New bankruptcy bill to speed up shutdown of failed businesses

by | posted in: Company Incorporations, e-filing of MCA Returns, Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0
Panel has sought the overhaul of the bankruptcy framework to allow the speedy winding up of failed businesses to protect shareholders and lenders, aiming to modernise an outdated system.

A government panel has sought the overhaul of the bankruptcy framework to allow the speedy winding up of failed businesses to protect shareholders and lenders, aiming to modernise an outdated system that drags out closure proceedings.

It has recommended new institutions and structures for a fresh regime that will encourage entrepreneurship and foster a startup culture, among the stated objectives of the Narendra Modi administration. The government has indicated it will move a Bill in the winter session of Parliament to give effect to the recommendations, addressing one of the key issues that has kept India low on the ease of doing business rankings.

The Bankruptcy Law Reform Commission headed by former law secretary TK Viswanathan has proposed insolvency resolution within 180 days and a new regulator to oversee the process. It’s also laid down a clear and speedy system for early identification of financial distress and revival of companies.

The timelines are on par with international norms for insolvency resolution. “The endeavour would be to introduce the Bill in the next session of Parliament,” Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said at the World Economic Forum in the Capital on Wednesday. Viswanathan submitted the report to the minister later in the day. The report, along with the draft legislation, has been made public for feedback. “The Bill seeks to improve the handling of conflicts between creditors and debtors, avoid destruction of value, distinguish malfeasance vis-a-vis business failure and clearly allocate losses in macroeconomic downturns,” the report said.

The World Bank has ranked India at 136 out of 189 countries in ‘resolving insolvency,’ estimating that it takes 4.3 years on average in Mumbai to settle a case.

Jaitley had identified bankruptcy law reform as a key priority for improving ease of doing business in his February budget speech. He said that a comprehensive bankruptcy code, meeting global standards and providing the necessary judicial capacity, would be unveiled in the fiscal year. Under the current system, proceedings take several years, hurting investors and lenders besides costing taxpayers crores of rupees.

Banks are groaning under bad debt stemming from projects that have got stuck, drawing the Reserve Bank of India’s concern. “We need a bankruptcy code. We need equity to be seen as equity and debt to be seen as debt. Today there’s a lot of confusion… We need that confusion to be changed,” RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan has said previously.

90 Days for Key Categories. The prescribed resolution timeline of 180 days can be cut further to 90 days from the trigger date for key categories. The proposed insolvency regulator will cover professionals and agencies specialising in the field.

The proposals include information utilities that will collect, authenticate and disseminate financial information from listed companies. An Insolvency Adjudicating Authority will hear cases by or against debtors. The Debt Recovery Tribunal should be the adjudicating authority with jurisdiction over individuals and unlimited liability partnership firms, it said. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) should be the adjudicating authority with jurisdiction over companies and limited liability entities, it added.

The draft bill has consolidated existing rules relating to insolvency of companies, limited liability entities, unlimited liability partnerships and individuals, all of which are currently scattered across a number of laws, into a single legislation.

According to the draft bill, during the transition phase, the Centre will exercise all regulatory powers until the agency is established. The panel’s report suggests that an insolvency resolution plan prepared by a resolution professional has to be approved by a majority of 75% of the voting share of financial creditors. As part of the insolvency resolution process, creditors and debtors will engage in negotiations to arrive at agreeable repayment plans.

The draft proposes that any proceeding pending before the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR) or the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) before the new law goes into force should stand abated or stopped.

“However, a company in respect of which such proceeding stands abated may make a reference to Adjudicating Authority within 180 days from the commencement of this law,” the recommendation said, keeping in view continuity of the process. Minister of State for Finance Jayant Sinha said the required infrastructure needed to be put in place.

“We also have to ensure that necessary judicial capacity is available,” he said. “We also need to resolve many of the situations immediately because they are short of cash in most of these bankruptcy types of cases.” The minister said the government was trying to put together a comprehensive solution where “we can resolve default and bankruptcy cases as quickly and efficiently possible.”

Industry feels the new system will create a robust and globally competitive insolvency regime. This will significantly reduce the time taken for insolvency proceedings in India, which at present, on an average basis is estimated at about 4.3 years as against only 1.7 years in high-income OECD countries,” said Chandrajit Banerjee, director general of the Confederation of Indian Industry.

“The architecture proposed by the Viswanathan committee of establishing an insolvency regulator to have oversight of the new class of insolvency professionals, agencies and information utilities will enhance the systemic efficiency of dealing with insolvency cases in a timebound manner,” he said.

