GST lends more weight to India’s 8% growth projection: S&P

Calling GST as the most important structural reform till date by the Modi government, S&P Global Ratings today said the passage of the indirect tax law gives it additional conviction of India clocking 8 per cent growth in the next few years.

“India’s GST passage gives us additional conviction around our 8%-ish GDP growth forecast over the next few years,” it said in a report titled ‘Asia-Pacific steadies while China goes silent’.

The rating agency had last month projected India to clock a “steroid-free” growth of 8 per cent in coming years. “The GST passage is arguably the most important structural reform to date by the Modi government and will improve efficiency, cross-state trade and tax buoyancy,” it said today.

It saw a reasonably firm pick-up in Asia-Pacific’s macro momentum indicators, with pick-up in retail sales offering the clearest sign in most of the region’s economies. This, it said, stems from rising income, which in turn is part of the region’s evolving growth dynamics, with consumption playing a larger role.

S&P said China has been nudged up as it raised the GDP growth forecast by about a quarter percentage point in 2016 and 2017 to 6.6 per cent and 6.4 per cent, respectively, and has kept its 2018 forecast roughly unchanged at 6.1 per cent.

Japan’s second-quarter out turn was weaker than expected, it said, adding that its 0.7 per cent GDP growth forecast for 2016 looked like “a mild stretch at this point”.

In its ‘APAC Economic Snapshots — September 2016’ report, it had stated that India’s structural reforms agenda had maintained strong momentum and, most recently with the GST passage, should propel growth higher. “For India, we are still forecasting GDP growth at about 8 per cent over the next few years. Moreover, this is relatively high quality, steroid—free growth backed by a broadening consumption base,” S&P had said.

“Inflation remains a risk, given the large weights on food, fuel, and other volatile items in the Reserve Bank of India’s target basket,” S&P had said.

The latest gross domestic production (GDP) figures showed that India’s growth slowed to 7.1 per cent in the April-June quarter, from 7.9 per cent in January-March.

RBI has also said the near-term growth outlook for India seems brighter than last fiscal’s and the economy is likely to expand at 7.6 per cent in 2016-17.

Source: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/gst-lends-more-weight-to-indias-8-growth-projection-sp/article9208148.ece

Company Incorporation in India made simpler and more versatile

MCA has taken another bold initiative in Government Process Re-engineering (GPR) and launched Simplified proforma for Incorporating Company Electronically (SPICe) e-Form.

Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has introduced a bold initiative in Company Incorporation so that registering a company and starting business, in India, is made simpler and speedier that your business can be started within the stipulated time frame, in line with international best practices.

 

MCA has launched SPICE (Simplified Proforma for Incorporating Company Electronically) w.e.f. 02.10.2016 for registering companies  in completely online form, vide Form INC-32.

 

This would be processed speedier as the e-MOA and e-AOA would have a faster review, by the approving authorities through the back office set up in this regard.

 

This would make setting up of business, in India, fairly simpler and more versatile, making way for “ease of doing business”.

The highlights of SPICE are:

  1. Simplified and completely Digital Form for Company Incorporation – Form INC-32
  1. Standard format of e-Memorandum of Association as per Companies Act, 2013 – Form INC 33
  1. Standard format of e-Articles of Association as per Companies Act, 2013 – Form INC 34
  1. Memorandum and Articles will now be filed as linked e-forms, except for Section 8  (not-for-profit companies)
  1. Provision to apply for Company Incorporation with a pre-approved Company Name vide INC -1, as well
  1. Mandatory DSCs of Subscribers and Witnesses in SPICe MOA and SPICe AOA 

7. Back Office productivity gains due to faster review of e-MOA and e-AOA by approving authorities.

As part of the initiative of ease of doing business in India, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs had earlier introduced e-filing of single Form INC-29 as alternative to INC 7, so that incorporating a company in India does not take too long a time. As further simplification of the process of registering companies, SPICE Form INC-32 is intended to make the whole process versatile for a new company to be registered on-line in India, under the Companies Act, 2013.

e-Filing of single Form INC-32

  • This form can be filed even after approval of name vide INC-1. This facility was not provided in INC-29.
  • Memorandum of Association (MOA) has been provided in Electronic Mode INC-33.
  • Article of Association (AOA) has been provided in Electronic Mode INC-34.
  • By new e-MOA & e-AOA, no need for physical signatures of Subscribers; Instead, Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) of Subscribers can be affixed on MOA & AOA.
  • By the new e-MOA & e-AOA, no need for physical signatures of Witness; Instead, Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) of Witness can be affixed on MOA & AOA.
  • Existing INC-29 and INC-7 will be phased out and SPICe will be the single, simplified versatile form to be filed on-line for incorporation of a company in India.

