MCA sees Rs 2.8 lakh cr recovery from IBC-led resolution process

Section 12 (A) of IBC allows for a withdrawal of an insolvency application if 90% of the creditors’ committee (CoC) by voting share approving it.

Terming the current insolvency process and its outcomes as ‘super success, Ministry of Corporate Affairs sees total recovery amount touching Rs 2.8 lakh crore through resolutions with the settlement of two key accounts, including some others — Essar Steel, where financial creditors have approved the resolution and Bhushan SteelNSE 5.27 % and Power.

“The 100 cases that have been settled through resolution accounts, Rs 1.8 lakh crore have been netted which is not a small amount and the accounts sitting on margin (Bhushan Steel and Power & Essar Steel), another Rs 1 lakh crore along with some other mid-sized resolutions can come, so Rs 2.8 lakh crore out of Rs 10 lakh crore of NPA that time is not a small amount, IBC is a super success”, says MCA senior officials on the insolvency processes

In case of Essar Steel, the CoC has approved the resolution process but the process got stuck after operational creditor Standard Chartered moved NCLAT for higher share from the funds. The debt-ridden steel firm had Rs 42,000 crore coming from the resolution plan of global steel major ArcelorMittal.

JSW Steel had revised its offer for Bhushan Power & Steel from Rs 11,000 crore to Rs18,000 crore and later to over Rs 19,000 crore which the CoC had approved.

And it is not just resolution process-led recoveries, the official said pre-resolution processes have also yielded results in 6,500 cases netting Rs 3 lakh crore on dead assets.

“6500 cases settled involving claims of close to Rs 3 lakh crore where they have been have settled before admission. And now after 12 (A) has been introduced, another 100 cases which are at stages of 90% CoC approval are moving towards out of court settlements. Both (in and outside resolutions and NCLT) are happening. About 500 cases have got settled through the court process and 6,500 cases settled even before admission”, said the officials.

Section 12 (A) of IBC allows for a withdrawal of an insolvency application if 90% of the creditors’ committee (CoC) by voting share approving it.

MCA officials dismissed the notion of high haircuts through resolution process. They said: “It (IBC) is super success. There should not be any brouhaha over haircuts. Will anybody pay more than what is the value? Suppose an asset is used for 20 years, there is nothing more to it, there is a Rs 50,000 crore loan, liquidation value is Rs 1,000 crore, so you get (the creditors) Rs 1,000 crore only.”

“Wherever a resolution has taken place, creditors are getting 200% of the liquidation value. So definitely value maximisation is the context, demand and supply will fix the value”, the officials said.

Source: Economic Times

The Companies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2019 – highlights

The Companies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2019 was promulgated on January 12, 2019.

It repeals and replaces the Companies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018 promulgated on November 2, 2018.

The 2019 Ordinance amends several provisions in the Companies Act, 2013 relating to penalties, among others.

 

Key Highlights

  • Commencement of business – Declaration by the Director: The Ordinance states that a company may not commence business, unless it (i) files a declaration within 180 days of incorporation, confirming that every subscriber to the Memorandum of the company has paid the value of shares agreed to be taken by him, and (ii) files a verification of its registered office address with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days of incorporation.  If a company fails to comply with these provisions and is found not to be carrying out any business, the name of the Company may be removed from the Register of Companies.

Any default in complying with the said will invite a fine of INR 50,000 to be paid by the company.

 

  • Removal of a Company’s name from the register – If the Registrar has enough reason to believe that a company is not carrying on business then he, after a physical verification of the registered office, can remove the company’s name from the register of companies. The ROC can strike off a company if the address of Registered Office is bogus or an incomplete/ improper address.

 

  • Issue of shares at a discount: The Act prohibits a company from issuing shares at a discount, except in certain cases.  On failure to comply, the company is liable to pay a fine between one lakh rupees and five lakh rupees every officer in default may be punished with imprisonment up to six months or fine between one lakh rupees and five lakh rupees.  The Ordinance changes this to remove imprisonment for officers as a punishment.

 

  • Further, the company and every officer in default will be liable to pay a penalty equal to the amount raised by the issue of shares at a discount or five lakh rupees, whichever is lower. The company will also be liable to refund the money received with interest at 12% per annum from the date of issue of the shares.

 

  • Alteration of Articles – After this amendment, any conversion of a Public Company to a Private Company will not be valid unless approved by an order of the Central Government. Previously, the power to issue such an order was with the Tribunal.

