CBDT allows One Time Relaxation for Verification of Tax Returns

-Through this one time relaxation scheme, ITR for FY 2014-15 to FY 2018-19 can be verified, on or before 30th September 2020.
– All such verified ITRs shall be processed on or before 31st December 2020.
– ITRs can be verified digitally through EVC or by sending duly signed a copy to CPC Bangalore.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) on Monday notified the one-time relaxation for verification of tax return for the Assessment Year 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20, which are pending due to non-filing of ITR- V form and processing of such returns.

It has been brought to the notice of CBDT that a large number of electronically filed ITR still remains pending with the Income-Tax Department for want of receipt of a valid ITR-V Form at CPC, Bengaluru from the taxpayers concerned.

In law, consequences of non-filing the ITR-V within the time allowed is significant as such a return is/can be declared Non-est in law. Thereafter, all the consequences for non-filing a tax return, as specified in the Income-tax Act,1961 follow.

“The CBDT, in the exercise of powers under section 119 of the Act, in case of returns for Assessment Years 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20 which were uploaded electronically by the taxpayer within the time allowed under section 139 of the Act and which have remained incomplete due to non-submission of ITR-V Form for verification, hereby permits verification of such returns either by sending a duly signed physical copy of ITR-V to CPC, Bengaluru through speed post or through EVC/OTP modes as listed in para 1 above.

Such verification process must be completed by 30.09.2020,” the circular said.

However, the circular clarified that this relaxation shall not apply in those cases, where during the intervening period, the Income Tax Department has already taken recourse to any other measure as specified in the Act for ensuring filing of a tax return by the taxpayer concerned after declaring the return as Non-est.

“CBDT also relaxes the time-frame for issuing the intimation as provided in the second proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 143 of the Act and directs that such returns shall be processed by 31.12.2020 and intimation of processing of such returns shall be sent to the taxpayer concerned as per the laid down procedure.

In refund cases, while determining the interest, provision of section 244A (2) of the Act would apply,” the circular said.

Read the Original Circular of CBDT

SEBI signs MoU with CBDT for Data Exchange

There is a need to create a regulator or authority for data business, which provides centralized regulation for all non-personal data exchanges,” the government-appointed panel said in the report. Such a regulator would be armed with legal powers to request data, supervise data sharing requests and settle disputes“.
A formal Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed today between the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for data exchange between the two organizations.
 
The MoU was signed by Smt. Anu J. Singh, Pr. DGIT (Systems), CBDT, and Smt. MadhabiPuri Buch, Whole Time Member, SEBI in the presence of senior officers from both the organizations via video conference.

The MoU will facilitate the sharing of data and information between SEBI and CBDT on an automatic and regular basis.

In addition to regular exchange of data, CBDT and SEBI will also exchange with each other, on request and suo moto basis, any information available in their respective databases, for the purpose of carrying out scrutiny, inspection, investigation and prosecution,” SEBI said in a statement.

In addition to regular exchange of data, SEBI and CBDT will also exchange with each other, on request and Suo moto basis, any information available in their respective databases, for the purpose of carrying out their functions under various laws.

The MoU comes into force from the date it was signed and is an ongoing initiative of CBDT and SEBI, who are already collaborating through various existing mechanisms.

A Data Exchange Steering Group has also been constituted for the initiative, which will meet periodically to review the data exchange status and take steps to further improve the effectiveness of the data-sharing mechanism.

The MoU marks the beginning of a new era of cooperation and synergy between SEBI and CBDT.

In the past, SEBI has cracked on several entities who had manipulated the stock prices of listed companies. The regulator had observed in the penny stock scam that promoters and market operators were using the stock exchange platform to evade taxes and launder black money.

Read the Press Release: SEBI signs MOU with CBDT for Data Exchange

The Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) hit by Covid pandemic may have something to cheer at last.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has formulated a Special Resolution Process (SRP) for MSMEs who find their financial position unmanageable due to Covid crisis.


While presenting the ‘Atma Nirbhar Bharat’ package Finance Minister had announced to come out with a Special insolvency resolution framework for MSMEs under section 240A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

According to sources close to the development, the scheme would be available to corporate MSMEs, that is, units incorporated as Companies or LLP.