Read earlier posts:

Integrated e-Form INC-29 for Company Incorporation and Ease of doing business

Incorporation of Companies under Companies Act, 2013 – Procedure

Source: http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/SPICEPress%20Release_03102016.pdf

GST Council: Tax exemption threshold fixed at Rs 20 lakh

The first session of the GST Council that concluded here on Friday made good progress in ironing out some of the contentious issues between the Centre and states: The exemption threshold for the goods and services tax (GST) has been fixed at Rs 20 lakh for all states except the northeastern ones and the three hill states of Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh, in whose case this limit would be Rs 10 lakh; states will have the assessment powers for units with annual turnover up to Rs 1.5 crore while in the case of bigger businesses too, the one-taxpayer-one-authority principle will be retained and either the Centre or the state concerned will be accorded the assessing power based on risk profiling.

Importantly, the Centre agreed to the states’ demand for including the proceeds from sundry cesses levied by them in the definition of “revenue”, a step that could increase its compensation payouts. This would also mean that the states would cease to levy the cesses, the proceeds from which stood at close to Rs 40,000 crore in FY16.

The council decided to take 2015-16 as the base year to compute compensation to states for any future revenue loss, but left open the question of projecting the business-as-usual rate of increase in revenue, crucial for quantifying compensation. Finance minister Arun Jaitley said three options were under consideration for projecting the revenue growth rate: A mutually agreed-upon fixed rate; the average of the three best (high-growth) years in the past five years; and the average of median three of the last five years. States had earlier turned down the Centre’s proposal for taking the average of the last three years for projecting future revenue growth, saying these years haven’t been particularly good due to the economic slowdown.

Jaitley said the Centre will continue to assess the 11 lakh service tax assessees (even those below Rs 1.5 crore) but added that states will be given training to assess them and once they acquire competence, the future addition to this taxpayer base will be shared with them for the purpose of assessment.

Regardless of whether the Centre or the state has control on an assessee, the tax proceeds will be shared between the two — the central GST component will go to the Centre and the states will appropriate the state GST, which could be slightly higher than central GST. As far as integrated GST — to be levied on interstate transactions and imports — is concerned, the place of supply rules will decide who the appropriating authority will be; of course, the basic principle is that tax needs to be paid where the consumption takes place.

The council, Jaitley said, would meet again on September 30 to finalise the draft rules on the council’s functioning and the exemption thresholds and decide how the grandfathering of tax sops (like the area-based excise exemptions) will be carried out. The crucial question of the GST slab structure, the revenue-neutral rate (RNR) and actual GST rates would be discussed by the council between October 17 and 19. The Arvind Subramanian panel that had estimated a RNR of 15-15.5% had said if the standard rate is 17%, it could comprise central GST of 8% and state GST of 9%.

Tax experts welcomed the outcome of the first meeting of the council. Harishanker Subramaniam, national leader, indirect tax, EY India, said: “It is interesting is that for GST on services, the Centre will have administrative control irrespective of threshold at least in the initial years till states are trained to handle services. This may be a good news for industry as many were worried as to how states will handle complexity of services.”

According to Pratik P Jain, leader, indirect tax, PwC India, enhancing the annual turnover for exemption to Rs 20 lakh from Rs 10 lakh contemplated earlier would be administratively easier for the government as several small businesses would be out of the GST ambit. “Industry would also welcome the move to have a single assessing authority, instead of having a dual system of assessment and scrutiny, which was a major concern for businesses,” he said.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/threshold-for-gst-fixed-at-rs-20-lakh/389350/

Ease of doing business: 12 states implement 75% of reforms

As many as a dozen states, including Uttarakhand, Rajasthan and Jharkhand, have implemented 75% of the reform initiatives under the ease of doing business programme, reflecting positive sentiments, commerce minister Nirmala Sitharaman said on Thursday.

