SEBI cross with UB over Mallya’s board seat

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) is not pleased with United Breweries (UB) allowing Vijay Mallya to continue on its board of directors, despite being tagged a wilful defaulter.

Mallya is chairman of the board of Bengaluru-based UB. Several banks have formally declared him a wilful defaulter and under new Sebi norms (late last month), any individual so tagged is barred from holding a board position in a listed company.

“Mallya should have stepped down as UB chairman and from its board, following Sebi’s new regulations. (We) are keeping a watch on the board functioning,” said a Sebi official, requesting anonymity.

IN TROUBLED WATERS

SEBI’s new curbs on wilful defaulters

  • New rule bans wilful defaulters from taking any board positions
  • Disallow defaulters from setting up market intermediaries
  • Defaulters would not be allowed to take control of other listed company
  • No wilful defaulter shall make a public announcement of an open offer for acquiring shares or enter into any transaction
  • Sebi’s rule disqualifies Mallya from various posts he holds at the moment

The regulator could soon initiate action if UB is in violation of the corporate governance norms, said the official. The regulator is believed to have also raised questions on the role of independent directors on UB’s board.

UB refused to comment on an email query sent to it.

Earlier this year, Mallya had resigned as chairman and managing director of United Spirits, as part of a deal with the company’s new owner, Diageo. Mallya, however, continued to serve on the board of other companies, including UB. Diageo now owns 55 per cent of USL and Mallya had stepped down from the board in February, for a $75 million payoff.

From the March quarter shareholding data, Mallya holds 8.08 per cent in UB in his personal capacity. Another 22 per cent in UB is owned by his group companies.

Heineken acquired a 37.5 per cent stake in United Breweries in 2008 through its takeover of Scottish & Newcastle and has since increased its holding to 42.4 per cent.

The banks say Mallya had given personal guarantees, apart from pledging his stake in UB Group companies, to raise funds for his now-grounded Kingfisher airline. This resulted in Mallya losing control over his liquor empire to global players — Diageo in spirits and Heineken in beverages.

Mallya reportedly left India on March 2, allegedly to escape enforcement action by multiple probe agencies and Indian banks, to which he owes Rs 6,963 crore in loans. In March, a consortium of lender approached the Supreme Court to stop Mallya from going abroad but he’d left; on April 18, a court in Mumbai issued a non-bailable arrest warrant against him.

Last week, the enforcement directorate had attached United Breweries Holdings and Mallya assets worth Rs 1,411 crore in Mumbai, Bengaluru, Coorg and Chennai. He was also declared a proclaimed offender early this week.

This was issued in response to a plea by the Enforcement Directorate on April 15 before the special court hearing cases under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. There were allegations on him that he transferred Rs 4,000 crore ($590 million) to tax havens.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/sebi-cross-with-ub-over-mallya-s-board-seat-116061600885_1.html

China’s debt more than double its GDP

China’s Debt more than GDP

China’s total borrowings were more than double its gross domestic product (GDP) last year, a government economist said, warning that debt linkages between the state and industry could be “fatal” for the world’s second largest economy.

The country’s debt has ballooned as Beijing has made getting credit cheap and easy in an effort to stimulate slowing growth, unleashing a massive debt-fuelled spending binge.

 

While the stimulus may help the country post better growth numbers in the near term, analysts say the rebound might be short-lived.

China’s borrowings hit 168.48 trillion yuan ($25.6 trillion) at the end of last year, equivalent to 249 per cent of the economy’s GDP, Li Yang, a senior researcher with a top government think tank, the China Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), told reporters yesterday.

The number, while enormous, is still lower than some outside estimates.

Consulting firm the McKinsey Group has said that the country’s total debt was likely as high as $28 trillion by mid-2014.

CASS, in a report last year, said China’s debt amounted to 150.03 trillion yuan at the end of 2014, according to previous Chinese media reports.

The most worrying risks lie in the non-financial corporate sector, where the debt-to-GDP ratio was estimated at 156 per cent, including liabilities of local government financing vehicles, Li said.

Many of the companies in question are state-owned firms that borrowed heavily from government-backed banks and so problems with the sector could ultimately trigger “systemic risks” in the economy, he said.

DRAGON IN TROUBLE
  • China’s borrowings hit ¥168 trn ($25.6 trn) at the end of last year, equivalent to 249% of the economy’s GDP
  • McKinsey Group said country’s total debt as high as $28 trn by mid-2014
  • Most worrying risks lie in the non-financial corporate sector, where the debt-to-GDP ratio was estimated at 156%
  • Problem will also affect state coffers because Chinese banks are “closely linked to the government”
  • The People’s Bank of China has announced that new loans extended by banks jumped to ¥985.5 bn last month, up from ¥555.6 bn in April

 

“The gravity of China’s non-financial corporate (debt) is that if problems occur with it, China’s financial system will have problems immediately,” Li said. He added that the problem will also affect state coffers because Chinese banks are “closely linked to the government”.

