One nation, one tax department: I-T takes cue from GST

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
The move, which will require a change in the income tax law, would also end the relevance of various geographic divisions in the form of wards and circles.

The one-nation, one-tax principle that underlines the goods and services tax (GST), set to be rolled out on July 1, could be adopted in a much more broader sense by the income tax department through a path-breaking initiative on jurisdiction-free assessment.

This would mean that a taxpayer in Mumbai could be assessed by an income tax officer located in Patna, a significant leap toward eradicating corruption by reducing the need for face-to-face contact between citizens and tax officials to the absolute minimum besides speeding up processing.

The move, which will require a change in the income tax law, would also end the relevance of various geographic divisions in the form of wards and circles with the whole country becoming one jurisdiction. This, it is hoped, will put an end to a system in which bribery is said to be used as a tool to ease processes through human intervention.


A high-level internal report of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) recommended the move, which is under active consideration, a senior official told Economic Times.

“We are looking at it,” the CBDT official said.

The government may consider implementing the process in the next financial year.

 

The Catalyst
The key catalyst for such a significant reform is the massive shift toward e-filing of returns, which is already jurisdiction-free with returns going to the Central Processing Centre in Bengaluru.

In the last financial year, over 42.1 million tax returns had been filed online by February. The number of e-returns processed by then was 43 million, which included some backlog from previous years.

Multiple Benefits
In line with this move towards e-processing, the income tax department may even opt for e-scrutiny for all limited scrutiny cases where assesses can explain the transactions in question over email, the official said.

A complete jurisdiction-free environment would make geography redundant and the income tax department completely faceless for taxpayers. Any review or scrutiny of return could happen anywhere in India through an electronic interface, ensuring that the payee is not forced to interact with officials. “A taxpayer would not need to have any physical interface with his assessing officer,” said the official cited above.

CBDT had earlier constituted a seven-member committee to formulate a Standard Assessment Procedure for e-scrutiny to promote greater certainty, transparency and accountability. The board has in recent times taken a number of initiatives to reduce the face-to-face contact between tax officials and assessees and make the system non-adversarial.

These include directing field offices to raise only specific queries in income tax assessment cases picked up for scrutiny. It also directed the expeditious completion of those scrutiny cases where income concealed is up to Rs 5 lakh. “Jurisdiction-free assessment will help the tax department plan and allocate assessment work across the country,” said Jiger Saiya, partner, direct tax, BDO India.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/59026099.cms

Income Tax department warns against cash dealings of Rs 2 lakh, seeks tip-off

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
Income Tax department warns against cash dealings of Rs 2 lakh.

Income Tax department today warned people against indulging in cash transaction of Rs 2 lakh or more saying that the receiver of the amount will have to cough up an equal amount as penalty.

It also advised people having knowledge of such dealings to tip-off the tax department by sending an email to ‘ blackmoneyinfo@incometax.gov.in ‘.

The government has banned cash transactions of Rs 2 lakh or more from April 1, 2017, through the Finance Act 2017.

The newly inserted section 269ST in the Income Tax Act bans such cash dealings on a single day, in respect of a single transaction or transactions relating to one event or occasion from an individual.

“Contravention of Section 269ST would entail levy of 100 per cent penalty on receiver of the amount,” the tax department said in a public advertisement in leading dailies.

In the 2017-18 Budget, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had proposed to ban cash transaction of over Rs 3 lakh. This limit was lowered to Rs 2 lakh as an amendment to the Finance Bill, which was passed by the Lok Sabha in March.

The restriction is not applicable to any receipt by government, banking company, post office savings bank or co- operative bank, the tax department said.

The move to ban cash transaction above a threshold was aimed at curbing black money by discouraging cash transaction and promoting digital economy.

The tax department had started the email address ‘ blackmoneyinfo@incometax.gov.in ‘ in December last year post the demonetisation of 500 and 1000 rupee notes.

It had then asked people having knowledge about conversion of black money into black/white to inform the government through this mail id.

Post the demonetisation of 500 and 1,000 rupee notes, people with unaccounted wealth had illegally converted their black money held in old notes to new 500 and 2,000 rupee notes.

The government had come out with a tax amnesty scheme PMGKY (Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana) under which people holding unaccounted cash could come clean by declaring their wealth and pay 50 per cent as tax and penalty. Also, a mandatory deposit of 25 per cent of the black money was to be made in a zero-interest bearing account for four years.

 

Source:  http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/58959395.cms

No tax scrutiny of big transaction if it matches income

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
I-T department gathered a huge amount of data as part of Operation Clean Money, which followed demonetisation, and is subjecting it to analytics to detect patterns and discover attempts at tax evasion.