These three states are followed by Telangana, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Punjab and Karnataka in implementing reforms.

The government, however, has maintained that the review process of the reform initiatives is still on and the current rankings may change.

The ranking of states is an assessment of the regulatory performance of states and a measure of how they improve over a period of time. Importantly, the rankings don’t accurately reflect the level of business-conducive nature of the states; rather, it shows how the states fared in implementing an action plan adopted by them with the help of the Centre within a particular time frame.

Addressing the inaugural session of the Invest North Summit organised by CII, Sitharaman also said tax and regulatory authorities are being directed not to go on an overdrive and asserted the government will not in any way create hindrances for businesses.

The ranking is based on indicators including the ease of starting a business, registering a property, getting credit, paying taxes and resolving insolvency.

The World Bank, which has been entrusted with the job of ranking states on their performance on ease of doing business by the centre, will likely wrap up this exercise by the end of this month.

Talking on the occasion, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion Ramesh Abhishek said India is also hopeful of improving its rank among other nations in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Index.

Last year, India was ranked 130th in the World Bank’s index covering 189 countries, an improvement of four notches from a year before.

While India improved its rank on three counts — starting a business, getting construction permits and accessing electricity — it witnessed its performance worsen in two areas — accessing credit and paying taxes.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/ease-of-doing-business-12-states-implement-75-of-reforms/387441/

Microfinance lending hits $10 billion

India’s microfinance industry is close to touching the $10-billion mark with the total loan portfolio of microfinance institutions (MFIs) at an all-time high of Rs. 63,853 crore as of March 31, 2016.

This represents a 31 per cent increase over the Rs. 48,882 crore loan portfolio as of end-March 2015, the Bharat Microfinance Report 2016 showed. The share of NBFC-MFIs stood over 88 per cent, followed by Societies and Trusts at 9 per cent. Nearly 88 per cent of the portfolio is held by MFIs with a portfolio size above Rs. 500 crore. The Bharat Microfinance Report 2016 — published by self-regulatory organisation Sa-Dhan — was released by Reserve Bank of India Executive Director US Paliwal and SIDBI Chairman and Managing Director Kshatrapati Shivaji in the Capital on Wednesday. The sector witnessed a healthy growth in client base with over 28 lakh new members taking the total number of clients to over 399 lakh. But the average loan per borrower of Rs. 11,425 is less than previous year’s Rs. 13,162.

MFI loan portfolio continued to grow at a good clip despite Bandhan, which was then the largest MFI, becoming a bank. If Bandhan’s loan portfolio of Rs. 9,524 crore of 2014-15 is excluded, then the growth rate of the MFI sector between 2014-15 and 2015-16 is over 60 per cent, said P Satish, Executive Director, Sa-Dhan.

“Despite Bandhan going out of the microfinance space, the sector witnessed strong growth. Attaining over 28 lakh clients is no mean feat. This goes to show that the microfinance industry, having reached its inflection point, is growing steadily,” Satish added.

Satish, however, expressed some concern over 13 MFIs recording over 100 per cent growth rates. He also said that MFIs are finding the business correspondent model rather attractive on the credit side.


If Bandhan’s loan portfolio of Rs. 9,524 crore of 2014-15 is excluded, then the growth rate of the MFI sector between 2014-15 and 2015-16 is over 60 per cent: Sa-Dhan ED

 

Source: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/tp-money-banking/microfinance-lending-hits-10-b/article9108686.ece

GST bringing realty shake-up

Retailers, both of physical stores and e-commerce entities, fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) companies and those in consumer durables have started rejigging their warehouse strategy.

This is in preparation for the national goods and services tax (GST), with the government working to an April 2017 deadline. All this could mean a shake-up in real estate, say analysts. A rough calculation suggests these businesses could look at reducing their warehouse count to half, while stepping up the total space acquisition in select destinations, once GST comes into play. In the next two to three years, businesses could see significant cost reduction due to the revised strategy.