“It’s a fatal issue in China. Because of such a link, it is probably more urgent for China than other countries to resolve the debt problem,” he said.

Speaking earlier this week, David Lipton, first deputy managing director with the International Monetary Fund, also singled out China’s corporate borrowing as a major concern, warning that addressing the issue is “imperative to avoid serious problems down the road”.

Despite the concerns, China is having difficulty kicking its credit addiction. On Wednesday, the People’s Bank of China announced that new loans extended by banks jumped to 985.5 billion yuan last month, up from 555.6 billion yuan in April.

 

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/international/china-s-debt-more-than-double-its-gdp-116061600556_1.html

Airtel teams up with Singtel to expand data business in 325 cities globally

Bharti Airtel and Singapore Telecommunications (Singtel) have combined resources to form an Internet Protocol Virtual Private Network (IP VPN) to deliver high-speed, secure data network coverage to enterprise customers in Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and the US.

The combined network will provide data connectivity to 325 cities across the world through 370 Points of Presence (PoP). Together, Singtel’s 200 PoPs in 160 cities around the world and Airtel’s 170 plus PoPs in 165 cities across India, Africa and Middle East will form a new network that offers a connectivity backbone to enterprises across Asia, Europe, Africa and North America.

“This association will strongly enhance our value proposition for enterprise customers by offering them a wider global reach and the largest reach within India under a single platform. In particular, this will benefit companies in the pharmaceutical, IT and IT-enabled services as well as financial services segments, which are branching out to international locations rapidly,” Manish Prakash, director for strategic ventures at Bharti Airtel, said in a joint statement issued on Tuesday.

Under this global network, multinational corporations can maintain line of sight of their operations across different regions by using high-bandwidth business applications such as cloud applications, unified communications, video conferencing and software-defined networking solutions.

“By tapping on one another’s infrastructure assets, we enhance each other’s capabilities,” said Lim Seng Kong, Managing Director of Global Enterprise Business at Singtel Group Enterprise.

Source :  http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/52745963.cms

Indian real estate may attract $2 bn investment from Japan

JapanJapanese developers and private equity investors are looking to enter Indian property market and could invest at least USD 2 billion over the next three years in residential as well as industrial projects, says JLL.

 

Realty consultant JLL India said in a report that the country is emerging as major investment destination for Chinese and Japanese developers.

 

China’s biggest developer Wanda has signed an MoU with Haryana government earlier this year and more developers from China and Japan are expected to enter the Indian realty market, it said.

 

Private equity investors from these two countries are also looking at entering India’s real estate sector, it added.

 

“Japanese developers are keen to explore strategic partnerships and enter into joint ventures with Indian builders, and are particularly interested in industrial projects. There is likely to be an inflow of at least USD 2 billion in investments from Japan into the Indian real estate market over the next three years,” JLL India Chairman and Country Head Anuj Puri said.

 

After 100 per cent foreign direct investment (FDI) was allowed into the real estate industry, it was only a matter of time before foreign developers made big investment announcements, he said.

 

“One of China’s most prominent developers, Dalian Wanda Group, signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) earlier this year with the northern state of Haryana to develop Wanda Industrial New City’. The investment of USD 10 billion, phased out over the next decade, is a very significant outlay by any Chinese company in India,” Puri said.

 

Other Chinese developers are also interested in India and most likely to follow suit, he added.

The RICS-JLL survey this January had shown that 62 per cent of the respondents felt that institutions from Japan and China could come knocking to the Indian real estate market in 2016.

 

Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Indian-real-estate-may-attract-2-bn-investment-from-Japan/articleshow/52763657.cms

US, Europe combined infra spending less than China’s

Despite a crying need for better infrastructure, investment in it has actually fallen in 10 major economies since the financial crisis, including the US, according to a new study by the McKinsey Global Institute. Meanwhile, China is still going gangbusters on roads, bridges, sewers, and everything else that makes a country run.

“China spends more on economic infrastructure annually than North America and Western Europe combined,” according to the report published Wednesday.

Economists around the world have been arguing that now is a great time to invest in infrastructure because interest rates are super-low and the global economy could use the spending jolt. “Is anyone proud of Kennedy airport?” Harvard University economist Lawrence Summers likes to ask.

