Corporate Affairs Ministry again extends statutory filing deadline amid MCA21 woes

by | posted in: Company Incorporations, e-filing of MCA Returns, Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0

Extending the deadline for the third time, Corporate Affairs Ministry has now given time till July 7 for companies to submit their statutory filings as issues related to MCA21 portal are yet to be fully resolved.

MCA21 is used for making electronic filings under the Companies Act and is managed by Infosys  for the ministry.

The upgraded system went live in the last week of March and stakeholders have been facing issues in using the portal.

The Ministry has extended the filing deadline for the third time in less than two months.

Initially, the extension was till May 10 and later the deadline was fixed for June 10.

Giving more time, the Ministry has extended the time limit for making the requisite filings under the companies law to July 10.

“…keeping in view, requests received from various stakeholders, it has been decided to extend the period for which the one time waiver of additional fees is applicable to all e-forms which are due for filing by companies between March 25 to June 30, 2016 as well as extend the last date for filing such documents and availing the benefit of waiver to July 7, 2016,” it said in a communication dated May 31.

While the communication does not mention anything about MCA21, Ministry officials expect to resolve the issues related to the portal soon.

On April 6, an Infosys spokesperson had said it was working with the Ministry to resolve the “minor teething problems” related to MCA21.

The portal is designed to fully automate all processes related to enforcement and compliance of legal requirements under the Companies Act.

Meanwhile, the Ministry has also extended the time limit for submitting Form 11 of LLP in respect of 2015-16 financial year without any additional fees to June 30.

Form 11 is for filing annual returns LLPs.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/52556624.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

 

MCA21 woes: Government extends filing deadline for stakeholders

by | posted in: Company Incorporations, e-filing of MCA Returns, Corporate Updates | 0

MCAWith stakeholders facing glitches in using the upgraded MCA21 portal, the Corporate Affairs Ministry has extended the deadline for submitting various filings without additional fee till May 10.

MCA21, used for making electronic filings under the Companies Act, is managed by InfosysBSE -0.87 % for the ministry. The upgraded system went live in the last week of March.

“Since the launch of the system, a number of stakeholders have faced issues and representations have been received from stakeholders to resolve the issues including, for allowing waiver of additional fee until the new system stabilises,” the ministry said in a communication.

Considering the situation, the ministry has decided to relax the additional fee payable on electronic forms which are due for filing by companies between March 25 to April 30 as one time waive additional fee.

“If such due e-forms are filed after May 10, 2016, no such relaxation shall be allowed,” the communication, dated April 12, said.

After upgradation to run on SAP platform, MCA21 went live on March 27, and since then there have been some glitches such as difficulty in uploading documents.

On April 6, an Infosys spokesperson had said it was working with the ministry to resolve the “minor teething problems” related to MCA21.

The portal is designed to fully automate all processes related to enforcement and compliance of legal requirements under the Companies Act.

Source:   http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/51843322.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Sebi may soon revisit start-up listing norms

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) may soon review its framework for listing of start-ups, including e-commerce firms, while incorporating suggestions from various stakeholders to make this platform much more vibrant.

The Institutional Trading Platform (ITP) is yet to see any start-up listing ever since an easier set of compliance and disclosure requirements was notified in August 2015.

These norms have been put in place to encourage Indian start-ups and entrepreneurs to remain within the country rather than go abroad for funds.

Under the rules, start-ups can list on the separate ITP of stock exchanges such as BSE and NSE.

The platform is open to only institutional investors and high networth individuals (HNIs), while retail investors have been excluded in order to safeguard small investors against a higher level of risks associated with this platform.

Many start-ups believe that the current listing norms are unattractive for them to list in India. Moreover, not a single company got listed on the relaxed ITP platform.

Now, Sebi is likely to review the ITP norms soon. It will also incorporate suggestions from various stakeholders to make this platform much more vibrant, sources said.

Sebi’s Primary Market Advisory Committee (PMAC) has also suggested that norms should be reviewed as the matter progresses.

Under the notified rule, minimum trading lot and the minimum application size have been kept at Rs 10 lakh so that only sophisticated and large investors come in.

For their listing, Sebi also relaxed the mandatory lock-in period for promoters and other pre-listing investors to six months, as against three years for other companies.

Besides, the disclosure requirements for these companies have been relaxed.

The companies can, however, graduate to the main platform later and the small investors can also invest at that time.

Earlier this month, Infibeam Incorporation made a stock market debut becoming the first e-commerce player in the country to get listed. The firm got listed on the main-board instead of institutional trading platform.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/sebi-may-soon-revisit-start-up-listing-norms-116041500531_1.html

Mallya default singes top auditing companies

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0

Some of world’s top auditing firms, including Price Waterhouse, Grant Thornton, Deloitte LLP and Walker Chandiok & Co, are under scrutiny with a slew of regulators seeking answers on their valuation, auditing and due diligence of UB Group companies over the last few years.