Hindustan Unilever, Nestle, Johnson & Johnson and Shoppers Stop are among those to have begun work on consolidating their warehouses, according to a source. These companies will take up mega space, in millions of square feet, to set up ‘mother warehouses’, he said. In the online space, top companies such as Flipkart and Amazon have been on an expansion spree for warehouses and fulfillment centres in the past two years, primarily to suit the complex tax structure through the country. Now, however, they won’t feel the need to have warehouses in every state and can strategise accordingly, Vijaya Ganesh Thangavel, managing director, Land & Industrial (India), Cushman & Wakefield, told this newspaper.

For instance, Max Fashion, a prominent retailer, has eight warehouses totaling 400,000 sq ft. The number is likely to come down to four after GST, says chief executive Vasanth Kumar. “The number will get firmed up once we know the full GST details and the implications such as the reverse logistics needs,’’ he said. Post GST, their warehouse count will be down but the total space covered could go up to around 600,000 sq ft by 2018 “to meet future business needs, as well our rate of growth at a 30-plus per cent CAGR (compounded annual rate)”.

If a typical e-commerce company was taking 300,000 to 400,000 sq ft in metros and tier-1 cities for warehouses, 100,000 sq ft in tier-2 and 40,000 to 50,000 sq ft in tier-3, the plan now will be to go for million sq ft space and more, away from big cities and in fewer locations, primarily where real estate cost won’t be prohibitive, says Thangavel of Cushman. Distribution centres, smaller in size in the range of 40,000 to 50,000 sq ft, could be set up closer to cities.

The biggest trend now is that prominent developers are getting into the warehouse space, which has mostly been a domain of local land owners till recently, according to Thangavel. Along with realtors, a new breed of advisors are coming up, only for warehouse planning. Also, warehouse parks are being set up for large structures. While the exercise of restructuring the warehouses will take a couple of years, he projects a cost reduction of at least 10 to 15 per cent by 2019-2020. Estimates are that big companies which have on an average one warehouse in every state, totaling to anything from 20 to 25, might look at eight to 10, pan-India post-GST.

“We understand that a few of the larger companies have started consolidating their warehousing requirements in strategic locations, in anticipation of GST, with a view to bringing efficiency into their supply chain,’’ said Rami Kaushal, managing director, Consulting and Valuations, CBRE South Asia.

Besides retailers and FMCG companies, even pharmaceutical companies would look at rationalising the number of operational warehouses and swap these for better quality and larger format ones, he said.

“Implementation of GST is expected to lead to rationalisation of warehousing demand, leading to lower logistics cost and reduced delivery time of manufactured goods,’’ Kaushal explained. The current complicated tax structure meant that choice in setting up inventory and distribution centres were based on the tax regime, rather than on operational efficiency, he said.

GST, when implemented, will free the decisions on warehousing and distribution from these tax considerations, according to Kaushal. ”This would enable occupiers to create larger hubs, servicing two or more states from a single location, which would help optimise inventory costs and increase efficiency.’’ This shift in operational planning would ultimately result in a hub and spoke model being adopted by many of the occupiers, he added.

Industrial warehousing space is estimated at approximately 800 million sq ft across the country and is expected to grow by nine to 10 per cent annually. A few sectors such as e-commerce, modern retailing and FMCG are expected to grow at about 20 per cent annually in the short term, according to CBRE.

A recent JLL report listed the National Capital Region, Mumbai, Pune, Bengaluru, Chennai, Hyderabad, Kolkata and Ahmedabad as top warehouse hubs. These eight city hubs together had a cumulative supply of organised Grade-A and Grade-B warehousing space of around 97 mn sq ft in 2015; this is expected to grow to around 116 mn sq ft by the end of 2016. It added that GST will result in emergence of new hubs such as Belgaum, Bhubaneswar, Coimbatore, Goa, Guwahati, Indore, Jaipur, Kolhapur, Lucknow/ Kanpur, Ludhiana, Nagpur, Patna, Raipur, Ranchi, Vapi and Vijayawada.

 

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/gst-bringing-realty-shake-up-116090801173_1.html