PM Narendra Modi, Shinzo Abe sign landmark India-Japan Civil Nuclear Deal

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, today met with Japan Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and signed the Civil Nuclear Deal between India and Japan. PM Narendra Modi, after signing the deal said, “Our strategic partnership is not only for the good & security of our own societies. It also brings peace, stability & balance to region.” PM Modi added, “I wish to thank Prime Minister Abe for the support extended for India’s membership  of the Nuclear Suppliers Group.”

This move comes after six years of negotiation. After the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant disaster, the nuclear deal negotiations were halted due to political resistance in Japan.

After many years, the deal was signed today on November 11. This nuclear treaty will bring Japan’s export nuclear technology to our country, and it will be a necessary step towards India’s nuclear deals with the US, France and other countries.

Soon after hitting the demonetization masterstroke in India, Prime Minister Narendra Modi left for his second visit to Japan in order to seal the civilian nuclear deal between the two countries. This is Modi’s fourth visit to Japan over the last decade (twice as PM and twice as Gujrat Chief Minister).

Soon after landing in Japan, Modi tweeted, “Reached Japan. Looking forward to fruitful deliberations that will boost economic and cultural ties between India and Japan.”

Statement from the Press:

Commenting on the issue, a top Japanese government official said, “Terrorism, which has been an outlier subject in Japan’s national discourse, was brought closer home in July, when seven of our own — five men and two women, who were associated with the Japan International Cooperation Agency — were killed in a terrorist attack in Dhaka.

Both the countries are expected to sign around 10 different agreements which highlight issues like skill development, culture etc. Nevertheless, the prime focus of this meet was the possible signing of the civilian nuclear deal that was initiated in June 2010 but got stuck after the Fukushima disaster in December 2015.

Commenting on the possible signing of the deal, Kumao Kaneko, a former Japanese diplomat and negotiator on nuclear issues, said that the NTP has been a treaty of “convenience and expediency”. Though India adheres to NPT principles, but has not inked the treaty yet. By signing the agreement, Japan is doing the correct thing, however, the Abe government will have to work hard in the Diet (Japan’s parliament) to get the naysayers on board.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/world-news/pm-narendra-modi-shinzo-abe-sign-india-japan-civil-nuclear-deal/443823/

CBDT signs bilateral APAs with Japanese trading firm arm

The Central Board of Direct Taxes has signed bilateral advance pricing agreements with Indian arm of a Japanese trading company, a move that will help bring down transfer pricing disputes relating to intra-group transactions.

“The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) entered into a bilateral advance pricing agreement (APA) on August 2, 2016, with Indian subsidiary of a Japanese trading company. This is the first bilateral advance pricing agreement with a Japanese company having a rollback provision in it,” a finance ministry statement said today.
Overall, it is fourth bilateral APA signed by CBDT.

Signing of the pact is an important step towards ascertaining certainty in transfer pricing matters of MNC cases and dispute resolution, the statement noted.

The APA scheme was introduced in the Income-Tax Act in 2012 and the rollback provision in 2014.

The scheme intends to provide certainty to taxpayers in the domain of transfer pricing by specifying methods of pricing and setting the prices of international transactions in advance.

Its progress strengthens the government’s mission of fostering a non-adversarial tax regime, the statement said.

CBDT expects more APAs to be concluded and signed in the near future.

An APA, usually for multiple years, is signed between a taxpayer and the tax authority (CBDT in India) on an appropriate transfer pricing methodology for determining the price and ensuing taxes on intra-group overseas transactions.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/cbdt-signs-bilateral-apas-with-japanese-trading-firm-arm-116080400879_1.html

FDI inflows rise 7% to $10.55 bn in Q1

Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows grew 7 per cent to $10.55 billion during the first quarter against $9.88 billion in January-March 2015.

According to the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) data, the sectors, which attracted maximum FDI during the period, include computer hardware and software, services, telecommunications, power, pharmaceuticals and trading business.

In terms of countries, India received maximum overseas inflows from the US, Singapore, Mauritius, Japan and the Netherlands.

An official said with the government further liberalising foreign investment policies for services sector in the Budget, more inflows would come.

The government has recently relaxed FDI norms in about eight sectors, including defence, civil aviation, food processing, pharmaceuticals and private security agencies.

Foreign investment is considered crucial for India, which needs around $1 trillion for overhauling infrastructure sector such as ports, airports and highways to boost growth.

A strong inflow of foreign investments will help improve the country’s balance of payments situation and strengthen the rupee value against other global currencies, especially the US dollar.

 

Source: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/fdi-inflows-rise-7-to-1055-bn-in-q1/article8916909.ece

Indian real estate may attract $2 bn investment from Japan

JapanJapanese developers and private equity investors are looking to enter Indian property market and could invest at least USD 2 billion over the next three years in residential as well as industrial projects, says JLL.

 

Realty consultant JLL India said in a report that the country is emerging as major investment destination for Chinese and Japanese developers.

