Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) signs seven Unilateral Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs)

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) entered into seven (7) Unilateral Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) today, i.e., 18th July, 2016, with Indian taxpayers. Some of these agreements also have a Rollback” provision in them.

 

The APA Scheme was introduced in the Income-tax Act in 2012 and the Rollback” provisions were introduced in 2014. The scheme endeavours to provide certainty to taxpayers in the domain of transfer pricing by specifying the methods of pricing and setting the prices of international transactions in advance. Since its inception, the APA scheme has attracted tremendous interest and that has resulted in more than 700 applications (both unilateral and bilateral) having been filed in just four years.

 

The 7 APAs signed today pertain to various sectors of the economy like banking, Information Technology and Automotives. The international transactions covered in these agreements include software development Services, IT enabled Services (BPOs), Engineering Design Services and Administrative & Business Support Services.

 

With todays signings, the total number of APAs entered into by the CBDT has reached 77. This includes 3 bilateral APAs and 74 Unilateral APAs. In the current financial year, a total of 13 Unilateral APAs have been entered into so far.

 

The progress of the APA Scheme strengthens the Governments mission of fostering a non-adversarial tax regime. The CBDT expects more APAs to be concluded and signed in the near future.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/government-press-release/central-board-of-direct-taxes-cbdt-signs-seven-unilateral-advance-pricing-116071800966_1.html

Black money: No cut in tax, warns CBDT

The government on Thursday clarified that tax paid under the ongoing amnesty scheme for persons with undisclosed domestic assets can’t be reduced to an effective 31% from 45% prescribed by enjoying immunity not only for such income declared but also for the other undisclosed income from which the tax is paid.

The Income Disclosure Scheme (IDS) 2016 is the latest in a series of such windows opened by governments to address the scourge of black money and the second by the Modi government.

The government on Thursday clarified that tax paid under the ongoing amnesty scheme for persons with undisclosed domestic assets can’t be reduced to an effective 31% from 45% prescribed by enjoying immunity not only for such income declared but also for the other undisclosed income from which the tax is paid.

The tax department said its earlier answer to a query in this regard, where it said after a valid declaration is made under the scheme, it won’t make any “enquiry in respect of sources of income, payment of tax, surcharge and penalty”, was “limited to the conduct of enquiry by the department”; the clarification, the department said, was in no way intended to modify the tax rate.

The Income Disclosure Scheme (IDS) 2016 is the latest in a series of such windows opened by governments to address the scourge of black money and the second by the Modi government.

The government had found response to an earlier amnesty scheme for Indians with undisclosed assets overseas tepid. The IDS, under which declarations can be made between June 1 and September 30, 2016, provides persons with hidden income a chance to declare such income/assets and pay tax, surcharge and penalty totalling 45% and enjoy immunity.

What necessitated the latest clarification by the I-T department is an interpretation by sections of analysts that its assurance that no enquiry will be made into “the sources of income, payment of tax” allowed one to pay the 45% tax on the fair market value of the declared asset (immovable property) and claim immunity with respect to not only this asset but an additional one equivalent to 45% of the declared asset as “the source of payment of tax”.

Effectively, this would have reduced the tax rate (including surcharge and penalty) on the assets declared plus the source of income for tax payment to 31%. However, the department has now said this has never been the intention.

Giving the example of a person declaring Rs 100 lakh as undisclosed income (as fair market value of immovable property as on June 1, 2016) under the scheme and paying the stipulated 45% tax on it from her “other undisclosed income”, the department has said:

“To get immunity under the scheme in respect of the entire undisclosed income of R145 lakh, the declarant has to declare undisclosed income of R145 lakh (R100 lakh being the undisclosed income represented by the immovable property and R45 lakh being the payment made from undisclosed income), and pay tax, surcharge, penalty under the scheme amounting to R65.25 lakh, ie, 45% of R145 lakh.”

Meanwhile, in recognition of the concerns raised by many quarters that the initial deadline (November 30, 2016) for making payments under the scheme was very tight and force people to make distress sale of assets, the government has revised the schedule for payments:

As per the new schedule, a minimum amount of 25% of the tax, surcharge and penalty will have to be paid by November 30, 2016; a further amount of 25% of the tax, surcharge and penalty by March 31, 2017; and the balance on or before August 30, 2017.

p2g1

Cisco readies plan to set up manufacturing plant in India

Technology major Cisco is working on a plan to establish a manufacturing facility in India and is in talks with the government for the same, a top official of the company has said.

