Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/smaller-vc-firms-ride-on-sidbi-and-local-investors-117030900003_1.html
Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/smaller-vc-firms-ride-on-sidbi-and-local-investors-117030900003_1.html
Foreign venture capital entities can now invest in unlisted Indian companies without Reserve Bank of India approval.
The venture capital firm will, however, have to be registered with market regulator SEBI. The investment can be made in an Indian company in 10 specific sectors or in any start-up.
The central bank on Thursday amended the regulations governing foreign venture capital investors (FVCI) in order to further liberalise and rationalise the investment regime and to give a fillip to foreign investment in start-ups.
According to the RBI, the 10 sectors in which SEBI-registered FVCIs can invest without its nod are: biotechnology, IT, nanotechnology, seed research and development, discovery of new chemical entities in pharmaceutical sector, dairy industry, poultry industry, production of bio-fuels, hotel-cum-convention centres with over 3,000 seating capacity, and infrastructure sector. FVCIs can also invest in equity, equity-linked instruments or debt instruments issued by an Indian ‘start-up’ irrespective of the sector in which it is engaged. The RBI said a start-up will mean an entity (private limited company, registered partnership firm or a limited liability partnership) incorporated or registered in India not prior to five years, with an annual turnover not exceeding Rs. 25 crore in any preceding financial year.
These start-ups should be working towards innovation, development, deployment or commercialisation of new products, processes or services driven by technology or intellectual property and satisfying certain conditions as given in the Foreign Exchange Management Regulations, 2016.
The RBI also said FVCIs can invest in units of a venture capital fund (VCF) or a Category-I alternative investment fund (AIF) or units of a scheme/fund set up by a VCF or by a Category-I AIF.
In a circular issued to banks authorised to deal in foreign exchange, the RBI said: “In order to further liberalise and rationalise the investment regime for FVCIs and to give a fillip to foreign investment in the start-ups, the extant regulatory provisions have been reviewed, in consultation with the Government of India.”
The consideration for all investments by an FVCI can be paid out of inward remittance from abroad through normal banking channels or out of sale/maturity proceeds of or income generated from investment already made. There will be no restriction on transfer of any security/instrument held by the FVCI to any person resident in or outside India.
To support young entrepreneurs, the central government will launch ‘special funds’ for those in the 16-21 years and 21-26 years age groups.
“It’s on the drawing board. We have accumulated funds worth Rs 9,000 crore under the technology cess category, and we want to use this. We might launch incubation centres, innovation hubs and even funds. This country requires investments of Rs 10,000 crore annually if we want to give boost to entrepreneurship,” said Y S Chowdary, ministry of state for science & technology and earth sciences.
He was speaking on the sidelines of the 11th edition of Indian Science and Technology Entrepreneurs Park & Business Incubators Association (Isba) here on Saturday.
The fund will be over and above the Rs 10,000 crore fund-of-funds for start-ups announced by the government early this year.
Over the past two years, the funding to several government departments supporting incubation in India has seen a spurt. H K Mittal, advisor, Department of Science and Technology (DST), said that the support for incubators has gone up 10 times.
“DST’s finance has gone up by at least 4.5x to Rs 180 crore for FY17. Several of our programmes like ‘Power of Idea’, Eureka and Entrepreneur-in-residence have seen their fund corpus going up. Our seed support programme has gone up five times. We can now fund start-ups starting from Rs 50 lakh to Rs 1 crore,” he added.
According to Kshatrapati Shivaji, chairman and managing director of Sidbi, the idea behind creating the fund-of-funds was to give a push to domestic venture capitalists (VCs). “We have already committed Rs 800 crore across 19 VCs, which, in turn, will mobilise the investments.”
The event also saw the signing of the first Indo-US Joint Early Stage Fund with a corpus of $40 million. About 50 per cent contribution for the fund comes from incubators that come under Isba and India Electronics & Semiconductor Association and the rest of the funds will have contribution from high net worth individuals based out of the US and serial entrepreneurs such as Sanjay Sharma, CEO of Roambee Corporation. At present, Isba supports around 100 incubators across India.
NURTURING YOUNG MINDS
Design and furniture start-up Livspace, owned by Home Interior Designs E-commerce Pvt. Ltd, has raised Rs.100 crore from existing investors Bessemer Venture Partners, Hellion Venture partners and Jungle Ventures, said three people aware of the development on condition of anonymity.
