• An employee can change the option of tax structure at the time of filing the ITR • TDS will get adjusted accordingly
The Central Board of Direct Tax (CBDT) recently came out with a circular, offering clarifications for tax-paying employees on how they can migrate to the new concessional tax regime, which was announced in this year’s Union Budget.
The lower income tax rates under the new regime came to effect from April 1, 2020. However, there were many concerns raised on how employees can choose to opt between the old and regime.
In an April 13 release, the CBDT said employees, who do not have any income from a business, can opt for the new concessional tax slabs or the old regime by intimating the deductor (employer) through a declaration form.
The declaration will also help employers determine whether to deduct TDS as per the old regime or the new concessional rates.
Employees have an option to choose between the new tax regime and the old one. Experts have already said that each employee/taxpayer may opt for any of the two, based on investments.
Coming to the new slabs under the concessional tax regime, those earning Rs 2.5 lakh will have to pay no tax while people earning Rs 2.5-5 lakh will have to pay 5 per cent tax.
Individuals in the income bracket of Rs 7.5-10 lakh will pay 15 per cent tax. People earning over Rs 10-12.5 lakh will be taxed at 20 per cent and those earning Rs 12.5-15 lakh will pay 25 per cent taxes. Finally, people earning above Rs 15 lakh will pay 30 per cent tax under the concessional tax regime.
To sum up the clarifications: 1) Employees, who do not have any income from a business, can choose to inform their employer through a declaration if they want to opt for the new tax regime for deducting tax at source on TDS from salaries.
However, employees who do not submit any declaration to the employer will continue to be charged under the old regime as earlier.
2) The IT department also clarified that an employee can change the tax structure at the time of filing income tax and that the amount of TDS will be adjusted accordingly.
“The deductor shall compute his total income, and make TDS thereon in accordance with the provisions of section IISBAC of the Act. If such intimation is not made by the employee, the employer shall make TDS without considering the provision of section 11SBAC of the Act,” the CBDT notification said.
3) Another important clarification by the tax department was related to TDS. Once employees make their intention clear to opt for the concessional rates, it will remain the same for TDS purpose for the year without any scope of modification.
“It is also clarified that the intimation so made to the deductor (employee) shall be only for the purposes of TDS during the previous year and cannot be modified during that year,” it said.
“However, the intimation would not amount to exercising an option in terms of sub-section (5) of section 115BAC of the Act and the person shall be required to do so along with the return to be furnished under sub-section (1) of section 139 of the Act for that previous year. Thus, option at the time of filing of return of income under sub-section (1) of Section 139 of the Act could be different from the intimation made by such employee to the employer for that previous year.”
Supplier can upload the Tax Invoices on real time basis in Anx-1.
Recipient can view his purchase Invoices on near real time basis.
Recipient can also view whether supplier has filed his return or not.
Supplier has to upload the Tax Invoices latest by 10th of Next Month.
However, recipient can claim ITC on missing invoices also subject to certain conditions.
In case, Invoice uploaded by the supplier in Anx-1, but RET-1 is not filed, uploading of invoices in Anx-1 will be treated as self-admitted liability and recovery proceedings will be initiated against the supplier, except in certain specified situations where recipient will be liable to pay.
Recipient has to pay the amount of ITC availed on missing invoices after specified period. (Missing invoices means, invoices not uploaded in Anx-1)
To find out missing invoices, Offline IT Tool will be provided for matching invoices in Anx-2 with invoices in the accounting system of recipient.
Payment of tax shall be discharged full at the time of filing of RET-1 or SAHAJ or SUGAM itself.
In case of Quarterly returns, tax shall be paid on monthly basis.
Recipient can do the following actions on the invoices appearing in Anx-2 (auto drafted Purchase Invoice):
Accept also called as locking
Reject (eg. Invoice not related to the recipient)
Pending
If no action is taken on a particular invoice, it will be deemed by the system as accepted and ITC will be available against these invoices.
Once invoice is accepted by the recipient, i.e., locked by the recipient, supplier cannot amend those invoices.
Locked Invoice should be unlocked by the recipient only, for making any amendment by the supplier.
Supplier will be able to issue Debit Note or Credit Note on locked invoices also. If credit/debit note is issued against any pending invoice, then system will club the credit/debit note with pending invoice.
