The Ministry for Corporate Affairs Ministry has hinted that the suspension of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is likely to be revoked after March 24.
he Ministry for Corporate Affairs Ministry has hinted that the suspension of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is likely to be revoked after March 24.
This has been conveyed in a written submission by the Ministry to the Standing Committee on Finance headed by Jayant Sinha. This submission came along with the note on allocation and utilisation of funds for the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), which is the insolvency regulator.
“It is expected that the suspension of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code will likely be revoked after March 24 and activities of IBBI will be increased manifold in the next financial year,” the MCA submission said.
Given that the economy is now in recovery mode, it is widely expected that the Centre will revoke the suspension after March 24. Also, any extension of the suspension this date would require Parliament approval, legal experts said.
6-month suspension
A six-month suspension was first introduced in June 5 for debt defaults arising post March 25, 2020, when the Covid-induced lockdown was announced. The suspension was to end on September 25, but was extended up to December 25. In mid-December, the suspension was further extended by three months, up to March 25.
In effect, the government had ensured that any corporate debt default during Covid, between March 25, 2020 and March 25, 2021, will remain outside the IBC purview. However, for defaults before March 25, 2020, there will be no protection, said experts.
While the law protects the corporate debtor from insolvency proceedings for the one-year period till March 25, it does not disallow such action against the personal guarantors of a corporate debtor.
‘Go digital’
In a separate development, the Standing Committee on Finance has, in its latest report tabled in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday, directed the MCA to move towards full digitisation of its functions, particularly of its statutory bodies. It sees the quasi judicial bodies facing a deluge of cases post withdrawal of the moratorium and underscored stressed the need to enhance their digital and infrastructural capacities to handle the increase in caseload.
The RBI notified Rotation Policy instead of Cooling Period for Bank Branch Audit for CAs.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) notified the change in norms on eligibility, empanelment, the appointment of Statutory Branch Auditors in Public Sector Banks from years 2020-21 onwards.
The RBI notified Rotation Policy instead of Cooling Period for Bank Branch Audit for CAs. In other words, the concept of compulsory rest for two years for audit firms located in the specified centres, after completion of four years of continuous branch audit, followed till Financial Year 2019-20 has been done away with.
Instead, the branch auditors across all the centres of the country, on completion of four years of continuous branch audit, will be subjected to the policy of rotation i.e. they may be considered for appointment as SBAs of any other PSB.
However, the audit firms will not be eligible to be re-appointed as SBAs, in the same bank where they completed their audit assignment prior to rest/rotation, at least for one cycle of four years.
The RBI further notified the change on norms for selection of branches of Public Sector Banks (PSBs) for Statutory Audit.
Firstly, statutory branch audit of PSBs should be carried out so as to cover 90% of all funded and 90% of all non-funded credit exposures of a bank.
The selection of branches for statutory audit shall include a representative cross section of rural/semi-urban/urban and metropolitan branches, predominantly including branches which are not subjected to concurrent audit.
CPUs/LPUs/and other centralised hubs, by whatever nomenclature called, would be included for branch audit every year.
The selection of branches shall be finalised by each PSB with the consent of their Statutory Central Auditor/s. Secondly, in respect of those branches, which are subject to concurrent audit by chartered accountants and not selected for branch audit, LFARs and other certifications done by concurrent auditors will be submitted to the Managing Director & CEO of the bank.
The banks in turn will consolidate/compile all such LFARs and other certifications submitted by the Concurrent Auditors and submit to Statutory Central Auditor/s as an internal document of the bank.
The RBI notified the change in the procedure for appointment of Statutory Branch Auditors.
Firstly, the list of eligible auditors/audit firms will be prepared by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) as per the norms prescribed by RBI.
Secondly, the list will be subjected to scrutiny by RBI for identifying the continuing and rested firms and excluding audit firms who have been denied audit.
Thirdly, RBI will, thereafter, forward the final list of all eligible auditors/audit firms to PSBs for selection of the required number of branch auditors/audit firms.
Banks will be required to clearly advise the selected audit firms that each audit firm can take up audit assignments (branch audit) in one PSB only. The audit firm should give its consent in writing for consideration of appointment in the bank concerned for the particular year and the subsequent continuing years.
Fourthly, the consent given by an audit firm is irrevocable and no request from audit firms for changing the bank, after giving its consent will be entertained.
Fifthly, after the selection of branch auditors, PSBs will be required to recommend the names of both continuing and selected branch auditors to RBI for seeking its prior approval before their actual appointment, as per statutory requirement.
The RBI while elaboration on the change in general guidelines applicable to appointment of Statutory Branch Auditors stated that SBAs will have a maximum tenure of four years in a particular bank.
