Faceless scrutiny of income tax return.. Here is all you need to know

Individual will be required to respond to the notice or order received through the registered account only.

The E-assessment Scheme 2019 aims to eliminate human interface, reduce corruption and bring in transparency.

The idea of faceless E-assessment was mooted in the Budget 2018 by the late Finance Minister, Arun Jaitley, who announced the proposal to introduce the new assessment scheme to replace the old assessment system of manual scrutiny and face-to-face interaction with tax authorities.

The new scheme, called the ‘E-assessment Scheme, 2019 (Scheme), was notified by CBDT on 12 September, 2019. It will be an online system, which will use artificial intelligence, machine learning and technology tools to randomly and automatically allocate cases for assessment within the Income Tax Department. It aims to eliminate human interface, reduce corruption and bring in transparency.

 

Salient features of the Scheme:

The Scheme will have dedicated E-assessment centres such as the National E-assessment Centre, Regional E-assessment Centre, assessment units, verification units, technical units and reviewer units with each centre and unit having a clearly defined role and process to follow.

# National E-assessment Centre (NEC): NEC will be a single point of contact for the taxpayer as well as for all units conducting assessment. NEC will interact with the taxpayer to obtain evidence, issue notices, receive information, issue draft assessment order, raise demand, etc, and also interact with all units for smooth conduct and completion of assessment proceedings. All communication between the NEC, the taxpayer and various units would be done online and would be digitally signed.

# Regional e-assessment Centre (REC): REC will ensure smooth conduct of E-assessment under the region of a Principal Chief Commissioner.

# Assessment units (AU): AU will perform the function of scrutinising tax returns, analysing submissions made and evidence submitted by the assessee and make requests, if any verification or technical assistance is required.

# Verification units (VU): VU will perform the function of making enquiry, cross verification, examination of records or witnesses and recording statements, as may be required for verification.

# Technical units (TU): TU will give advice on legal, accounting, forensic, information technology, valuation, transfer pricing, data analytics, management or other technical matter required for conducting assessments.

# Review units (RU): RU will review draft assessment order (DAO) to check if all material evidence, relevant points of fact and law, relevant tax case laws have been included in the DAO. It will also ensure the arithmetical accuracy of modifications proposed and perform other functions as may be required for review.

Procedure for assessment:

NEC will issue notice under section 143(2) online by uploading the digitally signed copy on the registered income tax account or by sending notice to the assessee’s registered email address or uploading the copy on a mobile app. A real time alert will be sent through SMS or the mobile app informing the same to the assessee

The assessee is required to respond within 15 days of receipt of notice.

On the issue of a notice, NEC will allocate the case to any AU through an automated allocation system. The AU will then identify issues, seek clarifications from the assessee and may request for verification or enquiry through VU or seek technical assistance through TU. Accordingly, NEC will initiate request to the respective units through an automated allocation system.

On receipt of all information, AU will prepare a DAO accepting the returned income or modifying the returned income or send the DAO to NEC for review. NEC will accordingly finalise the order or modify it or send the DAO to RU for review. Accordingly, it may send the DOA along with demand notice and penalty notice, where applicable, to the assessee or issue a showcause notice to the assessee.

In case of a showcause notice, the assessee will submit the response within the timeline specified in the notice. Considering the response, the NEC may either finalise the DAO or ask the AU to prepare a revised DAO.

On receipt of the revised DAO, the NEC will verify if any modification prejudicial to the taxpayer’s interest is proposed. Accordingly, the NEC will give an opportunity to the assessee to show cause as to why assessment should not be finalised as per the revised DAO; otherwise, NEC will finalise the assessment.

On completion of assessment, all records will be electronically transferred to the jurisdictional assessing officer (AO) only for imposition of penalty, recovery of demand, rectification of mistake, giving effect to appellate orders, submission of remand report or representation or for placing of any record before Commissioner (Appeals), Appellate Tribunal or Courts and for initiating prosecution or filing of complaint before the courts.

During the course of assessment proceedings, any unit may initiate penalty proceedings for non-compliance of any notice, direction or order and may recommend to the NEC to serve notice to the assessee.

Any appeal from the order of the NEC will be filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) having jurisdiction over the jurisdictional Assessing Officer.

During the assessment proceedings, no personal appearance will be allowed before the income-tax authority at NEC or any other units. In case personal hearing is required, to make oral submission or present the case, it shall be done only through video conferencing.

