File income tax return (ITR) even if your income is not taxable

Many people think it an avoidable headache to file income tax returns, when their income falls below the taxable limit, or when tax is deducted at source or when no taxes are due. They also unnecessarily fear some notice will come from Income Tax Department every year, once they have started filing income tax return.

Here are the benefits of filing the income tax return that show you that it’s always better to file the return every year, even if your income  is not taxable.

  1. Helps as Standard Income Proof

In simple words, a tax return is a summary document or declaration about the results of all your financial transactions undertaken during the tax year. It consolidates the income under all sources and calculates the taxes due after allowing all eligible deductions.

ITR is considered and accepted by various agencies as a proof of your income, not only in India but also globally. If you are looking for higher education or employment abroad, ITR is the largely accepted income proof.

PAN – Permanent Account Number, issued by the Income Tax authority is not only a prerequisite for filing ITR but is also now mandatory for all financial transactions – from opening a bank account, or purchasing mutual funds to real estate for investment. So it makes sense to get yourself one and file the tax return.

  1. Helps Loan application:

At the time of applying for a home loan or vehicle loan or education loan, most banks ask the applicant to furnish copies of tax returns for the past 2-3 years. This helps banks understand your financial position and ability to repay the loan. Providing a copy of returns receipts helps in faster approval of your loan application

Apart from a good credit history (or past repayment track), the fact that you are filing your ITR regularly gives you speedier access to credit and at better terms, although not necessarily a larger line of credit, but surely a better rate.

It also provides the impression to the lender that you are a law abiding citizen and will repay the loan within time.

3. Helps claiming your tax refund:

Filing of ITR also helps your claiming of Tax Refund! In the case of salaried employees or those who have sold property, where Tax is deducted at source at standard rate, you can claim refund if the tax outgo has been more than the actual tax payable. You must file your tax returns if you wish to claim tax refunds. Not doing so would lead to forgoing the refund.

Generally, your employer deducts taxes on your estimated income based on the declaration that you have submitted. Apart from this, taxes are also deducted at source on various other incomes such as interest, commission, rent, and others, at a standard rate. When you club all these incomes with your salary, and also consider tax deductions as applicable to you, the final tax rate applicable may turn out to be different from the TDS rate. Owing to this you may either have to pay more tax or expect a refund.

Thus, filing ITR is not always about paying tax. It can be used as a means to reduce your tax liability!

  1. Helps Carry forward of losses:

Income tax laws allow you to carry forward and set off certain losses (losses from business income, depreciation, capital gains) against future gain or income. These losses can be carried forward for eight consecutive years immediately succeeding the year in which the loss is incurred. Even if you have taxable income this year, you might have losses to carry forward that can be adjusted against gains in later years when you actually have higher incomes.

  1. Visa processing:

If you are planning to immigrate to another country or explore an overseas job opportunity, then prepare yourself in advance. Most embassies and consulates require you to furnish copies of your tax returns for the past couple of years at the time of the visa application. This is especially applicable when applying for visa for the US, the UK, Canada or Europe.

  1. Helps in Statutory Compliance:

This also helps in statutory compliance, when you need to file tax returns.

The income tax department requires you to file a tax return in case your gross total income exceeds Rs.2.5 lakh (Rs.3 lakh for tax payers older than 60 years and Rs.5 lakh for those older than 80 years) in the financial year. Further, even if you do not have taxable income but if you qualify as a ‘resident’ individual and have any asset or financial interest in an entity located outside of India, then also it is mandatory for you to file.

What if you don’t file your taxes? If you are required to file your returns but miss it, then the tax officer may impose a penalty of up to Rs.5,000 (under section 271F). And if you owe some taxes and still don’t file it, then you may be liable to pay additional interest (section 234A), along with other penalties for avoiding taxes.