Deloitte LLP conducted the financial and tax due diligence for Diageo of United Spirits Ltd (USL) which led to the $2.1 billion acquisition of the company, but could not detect the problems in annual accounts. These accounts, in turn, were prepared by PW, which was the auditor for USL between 2010 and 2011, and later by Walker & Chandiok & Co.

The accounts were disputed by Diageo in April 2015 after it found a Rs 2,100 crore hole and sought Vijay Mallya’s ouster from the USL board. Questions have also been raised by lenders on what basis Grant Thornton valued the Kingfisher brand at Rs 4,100 crore. This is now being probed by the Serious Fraud Investigation office (SFIO).

When contacted, a Grant Thornton spokesperson said the firm fully stood by its brand valuation report on Kingfisher. “We believe it was appropriate in the context of when it was done and the purpose for which it was done,” the spokesperson said.

PW declined comment but an external spokesperson said the firm had not received any communication from either the Securities and Exchange Board of India or the Enforcement Directorate. “Deloitte does not comment on client confidential matters,” its spokesperson said.

Diageo had invested in USL after the British company was given express representations that all of the receivables from Mallya entities were recoverable in full. The fund diversion worth Rs 2,100 crore from USL was later raised when KPMG, the new auditor appointed by Diageo, discovered discrepancies when it was finalising USL’s 2014 accounts. All the three years’ accounts will now have to be re-stated, according to listing norms.

In the same year, the new USL management called in PW UK for a forensic audit of the previous three years (which included auditing by its own India unit) and passed on the reports to the regulators including the Sebi, the ministry of corporate affairs and the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

The ICAI, sources said, had asked both PW and Walker Chandiok to explain the discrepancy. An ED official said it was surprising that none of the auditors or valuers for Diageo raised flags over the accounts manipulation or the Rs 4,000 crore diversion by USL to the British Virgin Islands in 2007.

While the auditors of USL are in the dock for cooking accounts, another marquee auditing firm — Grant Thornton is under investigation by the SFIO for its Rs 4,100 crore brand valuation of Kingfisher Airlines. It was based on this brand valuation in 2011 that Mallya raised Rs 9,100 crore from government-owned banks by offering the brand as collateral. The lenders are now holding a dud Kingfisher brand, which is finding no takers.

Sources in the ICAI said it was a redux of the Satyam scam, when some of the world’s top auditors overvalued assets before the Maytas and Satyam merger, which led to the unravelling of the scam. In the Satyam case, the ICAI had debarred two auditors from Price Waterhouse who were found guilty of professional misconduct. S Gopalakrishnan and T Srinivas were struck off the ICAI’s rolls and fined Rs 5 lakh each. A Central Bureau of Investigation court later convicted them of fraud.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/mallya-default-singes-top-auditing-companies-116031900495_1.html

The Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2016 introduced in Loksabha

by | posted in: Company Incorporations, e-filing of MCA Returns, Corporate Updates | 0

On 16th March 2016 Lok Sabha has passed the Companies (Amendment) Bill 2016 to further amend the Companies Act, 2013

The Act introduced significant changes related to disclosures to stakeholders, accountability of directors, auditors and key managerial personnel, investor protection and corporate governance. However, Government received number of representations from industry Chambers, Professional Institutes, legal experts and Ministries/Departments regarding difficulties faced in compliance of certain provisions. Amendments of the Act were carried out through the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015 to address the immediate difficulties arising out of the initial experience of the working of the Act, and to facilitate “ease of doing business”.

The changes introduced are broadly aimed at addressing difficulties in implementation owing to stringency of compliance requirements; facilitating ease of doing business in order to promote growth with employment; harmonization with accounting standards, the regulations of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 and the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; rectifying omissions and inconsistencies in the Act, and carrying out amendments in the provisions relating to qualifications and selection of members of the National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the directions of the Supreme Court.

The Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2016, inter alia, proposes the following, namely:—

  • Simplification of the private placements: Simplification of the private placement process by doing away with separate offer letter, by making filing of details or records of applicants to be part of return of allotment only, and reducing number of filings to Registrar;

Earlier, there was significant difficulty was created by the Companies Act, with the unduly restrictive set of provisions pertaining to private placements. This over-ambitious scheme of regulation was a direct result of some incidents in the past. One such provision requires every private placement to be routed through a separate bank account opened for this purpose, and a bar on utilization of the money until allotment. More often than not, the amount received in private placement is large, and companies cannot afford to keep the amount idle.

Now, this private placements process has been simplified with the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2016.

(b) Allow unrestricted object clause in the Memorandum of Association dispensing with detailed listing of objects, self-declarations to replace affidavits from subscribers to memorandum and first directors;

(c) Provisions relating to forward dealing and insider trading to be omitted from the Act;

(d) Requirement of approval of the Central Government for Managerial remuneration done away with:

Requirement of approval of the Central Government for Managerial remuneration above prescribed limits is replaced by approval through special resolution by shareholders;

Central Government control on managerial remuneration is eliminated. Section 197, which places limits on managerial remuneration, will now require special resolution only, if the limits placed under the law are exceeded.