The appointment of SBAs will be made on an annual basis, subject to their fulfilling the eligibility norms prescribed by RBI from time to time, and also subject to their suitability.
“While allotting branches, banks are required to select auditors/audit firms which are in close proximity to their offices/branches. Banks are also required to have a suitable mix of various categories of auditors / audit firms while selecting the branch auditors keeping in view the size of the branches to be audited.
Banks are advised to allot branches, to the extent possible, to the audit firms taking into consideration their category and audit experience in such a way that specialised and larger branches are audited by bigger/experienced audit firms,” the RBI said.
The audit firms retiring as Statutory Central Auditors from a PSB shall not be eligible to be appointed as SBAs of the same PSB during the prescribed cooling period for SCAs from that particular PSB.
The RBI notified change in the eligibility norms for the empanelment of audit firms to be appointed as Statutory Branch Auditors in PSBs.
To handle the menace of fake firms and circular trading entities, GST officials have cancelled 1,63,042 registrations in the month of October and November this year due to non-filing of GSTR-3B returns for more than six months
The Government has canceled the Goods and Service Tax (GST) registration of 163,000 business entities who have not filed monthly tax returns (GSTR-3B) for the last six months or more.
Furthermore, the department would persuade 25,000 taxpayers, who have not filed returns for October that was due by November 24, to comply with tax return deadlines.
“All these business entities, who had not filed their GSTR-3B returns for more than six months, were first issued the cancellation notices and then their registrations were cancelled as per standard operating procedure,” one of the officials said.
The Tax officers have been directed to follow up personally with these defaulting taxpayers so that their GSTR-3B returns due for the month are filed by November 30.
The push for better compliance comes on the heels of the tax department’s nationwide drive against fake invoice scams. It is suspected that fraudsters often register firms under GST but remain mostly dormant on compliance while using the status to claim invalid input tax credit (ITC).
As per the sources, in the Ahmedabad zone 11,048 GST registrations have been cancelled. In the Chennai zone, 19,586 suo motu cancellations have been done so far in respect of GST taxpayers who have failed to file returns for more than six months.
The officials said that the tax authority is also scanning newly registered entities that have not provided correct details at the time of registration.
Out of 720 deemed registrations granted between August 21 and November 16 this year, where Aadhaar authentication was not done, 55 deemed registrations have been identified for the discrepancy and the process of cancellation was initiated in these cases.
The government has cancelled Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration of over 163,000 business entities due to non-filing of tax returns for more than six months to curb the menace of fly-by-night operators who create bogus firms and fraudulently avail input tax credit (ITC) worth thousands of crores.
The Government has canceled the Goods and Service Tax (GST) registration of 163,000 business entities who have not filed monthly tax returns (GSTR-3B) for the last six months or more.
Furthermore, the department would persuade 25,000 taxpayers, who have not filed returns for October that was due by November 24, to comply with tax return deadlines.
“All these business entities, who had not filed their GSTR-3B returns for more than six months, were first issued the cancellation notices and then their registrations were cancelled as per standard operating procedure,” one of the officials said.
The Tax officers have been directed to follow up personally with these defaulting taxpayers so that their GSTR-3B returns due for the month are filed by November 30.
The push for better compliance comes on the heels of the tax department’s nationwide drive against fake invoice scams.
It is suspected that fraudsters often register firms under GST but remain mostly dormant on compliance while using the status to claim invalid input tax credit (ITC). As per the sources, in the Ahmedabad zone 11,048 GST registrations have been cancelled.
In the Chennai zone, 19,586 suo motu cancellations have been done so far in respect of GST taxpayers who have failed to file returns for more than six months.
The officials said that the tax authority is also scanning newly registered entities that have not provided correct details at the time of registration.
Out of 720 deemed registrations granted between August 21 and November 16 this year, where Aadhaar authentication was not done, 55 deemed registrations have been identified for the discrepancy and the process of cancellation was initiated in these cases.
Furthermore, the department would persuade 25,000 taxpayers, who have not filed returns for October that was due by November 24, to comply with tax return deadlines.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, in its gazette notification had made the generation of UDIN from the ICAI website mandatory for every kind of certificate/tax audit report and other attests made by their members as required by various regulators. This was introduced to curb fake certifications by non-CAs misrepresenting themselves as Chartered Accountants
The income tax department will validate with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) the unique document identification number (UDIN) of chartered accountants when they upload tax audit reports, the finance ministry said on Thursday.
To curb fake certifications by non-CAs misrepresenting themselves as chartered accountants, the ICAI in 2019 made generation of UDIN from the ICAI website mandatory for every kind of certificate and tax audit report and other attests made by their members as required by various regulators.