The firm, loosely based on US-based home design firm Houzz, was founded by Anuj Srivastava and Ramakant Sharma, former senior executives at Google Inc. and Myntra Designs Pvt. Ltd respectively, along with Shagufta Anurag, founder of architectural design consultancy Space Matrix.
The firm has already raised about $12.6 million in two rounds between December 2015 and August 2016 from Helion Venture Partners, Bessemer Venture Partners and Jungle Ventures.
Livspace co-founder Anuj Srivastava confirmed the development.
Livspace not only offers home interior design solutions and fulfils the order, it also sells furniture across categories such as living, dining and bedrooms. The company also runs a modular kitchen and wardrobe business.
The company has also acquired two start-ups in quick succession to fuel growth. The company acquired YoFloor, a mobile platform that offers a virtual trial room for home design in September 2015. In May last year, Livspace acquired Dwll, a curated online network of online designers. In March 2015, the company acquired DezignUP, an online community and marketplace for designers and consumers.
Livspace launched a home design automation platform, which will connect the designers on board with customers in real time and speed up the process of overall delivery, two months ago.
It essentially competes with the likes of Sequoia Capital-backed Homelane (Homevista Décor and Furnishing Pvt. Ltd), other than Urban Ladder Home Décor Solutions Pvt. Ltd, another Sequoia Capital portfolio and Pepperfry (Trendsutra Platform Services Pvt. Ltd), backed by Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
Urban Ladder, which has so far raised about $77 million from venture capital firms, and Pepperfry, the most well-capitalised online furniture store with about $128 million in its, initially started out by selling furniture. Both firms have, however, launched home interior solutions, modular furniture and kitchen in the last 12-15 months to compete with younger rivals such as Homelane and Livspace.
The investment in Livspace comes at a time when venture capital investment in India plummeted 58% in the June quarter over the previous three-month period, according to a report by KPMG and CB Insights, mirroring increasing investor caution towards funding start-ups.
VC firms ploughed $583 million into India in April-June, down from $1.4 billion in January-March, said the report. VC investments in India have been on a decline since October-December. Investments in the December quarter halved to $1.5 billion from $2.9 billion in July-September.
The online furniture segment has barely seen any big ticket investment in the last 12 months.
Among the bigger start-ups, Pepperfry last raised $100 million in July 2015, while Urban Ladder mopped up $50 million in April Last year. Urban Ladder raised debt capital of $3 million from Trifecta Capital, Mint reported on 24 August.
In a major incentive, startups can now issue shares to investors at higher than fair value without worrying about tax consequences.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has notified the much awaited tax exemption on investments above fair market rate for startups.
“The exemption provided to startups from the ‘rigour’ of section 56(2)(viib) of Income Tax Act has been long awaited,” Amit Maheshwari, Partner Ashok Maheshwary and Associates LLP, said.
The effect of the CBDT’s notification is that in case a startup gets investment from resident angel investors, family offices or funds which were not registered as venture capital funds, it will not be taxed even if the investment is made in excess to the fair value.
“It has been a long standing industry demand to abolish this Angel tax,” Maheshwari said.
A startup is a company in which the public are not “substantially interested” and conforms to certain conditions as prescribed by the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) in February this year.
Under Indian tax law, if an Indian company receives share subscription amount from an Indian resident which exceeds the fair value of shares, then the excess amount is taxed as income of the Indian company, said Rajesh H Gandhi, Partner, Deloitte Haskins and Sells LLP.
“The notification now exempts startups from this rigorous provision. This is a welcome relaxation and would ensure that startups can issue shares to investors at higher than fair value without worrying about any tax consequences,” Gandhi said.
A similar exemption already exists for Venture Capital Funds (VCFs).
Maheshwari said this Angel tax still poses threat to earlier investments which could be perceived as being overvalued in light of the declining valuations globally and in India.
Last week, the DIPP has launched a portal and mobile app through which startups can gather all latest updates on various notifications, circulars issued by various departments and different funding agencies.
In January, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had unveiled a slew of incentives to boost startup businesses, offering them a tax holiday and inspector raj-free regime for three years, capital gains tax exemption and Rs 10,000 crore corpus to fund them.