The salient features of the scheme are proposed to be:

  —   If an MSME finds it unable to meet its financial obligations, the insolvency resolution process could be initiated on the occurrence of default of at least Rs.1 lakh

  —   It can be triggered by the MSME promoter/ owner only (not by the Financial or other creditors)

  —   During the process of resolution, the MSME owner remains in control and keeps running the unit but all legal proceedings to take control of assets by creditors are stopped.

  —   It provides first right of offer to promoters of the MSME to submit resolution plans

  —   It proposes a simplified claim verification process and preparation of information memorandum

  —   It expands the scope of interim finance to facilitate rescue financing of the CD during COVID-19 with the approval of 3/4th financial creditors in value.

Federation of Indian Micro and Small & Medium Enterprises (FISME) which facilitated a consultation round of MSME associations with IBBI shared that most participants found the scheme potentially useful.

According to Lucknow based V K Agarwal Managing Director of Shashi Cables Ltd and former FISME President, the scheme seemed to be modelled on insolvency provisions under US chapter-11, was very promising indeed but some way needed to be found to make financial creditors to come on board and cooperate.

The scheme envisages appointment of an Insolvency Professional (IP) as Resolution Professional to conduct the process, with the consent of the unrelated financial creditors having at least 25% of the outstanding financial claims.

The scheme is under final stages of approval and is expected to be announced soon.

IBBI proposes to limit cases with insolvency professionals

The IBBI’s discussion paper said that the processes under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) require a unique combination of skill sets in terms of subject matter knowledge and management skills for an IP and at different stages of transactions, different sets of skills are called for.

In what may bring about major reform and efficiency in the insolvency regime in India, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has proposed to limit the number of cases an insolvency professional can handle to five as it noted that few insolvency professionals (IP) are handling too many cases

In a recent discussion paper, the board noted the “skewed” work allocation and has come up with a matrix for allocation of cases.

Citing observations by courts and  tribunals, the paper said: “Keeping in mind the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, the skewed work allocation amongst the IPs and the observations of the Supreme Court or Adjudicating Authority, and given the expansive and intense responsibilities of an IP in corporate processes, it is proposed to issue necessary guidelines to IPs advising them to limit the maximum number of assignments handled by them, to five, at a given point of time.”

As per the proposed matrix an insolvency resolution professional (IRP) can handle a total of five cases of resolution or liquidation, including voluntary liquidation, wherein the turnover of the corporate debtors is less than or equal to Rs 1,000 crore. As the matrix progresses, an IRP handling the case of a corporate debtor with the turnover of Rs 50,000 crore would be able handle only that very case, and no more.

“On the basis of information available, it is observed that a few IPs are handling too many assignments under the Code, which is detrimental to the institution of IP in the long run,” it noted.

The IBBI’s discussion paper said that the processes under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) require a unique combination of skill sets in terms of subject matter knowledge and management skills for an IP and at different stages of transactions, different sets of skills are called for.

A spike in one area of expertise will not be sufficient to create a uniform experience for stakeholders. Further, it cannot be ignored that no two IPs possess identical sets of qualification, experience, skills and expertise, it said.

“Similarly, no two CIRPs are same as it involves diverse businesses, complex corporate structures, varied stakeholders. The said restriction on an IP will put a check on undesirable instances of delay and disturbance to the processes led by IPs while simultaneously handling too many assignments under the Code.”

The Board was of the view that with limits in place, quality of output is expected to improve and it will facilitate the realisation of the objective of value maximisation as enshrined in the Code.

The major inputs for violation will be through complaints and therefore, the cost of surveillance for the Board may not be significant. Further, this will be conducive for development of the market for professionals as more talent will be drawn towards IP profession, it added.

The IBBI has sought public comments on the proposal till July 25, 2020.

Source: Economic Times

GSTN will re-credit late fees collected

The change in late fee amount made vide notification no. 57/2020 dated 30-06-2020 has been incorporated on the portal. Late fee paid in excess than prescribed in the notification shall be re-credited in due course.

CBIC had vide Noti 57/2020 has stated that that maximum Late Fee for Form GSTR 3B has been capped at Rs. 500 for tax period July 2017 to July 2020 subject to returns being filed before 30th September 2020.

But portal was not updated and it has levied late fees as per old calculation. Hence, GSTN Tech twitter posted that “The change in late fee amount made vide notification no. 57/2020 dated 30-06-2020 has been incorporated on the GST portal.

