Central Board of Direct Taxes cuts profit margin for safe harbour rules

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies, India & International - Corporate updates | 0
Safe harbour rules are defined as circumstances under which the income-tax authorities accept the transfer pricing declared by the assessee.

Given the lukewarm response to the safe harbour mechanism for transfer pricing, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) on Thursday cut the operating profit margin for information technology-enabled services, knowledge process outsourcing services (KPOs) and research and development (R&D) related to software and generic pharmaceutical drugs companies.

The new rules will apply to transactions of up to Rs 200 crore. Safe harbour rules, a dispute-avoidance mechanism, are defined as circumstances under which the income-tax authorities accept the transfer pricing declared by the assessee. The rule provides the minimum operating profit margin in relation to operating expenses that a taxpayer is expected to earn for certain categories of international transactions. The same is acceptable to the income tax authorities as arm’s length price (ALP). The rules are applicable for transactions between group companies based in different countries so that a fair price or ALP is arrived at by the tax authorities. The rules have come into effect from April 1 this year and will continue to remain in force for two successive years up to assessment year 2019-2020, the board said in a statement

For software development services, safe harbour margins have been reduced to a peak rate of 18% from 22% in the previous regime. Similarly, for KPOs, a graded structure of three different rates of 24%, 21% and 18% has been provided, based on employee cost to operating cost ratio, replacing the single rate of 25% earlier. For the third category of R&D services, the margins have been reduced to 24% from 30% and 29%, respectively, earlier. “The lukewarm response to the earlier safe habour scheme was on account of the high rates. Thus, taxpayers opted for unilateral APA process instead. The revised scheme has been designed to attract small to medium business, especially in the IT/ITeS segment, so as to give them a viable alternative to APA regime, which is both time consuming and expensive. The rates for IT/ITeS segment are more or less in line with the APAs being settled and hence the safe harbour scheme, this time, should get a positive response,” Arun Chhabra, director, Grant Thornton Advisory, said.

Assessees eligible under the present safe harbour regime up to AY 2017-18 shall also have the right to choose the safe harbour option most beneficial to them, the board said. It added that a new category of transactions being “Receipt of Low Value-Adding Intra-Group Services” has been introduced. “The revised safe harbour rules are a welcome step towards making safe harbour a viable alternate dispute resolution mechanism. Key highlights are: Reduction of margins for service units, introduction of safe harbour rate for low-valued services (in line with BEPS recommendation) and well-thought scheme for knowledge process outsourcing companies. Overall, it’s a welcome step towards strengthening the safe harbour option for small and mid size companies,” Kunj Vaidya, leader transfer pricing, Price Waterhouse & Co, said.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/central-board-of-direct-taxes-cuts-profit-margin-for-safe-harbour-rules/708984/

One nation, one tax department: I-T takes cue from GST

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
The move, which will require a change in the income tax law, would also end the relevance of various geographic divisions in the form of wards and circles.

The one-nation, one-tax principle that underlines the goods and services tax (GST), set to be rolled out on July 1, could be adopted in a much more broader sense by the income tax department through a path-breaking initiative on jurisdiction-free assessment.

This would mean that a taxpayer in Mumbai could be assessed by an income tax officer located in Patna, a significant leap toward eradicating corruption by reducing the need for face-to-face contact between citizens and tax officials to the absolute minimum besides speeding up processing.

The move, which will require a change in the income tax law, would also end the relevance of various geographic divisions in the form of wards and circles with the whole country becoming one jurisdiction. This, it is hoped, will put an end to a system in which bribery is said to be used as a tool to ease processes through human intervention.


A high-level internal report of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) recommended the move, which is under active consideration, a senior official told Economic Times.

“We are looking at it,” the CBDT official said.

The government may consider implementing the process in the next financial year.

 

The Catalyst
The key catalyst for such a significant reform is the massive shift toward e-filing of returns, which is already jurisdiction-free with returns going to the Central Processing Centre in Bengaluru.

In the last financial year, over 42.1 million tax returns had been filed online by February. The number of e-returns processed by then was 43 million, which included some backlog from previous years.

Multiple Benefits
In line with this move towards e-processing, the income tax department may even opt for e-scrutiny for all limited scrutiny cases where assesses can explain the transactions in question over email, the official said.

A complete jurisdiction-free environment would make geography redundant and the income tax department completely faceless for taxpayers. Any review or scrutiny of return could happen anywhere in India through an electronic interface, ensuring that the payee is not forced to interact with officials. “A taxpayer would not need to have any physical interface with his assessing officer,” said the official cited above.

CBDT had earlier constituted a seven-member committee to formulate a Standard Assessment Procedure for e-scrutiny to promote greater certainty, transparency and accountability. The board has in recent times taken a number of initiatives to reduce the face-to-face contact between tax officials and assessees and make the system non-adversarial.

These include directing field offices to raise only specific queries in income tax assessment cases picked up for scrutiny. It also directed the expeditious completion of those scrutiny cases where income concealed is up to Rs 5 lakh. “Jurisdiction-free assessment will help the tax department plan and allocate assessment work across the country,” said Jiger Saiya, partner, direct tax, BDO India.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/59026099.cms

No tax scrutiny of big transaction if it matches income

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0
I-T department gathered a huge amount of data as part of Operation Clean Money, which followed demonetisation, and is subjecting it to analytics to detect patterns and discover attempts at tax evasion.

If you splurged on something really expensive or made an enormous investment recently, rest assured your accounts won’t be opened up for scrutiny by the income tax department as long as these can be squared with your declared income.

“Scrutiny will be based on specific information,” a senior income tax official told ET. In other words, big transactions will no longer automatically qualify a person for scrutiny. The income tax department will only start asking questions if it has clear information that calls for an investigation, sparing honest taxpayers.

This was the outcome of a high-level meeting held by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) last week to review the conditions for scrutiny. Such cases are currently picked up through computer-based criteria related to transactions above a certain ceiling. This idea is to ensure that regular taxpayers such as salaried employees don’t face unnecessary hassle and to allow tax authorities to focus their energies on high-risk individuals or entities where information of possible wrongdoing is available.

The department’s multiple data sources include the tax authorities of other countries and high-value transactions in India that will likely be the basis of any scrutiny.

Those identified under the department’s Operation Clean Money as having made large cash deposits in banks and bought costly items after demonetisation was announced could also face scrutiny if they have not explained their transactions satisfactorily.

The department gathered a huge amount of data as part of Operation Clean Money, which followed demonetisation, and is subjecting it to analytics to detect patterns and discover attempts at tax evasion. It has already identified 60,000 individuals, who will now face closer investigation.

But there is a conscious effort to make a shift towards quality rather than quantity to ensure the effectiveness of the exercise. The focus will be on limited scrutiny based on information with the department rather than a general one. Roving enquiries won’t be permitted and a limited scrutiny can only be converted to a general one after following adequate procedures.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/no-tax-scrutiny-of-big-transaction-if-it-matches-income/articleshow/58689453.cms