Second set of 15 features (16-30 points) as PART-II:-
Missing invoices shall be reported in RET-1 of the current month.
System will calculate the interest automatically. Once the tax and interest is paid, the missing invoice will be clubbed with the monthly return to which it relates.
For amendments, separate Return Form is available.
Maximum 2 amendments return can be filed for any one month.
“NIL” Return can be filed by “SMS”.
Negative liability if any shall be carried forward to next month regular return.
Higher late fee for amendment return if change in liability is more than 10%
Shipping Bill details also should be entered in Anx-1 by the exporters.
If the shipping bill details are not available by the time of filing the return, the same can be entered later on also.
The export data then will be transmitted to ICEGATE portal for cross verification purposes.
Until the facility is ready to pull the data from ICEGATE portal, importers can avail ITC on imports and supplies from SEZ on self-declaration basis.
New concept of suspension of registration will be introduced. From the date of suspension till the date of cancellation, tax payer need not file returns and invoice uploading also will not be allowed.
HSN should be reported at 4 digit level in monthly return.
The tables in the return will be opened based on the profile of the tax payer.
For all return obligations offline utility tools are made available to make filing process as easy as possible.
On a day when the Economic Survey acknowledged the fact that both GST system is complex, taxpayers found it impossible to file their returns.
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) late on Friday night extended the due date for furnishing GST Annual Return and Reconciliation Statement (GSTR-9 / 9A and GSTR-9C) for FY 2017-18 in a staggered manner. The last date to file the Returns was January 31, 2020.
This came after thousands of taxpayers took to social media complaining about the GST portal not working. “Considering the difficulties being faced by taxpayers in filing GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C for FY 2017-18 it has been decided to extend the due dates in a staggered manner for different groups of States to 3rd, 5th and 7th February 2020 as under,” CBIC said in a Tweet.
Accordingly under Group 1, the states of Maharashtra, Karnataka, Goa, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Puducherry, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Other Territory has been placed and they will need to file their returns by 3rd February 2020.
Group 2 includes Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Chandigarh, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Delhi, Rajasthan and Gujarat that have to file by 5th February 2020.
Lastly group 3 includes the states of Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Jharkhand, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu, Lakshadweep, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh, which now have to file by 7th February 2020.
On a day when the Economic Survey acknowledged the fact that both GST system is complex, taxpayers found it impossible to file their returns. By evening of January 31, #gstnfailed was the top trend on Twitter. At 10 30 pm CBIC tweeted the extension dates, but early reports suggest the portal is still not working.
The changes in this year’s ITR forms are significant because it is seeking more disclosures.
More disclosures are aimed at improving income tax compliances & e-assessments.
In AY 2018-19, 58.7 million returns were filed, out of which about 23.7 million people filed returns with no tax liability
While it may be commonplace in Uncle Sam’s country, India is slowly getting used to the idea of disclosing more information to the taxman. In the last five years, income tax return (ITR) forms have started asking for more details to ensure that your spending patterns match your tax return profile.
However, the department seeking details of a valid passport or foreign travel with spends of over ₹2 lakh has left many with a feeling of discomfort as it further complicates the filing process. Many experts also worry about the privacy and security issues. “Data protection law for individuals in our country is not like that in developed countries such as the US. Also, given that the Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is under consideration, many people are worried and skeptical when it comes to divulging so much information,” said Divya Baweja, partner, Deloitte Haskins and Sells LLP, an accounting firm.
Whether asking for more information will bear fruit and result in better tax compliance continues to be a question mark. The fact remains that you need to provide additional details, for which you have to be on top of many things, including your spending patterns. Now, if you have spent more than ₹2 lakh on foreign travel or ₹1 lakh on electric bills in the current financial year (FY), you will need to furnish these details. The new ITR forms notified by Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), for the upcoming assessment year (AY) 2020-21, require you to disclose such information. If your spending patterns don’t line up with your tax declarations, it may land you in hot water.
The objective is to gather more and more information and make the process of selecting cases for scrutiny easier.