Venture capitalists are raising money at the fastest rate in a decade, raking in about $13 billion in the first quarter of 2016.
But much of that cash won’t flow into new startups anytime soon. Rather, venture firms are bracing for a downturn and boosting reserves to keep companies they have already backed from going bust, said venture capitalists and limited partners.
“They are squirrels trying to pack their cheeks full of nuts,” said Ben Narasin, a partner at Canvas Ventures. “Everyone has been waiting for winter to start for a long time.”
The paradox of rising venture fundraising and falling venture investing is the latest sign of a tectonic shift in the tech startup realm. The extraordinary growth of so-called “unicorn” companies such as Uber and Airbnb – now valued at tens of billions of dollars, based on venture investments – has left many high-value startups with no “exit strategy,” in Silicon Valley parlance.
Burned by previous busts, Wall Street has lost its appetite for initial public offerings from money-losing companies. No venture-backed tech startup has gone public this year, and the few that did last year – including enterprise storage company Pure Storage, and cloud storage and file-sharing firm Box – have seen their share prices steadily sink. High valuations have also scared off potential acquirers.
Scale Venture Partners exemplifies the cautious approach taking hold in the VC industry. It chose to do one fewer investment from its last fundraising round and to increase its reserves by more than 10 percent.
“We will have to support our companies longer,” said Rory O’Driscoll, a partner at the firm, which raised a $335 million fund in January.
Accel Partners has reduced its pace of new investments since the middle of last year, while increasing its follow-on funding for portfolio companies, according to an analysis by venture capital database CB Insights.
The venture firm raised $2 billion in March, but it won’t tap into the new fund until late fall, said managing director Richard Wong.
Total U.S. venture investment fell to $12.1 billion in the first quarter – down 30 percent from the most recent peak of $17.3 billion in the second quarter of last year.
Chris Douvos, managing director of Venture Investment Associates, an investor in early-stage venture funds, says the funds he backs are increasing their reserves by 10 percent to 25 percent over what they had in previous funds.
The $13 billion raised by VCs is the third-largest quarter for fundraising since the dot-com peak in 2000, according to Thomson Reuters data. There is now $382 billion of dry powder – cash available to spend – held by both venture capital and private equity firms that invest in technology companies, according to investment banking and consulting firm Bulger Partners.
“It’s fast, and it’s a lot of dollars this year,” said Beezer Clarkson, managing director at Sapphire Ventures, which invests in early-stage venture funds.
Many VCs believe that more reserves will be needed for the big cash infusions that startups often need after establishing themselves but before turning a profit.
VCs are also seeing mutual funds retreat from late-stage startup financing deals. Mutual funds led just eight deals in the fourth quarter of last year, down from 26 in the second quarter, according to the research firm CB Insights.
The confluence of trends means that money-losing startups likely will struggle more for venture capital. That, in turn, could lead to more companies failing or cutting staff, cooling the red-hot market for tech talent. It could also strengthen the hand of dominant tech companies, who may face fewer disruptive rivals and attract employees tired of volatile startup life, according to tech recruiters.
CASH BURN
Until recently, many venture capitalists have had a land-grab mentality, even with more obscure startups such as Magic Leap – an augmented reality company that raised about $800 million in February – or Social Finance, a startup in the highly scrutinized fintech sector that raised $1 billion in September.
Investors competed fiercely to finance hot companies they believed could be the next Google or Facebook. Higher prices for smaller stakes drove up valuations in companies, including many who burned cash quickly in a quest for growth. Many venture capitalists say they overpaid by 20 to 30 percent, and now have to keep those companies afloat.
Over the past six months, however, nervous whispers about a tech bubble have sparked rising skepticism of venture-dependent startups with stratospheric price tags.
The same venture capitalists who jousted in bidding wars for the next great deal just six months ago are now fending off appeals.
Canvas Ventures, Norwest Venture Partners and Accel Partners – among Silicon Valley’s more prominent firms – say they are getting more calls from peers asking them to join a late-stage round for companies running out of cash.
“We get a lot more ‘special opportunities, just for you,'” said Wong, of Accel Partners. “We get the phone calls, along with everyone else.”
