SEBI signs MoU with CBDT for Data Exchange

There is a need to create a regulator or authority for data business, which provides centralized regulation for all non-personal data exchanges,” the government-appointed panel said in the report. Such a regulator would be armed with legal powers to request data, supervise data sharing requests and settle disputes“.
A formal Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed today between the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for data exchange between the two organizations.
 
The MoU was signed by Smt. Anu J. Singh, Pr. DGIT (Systems), CBDT, and Smt. MadhabiPuri Buch, Whole Time Member, SEBI in the presence of senior officers from both the organizations via video conference.

The MoU will facilitate the sharing of data and information between SEBI and CBDT on an automatic and regular basis.

In addition to regular exchange of data, CBDT and SEBI will also exchange with each other, on request and suo moto basis, any information available in their respective databases, for the purpose of carrying out scrutiny, inspection, investigation and prosecution,” SEBI said in a statement.

In addition to regular exchange of data, SEBI and CBDT will also exchange with each other, on request and Suo moto basis, any information available in their respective databases, for the purpose of carrying out their functions under various laws.

The MoU comes into force from the date it was signed and is an ongoing initiative of CBDT and SEBI, who are already collaborating through various existing mechanisms.

A Data Exchange Steering Group has also been constituted for the initiative, which will meet periodically to review the data exchange status and take steps to further improve the effectiveness of the data-sharing mechanism.

The MoU marks the beginning of a new era of cooperation and synergy between SEBI and CBDT.

In the past, SEBI has cracked on several entities who had manipulated the stock prices of listed companies. The regulator had observed in the penny stock scam that promoters and market operators were using the stock exchange platform to evade taxes and launder black money.

Read the Press Release: SEBI signs MOU with CBDT for Data Exchange

The Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) hit by Covid pandemic may have something to cheer at last.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has formulated a Special Resolution Process (SRP) for MSMEs who find their financial position unmanageable due to Covid crisis.


While presenting the ‘Atma Nirbhar Bharat’ package Finance Minister had announced to come out with a Special insolvency resolution framework for MSMEs under section 240A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

According to sources close to the development, the scheme would be available to corporate MSMEs, that is, units incorporated as Companies or LLP.

The salient features of the scheme are proposed to be:

  —   If an MSME finds it unable to meet its financial obligations, the insolvency resolution process could be initiated on the occurrence of default of at least Rs.1 lakh

  —   It can be triggered by the MSME promoter/ owner only (not by the Financial or other creditors)

  —   During the process of resolution, the MSME owner remains in control and keeps running the unit but all legal proceedings to take control of assets by creditors are stopped.

  —   It provides first right of offer to promoters of the MSME to submit resolution plans

  —   It proposes a simplified claim verification process and preparation of information memorandum

  —   It expands the scope of interim finance to facilitate rescue financing of the CD during COVID-19 with the approval of 3/4th financial creditors in value.

Federation of Indian Micro and Small & Medium Enterprises (FISME) which facilitated a consultation round of MSME associations with IBBI shared that most participants found the scheme potentially useful.

According to Lucknow based V K Agarwal Managing Director of Shashi Cables Ltd and former FISME President, the scheme seemed to be modelled on insolvency provisions under US chapter-11, was very promising indeed but some way needed to be found to make financial creditors to come on board and cooperate.

The scheme envisages appointment of an Insolvency Professional (IP) as Resolution Professional to conduct the process, with the consent of the unrelated financial creditors having at least 25% of the outstanding financial claims.

The scheme is under final stages of approval and is expected to be announced soon.

IBBI proposes to limit cases with insolvency professionals

The IBBI’s discussion paper said that the processes under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) require a unique combination of skill sets in terms of subject matter knowledge and management skills for an IP and at different stages of transactions, different sets of skills are called for.

In what may bring about major reform and efficiency in the insolvency regime in India, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has proposed to limit the number of cases an insolvency professional can handle to five as it noted that few insolvency professionals (IP) are handling too many cases

In a recent discussion paper, the board noted the “skewed” work allocation and has come up with a matrix for allocation of cases.

Citing observations by courts and  tribunals, the paper said: “Keeping in mind the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, the skewed work allocation amongst the IPs and the observations of the Supreme Court or Adjudicating Authority, and given the expansive and intense responsibilities of an IP in corporate processes, it is proposed to issue necessary guidelines to IPs advising them to limit the maximum number of assignments handled by them, to five, at a given point of time.”

As per the proposed matrix an insolvency resolution professional (IRP) can handle a total of five cases of resolution or liquidation, including voluntary liquidation, wherein the turnover of the corporate debtors is less than or equal to Rs 1,000 crore. As the matrix progresses, an IRP handling the case of a corporate debtor with the turnover of Rs 50,000 crore would be able handle only that very case, and no more.

“On the basis of information available, it is observed that a few IPs are handling too many assignments under the Code, which is detrimental to the institution of IP in the long run,” it noted.

The IBBI’s discussion paper said that the processes under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) require a unique combination of skill sets in terms of subject matter knowledge and management skills for an IP and at different stages of transactions, different sets of skills are called for.

A spike in one area of expertise will not be sufficient to create a uniform experience for stakeholders. Further, it cannot be ignored that no two IPs possess identical sets of qualification, experience, skills and expertise, it said.

“Similarly, no two CIRPs are same as it involves diverse businesses, complex corporate structures, varied stakeholders. The said restriction on an IP will put a check on undesirable instances of delay and disturbance to the processes led by IPs while simultaneously handling too many assignments under the Code.”