 

  • Registration of charges: The Act requires companies to register charges (such as mortgages) on their property within 30 days of creation of charge.  The Registrar may permit the registration within 300 days of creation.
  • The Ordinance changes this to permit registration of charges: (i) within 300 days if the charge is created before the Ordinance, or (ii) within 60 days if the charge is created after the Ordinance. If the charge under the first category is not registered within 300 days, it must be completed within six months from the date of the Ordinance.  If the charge under the second category is not registered within 60 days, the Registrar may grant another 60 days for registration.

 

  • Annual Return:  Annual Return should be filed within 60 days from the date of the AGM, failure to this, penalty of Rs. 100 per day to Company + directors maximum Rs. 5 Lakh apart from ROC delay charges is applicable.

 

  • Penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs to Company secretary certifying wrong Annual Return.

 

  • Annual Financial Statement: Filing of Balance sheet with ROC within time limit- failure is costly for Company + Directors both. Penalty of Rs.100 per day + Rs. 1 lakh to Company + Director each.

 

  • Resignation of Auditor: The Return must be filed by the resigning Auditor within 30 days, failure to which the resigning Auditor is liable for penalty of Rs. 50,000 plus Rs. 500 per day.

 

  • Disqualification of Directors: A director can not become director in more than 20 companies. If he continues, he becomes disqualified now.

 

  • Company Secretary: Appointment of Company Secretary on the payroll (Private Companies having paid-up capital Rs. 5 crores & above) is mandatory. Default is now very costly- penalty increased substantially.

 

  • ROC may strike off a company if subscribers have not paid initial share capital after incorporation of a Company within 6 months.

 

  • Financial Year: The Indian subsidiary or associate or holding company of the foreign company may be allowed to follow any period as its financial period on an application made by such company if it is required for consolidation of its financials with the foreign company. Also the such period may or may not be one year.

 

  • Change in approving authority: Under the Act, change in period of financial year for a company associated with a foreign company, has to be approved by the National Company Law Tribunal.  Similarly, any alteration in the incorporation document of a public company which has the effect of converting it to a private company, has to be approved by the Tribunal.  Under the Ordinance, these powers have been transferred to central government.

 

  • Declaration of beneficial ownership: If a person holds beneficial interest of at least 25% shares in a company or exercises significant influence or control over the company, he is required to make a declaration of his interest. Under the Act, failure to declare this interest is punishable with a fine between one lakh rupees and ten lakh rupees, along with a continuing fine for every day of default.  The Ordinance provides that such person may either be fined, or imprisoned for up to one year, or both.

 

  • Resolutions and agreements to be filed – If the company fails to file a resolution and agreement before the specified time, the company shall be liable to pay INR 1,00,000 as penalty and in case of a continuing failure it will be extended further by INR 500 per day subject to a maximum penalty of 25 lakhs. For any officer who is liable, the penalty is of INR 50,000, and in case of a continuing failure it will be extended further by INR 500 per day subject to a maximum penalty of 5 lakhs.

 

  • Penalties in different sections – In section 191, the penalty is increased from a minimum of INR 25,000 to a minimum of one lakh rupees. In section 441, The maximum limit is increased from 5 lakh rupees to 25 lakh rupees.

 

Read the Ordinance Text  Companies-Amendment-Ordinance-2019

Cannot provide relief for de-registered firms, disqualified directors: Minister

PP Choudhary, Minister of State for Corporate Affairs

The Corporate Affairs Ministry has ruled out providing any relief for the 2.25 lakh de-registered companies and the 3.09 lakh disqualified directors, stating that these actions were caused by the ‘operation of law’.

“There is no proposal before us to provide any relief to them. No such issue is before us. The only issue before us and taking our attention is to get the pending Companies (amendment) Bill enacted by the Rajya Sabha,” PP Choudhary, Minister of State for Corporate Affairs, told BusinessLine.

The Ministry had de-registered 2.25 lakh companies and disqualified as many as 3.09 lakh directors for not filing financial statements for two or more years. Choudhary said that remedy for these two controversies are before the National Company Law Tribunal (in case of deregistered companies) and the High Courts (for disqualification of directors).

“There is no provision under the law to allow the government to resolve both the controversies. Our actions are by the operation of law enacted by Parliament. It is not within the domain of the government to provide relief without any explicit provision allowing for any relief,” he said.

He also highlighted that the de-registered companies and the disqualified directors had not opted to utilise the window of the Company Law Settlement Scheme in 2014 although it was available for nearly eight months.