If you splurged on something really expensive or made an enormous investment recently, rest assured your accounts won’t be opened up for scrutiny by the income tax department as long as these can be squared with your declared income.

“Scrutiny will be based on specific information,” a senior income tax official told ET. In other words, big transactions will no longer automatically qualify a person for scrutiny. The income tax department will only start asking questions if it has clear information that calls for an investigation, sparing honest taxpayers.

This was the outcome of a high-level meeting held by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) last week to review the conditions for scrutiny. Such cases are currently picked up through computer-based criteria related to transactions above a certain ceiling. This idea is to ensure that regular taxpayers such as salaried employees don’t face unnecessary hassle and to allow tax authorities to focus their energies on high-risk individuals or entities where information of possible wrongdoing is available.

The department’s multiple data sources include the tax authorities of other countries and high-value transactions in India that will likely be the basis of any scrutiny.

Those identified under the department’s Operation Clean Money as having made large cash deposits in banks and bought costly items after demonetisation was announced could also face scrutiny if they have not explained their transactions satisfactorily.

The department gathered a huge amount of data as part of Operation Clean Money, which followed demonetisation, and is subjecting it to analytics to detect patterns and discover attempts at tax evasion. It has already identified 60,000 individuals, who will now face closer investigation.

But there is a conscious effort to make a shift towards quality rather than quantity to ensure the effectiveness of the exercise. The focus will be on limited scrutiny based on information with the department rather than a general one. Roving enquiries won’t be permitted and a limited scrutiny can only be converted to a general one after following adequate procedures.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/no-tax-scrutiny-of-big-transaction-if-it-matches-income/articleshow/58689453.cms

High-value transactions by doctors, lawyers under income tax lens

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
Salaried individuals are not required to file the newly introduced statement of financial transactions (SFT).

Senior tax officials are reaching out to chartered accountants and CFOs to drive home the point that by May 31 business establishments, various financial institutions and professionals, including doctors, lawyers and architects, will have to report a slew of high-value transactions such as cash deposit, credit card payments, share sale, property deals, debentures and mutual fund units among others.

Salaried individuals are not required to file the newly introduced statement of financial transactions (SFT). Entities that will have to report are banks, professionals, fund houses, forex dealers, post office, nidhis, non-banking finance companies, property registrars, companies issuing bonds and debentures, and listed companies buying back shares from specific persons.

“Many are not fully aware of the new requirement. Under the modified rules, the earlier requirement of filing annual information return (AIR) has now been replaced by SFT. The changes have created new classes of first time filers who have to file SFT of specified transactions for FY 2016-17,” said Jai Raj Kajla, Director of Income Tax (Intelligence & Criminal Investigation) while addressing tax practitioners here on Friday.

The nature of transactions includes cash payment for purchase of demand drafts or pay orders of Rs 10 lakh or more in a year; cash payment of Rs 10 lakh or more for purchase of pre-paid RBI instruments, cash deposit or withdrawal of Rs 50 lakh or more from current account; one-time deposit of Rs 10 lakh or more with banks, nidhis, NBFCs and post offices; payment of Rs 1 lakh or more in cash and Rs 10 lakh or more by other mode against credit card bill issued to a person during the year; and property registrars for deals worth Rs 30 lakh or more.

Kajla and his colleagues met close to 300 tax practitioners and corporate CFOs to explain the new rules, which would require the reporting entity to register online with the tax office. SFTs have to be filed in separate form and not along with the regular Income tax returns.

“The Directorate is conducting workshops to address various categories of reporting entities like bullion dealers, stock brokers, and dealers of automobiles and luxury goods,” said Anu Krishna Aggarwal, Additional Director of Income Tax (I&CI).

As per the new requirements, apart from specific filers like banks which used to file similar AIR returns, SFT regulations would cover any person who is liable to audit under Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The particular section relates to audit of businesses and professions.

The purpose of the workshops was to spell out the rules to the chartered accountants who in turn can assist taxpayers in ensuring timely and accurate SFT compliance.

Laxman Singh Gurjar, Manpreet Singh Duggal, and Aastha Madhur – all deputy directors of Income Tax – and Vishnu Agarwal, chairman of the western India council of ICAI, participated in the discussions which also dealt with the finer points of compliance ..For instance, while reporting an entity will have to take into account all the accounts of the same nature maintained in respect of a person during a financial year; also, while attributing the entire value of the transactions to all the persons in cases where the account is maintained or transactions recorded in the name of more than one person.

Filing of inaccurate information will attract penalty of Rs 50,000.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/58651349.cms