Source: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-11-05/news/68043912_1_bankruptcy-framework-new-bankruptcy-bill-180-days

Mallya default singes top auditing companies

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs | 0

Some of world’s top auditing firms, including Price Waterhouse, Grant Thornton, Deloitte LLP and Walker Chandiok & Co, are under scrutiny with a slew of regulators seeking answers on their valuation, auditing and due diligence of UB Group companies over the last few years.

Deloitte LLP conducted the financial and tax due diligence for Diageo of United Spirits Ltd (USL) which led to the $2.1 billion acquisition of the company, but could not detect the problems in annual accounts. These accounts, in turn, were prepared by PW, which was the auditor for USL between 2010 and 2011, and later by Walker & Chandiok & Co.

The accounts were disputed by Diageo in April 2015 after it found a Rs 2,100 crore hole and sought Vijay Mallya’s ouster from the USL board. Questions have also been raised by lenders on what basis Grant Thornton valued the Kingfisher brand at Rs 4,100 crore. This is now being probed by the Serious Fraud Investigation office (SFIO).

When contacted, a Grant Thornton spokesperson said the firm fully stood by its brand valuation report on Kingfisher. “We believe it was appropriate in the context of when it was done and the purpose for which it was done,” the spokesperson said.

PW declined comment but an external spokesperson said the firm had not received any communication from either the Securities and Exchange Board of India or the Enforcement Directorate. “Deloitte does not comment on client confidential matters,” its spokesperson said.

Diageo had invested in USL after the British company was given express representations that all of the receivables from Mallya entities were recoverable in full. The fund diversion worth Rs 2,100 crore from USL was later raised when KPMG, the new auditor appointed by Diageo, discovered discrepancies when it was finalising USL’s 2014 accounts. All the three years’ accounts will now have to be re-stated, according to listing norms.

In the same year, the new USL management called in PW UK for a forensic audit of the previous three years (which included auditing by its own India unit) and passed on the reports to the regulators including the Sebi, the ministry of corporate affairs and the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

The ICAI, sources said, had asked both PW and Walker Chandiok to explain the discrepancy. An ED official said it was surprising that none of the auditors or valuers for Diageo raised flags over the accounts manipulation or the Rs 4,000 crore diversion by USL to the British Virgin Islands in 2007.

While the auditors of USL are in the dock for cooking accounts, another marquee auditing firm — Grant Thornton is under investigation by the SFIO for its Rs 4,100 crore brand valuation of Kingfisher Airlines. It was based on this brand valuation in 2011 that Mallya raised Rs 9,100 crore from government-owned banks by offering the brand as collateral. The lenders are now holding a dud Kingfisher brand, which is finding no takers.

Sources in the ICAI said it was a redux of the Satyam scam, when some of the world’s top auditors overvalued assets before the Maytas and Satyam merger, which led to the unravelling of the scam. In the Satyam case, the ICAI had debarred two auditors from Price Waterhouse who were found guilty of professional misconduct. S Gopalakrishnan and T Srinivas were struck off the ICAI’s rolls and fined Rs 5 lakh each. A Central Bureau of Investigation court later convicted them of fraud.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/mallya-default-singes-top-auditing-companies-116031900495_1.html

SEBI board clears wilful defaulter rules; clarifies on definition of control

by | posted in: Accounting Standards, Audit, Due Diligence, Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates | 0

SEBI says wilful defaulters would also be not allowed to take control of any other listed company.

India’s market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), on Saturday, tightened the rules for so-called wilful defaulters preventing them from raising funds through public issues. The rules, however, are applicable prospectively which suggests that those who have already been termed wilful defaulters may not come within the ambit of these strictures.

Following a board meeting in Delhi, on Saturday, SEBI said that entities declared as wilful defaulters will not be allowed to raise money through sale of shares, debt securities and non-convertible preference redeemable shares to the public.

“No issuer shall make a public issue of equity securities/debt securities/non-convertible redeemable preference shares, if the issuer company or its promoter or its director is in the list of the wilful defaulters,” said a press release issued by SEBI.

Such entities will not be allowed to take control of another listed entity, SEBI said. These firms will also not be allowed to set up market entities like mutual funds. The rules are applicable prospectively, said the regulator.

At a press conference in New Delhi, UK Sinha, chairman of SEBI said that all rules made by the regulator are prospective in nature.