 

China’s biggest developer Wanda has signed an MoU with Haryana government earlier this year and more developers from China and Japan are expected to enter the Indian realty market, it said.

 

Private equity investors from these two countries are also looking at entering India’s real estate sector, it added.

 

“Japanese developers are keen to explore strategic partnerships and enter into joint ventures with Indian builders, and are particularly interested in industrial projects. There is likely to be an inflow of at least USD 2 billion in investments from Japan into the Indian real estate market over the next three years,” JLL India Chairman and Country Head Anuj Puri said.

 

After 100 per cent foreign direct investment (FDI) was allowed into the real estate industry, it was only a matter of time before foreign developers made big investment announcements, he said.

 

“One of China’s most prominent developers, Dalian Wanda Group, signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) earlier this year with the northern state of Haryana to develop Wanda Industrial New City’. The investment of USD 10 billion, phased out over the next decade, is a very significant outlay by any Chinese company in India,” Puri said.

 

Other Chinese developers are also interested in India and most likely to follow suit, he added.

The RICS-JLL survey this January had shown that 62 per cent of the respondents felt that institutions from Japan and China could come knocking to the Indian real estate market in 2016.

 

Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Indian-real-estate-may-attract-2-bn-investment-from-Japan/articleshow/52763657.cms

US, Europe combined infra spending less than China’s

Despite a crying need for better infrastructure, investment in it has actually fallen in 10 major economies since the financial crisis, including the US, according to a new study by the McKinsey Global Institute. Meanwhile, China is still going gangbusters on roads, bridges, sewers, and everything else that makes a country run.

“China spends more on economic infrastructure annually than North America and Western Europe combined,” according to the report published Wednesday.

Economists around the world have been arguing that now is a great time to invest in infrastructure because interest rates are super-low and the global economy could use the spending jolt. “Is anyone proud of Kennedy airport?” Harvard University economist Lawrence Summers likes to ask.

The MGI report cites 10 countries where infrastructure spending fell as a share of gross domestic product from 2008 to 2013: the US, UK, Italy, Australia, South Korea, Brazil, India, Russia, Mexico, and Saudi Arabia. The study counts 11 economies, but that’s because it lists the European Union as a separate entity.

In contrast to the widespread declines, the institute says, infrastructure spending grew as a share of GDP in Japan, Germany, France, Canada, Turkey, South Africa and China. The chart from the MGI report shows China’s strength in infrastructure spending. Its bar is the highest. There’s such a thing as too much infrastructure spending, of course. At current rates of investment, China, Japan, and Australia are likely to exceed their needs between now and 2030, the McKinsey & Co-affiliated think tank says. To fund more public infrastructure, the report favours raising user charges such as highway tolls, among other measures.

To encourage more private investment in infrastructure, MGI argues for increasing “regulatory certainty” and giving investors “the ability to charge prices that produce an acceptable risk-adjusted return.”

 

Source:  http://www.business-standard.com/article/international/us-europe-combined-infra-spending-less-than-china-s-116061600030_1.html

Japan banks enter ranks of biggest energy lenders

JapanJapanese banks, known for the risk-aversion that spared them the worst of the credit crisis, have quietly grown into some of the world’s largest energy lenders.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc (MUFG), Japan’s largest bank, disclosed last month it has become one of the biggest oil and gas lenders with 9.2 trillion yen, or about $85 billion, in exposure – $45 billion more than it had reported at the end of the year. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc is not far behind with about $77 billion and Mizuho Financial Group Inc has about $48 billion, calculations based on the companies’ websites show.

The megabanks sought profits in the oil patch during the boom as Japan’s shrinking population and years of economic stagnation sapped the profitability of domestic lending. While energy is only a fraction of their business, souring loans have been a drag on earnings. MUFG sees full-year profit falling 11 per cent as negative interest rates squeeze loan profitability and bad-loan costs increase.

“Japanese banks were thought to have no exposure at all and all of a sudden they’re some of the most exposed companies around the world,” said Nicholas Smith, a strategist at brokerage CLSA Ltd in Tokyo who has covered Japanese equities for over 25 years. “Perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised, given their scramble to get overseas exposure.”

The longer oil remains around $50 a barrel, the worse it gets. MUFG and Sumitomo Mitsui reported in May that the cost of bad energy loans rose in the past 12 months to a combined $994 million. Sumitomo Mitsui said that number could rise in the next year. Mizuho didn’t disclose energy-related credit costs.

Brent gained 14 cents, or 0.3 per cent, to $52.65 a barrel on the London-based ICE Futures Europe exchange at 12:28 pm Singapore time.

“Considering that we have downgraded more than 100 rated energy companies globally since December 2015, the banks’ energy and resource-related exposures in this uncertain environment could create losses that would reduce their capital,” Raymond Spencer, an analyst for Moody’s Investors Service in Tokyo, wrote in a May 19 note.

With defaults on the rise, bank investors around the world have been demanding more information about energy lending. MUFG’s exposure jumped after the bank expanded its most recent disclosure to include refineries and pipelines, borrowers that were left out of previous reports.

