Sebi deems share transfer by promoters by way of gift as sale

Any inter-se transfer of shares by a promoter to his wife will be considered as sale even if it is in the form of a gift where no monetary transaction is involved, Sebi said.

According to guidelines, the promoters are not eligible for preferential allotment of shares or warrants if there has been any inter-se transfer of shares among promoter group firms in the last six months.
Giving its views on an application filed by KJMC Financial Services, the watchdog said that as envisaged in the Sebi ICDR (issue of capital and disclosure requirements) regulations, any transfer of shares in the form of gift will be considered as sale.
As per Sebi’s ICDR regulations, if any person belonging to the promoter or promoter group in the issuer company has sold his equity shares during the six months preceding the relevant date, such entity will be ineligible for allotment of specified securities on a preferential basis.
KJMC Financial Services had sought an interpretative letter from Sebi on whether transfer of shares by its promoter to his wife by way of gift will be considered as sale under the Sebi’s ICDR regulations.
“Our view is that the inter-se transfer by way of gift will be considered as sale as envisaged… in the Sebi ICDR regulations,” Sebi said, adding that its response is based on the information given in the company’s letter. Referring to the ICDR regulations, the regulator said: “The primary intention of the regulation was not with respect to consideration, but with change in ownership of equity shares.” It added: “Different facts or conditions might lead to a different result.

Further, this letter does not express a decision of the board on the questions referred.” The watchdog also said its views are expressed with respect to the clarification sought in terms of Sebi ICDR norms and is not applicable to any other Sebi regulations.

Source: http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/economy/sebi-deems-share-transfer-by-promoters-by-waygift-as-sale_7454721.html?utm_source=ref_article

 

Ease of doing business: 12 states implement 75% of reforms

As many as a dozen states, including Uttarakhand, Rajasthan and Jharkhand, have implemented 75% of the reform initiatives under the ease of doing business programme, reflecting positive sentiments, commerce minister Nirmala Sitharaman said on Thursday.

These three states are followed by Telangana, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Punjab and Karnataka in implementing reforms.

The government, however, has maintained that the review process of the reform initiatives is still on and the current rankings may change.

The ranking of states is an assessment of the regulatory performance of states and a measure of how they improve over a period of time. Importantly, the rankings don’t accurately reflect the level of business-conducive nature of the states; rather, it shows how the states fared in implementing an action plan adopted by them with the help of the Centre within a particular time frame.

Addressing the inaugural session of the Invest North Summit organised by CII, Sitharaman also said tax and regulatory authorities are being directed not to go on an overdrive and asserted the government will not in any way create hindrances for businesses.

The ranking is based on indicators including the ease of starting a business, registering a property, getting credit, paying taxes and resolving insolvency.

The World Bank, which has been entrusted with the job of ranking states on their performance on ease of doing business by the centre, will likely wrap up this exercise by the end of this month.

Talking on the occasion, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion Ramesh Abhishek said India is also hopeful of improving its rank among other nations in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Index.

Last year, India was ranked 130th in the World Bank’s index covering 189 countries, an improvement of four notches from a year before.

While India improved its rank on three counts — starting a business, getting construction permits and accessing electricity — it witnessed its performance worsen in two areas — accessing credit and paying taxes.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/ease-of-doing-business-12-states-implement-75-of-reforms/387441/

India’s banking outlook stable, worst asset quality cycle almost over: Moody’s

India’s banking system outlook is likely to be stable over the next 12-18 months as the pace of formation of bad loans is expected to decrease compared to last five years, global rating agency Moody’s said today. Under the asset quality recognition (AQR) of the Reserve Bank, lenders have recognised a major portion of their non-performing assets (NPAs) or bad loans, it said. “The pace of deterioration in asset quality over the next 12-18 months should be lower than what was seen over the last five years, especially compared to the fiscal 2015-16, even as we take into account some remaining problem loan under -recognition in a handful of large accounts,” said Moody’s Vice- President and Senior Credit Officer Srikanth Vadlamani.

Aside from these legacy issues, the underlying asset trend for Indian banks will be stable because of a generally supportive operating environment, he added. Moody’s said the stable outlook for the banks over the next 12-18 months reflects its assessment that the system is moving past the worst of its asset quality down cycle. The credit rating firm today released a report — ‘Banking System Outlook — India: Bottoming Asset Cycle, Strong Liquidity Support Stable Outlook’. The agency rates 15 banks in the country that together account for around 70 per cent of system assets. The ratings outlook on 11 of the banks is positive. Vadlamani expects net interest margins (NIMs) of banks to stabilise, given the expectation of limited policy rate cuts over the next 12 months, with an upside risk coming from current changes in portfolio mixes in favour of higher yielding retail loans.