In January 2015, SEBI issued a draft paper proposing that wilful defaulters would not be allowed to sell shares, debt securities and non-convertible preference redeemable shares to the public. The paper had suggested that wilful defaulters be barred from taking control of another listed entity, but that they be allowed to participate in counter offers to deal with hostile takeover bids. Each of these restrictions would be applicable if the issuer, its promoter, group company or director of the issuer of such securities were in the list of wilful defaulters published by RBI, the stock market regulator had said.

The final regulations announced on Saturday are along the same lines.

Policy makers have toughened their stance against wilful defaulters as they try and improve the asset quality of the banking sector. While defaulters who are hit by external factors such as weakness in economic conditions may deserve some help from the system, policy makers feel that wilful defaulters must not be spared.

RBI has been asking banks to get tough on wilful defaulters and has a tough set of rules in place which say that anyone tagged a wilful defaulter cannot raise fresh funds from the banking system. The banking regulator, however, has been of the view that such defaulters also need to have their access to capital markets restricted. This has now happened with SEBI tightening its rules as well.

While RBI has not disclosed the quantum of loans that fall under the wilful default category, data has emerged from some large public sector banks.

Loans worth Rs.11,700 crore given by State Bank of India have been locked up as non-performing assets as nearly 1,160 defaulters have wilfully decided not to repay, PTI reported on 24 February.

Another state-owned lender, Punjab National Bank (PNB), declared 904 borrowers who owed it a combined Rs.10,869.71 crore as of December-end as wilful defaulters. PNB added 140 companies to the list of wilful defaulters in the December quarter alone.

The most prominent case in this regard is the attempt by banks and investigative agencies to recover dues from UB Group chairman Vijay Mallya, who has been declared a wilful defaulter by lenders like State Bank of India. The country’s largest lender had moved the Bangalore debt recovery tribunal (DRT) seeking an arrest warrant against Mallya. On Friday, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) issued summons to Mallya, asking him to be personally present before it on 18 March. The summons is part of ED’s probe into a money laundering case against the former liquor baron.

Definition of control

Separately, the market regulator clarified what the term ‘control’ means in the context of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) by pegging the shareholding threshold of an acquirer at 25%.

“Considering the international practices and the current regulatory environment in India, the definition of control may be amended such that control is defined as (a) the right or entitlement to exercise at least 25% of voting rights of a company irrespective of whether such holding gives de facto control and/or (b) the right to appoint majority of the non-independent directors of a company,” said SEBI in its press release.

The move is aimed at removing ambiguities that companies currently confront during takeovers. Currently, the definition of ‘control’ under the Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers (SAST) Regulations, 2011—popularly known as the Takeover Code—doesn’t specify a threshold for shareholding.

The current takeover code states that an acquirer is in ‘control’ only if the board of the company that’s being acquired gives the former the right to appoint a majority of the directors, and have the final say on management and policy decisions.

The control of management or policy decisions is through shareholding or management rights or shareholders’ agreement or voting agreements.

SEBI has also cleared a framework for protective rights with an exhaustive list of rights that do not lead to acquisition of control.

“An illustrative list of protective rights which would not amount to acquisition of control may be issued. Grant of such protective rights to an investor may be subject to obtaining the public shareholders’ approval (majority of minority),” SEBI said.

Somasekhar Sundaresan, partner, J Sagar Associates, said “The company that is declared to be a willful defaulter ought to be left out of the severity of SEBI’s measures, and instead those in control of the company alone should have been targeted. A defaulter, whether willful or not, requires restructuring, and imposing prohibitions on the business entity could in fact hurt lenders for whose benefit the policy on willful defaulters has been developed. Expanding the scope to directors would also mean that turning around a company that is accused of being a willful defaulter would become impossible since no one would join the board even after throwing out the old promoters. Detailed provisions on when a borrowing entity ceases to be a willful defaulter would be needed—it cannot be after the board is replaced since, so long as it is a willful defaulter, no one would be able to join the board.”

“The move to allow shareholders to confer the power to exercise veto rights to selected investors without getting into whether they mean “control” is a positive measure. Open offers are for the benefit of public shareholders and they must have the power to waive an open offer. This is a very mature measure of reform. Market players would keenly await what SEBI puts out as a list of veto rights aimed at investor protection will not constitute control,” added Sundaresan.

Source: http://www.livemint.com/Money/LSmk1XiZ26pZnyGj5m4ufP/Sebi-bars-wilful-defaulters-from-markets-posts-at-listed-fi.html

Canadian fund commits Rs 1012 crore for renewable energy in India

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, Income Tax,e-Filing- Individuals, Firms, Companies | 0

CDPQ, which deals primarily in public and para-public pension and insurance plans, also announced the establishment of its Indian office in New Delhi.