New ITR Forms: ITR-1 & ITR4
ITR-1 which is also known as “Sahaj” can be used by an individual whose incomes primarily include salary income and whose total income does not exceed Rs.50 lakh during the FY. On the other hand ITR-4 can be used to file returns by resident individuals, Hindu Undivided Family (HUFs) and firms (other than LLP) having a total income of up to Rs.50 lakh from business and profession and filing return under presumptive taxation scheme.
There are two major changes in the ITR Forms – first, an individual taxpayer cannot file return either in ITR-1 or ITR4 if he is a joint-owner in house property, second, ITR-1 form is not valid for those individuals who have deposited more than Rs.1 crore in bank account or has incurred Rs2 lakh or Rs1 lakh on foreign travel or electricity respectively.
Additional info
So far, the government has notified ITR-1 and ITR-4 forms for tax filing for FY 2019-20 or AY 2020-21. However, you will have to wait to file returns as online utilities are not yet updated. The new ITR forms ask you to provide a valid passport number, if you have one; and details of your employer like name, nature of business, address and TAN.
The objective is to gather more and more information about an individual, which will help the tax department carry out specific enquries and make the process of selecting cases for scrutiny easier. “These alterations may be happening because the government is slowly moving towards e-assessments and is thus seeking greater clarification from taxpayers in the return itself to save time and costs,” said Shailesh Kumar, director, Nangia Andersen Consulting Pvt. Ltd, a business tax advisory firm.
Other experts echo the thought. “The changes reflects the continuing journey of the government towards simplification and automation. It has already started providing pre-filled return forms. These disclosures will help capture the complete details of taxpayers and the validation of their financial information, wherever such information is available from more than one source,” said Kuldip Kumar, partner and leader, personal tax, PwC, an accountancy firm.
Data is the new oil
In a computerised environment, tax returns are now filed online and data is something that the government wants to be best friends with to tackle the problem of tax evasion. At the front-end, it is seen as asking for more information from you, the tax payer. However, this isn’t the first time the ITR forms have been amended. Every year, CBDT notifies the forms carrying amendments in accordance with the Finance Act. The aim is to increase the tax base as only a tiny percentage of the population files returns. Also, among the people who file returns, about 40% show that they have no tax liability.
At the back-end, the government is taking steps to strengthen the compliance ecosystem. For instance, in 2004, as a measure to widen the tax base, the concept of Annual Information Return (AIR) filing was introduced. AIR is a statutory requirement where mutual funds, institutions issuing bonds and registrars or sub-registrars, and so on are required to record and report high-value financial transactions of individuals to the tax department.
In 2006, a project for enabling e-filing of ITR was launched. Further, in 2007, the government launched integrated taxpayer data management system (ITDMS). Under this system, data from multiple sources is collected in a complex process for drawing a complete profile of the taxpayer. A non-filers monitoring system (NMS), focusing mainly on non-filers with potential tax liabilities, was also initiated by the department. The system assimilates and analyses in-house information as well as transactional data received from various sources like ITR and AIR filed by third parties and other departments to identify people who had undertaken high value financial transactions but did not file their returns.
Taking it further, in the year 2017, the tax department initiated “project insight” to strengthen the non-intrusive information-driven approach for improving tax compliance and effectively utilizing information in tax administration. Under this project, an integrated data warehousing and business intelligence platform, which includes Income Tax Transaction Analysis Centre (INTRAC) and Compliance Management Centralized Processing Centre (CMCPC), has been set up. According to the department’s website, INTRAC leverages data analytics in tax administration and performs tasks related to data integration, compliance management, enterprise reporting and research support. CMCPC uses campaign management approach (consisting of emails, SMS, reminders, outbound calls and letters) to support voluntary compliance.
Will disclosures help?
The government wants you to divulge more information for better scrutiny. However, some experts feel that this will only increase the burden on the tax payers, who are already struggling with a very complicated system of tax filing. “This is overreach and intrusion, and it’s a wasteful exercise. For instance, many people from India go to gulf countries for labour work; if such people get notices, they won’t know how to respond. There is a lot of duplication. The department has already acquired most of this information through AIR filed by different entities,” said Himanshu Sinha, partner, Trilegal, a law firm.
While giving out more information makes things more difficult, such information will be able to trace non-filers and is intended to bring more compliances.