“Credit costs will also remain high for the sector, including for some private sector banks, but will be no higher than in recent years for the industry overall.” Indian banks’ capital strength will continue to show divergence between the weak public banks and the far stronger private lenders, he said. State-owned banks will require significant external infusions of equity capital over the next three years. “For state-run banks to have a credit growth of 12-15 per cent over the next three years, equity capital requirement will be of USD 1.2 trillion,” he said.

The PSU banks have not been able to demonstrate access to the equity capital markets, while the announced capital infusion plans of the Government fall short of the amount required for full recapitalisation, Vadlamani said. “A potential way to bridge this capital shortfall would be to slow loan growth to the low single digits over the next three years,” he said.

Source: http://indianexpress.com/article/business/banking-and-finance/indias-banking-system-outlook-stable-worst-asset-quality-cycle-almost-over-moodys-3039297/

Readying comexes to take on defaulters

Lax risk management rules have been cited as one of the reasons that led to the NSEL debacle. It is, therefore, not surprising that the current commodity market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, is focusing on the risk management rules in the commodity exchanges. Early this month, it released a circular that tightened the rules for collecting trading margins on commodity derivative contracts and for contributions to the Trade Guarantee Fund (TGF).

Here, we take a closer look at the changes made to the manner in which the TGF is maintained by the exchanges.

As its name denotes, this fund is used to guarantee the settlement of all bona fide transactions of the members of the exchange. This is the corpus that is used to protect the interest of investors, if there is a large default, thus acting as the primary means of building confidence of investors towards the exchange.

Guaranteeing performance

The TGF is built through various components: a) yearly contribution of the exchanges. This was typically 5 per cent of the gross revenue every year. b) The security deposit paid by members to the exchanges, which is also called the Base Minimum Capital (BMC), c) all the penalties paid by the members to the exchanges in settlement-related issues, d) interest earned by investment of the fund balance in the TGF e) less the amount utilised for meeting the shortfall in member defaults in a year.

The yearly contribution of the exchange and the base minimum capital of members accounts for almost 90 per cent of the TGF. For instance, the TGF balance towards the end of June 2016 was ₹258 crore. Of this, contribution of the exchange accounted for ₹105 crore and BMC (cash as well as non-cash component) was ₹129 crore.

Recent tweaks

SEBI has, through the circular issued on September 1, sought to fortify the TGF maintained by commodity exchanges. This is done in three ways,

One, the BMC or the security deposit paid by members who clear non-algo trades has been increased from ₹10 lakh to ₹25 lakh. Members who also clear algo trades shall, however, continue to maintain BMC of ₹50 lakh. The higher amount of security maintained with exchanges will go towards increasing the TGF. Further, interest earned by investing this incremental amount will also be useful to exchanges.

Two, changes have also been brought about in the contribution made by exchanges to the Trade Guarantee Fund. Currently, the extent of risk is to be assessed every quarter and funds are transferred to the TGF to enable the exchange to handle the risk. The transfers were, however, capped at 5 per cent of the turnover of the exchanges, net of income tax paid. SEBI has now stipulated that the exchanges need not limit themselves to 5 per cent of their turnover in transferring money to this fund.

 

If the risk of default arises, say, if there is a global crash in commodity prices, then the exchange can transfer much more funds, to brace itself for member defaults.

Three, rules regarding usage of funds in the TGF, in the event of a default, have also been clearly spelt out. SEBI has termed it the ‘default waterfall’.

If a member defaults from payment, then the funds withdrawn from the TGF shall be in the following order – first the security deposit paid by the defaulting member to the exchange (BMC) shall be used to repay clients, then insurance if any, will be claimed. If these are not sufficient, then 5 per cent of the corpus in the TGF can be used for meeting the default. The ulitisation of the TGF shall also follow a certain order; penalties and investment income shall be used first, then exchange contribution to the fund and finally the funds of non-defaulting members shall be used, on a pro-rata basis.

If the default is so huge that even these fall short, ₹100 crore shall be left in the TGF and the remaining paid out. After all this, if there are still some dues remaining, the clients will have to take a pro rata haircut.

The tweaks are welcome and could help in tackling an NSEL-like fiasco in future. But SEBI should also make sure that there are regular audits of the TGF, perhaps on an annual basis, to ensure that these rules are followed by the exchanges.