Late fee paid in excess than prescribed in the notification shall be re-credited in due course.”

[To be published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i)]
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
(Department of Revenue)
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Notification No. 57/2020 – Central Tax

New Delhi, the 30th June, 2020

G.S.R…..(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by section 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) (hereafter in this notification referred to as the said Act), read with section 148 of the said Act, the Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 76/2018– Central Tax, dated the 31st December, 2018, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub- section (i) vide number G.S.R. 1253(E), dated the 31st December, 2018, namely :–

In the said notification, after the third proviso, the following provisos shall be inserted, namely: –
“Provided also that for the class of registered persons mentioned in column (2) of the Table of the above proviso, who fail to furnish the returns for the tax period as specified in column (3) of the said Table, according to the condition mentioned in the corresponding entry in column (4) of the said Table, but furnishes the said return till the 30th day of September, 2020, the total amount of late fee payable under section 47 of the said Act, shall stand waived which is in excess of two hundred and fifty rupees and shall stand fully waived for those taxpayers where the total amount of central tax payable in the said return is nil:

Provided also that for the taxpayers having an aggregate turnover of more than rupees 5 crores in the preceding financial year, who fail to furnish the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of May, 2020 to July, 2020, by the due date but furnish the said return till the 30th day of September, 2020, the total amount of late fee under section 47 of the said Act, shall stand waived which is in excess of two hundred and fifty rupees and shall stand fully waived for those taxpayers where the total amount of central tax payable in the said return is nil.”.

2. This notification shall be deemed to have come into effect from the 25th day of June, 2020.

[F. No. CBEC-20/06/08/2020-GST]
(Pramod Kumar)
Director, Government of India

Note: The principal notification No. 76/2018-Central Tax, dated 31st December, 2018 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide number G.S.R. 1253(E), dated the 31st December, 2018 and was last amended vide notification number 52/2020 – Central Tax, dated the 24th June, 2020, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R.405 (E), dated the 24th June, 2020.

Govt Notification

Companies get more time to meet deposit repayment and debenture reserve norms amid COVID-19

Company Law
• The extension is applicable to both deposits as well as debentures maturing this fiscal
• The extension is given in view of the requests received from various stakeholders seeking more time on account of covid-19
• The move comes at a time when businesses are struggling with a weak balance sheet after the national lockdown

The government has given a three-month extension to companies to set aside a part of the deposits and debentures maturing in FY21 in a dedicated account, a statutory requirement under the Companies Act.

The Ministry of  Corporate Affairs (MCA) said in a circular that the due date of April end, which was extended till end of June in a circular in March, has been further extended till end of September, 2020.

The circular, signed on Friday, said the extension was given in view of the requests received from various stakeholders seeking more time on account of covid-19.

The extension is applicable to both deposits as well as debentures maturing this fiscal. The Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules of 2014 said every company needs to set up a Debenture Redemption Reserve before end of April every year and deposit in that not less than 15% of the debentures maturing in that year. This investment could be in the form of bank deposits or central and state government securities or specified corporate bonds.

Similarly, companies accepting deposits from its members have to deposit not less than 20% of such deposits maturing in a financial year and in the subsequent financial year in a scheduled bank in a separate account called deposit repayment reserve account. For this requirement under the Companies Act too, the government had in March given three months extra time till end of June. Due dates for both the requirements now stand extended till end of September, 2020.

The move comes at a time when businesses are struggling with a weak balance sheet after the national lockdown to check the spread of coronavirus infections wiped out two months of business. The government’s over 20 trillion stimulus package relied mostly on bank credit to businesses rather than on more upfront measures.

The Ministry of  Corporate Affairs (MCA) has in the last few months taken a series of steps that will reduce the compliance burden and lower the cost of capital for businesses.

Source: MCA Circular dated 19 June 2020

MCA relaxes time to file forms for creation/modification of charges

In a view of the pandemic situation due to COVID-19 outbreak and several representations made, by the stake holders, Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has came out with a new scheme called “Scheme for relaxation of time for filing forms related to creation or modification of charges under the Companies Act, 2013” for the purpose of condoning the delay in filing certain forms related to creation/ modification of charges.

This important relaxation by MCA in relation to creation and modification of Charges under the Companies Act, 2013 is very significant, especially during the pandemic situation due to COVID-19, is detailed as below:

=========================================================

F.No. 02/05/2020 CL-V
Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
5th Floor, ‘A’ Wing, Shastri Bhawan,
Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi-1.