Income Declaration Scheme: Rs 65,000 cr and counting

The Capital’s tallest building, the 28-storey Civic Centre near the New Delhi Railway Station, is hardly a hub of action on a weekend night. But September 30 was not like any other Friday evening. It was the last day of the government’s Income Declaration Scheme (IDS). And hours before the midnight deadline, top officials in Mumbai and New Delhi confirmed that the response was overwhelming. Till 11 pm, the pan-India declarations had exceeded Rs 65,000 crore, implying a tax amount or earning of Rs 30,000 crore for the government.

While the final tally will be announced by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley at a press conference on Saturday afternoon, till evening of Friday, Hyderabad emerged as a top destination with declaration of Rs 13,000 crore, followed by Mumbai (Rs 8,500 crore), New Delhi (Rs 6,000 crore) and Kolkata (Rs 4,000 crore).

Business Standard visited Delhi’s Civic Centre, which houses one of the largest income tax offices in the country, to do a reality check of the Narendra Modi government’s ambitious black money declaration scheme just before the window closed. At the main gate, the register kept for visitors’ entry got filled and the second register had more than 100 entries at 9 pm. The basement parking was overflowing through the day, a clear indication that the scheme had picked up momentum on the last day.

Across several floors of the building, aides of those declaring undisclosed income were lined up till late in the evening. All top officers were at work, handholding people who wanted to come out clean, by paying 45 per cent tax on the declared amount. Among the people who had rushed with the income papers along with fat cheques was a 20 something man with a backpack. He represented a businessman, but remained tight-lipped, in the spirit of the scheme that promises not to give away any detail of the people who had responded to the government’s call.

There were more like him, sitting on sofas outside the commissioners’ rooms or at the elevators, trying to reach the right floor before midnight.

“I am just delivering the form for someone else. This is not my declaration,” said one of those, when asked why he waited for the last minute to make the disclosure.

A helpful principal commissioner pointed out that there was a rush of people over the last two days, with most seeking clarifications about the scheme. Many of the last day declarants were the ones whose forms were rejected earlier because of incomplete information, a source said.

With a sigh of relief, another principal commissioner at 10 pm said over Rs 200 crore worth declarations were received in his office, helping him meet the expectations.

There was no time to break for dinner but cooks, sourced from a prominent restaurant chain, were at work, making cuisines for close to 100 people who stayed up till midnight to accept declarations.

A tax officer gave out the secret of the scheme’s success. “Besides the 900,000 letters that were sent out, we intimated individuals whose information we had. Most of them chose to declare it under the scheme to avoid the risk of prosecution after the window closed,” he said.

In fact, it was during the surveys that many individuals decided to declare their unaccounted income or assets. “During surveys, they asked if they could still declare it. We agreed, and that worked,” he said. In the 1997 tax amnesty scheme — Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme (VDIS) — the government had received Rs 33,000 crore in declarations. In contrast, only about 644 declarations worth Rs 4,164 crore were made under the black money window for foreign assets last year, resulting in tax collection of Rs 2,428 crore.

The stiff warning from the Prime Minister against the black money holders earlier this month may have also acted as a trigger for people to avail the one-time Scheme. Modi, in an interview to a private channel, had said, “No one should blame me if I take tough decisions after the 30th (of September).”

The IDS, which charges a one-time effective tax rate of 45 per cent on undisclosed income or property, gave a chance to domestic taxpayers to declare undisclosed income or assets by September 30 and avail immunity from prosecution under the Income-tax Act, Wealth Tax Act and Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/income-declaration-scheme-rs-65-000-cr-and-counting-116093001207_1.html

GST Council: Tax exemption threshold fixed at Rs 20 lakh

The first session of the GST Council that concluded here on Friday made good progress in ironing out some of the contentious issues between the Centre and states: The exemption threshold for the goods and services tax (GST) has been fixed at Rs 20 lakh for all states except the northeastern ones and the three hill states of Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh, in whose case this limit would be Rs 10 lakh; states will have the assessment powers for units with annual turnover up to Rs 1.5 crore while in the case of bigger businesses too, the one-taxpayer-one-authority principle will be retained and either the Centre or the state concerned will be accorded the assessing power based on risk profiling.