The Board was of the view that with limits in place, quality of output is expected to improve and it will facilitate the realisation of the objective of value maximisation as enshrined in the Code.

The major inputs for violation will be through complaints and therefore, the cost of surveillance for the Board may not be significant. Further, this will be conducive for development of the market for professionals as more talent will be drawn towards IP profession, it added.

The IBBI has sought public comments on the proposal till July 25, 2020.

Source: Economic Times

GSTN will re-credit late fees collected

The change in late fee amount made vide notification no. 57/2020 dated 30-06-2020 has been incorporated on the portal. Late fee paid in excess than prescribed in the notification shall be re-credited in due course.

CBIC had vide Noti 57/2020 has stated that that maximum Late Fee for Form GSTR 3B has been capped at Rs. 500 for tax period July 2017 to July 2020 subject to returns being filed before 30th September 2020.

But portal was not updated and it has levied late fees as per old calculation. Hence, GSTN Tech twitter posted that “The change in late fee amount made vide notification no. 57/2020 dated 30-06-2020 has been incorporated on the GST portal.

Late fee paid in excess than prescribed in the notification shall be re-credited in due course.”

[To be published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i)]
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Notification No. 57/2020 – Central Tax

New Delhi, the 30th June, 2020

G.S.R…..(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by section 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) (hereafter in this notification referred to as the said Act), read with section 148 of the said Act, the Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 76/2018– Central Tax, dated the 31st December, 2018, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub- section (i) vide number G.S.R. 1253(E), dated the 31st December, 2018, namely :–

In the said notification, after the third proviso, the following provisos shall be inserted, namely: –
“Provided also that for the class of registered persons mentioned in column (2) of the Table of the above proviso, who fail to furnish the returns for the tax period as specified in column (3) of the said Table, according to the condition mentioned in the corresponding entry in column (4) of the said Table, but furnishes the said return till the 30th day of September, 2020, the total amount of late fee payable under section 47 of the said Act, shall stand waived which is in excess of two hundred and fifty rupees and shall stand fully waived for those taxpayers where the total amount of central tax payable in the said return is nil:

Provided also that for the taxpayers having an aggregate turnover of more than rupees 5 crores in the preceding financial year, who fail to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of May, 2020 to July, 2020, by the due date but furnish the said return till the 30th day of September, 2020, the total amount of late fee under section 47 of the said Act, shall stand waived which is in excess of two hundred and fifty rupees and shall stand fully waived for those taxpayers where the total amount of central tax payable in the said return is nil.”.

2. This notification shall be deemed to have come into effect from the 25th day of June, 2020.

[F. No. CBEC-20/06/08/2020-GST]
(Pramod Kumar)
Director, Government of India

Note: The principal notification No. 76/2018-Central Tax, dated 31st December, 2018 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 1253(E), dated the 31st December, 2018 and was last amended vide notification number 52/2020 – Central Tax, dated the 24th June, 2020, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R.405 (E), dated the 24th June, 2020.

Govt Notification

Cooperative banks to be brought under RBI supervision

Government banks, including 1,482 urban cooperative banks and 58 multi-state cooperative banks, are now being brought under the supervisory powers of the RBI.
RBI’s powers will also apply to the cooperative banks as they apply to scheduled banks.

The Union Cabinet on Wednesday decided to bring all co-operative banks under the Reserve Bank of India through an ordinance. This was announced by Union information and broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar during a virtual press conference.

“Government banks, including 1,482 urban cooperative banks and 58 multi-state cooperative banks, are now being brought under supervisory powers of Reserve Bank of India (RBI),” Javadekar said today. These banks will come under the supervision of RBI with immediate effect from date of President’s approval on the ordinance.

After the Punjab and Maharashtra Cooperative (PMC) Banks fiasco last year, the Union Cabinet in February amended Banking Regulation Act to strengthen the cooperative banks in the country. During Budget 2020, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman also announced that cooperative banks will be brought under the ambit of RBI.

There are more than 8.6 crore depositors in over 1,500 urban and multi-state cooperative banks across the country. “Depositors’ money amounting to 4.84 lakh crore in the cooperatives banks will stay safe,” Javadekar said while announcing the decision.

The government also announced to provide 2% interest subvention to borrowers under the ‘Shishu’ category of the flagship Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana (PMMY). Under the Shishu category, collateral free loans of up to 50,000 will be given to beneficiaries.

“The Union Cabinet has approved the scheme for interest subvention of 2% to Shishu loan category borrowers under PMMY, outstanding as on March 31, 2020, for a period of 12 months to eligible borrowers,” Javadekar said.

Launched in 2015, the Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana provides loans up to 10 lakh to non-corporate, non-farm small/micro enterprises. These loans are classified as MUDRA loans under PMMY. Commercial banks, RRBs, small finance banks, MFIs and NBFCs provide MUDRA loans.

In the wake of coronavirus outbreak, the central government decided to extend the tenure of the OBC Commission by six months, Union minister Prakash Javadekar said. The government also announced 15,000-crore infrastructure fund to provide interest subvention of up to 3% to private players for setting up of dairy, poultry and meat processing units.

“A fund worth 15,000 crore has been approved by the Cabinet that will be open to all and will help in increasing milk production, boost exports and create 35 lakh jobs in the country,” Javadekar told.

Source: Economic Times

Continued