The E-assessment Scheme, 2019 is a welcome step towards standardisation and easing of assessment procedure. However, its success and ensuring that ease of doing business is achieved will depend on its careful implementation

CBDT extends the due date for filing ITRs & Tax Audit Reports from 30 th September to 31, October 2019

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has decided to extend the deadline for filing of ITRs and Tax Audits Reports by a month. Given the relentless demands by Chartered Accountants (CAs) and tax consultants, the CBDT has given a breather till October 31. It will also provide some respite to smaller companies too, who are struggling with GST filings.

Last night, the CBDT tweeted: “On consideration of representations recd from across the country, CBDT has decided to extend the due date for filing of ITRs & Tax Audit Reports from 30th Sep, 2019 to 31st of Oct, 2019 in respect of persons whose accounts are required to be audited. Formal notification will follow”.

This category of ITR is to be filed by those entities that are assessed under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act such as companies, partnership firms, proprietorship among others and their accounts are to be audited before filing.

The new deadline is also required because the CBDT has been intermittently changing the background software required for filing the ITRs.

There was a change in the ITR 6 software utility. Since all tax-filing is now software-driven, the CBDT will require some time to rework the filing process due to the changes in the software.

The old belief that there would be loss in revenue of the Government, if there is a delay in filing ITRs and Tax Audit Reports is wrong as a considerable share of revenue has already got collected due to Tax Deducted at Source and Advance Tax payments.

Filing ITRs and Tax Audit Reports is primarily an administrative exercise to inform the Income Tax Department about the payable tax. By extending the deadline, there would be no revenue loss to the Government. It will give some relief to the CAs fraternity and smaller companies who are struggling with various tax compliances, he said.

 

Read the Original CBDT Notification

Deadline to file income tax return for FY2018-19 extended to August 31

Highlights
1. The finance ministry has extended the deadline for filing income tax return
2. New deadline for ITR submission for FY 2018-19 extended to August 31
3. This year CBDT had extended the deadline for employers to file their TDS returns
4. If the ITR is filed between January 1 and March 31, then late filing fees of Rs 10,000 will be levied

The finance ministry has extended the deadline for filing income tax return (ITR) for FY2018-19 by individuals to August 31, 2019 from July 31, 2019. The extension is a much needed relief as there were multiple problems being faced by individuals in filing returns by July 31. July 31 was the deadline to file income tax returns for most individuals and HUFs. This is that category of individuals and HUFs who are not mandatorily required to get their accounts audited for tax purposes.

Many chartered accountant/tax practioner societies had appealed to the government to extend the ITR filing deadline to provide sufficient time to individuals to file ITR properly. There are many reasons for this.

This year CBDT had extended the deadline for employers to file their TDS returns, i.e., Form 24Q, from May 31, 2019 to June 30, 2019 and consequently deadline of issuing Form 16 by the employer was also extended from June 15, 2019 to July 31, 2019. Consequently, employees wait employees waiting to get their Form 16s to file their ITRs were left with only 21 days to file their tax return by the earlier deadline of July 31.

If the ITR is not filed by an individual before the expiry of the deadline, which is usually July 31, then the individual would have to pay a late filing fee of Rs 5,000, if filed by December 31. If the ITR is filed between January 1 and March 31, then late filing fees of Rs 10,000 will be levied.

With extension of the deadline, individuals will have more time to file their ITRs without worrying about late filing fees.

Even though it is easier to fill salary details in ITR-1 this year as individuals are required to just copy-paste the same from Form 16, sources of interest income are required to be provided in greater detail. This could be a tedious process.

Further, while the tax department has started providing pre-filled XML for ITR forms 1 to 4, the pre-filled XML file for ITR-2 does not contain salary details which individuals have to fill-in by themselves. ITR-2 asks individuals to provide detailed break-up of salary such as basic, HRA and so on received by choosing the options from the drop-down menu.

The calculation of long-term capital gains (LTCG) tax on equity shares and equity mutual funds is also a complicated process due to the grandfathering clause which came into effect from FY2018-19 onwards. In addition to that, individuals were also required to provide details such as ISIN code/Folio number, name of shares/units and so on for sale of equity shares and equity mutual funds. However, later on this was made optional.

Read Original Circular

Source: Economic Times

Income tax department eyes over Rs 100 bn from ‘struck off’ firms

The income-tax (I-T) department is estimating tax recovery of over Rs 100 billion from companies that have been struck off from records of the Registrar of Companies (RoC) last year.

The tax department is in the process of filing a petition before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for restoration of registration in as many as 50,000 such companies.

The RoCs had struck off 300,000 companies after it was found they had not filed their statutory returns. Directors of these companies have been prohibited from holding directorships in any other company.
The move follows Central Board of Direct Taxes’ (CBDT) directive to identify, process and file petition to restore these companies by August 31. The board also asked the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) not to oppose the restoration application in the tribunal, as such a move would refrain them from launching tax recovery proceedings against these firms.
“Several of these companies are restricted to operate their bank accounts and movable and immovable properties until they are restored. The restoration will compel these firms to make relevant disclosures of credentials under Companies Act, and then accordingly tax proceeding will be initiated for tax recovery,” said an I-T official.