Canada’s institutional fund manager Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec (CDPQ) on Wednesday said it has committed an investment of $150 million (Rs 1012.05 crore) in the Indian renewable energy sector. CDPQ, which currently manages $248 billion (Rs 16.73 lakh crore) in net assets, invests globally in major financial markets, private equity, infrastructure and real estate.

“CDPQ plans to commit $150 million to renewable energy investments in India,” the company said in a statement.

Over the next 3-4 years, CDPQ will use its commitment to target hydro, solar, wind and geothermal power assets with investments likely to take the form of select partnerships with leading Indian renewable energy companies, it added.

“We believe that India stands out as an exceptional country to invest in, given the scope and quality of investment opportunities, the potential for strategic partnerships with leading Indian entrepreneurs and the current government’s intention to pursue essential economic reforms,” CDPQ President and CEO Michael Sabia said.

CDPQ, which deals primarily in public and para-public pension and insurance plans, also announced the establishment of its Indian office in New Delhi. It appointed Anita Marangoly George managing director of its South Asia operations.

George, who joins the company from the World Bank where she was working on the global practice on energy, had helped finance the first commercial solar project in the country, the statement said. She will be taking up the new assignment from April 1 this year, it added.

 

Source: http://www.dnaindia.com/money/report-canada-s-fund-manager-commits-rs-1012-crore-investment-in-indian-renewable-energy-2187291

PE inflows from foreign funds in real estate up 33%

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Cross Border Transactions, M&As, Joint Ventures, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

Total private equity investments from foreign funds in Indian real estate increased 33%, from $1,676 million (around R11,306 crore) in 2014 to $2,220 million (around R14,974 crore) in 2015, according to latest findings of global real estate consultancy Cushman & Wakefield.

 

Owing to high property prices and high investment potential, Mumbai was accounted for about 35% of the total foreign investments in 2015, followed by Delhi NCR accounting for about 25% of the investments.

Sanjay Dutt, managing director, Cushman & Wakefield India said, “The three large cities; Mumbai, Bengaluru and Delhi-NCR continue to attract the highest investments in India and account for about 75% of these investments.

However, with government initiatives to de-stress these cities, relaxed FDI norms and focus to improve infrastructure across the country, other cities in India are likely to witness rise in PE investments going forward.”

The structured debt deals accounted for almost half (49% in value terms) of the total PE investments in 2015.

The structured deals strategy, though moderated due to increased competition, offers returns in the range of 15% – 17% to its investors.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/article/industry/companies/pe-inflows-from-foreign-funds-in-real-estate-up-33/221723/

IMF knowledge sharing center to come up in India

by | posted in: Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

In a first for Asia, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) will set up a knowledge-sharing centre in India, to provide technical support and assistance here and to five other South Asian nations. Their team will extend expertise in core macroeconomic and financial management areas, said an unnamed government source. An agreement is likely to be signed here on Saturday by IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde with Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

The new IMF centre, being set up amid global economic uncertainty, will provide assistance to India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bhutan. Since the IMF team will be based out of the region, it will ensure better understanding of regional concerns, including trade, agriculture, climate change, facilitating a reform process and support to regional integration. The knowledge centre will come up in the wake of IMF announcing implementation of its long-pending quota reform, giving more voting rights to emerging economies.

With these changes, to be effected in the coming days, India’s quota in the IMF would rise to 2.7 per cent from the existing 2.44 per cent. Also, the voting share of India would increase to 2.6 per cent from 2.34 per cent. For the first time, four emerging market (EM) countries of the Brics bloc — Brazil, China, India and Russia — will be among the 10 largest members of IMF.

Two new multilateral agencies are also being set up — a New Development Bank of the Brics countries and an Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.

An Asian economic crisis did occur in the late 1990s but from the Southeast Asian ‘tigers’ of that time. This time, one could emanate from China or another large economy from the EMs. According to the Economic Survey of 2015-16, if this kind of crisis does emerge, it would be very different from those of earlier decades. Since the 1980s, it said external financial crises have followed one of three basic forms — Latin American, Asian or global models.

In a Latin American debt crisis, governments went on a spending binge, financed by foreign borrowing (of recycled petrodollars) while pegging their exchange rates. In the Asian one of the late 1990s, the transmission mechanism was similar — overheating and unsustainable external positions under fixed exchange rates — but the instigating impulse was private borrowing rather than governnment borrowing.