General Circular No. 23/2020
Dated: 17th June, 2020

To

All Regional Directors,
All Registrar of Companies,
All Stakeholders.

Subject: Scheme for relaxation of time for filing forms related to creation or modification of charges under the Companies Act, 2013.

Sir/Madam,

The companies are required to file forms related to creation or modification of charges within the timelines provided in section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act), i.e. a total of 120 days of the creation or modification of charge. In case, the company fails to register the charge within the period of thirty days referred to in sub-section (1) of section 77, the charge holder may file the form related to creation or modification of charges under section 78 of the Act, within the overall timelines for filing of such form under section 77.

  1. On account of the pandemic caused by the COVID-19, representations have been received in this Ministry, requesting that the timelines related to filing of certain charge related forms may be suitably relaxed so as to provide a window of compliance for the registration of charges. Under the Companies Fresh Start Scheme, 2020 as laid out in the General Circular No. 12/2020, dated 30.03.2020, the benefit of waiver of additional fees was not extended to the charge related documents. Therefore, it has been suggested that some dispensation may be provided for filing of charge related documents as well.
  2. In view of the above, the Central Government in exercise of its powers under section 460 read with section 403 of the Act and the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 (Fees Rules) has decided to introduce a Scheme, namely “Scheme for relaxation of time for filing forms related to creation or modification of charges under the Companies Act, 2013” for the purpose of condoning the delay in filing certain forms related to creation/modification of charges.
  3. The details of the scheme are as under: –

(i) The scheme shall come into effect from the date of issue of this Circular.

(ii) Applicability: The scheme shall be applicable in respect of filing of Form No. CHG-1 and Form No. CHG-9 (both referred as ‘form’ or ‘forms’) by a company or a charge holder, where the date of creation/modification of charge:

(a) is before 01.03.2020, but the timeline for filing such form had not expired under section 77 of the Act as on 01.03.2020, or

(b) falls on any date between 01.03.2020 to 30.09.2020 (both dates inclusive).

(iii) Relaxation of time:

(a) In case a form is filed in respect of a situation covered under sub-para (ii)(a) above, the period beginning from 01.03.2020 and ending on 30.09.2020 shall not be reckoned for the purpose of counting the number of days under section 77 or section 78 of the Act. In case, the form is not filed within such period, the first day after 29.02.2020 shall be reckoned as 01.10.2020 for the purpose of counting the number of days within which the form is required to be filed under section 77 or section 78 of the Act.

(b) In case a form is filed in respect of a situation covered under sub-para (ii)(b) above, the period beginning from the date of creation/modification of charge to 30.09.2020 shall not be reckoned for the purpose of counting of days under section 77 or section 78 of the Act. In case, the form is not filed within such period, the first day after the date of creation/modification of charge shall be reckoned as 01.10.2020 for the purpose of counting the number of days within which the form is required to be filed under section 77 or section 78 of the Act.

(iv) Applicable Fees:

(a) In regard to sub-para (iii)(a) above, if the form is filed on or before 30.09.2020, the fees payable as on 29.02.2020 under the Fees Rules for the said form shall be charged. If the form is filed thereafter, the applicable fees shall be charged under the Fees Rules after adding the number of days beginning from 01.10.2020 and ending on the date of filing plus the time period lapsed from the date of the creation of charge till 29.02.2020.

(b) In regard to sub-para (iii)(b) above, if the form is filed before 30.09.2020, normal fees shall be payable under the Fees Rules. If the form is filed thereafter, the first day after the date of creation/modification of charge shall be reckoned as 01.10.2020 and the number of days till the date of filing of the form shall be counted accordingly for the purposes of payment of fees under the Fees Rules.

(v) The Scheme shall not apply, in case:

(a) The forms i.e.CHG-1 and CHG-9 had already been filed before the date of issue of this Circular.

(b) The timeline for filing the form has already expired under section 77 or section 78 of the Act prior to 01.03.2020.

(c) The timeline for filing the form expires at a future date, despite exclusion of the time provided in sub-para (iii) above.

(d) Filing of Form CHG-4 for satisfaction of charges.

  1. This issues with the approval of the Competent Authority.

Yours faithfully,

(K S Narayanan)

Assistant Director (policy)