Importantly, the Centre agreed to the states’ demand for including the proceeds from sundry cesses levied by them in the definition of “revenue”, a step that could increase its compensation payouts. This would also mean that the states would cease to levy the cesses, the proceeds from which stood at close to Rs 40,000 crore in FY16.

The council decided to take 2015-16 as the base year to compute compensation to states for any future revenue loss, but left open the question of projecting the business-as-usual rate of increase in revenue, crucial for quantifying compensation. Finance minister Arun Jaitley said three options were under consideration for projecting the revenue growth rate: A mutually agreed-upon fixed rate; the average of the three best (high-growth) years in the past five years; and the average of median three of the last five years. States had earlier turned down the Centre’s proposal for taking the average of the last three years for projecting future revenue growth, saying these years haven’t been particularly good due to the economic slowdown.

Jaitley said the Centre will continue to assess the 11 lakh service tax assessees (even those below Rs 1.5 crore) but added that states will be given training to assess them and once they acquire competence, the future addition to this taxpayer base will be shared with them for the purpose of assessment.

Regardless of whether the Centre or the state has control on an assessee, the tax proceeds will be shared between the two — the central GST component will go to the Centre and the states will appropriate the state GST, which could be slightly higher than central GST. As far as integrated GST — to be levied on interstate transactions and imports — is concerned, the place of supply rules will decide who the appropriating authority will be; of course, the basic principle is that tax needs to be paid where the consumption takes place.

The council, Jaitley said, would meet again on September 30 to finalise the draft rules on the council’s functioning and the exemption thresholds and decide how the grandfathering of tax sops (like the area-based excise exemptions) will be carried out. The crucial question of the GST slab structure, the revenue-neutral rate (RNR) and actual GST rates would be discussed by the council between October 17 and 19. The Arvind Subramanian panel that had estimated a RNR of 15-15.5% had said if the standard rate is 17%, it could comprise central GST of 8% and state GST of 9%.

Tax experts welcomed the outcome of the first meeting of the council. Harishanker Subramaniam, national leader, indirect tax, EY India, said: “It is interesting is that for GST on services, the Centre will have administrative control irrespective of threshold at least in the initial years till states are trained to handle services. This may be a good news for industry as many were worried as to how states will handle complexity of services.”

According to Pratik P Jain, leader, indirect tax, PwC India, enhancing the annual turnover for exemption to Rs 20 lakh from Rs 10 lakh contemplated earlier would be administratively easier for the government as several small businesses would be out of the GST ambit. “Industry would also welcome the move to have a single assessing authority, instead of having a dual system of assessment and scrutiny, which was a major concern for businesses,” he said.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/threshold-for-gst-fixed-at-rs-20-lakh/389350/

Indirect tax mop-up rises 27.5% to Rs 3.36 lakh cr till August

Net indirect tax collections in the April-August period grew 27.5 per cent to Rs 3.36 lakh crore on the back of surge in excise collections.

The collection till August 2016 show that 43.2 per cent of the annual budget target of indirect taxes, which includes Central Excise, Service Tax and Customs, has been achieved.

Till August, Indirect tax net revenue collections are at Rs 3.36 lakh crore, which is 27.5 per cent more than the net collections for the corresponding period last year.

Net tax collections of Central Excise stood at Rs 1.53 lakh crore during April-August, as compared to Rs 1.03 lakh crore during the corresponding period in the previous financial year, registering a growth of 48.8 per cent.Net collections of Service Tax during April-August stood at Rs 92,696 crore, a growth of 23.2 per cent as compared to Rs 75,219 crore during the same period previous year.

Customs mop-up during April-August was at Rs 90,448 crore as compared to Rs 85,557 crore during the same period last fiscal, registering a growth of 5.7 per cent.
The government hopes to collect Rs 8.47 lakh crore from direct taxes and Rs 7.79 lakh crore from indirect taxes, which includes Customs, excise and service tax, in 2016-17.

 

GST bringing realty shake-up

Retailers, both of physical stores and e-commerce entities, fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) companies and those in consumer durables have started rejigging their warehouse strategy.