The global one of 2008, with America as its epicentre, was unique in that it involved a systemically important country and originated in doubts about its financial system.

If a crisis occurs in China or another large EM, it is more likely to resemble events of the 1930s, when the UK and then the US went off the gold standard, triggering a series of devaluations by other countries and leading to a collapse of global economic activity.

If such a crisis hits India, it will require fresh prescriptions and it is here that the IMF centre would be of help, a source said.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/imf-knowledge-sharing-centre-to-come-up-in-india-116030901112_1.html

Indian start-ups get back to basics

by | posted in: Corporate & Business Advisory Services, Corporate Updates, Economy, Business Updates, Corporate Affairs, India & International - Corporate updates | 0

India’s start-ups have a new catchphrase – back to basics. Traditionally, these businesses have focused on fundamentals -invest to grow while ensuring one doesn’t burn money in chasing eyeballs that do not translate into revenue and profit.

The year 2015 was an aberration, with soaring valuations and nearly Rs 36,000 crore or $5 billion in venture capital and private equity money pumped into start-ups. Now, with a global reset by investors to tighten their belts and relook at how businesses are run, India has also been hit.

TREADING CAUTIOUSLY
  • Investors pumped $5 bn in start-ups in 2015
  • As global investors tighten belts, Indian start-ups are impacted
  • Investors seek to look at business value than valuation of business
  • Morgan Stanley writes down investment value in Flipkart by 27 per cent
  • Now, investors are focusing on business fundamentals
  • Start-ups shed jobs, cut down on high spends and focus on building sustainable business

Several entities that followed the burn-cash model have been forced to shed jobs and improve their business models. Among the more known names, Zomato, Housing and TinyOwl have shed jobs. Flipkart, the largest e-commerce company and the most highly valued start-up, saw investor Morgan Stanley mark down the value of its (minority) stake by 27 per cent. While factors such as growing competition and not meeting the growth targets could have influenced this, the message for the rest of the start-up system was clear – pull up your socks.

“One thing which certainly happened was that the valuations of B2C (business to consumer) companies weren’t justified. What you’re seeing is more in terms of right-sizing or to be fairly valued,” said Sanjay Nath, managing partner at Blume Ventures. “I wouldn’t use the term ‘bubble’, as that would signify India’s fundamentals are not strong. That’s definitely not the case.”

The fundamentals of India as a market are very strong, he adds. There’s a huge growth in smartphone sales, the uptake of third-generation (3G) technology data connectivity is growing and 4G services are coming in. Growth in tier-II and tier-III cities is very high, and as these are highly underpenetrated, the opportunities are immense.

“Recession is when good companies are built. I’m not saying there’s one, so these are good times,” says Shashank N D, co-founder and chief executive officer of Practo, a health care technology entity.

To grow fast and outdo the competition, several start-ups in the B2C space, especially the segments of foodtech and hyperlocal, began to offer discounts and cash-backs, despite making a loss on each such transaction. This unsustainable model of business is on the way out. Investors now are pressurizing companies in their portfolio to focus on operational efficiency, improve productivity, keep costs low and move to profitability.

“Suddenly, a view to profitability is coming in and the view of discounting and cash-backs is being rolled away slowly. It’s being done very subtly, which is why nobody is noticing it, but it’s happening,” said Ash Lilani, managing partner and co-founder at Saama Capital. “A lot of good investors are making sure their good companies are financed for the next 18-24 months. But, it’s rationalisation, it’s (about) coming back to earth.”

Start-ups have begun looking at ways to conserve cash, with the slump in funding the market is currently going through. Despite this, there’s a lot of optimism that the market will recover and investors will open their purse strings, though it is presumed the pace of investments would substantially reduce.

“The overall investment in the latter part of 2016 should catch up, as you can’t just not make investments and sit because the money is there. Unnecessary funding or crazy funding which was happening will slow down a bit but good companies will raise much more money this year,” said Shekhar Kirani, managing partner at Accel Partners India.

Rajan Anandan, managing director of Google India and prolific backer of start-ups as an angel investor, says the best is yet to come out of India. “If you think of this evolution as a series of (cricket) test matches, let’s say it’s a five-test series and we’re at the first test in the third day. We have to finish the first test, go to the second, then the third. It’s very early. There are going to be periods of ups and downs; it’s a bump in the road,” was the way he put it.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/indian-start-ups-get-back-to-basics-116030700027_1.htm