Tax industry experts, too, believe that restoration is essential to recover taxes due from these firms.

“The tax department is contesting the strike off of so-called companies as in several cases there would be pending tax demands that cannot be recovered if the company is not active. Also, even in cases where genuine companies have been struck off, with the best intentions, the companies would not be able to pay the tax dues as all their assets including bank accounts would be non-operational,” said Amit Maheshwari, partner at Ashok Maheshwary & Associates LLP.

The I-T department is of the view that these companies abused their corporate structure by creating multi-layering during  demonetisation for cash deposits. I-T probe also reveals that many individuals have used these firms for siphoning money or converting undisclosed cash to legitimate money post the note ban.

Official data say that 35,000 companies deposited and withdrew cash worth over Rs 170 billion after the note ban, through about 60,000 bank accounts.

It was noticed that the accounts that had negligible balance on November 8, 2016, have seen significant cash deposits and withdrawal during this period.

According to people with knowledge of the matter, along with restoration, the I-T department will also start issuing notices to these firms under Section 179 of the I-T Act, which makes the company’s directors/promoters liable to pay dues on behalf of the firm, without adjudication by the court.

Further, tax recovery officers have been asked to conduct survey operations on select firms where the tax demand is high. In cases where assets or bank accounts are lying abroad, the department will seek the foreign tax authority’s assistance to recover tax claims with the provisions in the relevant treaty, said another senior official.

Sources said that in a meeting of a task force on shell companies set up by the Prime Minister’s Office, on November 30 last year, the director general of corporate affairs (DGCoA) had suggested that the tax department approach RoCs for taking up the matter of reviving these companies. It was also suggested that revenue considerations should weigh in favour of restoring them.

Apart from these companies, another set of above 200,000 firms have been sent notices and action will soon be taken against them. However, the tax department wants MCA to keep them posted before striking off any company, since there could be tax dues.

 Taxing Affair
  • I-T pursuing restoration of 50,000 struck-off companies
  • RoCs had struck off 300,000 companies, prohibited their directors from holding directorship in other firms
  • Tax industry experts believe that restoration is essential for recovery of taxes from these firms
  • Restoration will allow companies to operate bank account, assets
  • After restoration, I-T to issue notices under Section 179 of I-T Act
  • Directors/promoters would be liable to pay tax dues
  • These firms abused corporate structure to facilitate significant cash transactions post note ban

Source: Business Standard

CBDT to share data with GST department to trap tax evaders

Highlights
• This move will apply for all those assessees who have business income and file the returns specified for those with this income i.e. ITR 3 to ITR -7.
• Before sharing any information, the income tax authority shall determine that such information is necessary for the GSTN authority to perform its functions.

The government on Tuesday authorized the income tax department to share details including sales and profits that businesses have reported in their income tax returns with GSTN, the company that processes Goods and Services Tax (GST) returns, to scale up scrutiny and check tax evasion.

The move will allow direct and indirect tax authorities to zero in on discrepancies in the information that business have disclosed in their respective tax return forms and nail tax evaders. The move comes as part of tightening of anti-evasion measures after the GST Council gave several relaxations in recent months to ease the rigors of tax compliance to businesses, especially to small ones. A formal system of data sharing between direct and indirect tax authorities means businesses have to be extra careful while filling up their tax returns and avoid mismatches. The move is significant considering that businesses did not show enthusiasm in opting for a single window tax facility for corporate tax, service tax and central excise in 2006 under the name Large Taxpayer Unit as they apparently preferred to avoid simultaneous scrutiny by different tax authorities.

An office order issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) on Tuesday authorized the Principal Director General of Income Tax (systems) or Director General of Income Tax (systems) to share specified data with an officer of GSTN. The designated officers from both sides will also decide ways of simultaneous exchange of information

==============================================================================

Order.  F. No. 225/105/2019/ITA.ll              Order Under Section 138(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

F. No. 225/105/2019/ITA.ll
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

New Delhi, the 30th  April, 2019

Order In exercise of powers conferred under section 138(1)(a) of the Income tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’), for purposes of sub-clause (i) of section 138(1)(a) of the Act, the Central Board of Direct taxes (‘CBDT’) hereby directs that Principal Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or Director General of Income-tax (Systems), New Delhi shall be the specified income-tax authority for furnishing information respecting assessees to the Nodal Officer, Goods and Services Tax Network (‘GSTN’).