This is in preparation for the national goods and services tax (GST), with the government working to an April 2017 deadline. All this could mean a shake-up in real estate, say analysts. A rough calculation suggests these businesses could look at reducing their warehouse count to half, while stepping up the total space acquisition in select destinations, once GST comes into play. In the next two to three years, businesses could see significant cost reduction due to the revised strategy.

Hindustan Unilever, Nestle, Johnson & Johnson and Shoppers Stop are among those to have begun work on consolidating their warehouses, according to a source. These companies will take up mega space, in millions of square feet, to set up ‘mother warehouses’, he said. In the online space, top companies such as Flipkart and Amazon have been on an expansion spree for warehouses and fulfillment centres in the past two years, primarily to suit the complex tax structure through the country. Now, however, they won’t feel the need to have warehouses in every state and can strategise accordingly, Vijaya Ganesh Thangavel, managing director, Land & Industrial (India), Cushman & Wakefield, told this newspaper.

For instance, Max Fashion, a prominent retailer, has eight warehouses totaling 400,000 sq ft. The number is likely to come down to four after GST, says chief executive Vasanth Kumar. “The number will get firmed up once we know the full GST details and the implications such as the reverse logistics needs,’’ he said. Post GST, their warehouse count will be down but the total space covered could go up to around 600,000 sq ft by 2018 “to meet future business needs, as well our rate of growth at a 30-plus per cent CAGR (compounded annual rate)”.

If a typical e-commerce company was taking 300,000 to 400,000 sq ft in metros and tier-1 cities for warehouses, 100,000 sq ft in tier-2 and 40,000 to 50,000 sq ft in tier-3, the plan now will be to go for million sq ft space and more, away from big cities and in fewer locations, primarily where real estate cost won’t be prohibitive, says Thangavel of Cushman. Distribution centres, smaller in size in the range of 40,000 to 50,000 sq ft, could be set up closer to cities.

The biggest trend now is that prominent developers are getting into the warehouse space, which has mostly been a domain of local land owners till recently, according to Thangavel. Along with realtors, a new breed of advisors are coming up, only for warehouse planning. Also, warehouse parks are being set up for large structures. While the exercise of restructuring the warehouses will take a couple of years, he projects a cost reduction of at least 10 to 15 per cent by 2019-2020. Estimates are that big companies which have on an average one warehouse in every state, totaling to anything from 20 to 25, might look at eight to 10, pan-India post-GST.

“We understand that a few of the larger companies have started consolidating their warehousing requirements in strategic locations, in anticipation of GST, with a view to bringing efficiency into their supply chain,’’ said Rami Kaushal, managing director, Consulting and Valuations, CBRE South Asia.

Besides retailers and FMCG companies, even pharmaceutical companies would look at rationalising the number of operational warehouses and swap these for better quality and larger format ones, he said.

“Implementation of GST is expected to lead to rationalisation of warehousing demand, leading to lower logistics cost and reduced delivery time of manufactured goods,’’ Kaushal explained. The current complicated tax structure meant that choice in setting up inventory and distribution centres were based on the tax regime, rather than on operational efficiency, he said.

GST, when implemented, will free the decisions on warehousing and distribution from these tax considerations, according to Kaushal. ”This would enable occupiers to create larger hubs, servicing two or more states from a single location, which would help optimise inventory costs and increase efficiency.’’ This shift in operational planning would ultimately result in a hub and spoke model being adopted by many of the occupiers, he added.

Industrial warehousing space is estimated at approximately 800 million sq ft across the country and is expected to grow by nine to 10 per cent annually. A few sectors such as e-commerce, modern retailing and FMCG are expected to grow at about 20 per cent annually in the short term, according to CBRE.

