the previous year.

In April-January, the total direct tax collection grew 10.79 per cent to Rs 5.82 lakh crore led by robust collections in personal income tax.