“I don’t believe that proactively lending to the natural resource and energy sector is in itself a mistake,” said Nobuyuki Hirano, president of MUFG, at a May 16 briefing discussing the company’s financial results. He said the company has prepared “appropriately” for potential losses. One concern for Japanese lenders is the deteriorating finances of the US shale industry. During the boom, drillers that outspent cash flow even when oil was $100 a barrel tapped credit from Japanese banks that were pushing to expand overseas lending.

Then prices plummeted below $30. Since the start of 2015, 142 oilfield service companies and oil and gas producers have gone bankrupt, owing almost $62 billion, according to law firm Haynes & Boone.

Sumitomo Mitsui is among the lenders to Stone Energy Corp., which is in restructuring talks. MUFG and Mizuho are among Linn Energy LLC,’s creditors, company records show. Linn owed $2.55 billion on two credit lines when it filed for bankruptcy May 11. Mizuho was also a lender to Breitburn Energy Partners LP, which owed $1.2 billion on its credit line when it filed for bankruptcy May 15.

While these credit lines are split up among a dozen or more lenders, and collateral in the form of oil and gas reserves may mitigate any losses, the risk is adding up. MUFG said in April that its North American subsidiary has made $5.52 billion in loans to exploration and production companies. Almost half of those loans are now marked as “criticised,” a regulatory designation that means that, at best, the loans exhibit potential weaknesses and at worst will result in losses.

The size of Sumitomo Mitsui’s total oil and gas-related exposure to non-Japanese borrowers, which is the area most vulnerable to changes in oil prices, is 6 per cent of its total portfolio, Koichi Miyata, president of the group holding company, said at a results briefing in Tokyo on May 13. “And this is a diverse mix including oil majors, 85 per cent of which I think is fair to say is extremely good credit,” he said.

Mizuho said its bad debts in the energy and resource sector totalled about $279 million as of March. “Even based on oil prices at the moment, we’re absolutely not seeing the recording of any major concentration of credit costs,” Mizuho’s President Yasuhiro Sato said at a May 13 briefing on the bank’s financial results.

“I don’t think we need to be worried at the current point in time,” said Nana Otsuki, chief analyst at Monex Group Inc, a Tokyo-based online securities firm. “But we’ll need to watch risks more carefully next year, particularly if there are any movements in the price of oil.”

 

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/international/japan-banks-enter-ranks-of-biggest-energy-lenders-116060901307_1.html

To de-stress banks, Modi govt plans ‘significant’ stressed assets fund

Given the need for large chunks of equity capital to infuse new life into banks’ stressed assets, the government plans a new fund of “significant size” with this mandate, minister of state for finance Jayant Sinha said on Tuesday. A variety of other funds including the proposed National Infrastructure Investment Fund (NIIF) could help bolster the planned stressed assets fund, he added.

“We need an efficient resolution (of the issue of rising stressed assets) and recovery process for our banks,” Sinha said on the sidelines of a conference organised by rating agency Crisil on the deepening of corporate bond markets. He said a committee might be set up to take a look at what kind of haircuts would need to be taken by banks and what their sustainable levels of debt could be. While these could be commercial decisions taken by banks, the government would ensure the process is carried out with integrity, he emphasised.

Many state-owned lenders are facing a tough situation, having reported large losses owing to assets turning sour. Gross non-performing assets in the banking system at the end of March are estimated at Rs 5.7 lakh crore while the provisions set aside by banks in FY16 was Rs 1.43 lakh crore. Total losses of PSBs in FY16 was Rs 17,022 crore.

“We expect a variety of funds — distressed debt funds, special situations fund and NIIF — to participate in the equity investments in these stressed assets,” the minister said. The NIIF, intended to give a leg-up to the country’s efforts to find the elusive equity capital for its huge plans for infrastructure creation, is being set up with an initial corpus of Rs 40,000 crore, half of that from the government, which will remain a minority partner.

The NIIF, which will have several sector-specific sub-funds, is expected to catalyse financing of infrastructure projects by leveraging the corpus multiple times. Many global sovereign wealth funds including the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, Singapore’s Temasek and Russian Direct Investment Fund have evinced interest in investing in the NIIF. The search for the CEO of the fund has reached the final stage, the minister indicated.

jayant

 

Sinha said: “There are also many other players who are looking to invest in the stressed assets of Indian banks. So we expect that there will be a vibrant market to be able to take these assets that are in need of equity capital right now.” On Tuesday, finance minister Arun Jaitley, on a visit to Japan, pitched for investments in the NIIF to Japanese investors.

While Sinha has indicated the NIIF’s participation in the proposed stressed assets fund, the former’s stated objective has been to maximise economic impact mainly through infrastructure development in commercially viable projects, both greenfield and brownfield, including stalled projects. It could also consider other nationally important projects if commercially viable.

 

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/article/industry/banking-finance/bank-npas-centre-turns-to-stressed-assets-fund-to-cap-crisis/270598/