A recent JLL report listed the National Capital Region, Mumbai, Pune, Bengaluru, Chennai, Hyderabad, Kolkata and Ahmedabad as top warehouse hubs. These eight city hubs together had a cumulative supply of organised Grade-A and Grade-B warehousing space of around 97 mn sq ft in 2015; this is expected to grow to around 116 mn sq ft by the end of 2016. It added that GST will result in emergence of new hubs such as Belgaum, Bhubaneswar, Coimbatore, Goa, Guwahati, Indore, Jaipur, Kolhapur, Lucknow/ Kanpur, Ludhiana, Nagpur, Patna, Raipur, Ranchi, Vapi and Vijayawada.

 

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/gst-bringing-realty-shake-up-116090801173_1.html

Banks can accept tax dues in cash under IDS: RBI

The Reserve bank of India (RBI) on Thursday directed banks to accept tax dues in cash under the domestic black money declaration scheme which closes on September 30. Under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, which came into effect on June 1, one can come clean by paying tax, penalty and cess totalling 45 per cent of the undisclosed income.

It was brought to RBI’s notice by the government that “banks are hesitant” in allowing deposit of large amounts of cash by declarants under the scheme.


“We advise that banks must invariably accept cash, irrespective of amount, over the counters from all declarants who desire to deposit cash at the counters, including deposits under the above Scheme through challan ITNS- 286,” the central bank said.

The banks, however, have to comply with the Know Your Customer requirements.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/banks-can-accept-tax-dues-in-cash-under-ids-rbi-116090801067_1.html

CBDT extends due date for filing of Income Tax Returns

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has announced extension for the due date for filing of Income tax returns by tax payers whose accounts are required to be audited under the Income Tax Act is the 30th September of the following year.

The tax payers whose business receipts exceed by Rs 1 crore or professional receipts exceed Rs 25 lakh during the previous year 2015-16 are required to file an Income Tax return accompanied by an audit report by the above mentioned due date.

However, taking into consideration that the last date for making declarations under the Income Declaration Scheme 2016 is also 30th September, 2016, the Central Board of Direct Taxes has decided to extend the last date for such returns which were due on  September 30, 2016 to October 17, 2016 in order to remove inconvenience and to facilitate ease of compliance.

The Order of CBDT vide F.No.225/195/2016-ITA-H dated 9 th September, 2016, under Section 119 of the Income Tax Act,1961and the Press release from the Ministry of Finance extending the due date to 17 October, 2016 is as below.

 

F.No.225/195/2016-ITA-H
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

North Block, ITA.II Division New Delhi, the 9th September, 2016

Order under Section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

The last date for making declarations under the Income Declaration Scheme 2016 is 30th September, 2016 which coincides with the last date of filing Income-tax returns by the tax payers whose accounts are audited and who are required to furnish the returns of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 by 30th September, 2016 as per provisions of section 139 (1) of Income tax Act, 1961.

In order to remove inconvenience and to facilitate ease of compliance, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, in exercise of powers conferred under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereby extends the ‘due-date’ for furnishing such returns of Income from 30th September, 2016 to 17th October, 2016, in case of tax payers throughout India, who are liable to furnish their Income-tax return by the said ‘due-date’.

(Deepshikha Sharma)

Director to the Government of India

============================================

Government of India

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue

Central Board of Direct Taxes

 

New Delhi, 9th September, 2016

 

Press Release

 

Sub :- CBDT Extends due date for filing of Income Tax Returns – reg

 

The due date for filing of Income tax returns by tax payers whose accounts are required to be audited under the Income Tax Act is the 30th September of the following year. The tax payers whose business receipts exceed Rupees One Crore or professional receipts exceed Rupees twenty-five Lakh during the previous year 2015-16 are required to file an Income Tax return accompanied by an audit report by the above mentioned due date.

 

However, taking into consideration that the last date for making declarations under the Income Declaration Scheme 2016 is also 30th September, 2016, the Central Board of Direct Taxes has decided to extend the last date for such returns which were due on 30th September, 2016 to 17th October, 2016 in order to remove inconvenience and to facilitate ease of compliance.

 

(Meenakshi J Goswami)

Commissioner of Income Tax

(Media and Technical Policy)

Official Spokesperson, CBDT.

Source: Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India