The MGI report cites 10 countries where infrastructure spending fell as a share of gross domestic product from 2008 to 2013: the US, UK, Italy, Australia, South Korea, Brazil, India, Russia, Mexico, and Saudi Arabia. The study counts 11 economies, but that’s because it lists the European Union as a separate entity.

In contrast to the widespread declines, the institute says, infrastructure spending grew as a share of GDP in Japan, Germany, France, Canada, Turkey, South Africa and China. The chart from the MGI report shows China’s strength in infrastructure spending. Its bar is the highest. There’s such a thing as too much infrastructure spending, of course. At current rates of investment, China, Japan, and Australia are likely to exceed their needs between now and 2030, the McKinsey & Co-affiliated think tank says. To fund more public infrastructure, the report favours raising user charges such as highway tolls, among other measures.

To encourage more private investment in infrastructure, MGI argues for increasing “regulatory certainty” and giving investors “the ability to charge prices that produce an acceptable risk-adjusted return.”

 

Source:  http://www.business-standard.com/article/international/us-europe-combined-infra-spending-less-than-china-s-116061600030_1.html

S&P: Renewable energy biz high-growth area in India

Renewable energy business is a high-growth area in India, though falling asset prices and competitive bidding for new power purchase agreements may lead to volatility in returns on investments, S&P Global Ratings said today.

 

“We believe the renewable energy business is a high-growth area in India, given the governments focus on increasing capacities for renewable energy and priority dispatch,” it said in a statement.

 

However, falling asset prices and competitive bidding for new power purchase agreements (PPAs) can expose renewable energy assets to volatility of returns on investments, it said.

 

It added that such assets also face greater volatility of cash flows due to seasonality and inherent uncertainty of wind/hydro/solar patterns, resulting in resource risks.

 

The agency further said that Tata Powers business position is unlikely to materially change after the acquisition of Welspun Renewable Energy.

 

S&P Global Ratings further said that its corporate credit rating on Tata Power Ltd (B+/Stable) is not immediately affected by the company’s acquisition of Welspun Renewable Energy for an enterprise value of Rs 92.49 billion.

 

Tata Power indicated that it intends to maintain leverage at the current improved levels post-acquisition through strategic measures.

 

Source: http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-newspaper/s-p-renewable-energy-biz-high-growth-area-in-india/story-d7BXtbQVS7YW2RWnGDIjgN.html

India records 10-year low in public-private investments: World Bank

India recorded a 10-year low in investments in public-private sector in the year 2015, adding to contraction that pulled down the global investment to below its five-year average of $124.1 billion, the World Bank has said.

In its latest annual report, the World Bank said global investment in 2015 decreased to $111.6 billion, below the five-year average of $124.1 billion from 2010 to 2014.

“This contraction resulted from lower investments in Brazil, China and India,” the World Bank said on Monday in its latest report on Private Participation in Infrastructure Database.

“India recorded a 10-year low in investments, as only six road projects — usually a rich source of PPI over the past 10 years – reached financial closure,” the World Bank said.

In South Asia, there were 43 deals for a combined total of $5.6 billion that closed in the region, representing 5 per cent of the total investment — a decline of 82 per cent from the five-year average of $30.5 billion.

“Consistent with historical trends, India generated a majority of the projects (36 out of 43); Pakistan had four; Nepal, two; and Bangladesh, one. Notably, 26 of the 36 projects in India, amounting to $2.0 billion, targeted renewable energy, while all of Pakistan’s projects, totalling $749.9 million, solely focussed on renewables,” the Bank said.

Solar energy investments climbed 72 per cent higher than the last five year average, while renewables attracted nearly two-thirds of investments with private participation, it said.

Global private infrastructure investment in 2015 mostly remained steady at $111.6 billion when compared to the previous year, it said.

Among the most notable, commitments in Brazil were only $4.5 billion in 2015 — a sharp decline from $47.2 billion the previous year, reversing a trend of growing investments, it said.

“Investment in China also fell significantly below its 5-, 10-, and 20-year averages, as the average transaction dropped to $63 million,” it said.

By number of projects, however, these three historical heavyweights took the lead, with 131 of the 300 global deals, or 44 per cent of all projects.

Still their combined investment of $11.6 billion only made up 10 per cent of the global total, compared to 54 per cent in 2014, which was also the annual average over the previous four years.

According to the World Bank, global private infrastructure investment in 2015, though on par with the previous year, was 10 per cent lower than the previous five-year average because of dwindling commitments in China, Brazil, and India.

“The data finds that investments in other emerging economies increased rapidly to $99.9 billion, representing a 92 per cent year-over-year increase,” said Clive Harris, Practice Manager, Public-Private Partnerships, World Bank Group.