Terming India as one of its “best bases”, Cisco CEO Chuck Robbins said the company is “very actively involved in India across the board” and working on a broader base from digitisation to smart cities in the country.

He was interacting with reporters at the Cisco Live 2016 annual conference here.

On expansion plans in India, Robbins said, “… Prime Minister Narendra Modi is very committed to manufacturing. We worked through a business case and… presented to him that… That was fantastic and we have been moving forward.”

He added that the company is moving forward on various healthcare and security initiatives, with a lot happening on the digital cities front.

Cisco is engaged in over 15 smart cities projects in the country. The company is also working with Andhra Pradesh government for rolling out Bharat Net.

The company views India as one of the best bases and is focusing a lot on education as well, Robbins added.

The country is home to Cisco’s second-largest site, which has about 11,000 employees. It is offering education to 24,000 students spread across 47 schools.

Source : http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/53187492.cms

 

E-filing: ATM-based Income Tax Return (ITR) validation facility enhanced

The Income Tax department has widened the ATM-based validation system for filing e-ITRs by taxpayers with the inclusion of Axis Bank, after SBI, as part of its measure to enhance the paperless regime of filing the annual I-T returns.

“Now, Electronic Verification Code (EVC) can also be generated by pre-validating Automated Teller Machine (ATM) provided by Axis Bank. SBI had activated the facility last month. Other banks are also expected to join soon,” a senior I-T department official said.

In May this year, the department had launched the bank account-based validation facility in this regard for those who have not availed the internet banking facility.

 

The new facility is available on the official e-filing portal of the department- http://incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in/ and will work by using the One Time Password (OTP) verification system as activated by the department last year by using the Aadhaar number.

These measures are used to validate the e-ITR so that the taxpayer does not take the trouble of sending the paper-based ITR-V by post to the Bengaluru-based Central Processing Centre (CPC) for final resolution and processing.

The new ITRs have been notified early this year and taxpayers can e-file their ITRs till July 31.

ITR-1 can be filed by individuals having income from salaries, one house property and from other sources including interest.

ITR-2 is filed by Individuals and Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) not having income from business or profession.

ITR-2A is filed by those individuals and HUFs who do not have income from business or profession and capital gains and who do not hold foreign assets.

Government disburses Rs 1,433 crore as interest subsidy to exporters

Government has disbursed Rs 1,433 crore up to March under the interest subsidy scheme to exporters, the Commerce Ministry today said.

The Centre’s interest equalisation scheme, announced last December, reduces cost of capital by allowing 3 per cent interest subsidy on pre and post-shipment rupee export credit to eligible exporters.

“Indian exporters pay high rate of interest on the capital borrowed… all products manufactured and exported by SMEs (are) eligible. Up to March 2016, benefit to the tune of Rs 1,432.90 crore has been passed on to eligible borrowers,” the ministry said in a statement.

Enlisting steps to improve ease of doing business and boost exports, it said the ministry has taken several steps.

Number of mandatory documents required for exports and imports have been reduced to three for each segment. Earlier 7 documents were required for exports and 10 for imports.

“Exporter can now file online applications for IEC (import export code), Advance License, MEIS (merchandise exports from India scheme), SEIS (services exports from India scheme), pay application fee online and check status of their applications,” it said.

To spread awareness about benefits of free trade agreements, it said an ambitious outreach programme has been launched to reach out to exporters located in the 34 major export clusters/cities.

“The programmes focus on training exporters to utilise the FTAs, taking inputs from exporters on FTAs under negotiations for example Regional comprehensive economic policy (RCEP),” it added.

It said the efficacy of these initiatives is reflected in the fact the annual trade data  indicates the share of manufacturing sector in India’s total exports has increased from 64 per cent in 2014-15 to more than 69 per cent in 2015-16.

In terms of trading across borders, India is ranked at 133rd out of 189 economies, according to the World Bank’s report on ease of doing business.

Source:http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/53178132.cms

 

Govt to cut subsidy if pvt cos do not slash DAP, MoP rates

The Centre has asked private firms to slash retail prices of non-urea fertilisers by up to Rs 5,000 per tonne, in line with public-sector firms, or else it will cut down the subsidy provided to them.