The ministry said that in line with the ongoing initiatives of the income tax department for integrating with other government agencies and bodies, income-tax e-filing portal has completed its integration with the ICAI portal for validation of UDIN generated from the ICAI portal by the chartered accountants for documents certified/attested by them.
Income-tax e-filing portal had already factored mandatory quoting of UDIN with effect from April 27, 2020, for documents certified/attested in compliance with the Income Tax Act,1961 by a chartered accountant.
“With this system level integration, UDIN provided for the audit reports/certificates submitted by the chartered accountants in the e-filing portal shall be validated online with the ICAI,” the ministry added.
It said this will help in weeding out fake or incorrect tax audit reports not duly authenticated with the ICAI.
If a chartered accountant was not able to generate UDIN before submission of audit report or certificate, the e-filing portal permits such submission, subject to the CA updating the UDIN within 5 calendar days from the date of form submission in the income tax e-filing portal.
If the UDIN for the audit report/certificate is not updated within the 15 days, such audit report and certificate uploaded shall be treated as invalid submission, the ministry added.
In a statement, the Department of Revenue (DoR) reiterated that there will be no extra compliance burden on the taxpayers for GST turnover displayed in the Form 26AS, which is an annual consolidated tax statement that can be accessed from the income-tax website by taxpayers using their Permanent Account Number (PAN).
Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched GST into operation on the 1 st of July, 2017. GST was publicised as ‘one nation, one tax’ by the government, aimed to provide a simplified, single tax regime. GST is a dual levy where the Central Government levies and collects Central GST (CGST) and the State levies and collects State GST (SGST) on intra-state supply of goods or services. Centre also levies and collects Integrated GST (IGST) on inter-state supply of goods or services. The GST Portal is a website where all the compliance activities of GST can be done before and after GST login. Activities such as the GST registration return filing, payment of taxes, application for refund, etc. can be done on the GST Portal.
GSTN, recently launched many new features on GSTN portal. One of its features is that GSTN portal is now showing aggregate annual turnover for previous financial year after logging in to the portal.
The GST turnover is being shown in 26AS just for the information of the taxpayer. DoR acknowledged that there may be some differences in GSTR-3Bs filed and the GST shown in the Form 26AS but it can’t happen that a person shows turnover of crores of rupees in GST and doesn’t pay a single rupee of income tax.
The DoR said that the notified Income Tax Return for the current AY 2020-21 already requires reporting of GST outward supplies in the Schedule GST.
Therefore, the information displayed in Form 26AS would provide ease of compliance to the taxpayers in filling Schedule GST.
The revenue department has noticed that many unscrupulous persons are trying to avail or pass on input tax credit fraudulently by generating fake invoices and has already formulated a strategy for identifying these fake invoice generators which inter alia takes into account the income tax profiles of the suspected fake invoice generators.
These persons in most of the cases never file their income tax returns or disclose very meagre taxable income in the income tax return.
The suspected fake invoice generators are being identified for serious action under GST and other laws including suspension of their GST registration based on the fact that whether their income tax payment commensurate with the expected profit margin on turnover reported by them in the GST returns, the DoR said.
What “aggregate turnover” means?
“Aggregate turnover” is the aggregate value of all taxable supplies, exports of goods or/and services or both, exempt supplies and interstate supplies of persons having the same PAN, to be computed on all India basis. However, such taxable supplies do not include the value of inward supplies on which GST is being paid under reverse charge basis. The aggregate turnover also excludes Central tax, State tax, Union territory tax, Integrated tax and cess.
Basically, sum of the following shall be considered as an aggregate turnover:
Value of all taxable supplies of goods and services
Value of all Inter-state supplies
Value of all exempt supplies of goods and services
Value of all export of goods or services or both
However, the following items would be excluded from Turnover:
Inward supplies on which taxes are paid under reverse charge
Taxes and cesses under GST
Interstate supply of services
Transactions which are neither supply of goods or service.
Supplies provided outside India or received outside India
Extrapolation of Turnover at GSTIN level (for those who have not filed all the returns as per their eligibility or liability)
GSTIN-wise GSTR-3B turnover for FY 2019-2020 has been extrapolated by the formula: >> Total turnover declared as per all GSTR-3B filed / No. of GSTR-3B filed) X No. of GSTR-3B eligible or liable to be filed
GSTIN-wise CMP-08 outward supply has been extrapolated by the formula: >> Total outward supply declared as per all CMP-08 filed / No. of CMP-08 filed) X No. of CMP- 08 eligible or liable to be filed
Added both the values of S. No. (a) and S. No. (b).
For those taxpayers who have filed all the returns as per their respective eligibilities, value of S. No. (c) will be the actual turnover)
Aggregation of extrapolated turnover at PAN level or Annual Aggregate Turnover Resultant values as per S.No. (c) above are aggregated or rolled up at PAN level to arrive at the Annual Aggregate Turnover.