35th GST Council Meeting was held on 21 June 2019 at New Delhi, after a gap of more than three months, chaired by Union Finance Minister, Mrs Nirmala Sitharaman.
This GST Council meeting has been called at a time when the countdown to upcoming Union Budget 2019 is less than a month away. A lot of expectations piled up over months concerning various indirect tax issues will be addressed in this meeting.
Highlights of 35th GST Council Meeting
The 35th GST Council meeting concluded with consensus on the following matters
GST annual return due date extended till 31 August 2019 for FY 2017-18
The due date for filing GSTR-9, GSTR-9A, and GSTR-9C for the FY 2017-18 has been extended by two months, till 31 August 2019. Official notification can be made anytime soon.
Aadhaar-enabled GST Registration introduced:
In order to ease the current process of GST registration and reduce the paperwork involved, GST Council has given a go-ahead to a new system for verification of taxpayers registering themselves under GST. Aadhaar number shall be linked to the GSTIN while generation.
NAA tenure extended by two years
Tenure of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) was due to end by 30 November 2019. GST Council has further extended this tenure by two years, to enable it to take up all the pending cases. Hence, the authority can take up new cases in future due to rate cut issues, indicating that the GST Council has plans for further rationalisation of GST rates.
10% penalty to apply for any delay in depositing profiteered amount
GST Council has approved a levy of 10% penalty for delay in depositing the profiteered amount by more than 30 days. This is a fair measure that would encourage timely compliance by the taxpayer.
E-invoicing to start from January 2020
The new system for raising all the tax invoices on the GST portal has received in-principle approval for implementation from 1 January 2020. This applies to only B2B invoicing. By this system, no separate e-way bill will be required in case of e-invoice. Returns to be framed from these e-invoices. A phased implementation is being worked out.
Earlier, the government had fixed Rs 50 crore as the limit for the applicability of e-invoicing.
E-ticketing made mandatory for multiplexes
Among other major decisions, the GST Council approved the electronic ticketing system, for multiplexes, having multi-screens. This will help curb cases of tax evasion and the use of black tickets that have been prevalent.
Rate cut decision on electric vehicles, chargers & leasing thereof deferred; Committee to submit its report
The decision to cut GST rates for electric vehicles and electric chargers have been postponed to the next Council meeting. The matter has been referred to the Fitment Committee for checking the feasibility of the rate cut. At present, the GST rates for electric vehicles and electric chargers are 12% and 28% respectively.
Likewise, the valuation rules for goods and services pertaining to solar power generating systems and wind turbines will be placed before the next Fitment Committee. The suggestions made by this Committee will be placed before the next GST Council meeting.
Rate cut for lottery put on hold; Matter to be referred before an Attorney General
The previous council meet had not tabled the rate cut matter for lotteries. The 35th GST Council meeting discussed the matter at length and also brought to light two pending cases on this matter before the high court and supreme court respectively. Although the courts had referred the matter back to GST Council, the Council has decided to consult the Attorney General of India.
GSTAT to be GST Appellate Tribunal.
The GST council also definitively stated the Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal will be the appellate authority and will adjudicate on appeals arising from central and state tax authorities’ in-house dispute resolution system. The states will decide the number of GSTAT required by them as a result of which there can be two tribunals in a single state.
CMP-02 for opting into the composition scheme for service providers under Notification 2/2019-CT rate
31 July 2019
For non-filing of GST returns, E-way bills to be blocked
The law stated that where the GST returns in GSTR-3B/ GSTR-4 is not filed for two consecutive tax periods, e-way bill generation for such taxpayers would be disabled. This will be brought into effect from 21 August 2019, instead of the earlier notified date of 21st June 2019.
Highlights • This move will apply for all those assessees who have business income and file the returns specified for those with this income i.e. ITR 3 to ITR -7. • Before sharing any information, the income tax authority shall determine that such information is necessary for the GSTN authority to perform its functions.
The government on Tuesday authorized the income tax department to share details including sales and profits that businesses have reported in their income tax returns with GSTN, the company that processes Goods and Services Tax (GST) returns, to scale up scrutiny and check tax evasion.