Retail prices of non-urea fertilisers such as Di-ammonium Phosphate (DAP), Muriate of Potash (MoP) and NPK are decontrolled and are determined by the manufacturers, while the Centre gives them fixed subsidy each year.
Earlier this month, the Fertiliser Ministry asked both public and private fertiliser companies to pass on falling global prices of raw materials by reducing the retail price of non-urea soil nutrients.

Accordingly, state-run Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers (RCF) and National Fertilizers Ltd (NFL) reduced the retail price of DAP by Rs 2,500 to Rs 22,000/tonne, MoP by Rs 5,000 to Rs 11,000/tonne, while complex fertilisers rates were brought down by Rs 1,000/tonne.

Private players, however, did not cut the rates.

“Even private companies will be reducing the prices. International prices have come down, they have to reduce the retail price. If they do not reduce the price, we will cut down the subsidy. This has been told to them very clearly,” a senior Fertiliser Ministry official told PTI.

Global prices of raw material used in making of complex fertilisers have come down by USD 50-70 a tonne. “They have been told very clearly this has to be passed on to farmers. If private companies do not fall in line, then the subsidy will be cut further,” the official added.

In March, the government had reduced the fixed subsidy on phosphatic and potassic (P&K) fertilisers factoring falling global prices.

When asked that private firms are concerned about their margin, the official said: “The issue is that some of them have old stock of about 50 lakh tonnes lying in the field. They have sold that to dealers at higher price. They cannot ask the dealers now to sell at lower price.”

The private companies want old stock to be cleared as their entire working capital is blocked, the official said, adding that the government is monitoring the situation and will ensure farmers get non-urea fertilisers at lower rates.

Total subsidy outgo is estimated to be Rs 21,274 crore for complex fertilisers for this fiscal.

The share of complex fertilisers by PSUs is less than 10 per cent. The cooperative major IFFCO and private companies Coromandel International, Deepak Fertilisers, Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Ltd, and Tata Chemicals have major share in these soil nutrients.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/govt-to-cut-subsidy-if-pvt-cos-do-not-slash-dap-mop-rates-116071200606_1.html

Alternative Investment Funds coming to India

Markets regulator SEBI is learnt to be in process of creating a new category of Alternative Investment Funds(AIFs) to encourage long-term funds to use the AIF route to invest in the listed space.

 

Sources privy to the development said the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) will reclassify the existing category III into two groups – one comprising long-term funds like pension funds and the other consisting of hedge funds and other arbitrage funds who look to invest on a short-term basis.

 

Further, SEBI is also expected to consult the government in providing a ‘pass through’ status to the new category of AIF on par with Category I and Category II AIFs. According to legal experts, this categorisation would help the long-term overseas funds to receive a favourable tax treatment in the AIF space as currently they are taxed on par with arbitrage funds.

 

As per the current tax regulations, any investments made in listed companies which are held for more than 12 months are termed long-term investments, while others are called short-term investments. Capital gains tax is applicable only for short-term investments and investors needn’t pay any capital gains tax in case of long-term holding.

 

However, if a fund invests in the listed space through the AIF route, irrespective of the nature of holding, the investor would be taxed at uniform slab applicable for category III AIFs.

 

“Current SEBI AIF regulations are like one size fits all. Category III AIFs comprise several types of short-term and long-term funds and the purpose of each of them is different. However, the tax they are paying is the same. Long-term funds would rather take the direct route or would invest via P-notes instead of AIFs,” said a lawyer.

 

These measures are a part of efforts made by SEBI and union government to promote AIFs. During the union budget 2015, the government had provided pass-through status for Category I and Category II AIFs. Last November, the government had allowed foreign funds to invest in AIFs through the direct route.

 

In the last two years, inflows into AIFs have witnessed a significant increase. According to a SEBI data, cumulative funds raised via the AIFs as on March 31, 2016 was `22,691.18 crore — a fourfold increase compared to `5,847.5 in Q2FY15.

 

According to Jay Gandhi, Partner at Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas, the SEBI AIF regulations have found great traction in the market in a relatively short period of time. “The AIF regulations have permitted investment managers great flexibility in structuring various kind of fund structures targeted at specific segments of the investor community,” Gandhi said.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/markets/alternative-investment-funds-coming-india-heres-need-know/314881/