Choudhary said the government, in future, could consider providing a departmental mechanism for resolution of grievance instead of going to NCLT for the de-registered companies.

Meanwhile, sources said that over ₹21,000 crore was deposited and withdrawn post-demonetisation by about 35,000 companies forming part of the 2.25 lakh de-registered companies. In one case, a company, which had a negative opening balance on November 8, 2016, deposited and withdrew ₹2,484 crore post-demonetisation. There was another company that had deposited ₹3,700 crore post demonetisation in one account, sources said.

Source: The Hindu Business Online

Government tightens screws on assets owned by deregistered companies

According to the minister, since the country-wide land records have been computerised, it would not take much time for the states to provide the requisite information to the district authorities and the central government.

The corporate affairs ministry today asked states to complete identification of properties owned by deregistered companies at the earliest and ensure district administrations prevent transactions in those assets.

Amid intensifying efforts to fight the black money menace, the ministry has also urged the states to initiate disciplinary action against the officials concerned in case such transactions go through.

The names of around 2.25 lakh companies which have not been carrying out business activities for long have been struck off the official records and a number of directors associated with such firms have been disqualified.

Against this backdrop, Minister of State for Corporate Affairs P P Chaudhary today held a review meeting with representatives from various states on action taken with respect to properties belonging to around 2.09 lakh deregistered companies.

During the meeting, Chaudhary asked the states’ representatives to complete the process of identification and tracking of properties belonging to such companies at the earliest, according to an official release.

In this regard, the states have been requested to share information with the ministry in a time-bound manner.

On September 12, the ministry had sent a letter to states for identification and tracking of properties belonging to around 2.09 lakh companies that were deregistered. Now, the number of such firms is about 2.25 lakh.

Additional state-wise information pertaining to such companies was also shared with the state representatives.

According to the minister, since the country-wide land records have been computerised, it would not take much time for the states to provide the requisite information to the district authorities and the central government.

Since the names of the companies have been struck off, any transaction pertaining to properties owned by them, their directors or authorised signatories would be “void ab initio and a nullity till such companies are restored by an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), the release said.

“In fact, by virtue of the company’s name having been struck off from the Register of Companies under the Companies Act, 2013, its identity as a legal person had been lost and hence, the legal ownership of properties belonging to such a company was non-existent,” it added.

Chaudhary advised the representatives to ensure that requisite directions are urgently issued to all the district authorities dealing with registration of properties to put in place appropriate mechanism to prevent transactions in properties belonging to the deregistered companies.

Officials allowing registration of transactions in such properties by ignoring the requisite directions may be subjected to disciplinary action, he told the representatives.

Emphasising that tackling of shell companies is an imperative element in the fight against black money, Chaudhary said such a drive would help unearth benami properties and discourage illegal practices, which would create a healthy economic environment for honest businessmen.

Individual businesses to soon be under ambit of bankruptcy code

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India has published draft rules dealing with insolvency resolution process of individuals and firms on its website
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India has published draft rules dealing with insolvency resolution process of individuals and firms on its website .                                    The existing insolvency and bankruptcy code, at present, applies only to corporate defaulters

The government on Tuesday expanded the scope of the new insolvency rules to bring individual businesses under its purview.

On Tuesday, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) published the draft rules dealing with insolvency resolution process of individuals and firms on its website (www.ibbi.gov.in) ; public comments can be submitted till 31 October.

Once notified, even individual businesses such as proprietorships will come under the bankruptcy regime. This will enable an orderly bankruptcy resolution within the purview of a transparent rules-based regime. The existing insolvency and bankruptcy code, at present, applies only to corporate defaulters.

“These rules shall apply to matters relating to the insolvency resolution process for individuals and firms under Part III of the code,” said the draft rules issued by IBBI.

Part III of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, deals with insolvency and bankruptcy of individuals and partnership firms.

According to a statement issued by IBBI on Tuesday, the draft rules and regulations have been submitted by a working group which was formed to recommend the strategy and approach for implementation of the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, dealing with insolvency and bankruptcy in respect of guarantors to corporate debtors, i.e., personal guarantors, and individuals having businesses.

“So far, the rules were only in respect of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and the rules concerning individuals and partnership firms were yet to come,” said Satwinder Singh, partner at Vaish Associates, a law firm. “The jurisdiction for corporate, companies, limited liability partnership (LLP) lies before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and with the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) for individuals and firms. The provisions relating to insolvency and bankruptcy of individuals and firms had not been notified earlier, so now the IBBI has come out with the draft rules.”