Source: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/portfolio/real-assets/readying-comexes-to-take-on-defaulters/article9096891.ece

FinMin revises criteria for recapitalisation of PSBs

State-owned banks looking forward to the next round of capital infusion will need to fulfill a new set of criteria, including credit recovery, as the finance ministry has revised the recapitalisation norms.

The second tranche of capital allocation for the current fiscal would be based on cost of operations as well as recovery and quality of credit on the basis of risk weighted assets, sources said.

Only those lenders that fulfil the criteria post third quarter (October-December) results of the current fiscal will be eligible for the second round of funding, sources added.

The money was allocated last fiscal on the twin principles of ensuring 7.5 per cent common equity tier 1 (CET 1) at the end of the 2016 and growth capital to five major banks.

The government in July had announced the first round of capital infusion of Rs 22,915 crore for 13 banks.

“75 per cent of the amount (Rs 22,915 crore)…Is being released now to provide liquidity support for lending operations as also to enable banks to raise funds from the market,” the finance ministry had said in a statement.

“The remaining amount, to be released later, will be linked to performance with particular reference to greater efficiency, growth of both credit and deposits and reduction in the cost of operations,” it had said.

The first tranche was announced with the objective to enhance their lending operations and enable them to raise more money from the market.

Out of the Rs 22,915 crore, State Bank of India (SBI) was provided Rs 7,575 crore followed by Indian Overseas Bank (Rs 3,101 crore) and Punjab National Bank (Rs 2,816 crore).

The other lenders, which have got commitment of capital infusion are Bank of India (Rs 1,784 crore), Central Bank of India (Rs 1,729 crore), Syndicate Bank (Rs 1,034 crore), UCO Bank (Rs 1,033 crore), Canara Bank (Rs 997 crore), United Bank of India (Rs 810 crore), Union Bank of India (Rs 721 crore), Corporation Bank (Rs 677 crore), Dena Bank (Rs 594 crore) and Allahabad Bank (Rs 44 crore).

The capital infusion exercise for the current fiscal is based on an assessment of need as per the compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of credit growth for the last five years, banks’ own projections of credit growth and estimates of the potential for growth of each PSB, it had said.

Finance minister Arun Jaitley in his budget speech for 2016-17 had proposed to allocate Rs 25,000 crore towards recapitalisation of PSU banks. “If additional capital is required by these banks, we will find the resources for doing so. We stand solidly behind these Banks,” he had said.

 

Source: http://www.mydigitalfc.com/economy/finmin-revises-criteria-recapitalisation-psbs-539

FPI equity buys in India touch $5.4 bn this year

Foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) have bought equities worth $5.4 billion in the Indian markets in 2016 so far, according to data obtained from Bloomberg. This makes India the third biggest destination for FPIs after Taiwan and South Korea which have seen inflows of $13.6 billion and $8.1 billion, respectively, reports fe Bureau in Mumbai.

 

Thailand ranks fourth with foreign inflows of $ 3 billion followed by Indonesia which received foreign investment worth $ 2.8 billion. In 2016 so far, the Sensex gained 7.44% and Nifty50 gained 8.73%.

Gr1

Source:

http://www.financialexpress.com/markets/indian-markets/fpi-equity-buys-in-india-touch-5-4-bn-this-year/349325/

SEBI proposes changes in ITP norms to attract more firms

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) on Friday proposed changes to the Institutional Trading Platform (ITP), to draw more companies to it. Comment on the discussion paper has been invited till August 14.

Introduced in 2013, the platform allows companies, particularly in information technology (IT), to list without necessarily doing an Initial Public Offer of equity. So far, only around 40 companies are listed on the ITP platforms of the BSE or the National Stock Exchange.

IT companies to qualify on this platform need Qualified Institutional Buyer (QIB) shareholding of at least 25 per cent; other companies need 50 per cent. Sebi has proposed to expanded the definition of QIBs to investors such as family trusts and individual foreign investors. Also, to do away with the 25 per cent cap on single investors listed on the platform.

Further, it proposes to reduce the minimum institutional investor participation, from 75 per cent to 50 per cent. Also, to increase the ceiling on allotment to individual institutional investors from 10 per cent to 25 per cent to a single entity. Sebi has also proposed to make market making compulsory for a minimum of three years for an issue size of less than Rs 100 crore.

More important, it has proposed to ease trading lots on the ITP platform from Rs 10 lakh to Rs 5 lakh. Interestingly, Sebi has also proposed to rename ITP as  ‘high-tech start-up & other new business platform’.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/sebi-proposes-changes-in-itp-norms-to-attract-more-firms-116072901316_1.html