The move will allow direct and indirect tax authorities to zero in on discrepancies in the information that business have disclosed in their respective tax return forms and nail tax evaders. The move comes as part of tightening of anti-evasion measures after the GST Council gave several relaxations in recent months to ease the rigors of tax compliance to businesses, especially to small ones. A formal system of data sharing between direct and indirect tax authorities means businesses have to be extra careful while filling up their tax returns and avoid mismatches. The move is significant considering that businesses did not show enthusiasm in opting for a single window tax facility for corporate tax, service tax and central excise in 2006 under the name Large Taxpayer Unit as they apparently preferred to avoid simultaneous scrutiny by different tax authorities.
An office order issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) on Tuesday authorized the Principal Director General of Income Tax (systems) or Director General of Income Tax (systems) to share specified data with an officer of GSTN. The designated officers from both sides will also decide ways of simultaneous exchange of information
Order. F. No. 225/105/2019/ITA.ll Order Under Section 138(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
F. No. 225/105/2019/ITA.ll
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
New Delhi, the 30th April, 2019
Order In exercise of powers conferred under section 138(1)(a) of the Income tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’), for purposes of sub-clause (i) of section 138(1)(a) of the Act, the Central Board of Direct taxes (‘CBDT’) hereby directs that Principal Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or Director General of Income-tax (Systems), New Delhi shall be the specified income-tax authority for furnishing information respecting assessees to the Nodal Officer, Goods and Services Tax Network (‘GSTN’).
2. The data/information to be furnished by the specified income-tax authority shall be: (a) Request based exchange of data, wherein, important financial fields which are captured in the Income Tax Returns (ITRs) such as (i) status of filing of ITR; (ii) turnover; (iii) gross total income, (iv)turnover ratio; (v) GTI range; (vi) turnover range and (vii) any other field, the modalities of which shall be decided by the concerned specified authorities. (b) Spontaneous exchange of data, the modalities of which shall be decided by the concerned specified authorities. (c) Automatic exchange of data, the modalities of which shall be decided by the concerned specified authorities.
While furnishing the information, the specified income-tax authority shall form an opinion that sharing of such information is necessary for the purposes of enabling the specified authority in GSTN to perform its functions under the Goods and Services Tax.
3. To facilitate the process of furnishing information, Principal Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or Director General of Income-tax (Systems) would enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (‘MoU’) with nodal officer, GSTN, which inter-alia would include modalities of exchange of data, maintenance of confidentiality, mechanism for safe preservation of data, weeding out after usage etc. The time line for furnishing information shall also be decided by Pr. Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or Director General of Income-tax (Systems) in consultation with concerned nodal officer and included in the said MoU.
4. A copy of MoU shall be forwarded to this division for record purposes.
5. This issues with the approval of Chairman, CBDT.
The law provides for attachment of properties or assets and subsequent realisation of assets for repayment to depositors.
The President on Thursday promulgated the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Ordinance which seek to curb the menace of ponzi schemes and make such unregulated deposit scheme punishable.
The Ordinance will help put a check on illicit deposit taking activities like Saradha scam and Rose Valley chit fund scam in the country that dupe poor and the financially illiterate of their hard earned savings.
The legislation contains a substantive banning clause which bans deposit takers from promoting, operating, issuing advertisements or accepting deposits in any unregulated deposit scheme.
“No deposit taker shall directly or indirectly promote, operate issue any advertisement soliciting participation or enrolment in or accept deposits in pursuance of an unregulated deposit scheme,” the Ordinance said.
The law also proposes to create three different types of offences — running of unregulated deposit schemes, fraudulent default in regulated deposit schemes, and wrongful inducement in relation to unregulated deposit schemes.
The Ordinance also provides for severe punishment ranging from 1 year to 10 years and pecuniary fines ranging from Rs 2 lakh to Rs 50 crore to act as deterrent. It too has adequate provisions for disgorgement or repayment of deposits in cases where such schemes nonetheless manage to raise deposits illegally.
The law provides for attachment of properties or assets and subsequent realisation of assets for repayment to depositors. Clear-cut timelines have been provided for attachment of property and restitution to depositors.
It also enables creation of an online central database for collection and sharing of information on deposit-taking activities in the country.
Being a comprehensive union law, it adopts best practices from state laws, while entrusting the primary responsibility of implementing the provisions of the legislation to the state governments.
First 15 features (1-15 points) as PART-I:-