PAPER GAINS
For now, venture capitalists have little problem raising money, despite their new hesitance to spend it and the inability of many startups to turn profits or go public.
That’s in part because many VC firms are currently showing huge paper gains in the value of their portfolios. Many firms are raising as much as possible now, in case valuations drop in so-called “down rounds,” when later stage investors pay less for company stakes than earlier ones, and the returns on their investments plummet, according to limited partners.
Signs of falling returns are already emerging. Cambridge Associates, an investment advisor, measured a -0.4 percent return on the U.S. Venture Capital Index for the third quarter of last year, the first down quarter since 2011.
First Round Capital, an early-stage venture firm, warned its limited partners in a letter a year ago that the seed-stage venture capital deals will see much lower returns in the next several years.
But that warning didn’t scare Douvos, an investor in First Round, which was an early backer of Uber and made a bundle on the IPOs of Square and OnDeck Capital.
“Fund performance will soften,” Douvos said. But, he said, “The returns from First Round are so good that nothing else really matters.”
Read Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-venture-fundraising-idUSKCN0Y41DQ
The RBI’s move to regulate the peer-to-peer (P2P) lending business has evoked good response with most participants saying that it could provide greater confidence to lenders and borrowers, as also to venture capitalists. The space has some 35 startups now and more than 20 of them were founded just last year, according to data from startup tracking platform Tracxn. They have collectively attracted only $7.5 million in venture funds, and the ones that have received the most funds include Faircent, Milaap, iLend, RangDe, LendenClub and LoanCircle.
“VCs have so far shied away from the industry due to lack of recognition and regulation of the segment,” says IDG Ventures partner Karan Mohla, adding that the proposed regulation will help the sector grow the way microfinance did.
P2P lending typically involves a technology platform that brings together borrowers and lenders, often individuals. The borrower can place his/her requirements, and lenders can bid to service that borrower. Normally, the platforms insist on more than one lender servicing a single borrowing requirement to reduce risks. The interest rate may be set by the platform or by mutual agreement between the borrower and lender, or through an auction where lenders place bids. The platform does a preliminary assessment of the borrower’s creditworthiness, and they also collect the loan repayments. Over time, the platforms could automatically develop creditworthiness scores. Borrowers and lenders both pay a fee to the platform for these services. The average interest rates on these platforms tend to be high at 20% and the loan amount is an average of around Rs 1 lakh. Most borrowers are self-employed or those with salaries above Rs 6 lakh per annum. Most platforms charge around 2.5% of the loan amount as commission, from both parties.
The RBI is looking at factors such as what should constitute P2P lending, the legal framework, whether to set a maximum interest rate, and how to differentiate it with crowd-funding. It is, for now, looking to categorize them as non-banking financial companies (NBFCs).
“The potential benefits that P2P lending promises to various stakeholders (to borrowers, lenders, agencies, etc) and its associated risks to the financial system are too important to be ignored,” says the RBI consultation paper. The UK-based Peer-to-Peer Finance Association (P2PFA) estimates that lending through the channel globally has grown dramatically from 0.2 billion pounds in the first quarter of 2012 to 5.1 billion pounds in the first quarter of 2016.
Apoorv Sharma, founder of Venture Catalyst and an investor in LenDen, says P2P in India is still in its early stages but the government’s involvement could drive rapid growth.
Faircent, one of the largest platforms in the country, believes that the new norms will accelerate the growth in the sector – similar to how RBI regulations helped the e-wallet sector. The company has raised funding from Aarin Capital, M & S Partners and others. It has disbursed more than Rs 4.5 crore to beneficiaries so far and it is looking at loans of more than Rs 60 crore this fiscal.
Abhishek Periwal, founder of P2P platform KountMoney, said that regular banking channels don’t cater to lots of self-employed people. “P2P lending platforms come into play here, as they are faster than banks and NBFCs,” he said. Bhavin Patel, founder of LenDen Club, which started in 2015, believes the RBI regulation will be a confidence booster but has reservations about the regulator’s proposal that payment should happen directly between the borrower and the lender and that P2P platforms should have brick-and-mortar offices. He thinks the former will make monitoring and control difficult, and the latter is unnecessary. “A lot of our plans have been put on hold due to these uncertainties,” said Patel, whose platform has more than 2,000 borrowers and 900 lenders.