Harsh Pais, partner at law firm Trilegal, said, “It is a positive step towards consolidating the bankruptcy regime for individuals, for whom there was no systematic approach previously. For companies, at least there was recourse to the Companies Act, whereas for individuals there were only some archaic laws from the early 1900s, which were hardly relied upon in practice.”

Most of the small and medium enterprises (SMEs) take the legal form of either partnership or proprietorship firms. Though the loans are smaller in value, SME borrowers far outnumber companies, resulting in their borrowings exerting a significant influence in the financial sector’s stability.

Bankruptcy resolution is high on the agenda of the central government, which is keen to improve the ease of doing business in India and attract more private investments from domestic and overseas sources. An efficient exit route from failed projects is an essential factor that lenders consider before participating in projects.

 

Source: Live Mint

Bankruptcy board to register 100 more insolvency professionals to add to 940

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), which has so far registered 940 insolvency professionals (IPs), is in the process of granting registration to about 100 more such professionals, according to its whole time member Navrang Saini.

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), which has so far registered 940 insolvency professionals (IPs), is in the process of granting registration to about 100 more such professionals, according to its whole time member Navrang Saini. “It is a continuous process, the applications come to us through insolvency professionals agencies, we examine the applications and carry out due diligence and then we grant registration to them,” said Saini while addressing an Assocham conference on IBC and RERA. The IBBI had received three applications for registration as information utility (IU) out of which two applicants have been granted in-principle approval and it is in the process of examining the third one.

“We are in the process of giving approval to one of the IU, we may give the final registration if they meet all criteria, we have already given in-principal approval to two IUs and out of that I hope one will start functioning by end of this month, the third application is still under examination with the board,” Saini said.

As on September 12, 3,437 cases have been filed out of which 354 cases have already been admitted by the various benches of NCLT. Out of these, 337 have already been rejected. “To deal with such a large number of insolvency related matters, we need institutional infrastructure,” he said.

Rules for registered valuers are to be made by ministry of corporate affairs which is in the process of notifying and issuing the same.

The board has already invited suggestions on the regulations which have already been notified by the board and it will receive the suggestions up to December 31 and come out with the amendments based on the suggestions received and advisory committees constituted for this purpose by March 31, 2018.

Source: Financial Express

Centre asks banks to restrict accounts of 2.09 lakh firms

The finance ministry has advised all banks to take immediate steps to restrict transactions in bank accounts of more than 2.09 lakh companies, whose names have been struck off the Register of Companies.

Banks have also been advised to step up due diligence while dealing with all firms in general and been alerted that even if a firm is ‘active’ in the corporate affairs ministry database, it should be seen with ‘suspicion’ if it has failed to file statements or returns.

‘Not compliant’

“…Prima facie, the company is not complying with its mandatory statutory obligations to file this vital information for availability to its stakeholders,” the finance ministry has reasoned.

On July 1, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had first revealed the government’s decision to cancel the registrations of one lakh companies that had suspicious and questionable operations, identified on the basis of data mined from the deposit of bank notes following last November’s demonetisation of Rs.500 and Rs.1,000 notes.

The PM had promised more action would follow on two lakh similar firms and 38,000 shell companies. Tuesday’s statement reveals that progress has been made in scrapping another 1,09,032 firms under the Companies Act since then.

‘Directors barred’

“The existing directors and authorised signatories of such struck-off companies will now become ex-directors or ex-authorised signatories. These individuals will therefore not be able to operate bank accounts of such companies till such companies are legally restored under Section 252 of the Companies Act by an order of the National Company Law Tribunal,” the ministry said, disclosing ‘stepped up decisive action’ against errant companies.

“Since such ‘struck off’ companies have ceased to exist, action has been initiated to restrict the operation of [their] bank accounts. The Department of Financial Services has, through the Indian Banks Association, advised all banks … [to] take immediate steps to put restrictions on bank accounts of such struck-off companies,” the ministry said, adding that the list of firms had been put up on the corporate affairs ministry’s website.

In addition, the statement said that banks had been advised to go in for ‘enhanced diligence while dealing with companies in general.’

“A company… even having an active status on the website of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs but defaulting in filing of its due financial statement/s or annual return/s in particular of charges on its assets on the secured loan should be seen with suspicion…” the ministry has told banks.

Source: The Hindu