What is the relevance of knowing aggregate turnover?
The aggregate turnover is a crucial parameter for determining the following aspects:
Determining whether registration is required or not-
Aggregate Turnover is relevant for a person to determine threshold limit to obtain registration under GST.
Threshold turnover limit for exclusively supply of goods = Rs 40 lakh (Rs 20 lakh in case of supplies effected from special category states)
Threshold turnover limit for supply of Services or (goods and services both): Rs 20 lakh (Rs 10 lakh in case of supplies effected from special category states)
Determine the limit of composition levy – Threshold limit to opt for composition scheme: Rs 1.5 crore in a financial year (Rs 75 lakh in case of supplies effected from special category states).
To determine a “Taxable person” – Section 2 of CGST Act defines the “taxable person” as a person who has obtained registration or is liable to register as per section 22 and 24 of CGST Act. Here the Section 22 provides a liability to register when the tax payer’s turnover exceeds the limit as determined in certain cases. This is again based on aggregate turnover.
Calculation of Late fee –
Under section 33 any registered taxable person person who fails to file the return u/s 30 i.e Annual return shall be liable to pay late fees of Rs. 100 for every day when such failure continues subject to a maximum of an amount of 0.25% of his aggregate turnover.
This can escalate the amount of late fee because aggregate turnover will include all supplies except reverse charge.
To determine whether Audit is required –
Registered persons with an aggregate turnover exceeding the prescribed GST audit limit of Rs 2 Crore during a financial year are liable for GST Audit. The turnover limit of Rs 2 Crore is same for the registered tax persons across all States and UTs. Thus, no separate turnover limit is defined for Special Category States for GST Audit.
Therefore, it is advised to carry on the computation of aggregate turnover accurately as the same will be used at a number of places which will in turn determine the tax liability of a person.
– The rate of interest as of February 29 that will be used to calculate the interest differential will not include any penalties or any penal rate of interest applied to the loan. – The package will be available for eligible borrowers irrespective of whether they have availed or partially availed or not availed the moratorium on repayment announced by RBI
Borrowers will not need to apply for the interest-on-interest waiver scheme for the six-month loan moratorium, the finance ministry has said, asking lenders to credit ex-gratia relief amount into the accounts of those eligible.
The ministry late Tuesday issued a set of 20 clarifications on the scheme in form of frequently asked questions or FAQs
The lending institutions will draw up a list of their borrowers eligible under the criteria laid down by the government and refund the difference between the compound interest and simple interest paid between March 1 and August 31.
The benefit is available to all eligible borrowers including those who did not opt for moratorium. The lenders can seek a refund from the government that will foot the bill.
According to a Crisil report, 75% of borrowers will be covered under the scheme, which likely to cost the government Rs 7,500 crore.
The scheme is not applicable to accounts classified as non-performing assets (NPAs) at the end of February as also loans against fixed deposits, bonds, shares or other interest-bearing instruments and loans given for investment in financial assets such as shares and debentures.
While the scheme includes any outstanding amount on credit cards, relief will not be paid to those credit card holders with a card balance in ‘credit’, as per the FAQs.
The Rs 2 crore limit is based on the borrower’s aggregate loans across lending institutions as on February 29.
Non-fund based limits such as letters of credit and guarantees would not count towards the Rs 2 crore limit.
For calculating the interest differential, lending institutions will consider the contracted interest rate on loans as of February 29. For zero interest loans, the lender’s base rate should be used while for credit card dues, the weighted average lending rate for the transactions between March 1 and August 31 should be applied, the ministry said.
On October 23, the government had announced the scheme for ex-gratia payment of difference between compound interest and simple interest for six months (March 1, 2020 to August 31, 2020) to borrowers in specified loan accounts.
The move was in response to the Supreme Court (SC) seeking clarity on the waiver of ‘interest on interest’ in the ongoing case filed for relief of borrowers availing the moratorium on loan repayments granted by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).
The case was filed on behalf of borrowers, seeking relief from payment of the interest accruing on the monthly instalments that were paused for six months.
The SC has set the next hearing for November 2 to assess the implementation of the scheme, which the government said would be completed by November 5.
“Banks will not have to go through individual borrowers, only the categories need to be selected and the scheme needs to be applied. It will all be system-based, there is not much manual intervention required,” said Mukesh Kumar Jain, former managing director and CEO of the erstwhile Oriental Bank of Commerce.
The FAQs said banks would use the information they had along with information from credit bureaus to assess a borrower’s aggregate loans. Jain said this should not be an issue as, “Normally, loans up to Rs 2 crore are taken from a single bank since it is a relatively small amount”.