2.  The data/information to be furnished by the specified income-tax authority shall be: (a)  Request based exchange of data, wherein, important financial fields which are captured in the Income Tax Returns (ITRs) such as (i) status of filing of ITR; (ii) turnover; (iii) gross total income, (iv)turnover ratio; (v) GTI range; (vi) turnover range and (vii) any other field, the modalities of which shall be decided by the concerned specified authorities. (b)  Spontaneous exchange of data, the modalities of which shall be decided by the concerned specified authorities. (c)  Automatic exchange of data, the modalities of which shall be decided by the concerned specified authorities.

While furnishing the information, the specified income-tax authority shall form an opinion that sharing of such information is necessary for the purposes of enabling the specified authority in GSTN to perform its functions under the Goods and Services Tax.
3.  To facilitate the process of furnishing information, Principal Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or Director General of Income-tax (Systems) would enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (‘MoU’) with nodal officer, GSTN, which inter-alia would include modalities of exchange of data, maintenance of confidentiality, mechanism for safe preservation of data, weeding out after usage etc. The time line for furnishing information shall also be decided by Pr. Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or Director General of Income-tax (Systems) in consultation with concerned nodal officer and included in the said MoU.
4.  A copy of MoU shall be forwarded to this division for record purposes.
5.  This issues with the approval of Chairman, CBDT.
(Rajarajeswari R.) Under Secretary,
(ITA-Il), CBDT

Income Tax Return Forms for Salaried Class, Professionals and self-employed individuals available for e-filing

The Income Tax Department has informed that the tax return forms i.e, ITR-1 and ITR-4 for the salaried persons, Professionals, and self-employed individuals are available in the official portal for e-filing.

It also said that the other forms for Companies and other entities will be available in the portal shortly.

“ITR 1 & 4 for AY 2019-20 is available for e-Filing. Other ITRs will be available shortly,” the department said.

The department has enabled ITR-1 which is largely used the salaried class of taxpayers with income up to Rs 50 lakh from salary, one house property only and additional income such as interest earned from fixed deposits, recurring deposits among others.

ITR-4 for professionals and self-employed individuals who have opted for the presumptive income scheme was launched in the e-portal.

A few days ago, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) had notified the income tax return forms for the year 2019-20.

Last year, the Government brought numerous reforms in the tax return forms.

Last year, the number of ITR Forms have been reduced from nine to seven forms.

The ITR Forms ITR-2, ITR-2A and ITR-3 have been rationalized and a single ITR-2 has been notified in place of these three forms.

All seven ITRs are to be filed electronically on the official web portal of the department -https://www.incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in – except for some category of taxpayers.

From this year onwards, the quoting of Aadhaar with the income tax return is mandatory for e-filing after the latest Supreme Court verdict wherein the Apex Court overruled the judgment of the Delhi Court allowing the manual filing of tax return without mentioning Aadhaar number.

 

CBDT warns Cash Transactions above Permissible Limits

CBDT warns Cash Transactions above Permissible Limits

With a view to promoting cashless transactions, the Central Board of Direct Taxes ( CBDT ) has issued an advisory on its official website regarding cash transactions over and above the prescribed limits specified under the law.

 

The advisory issued by the Board remind the taxpayers to not accept cash of two lakh or more in aggregate from a single person in a day or for one or more transactions relating to one event or occasion.

 

One of the major steps introduced by the Government after the demonetization was to restrict cash transaction above Rs. 2 lakh rupees.

 

Under the Finance Act, 2017, the amounts in excess of Rs. 20,000 or more shall be received or repaid in cash for transfer of Immovable Property and amount more than Rs. 10,000/- in cash relating to the expenditure of business/profession was also banned.

 

Further, amount in excess of Rs. 2,000/- in cash cannot be donated to a registered trust /political party.

 

The department further reminded that the contravention may result in the levy of tax/ penalty.

 

The CBDT advisory said that any payment made in cash on account of the premium on health insurance facilities is not allowable as a deduction under section 80D of the Income Tax Act.

 

“Any information regarding black money including information about undisclosed income/ assets (both in India as well as abroad) and Benami transactions can be given to the jurisdictional Director General/ Pr. General of Income Tax (Investigation),” it said.

 

The CBDT has recently announced a new scheme called Income Tax Informants Rewards Scheme 2018 through which the department will reward up to 5 crore rupees to informants.

 

The scheme regulates grant and payment of reward to a person who is an informant under this scheme.

 

Also, the Benami Transactions Informants Reward Scheme 2018 has been announced for regulating grant for informants giving information relating to benami property actionable under Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, as amended by Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016.