(e) Loans to entities in which directors are interested:

A company may give loans to entities in which directors are interested after passing special resolution and adhering to disclosure requirement;

 (f) Provisions easing business by overseas entities

In support of the “Make in India” policy, it is quite appropriate that the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2016 must have enabled foreign owned businesses to form companies in India. Accordingly, there are several provisions to facilitate foreign-owned businesses:

– EGM of a wholly-owned subsidiary of a foreign company may be called anywhere in India.

– The requirement for a resident director provided in section 149 is sought to be amended to provide that in case of newly incorporated companies the condition may be satisfied subsequent to incorporation, rather than before incorporation.

– Remove restrictions on layers of subsidiaries and investment companies

(g) Allow for exempting class of foreign companies from registering and compliance regime under the Act;

(h) Align prescription for companies to have Audit Committee and Nomination and Remuneration Committee with that of Independent Directors;

(i) Test of materiality to be introduced for pecuniary interest for testing independence of Independent Directors;

(j) Disclosures in the prospectus required under the Companies Act and the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 and the regulations made thereunder to be aligned by omitting prescriptions in the Companies Act and allowing these prescriptions to be made by the Securities and Exchange Board of India in consultation with the Central Government;

(k) Provide for maintenance of register of significant beneficial owners by a company, and filing of returns in this regard to the Registrar;

(l) Removal of requirement for annual ratification of appointment or continuance of auditor;

(m) Amend provisions relating to Corporate Social Responsibility to bring greater clarity.

http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Companies,%202016/Companies%20bill,%202016.pdf

Government working on approving companies’ names in 24 hours: MCA

by | posted in: Company Incorporations, e-filing of MCA Returns, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0

The government is working on ensuring that the name of a new company is approved within 24 hours, a step towards improving ease of doing business and reducing overall transaction costs.

Corporate Affairs Secretary Tapan Ray said his Ministry is focused on reducing the problems faced by the industry and ensuring that ease of doing business becomes the “order of the day”.

“Incorporating a company is now much easier and will be made further easier as we go along the road. We are aiming to get a name (of a new company) approved within 24 hours,” Ray said.

The Corporate Affairs Ministry is fully geared up to improve ease of doing business, not only for starting a venture but also for the life cycle of companies as a whole, he noted.

Speaking at an event organised by the Institute of Cost Accountants of India (ICAI) here, Ray said speedier approval of names is itself a cost-cutting experiment because any delay adds to transaction costs.

“So ease of doing business is directly related to transaction costs. So the moment you make the ease of doing business better, transaction costs comes down and ultimately it has an affect on the product,” Ray said.

Stressing the need for becoming globally competitive, he said the dream of making India a manufacturing hub can be realised when costs are low.

“People will only start manufacturing in India if it is the cheapest,” he added.

Corporate Affairs Ministry, which is implementing the Companies Act, has been taking various steps to improve ease of doing business in the country.

Ray said setting up of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) would further facilitate business in the country.

The Ministry has sought comments from stakeholders on draft rules pertaining to the proposed NCLT, which would replace the Company Law Board (CLB).

Source:
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/50785152.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

India Inc takes to social causes (CSR)

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0

The move to make corporate social responsibility (CSR) spending mandatory has resulted in a spurt in social spending by India Inc. Spending on CSR activities by the top 100 companies increased to Rs 5,240 crore in 2014-15. The figure had stood at Rs 3,000 crore in 2012-13, when CSR spending was voluntary. Corporate governance firm Institutional Investor Advisory Services (IiAS) projects spending will increase to Rs 8,500 crore in the current financial year.

The Companies Act, 2013, requires companies above a certain financial threshold to spend at least two per cent of their average net profit of the preceding three years on CSR. Although CSR spending is compulsory, the Act has taken a ‘comply or explain’ approach, where a company has to provide reasons if the spending is less than the stipulated amount.

According to IiAS, CSR spends in FY15 were 26 per cent lower than the prescribed amount.

“Even as CSR is entering corporate consciousness, the next two to three years will remain a ‘learning period’ for industry,” the governance firm said in a note on Tuesday.

India Inc takes to social causes
IiAS has tracked the spending of BSE 100 companies, where 95 companies qualify under the profitability criteria for mandatory spending. The remaining five companies were not required to spend as they made average losses in the preceding three years.

State-owned firms set aside lesser amount compared to private sector firms. In FY13, public sector units (PSUs) spent 0.6 per cent of their average profits in the preceding three years. In comparison, non-PSUs spent one per cent of their average profit before tax of the preceding three years.

The trend continued in FY15. The CSR spends of the S&P BSE 100 companies aggregated 1.5 per cent of their three-year average profits. Non-PSUs spent 1.6 per cent and the 21 PSUs spent 1.3 per cent of their average profit in the preceding three years, IiAS noted.

Close to Rs 61 crore of the CSR spends by India Inc in FY15 was towards the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund and seven companies contributed Rs 47 crore towards Swachh Bharat Kosh.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/india-inc-takes-to-social-causes-116010500776_1.html