India Agri Business Fund invests Rs 100 crore in Parijat Ind

Rabobank-promoted private equity fund ‘India Agri Business Fund II’ has invested around Rs 100 crore in agrochemical firm Parijat Industries to acquire a minority stake.

Rabo Equity Advisors, the investment advisors for PE fund ‘India Agri Business Fund II’, announced an “undisclosed investment” into Parijat Industries to acquire minority stake. Sources said that an investment of about Rs 100 crore has been made in Parijat Industries.

This is the second investment by India Agri Business Fund II, Rabo Equity advisors said in a statement. The first investment, which was also of about Rs 100 crore, was announced last week in Cremica Food Industries.

India Agri Business Fund II is a USD 200 million private equity fund targeted at expansion/growth of Indian food and agri-business companies in India across the value chain.

The fund sponsored by Rabobank along with pedigreed anchors namely CDC Group and Asian Development Bank.

Commenting on the investment, Rabo Equity Advisors CMD Rajesh Srivastava said that it expects Parijat to be a leading agrochemical player in the high potential sector. “We are especially excited at the company’s export forays and new products expected to be launched in the domestic market over the next few years,” he added.

Parijat is looking to achieve sales of Rs 1,500 crore by 2021 and also expand its domestic distribution network to 10,000 retail points in three years from 4,500 at present. “Our team at Parijat is committed to exponentially growing its domestic presence besides the international footprint. We are delighted to have Rabo Equity as our partner and hope to leverage their extensive domain knowledge and global outreach in the food and agri sector,” said Keshav Anand, Chairman & Managing Director, Parijat Industries.

Rabo Equity Advisors currently advises two funds in India, IABF-I and IABF-II. India Agri Business Fund I, a USD 120 million fund which is invested in 10 companies across sectors like biotechnology, warehousing, edible oils, dairy and basmati rice.

 

Source: http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/india-agri-business-fund-invests-rs-100-croreparijat-ind_6839841.html

India, US to expand economic cooperation, break down trade barriers

India and the US today vowed to expand economic relation between the two nations and explore new opportunities to break down barriers to facilitate movement of goods and services.

The leaders of the two countries resolved to pursue US- India Totalisation Agreement and enhance engagement on intellectual property rights with a view to promote innovation and creativity.

“In order to substantially increase bilateral trade, they (leaders) pledged to explore new opportunities to break down barriers to the movement of goods and services, and support deeper integration into global supply chains, thereby creating jobs and generating prosperity in both economies,” said the joint statement issued after a meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Barack Obama.

They look forward to the second annual Strategic and Commercial Dialogue in India later this year to identify concrete steps in this regard, it added.

Highlighting the strong and expanding economic relations between the US and India, the leaders committed to support sustainable, inclusive, and robust economic growth, and common efforts to stimulate consumer demand, job creation, skill development and innovation.

It was decided to continue discussion later this year on the US-India Totalisation Agreement.

The ‘Totalisation Agreement’ seeks to do away with double taxation of income with respect to social security taxes.

Under this agreement, professionals of both the countries would be exempted from social security taxes when they go to work for a short period in the other country.

The two leaders also committed to make concrete progress on IPR issues by working to enhance bilateral cooperation among the drivers of innovation and creativity.

They also commended the increased engagement on trade and investment issues under the Trade Policy Forum (TPF) and encouraged substantive results for the next TPF later this year.

The leaders also welcomed the engagement of the US’ private sector companies in India’s Smart City programme.

The leaders resolved to facilitate greater movement of professionals, investors and business travellers, students, and exchange visitors between their countries to enhance people-to-people contact as well as their economic and technological partnership.

On the MoU for Development of an International Expedited Traveller Initiative (also known as Global Entry Programme) the statement said efforts will be made for entry of India into the said programme within three months.

 

Source: http://www.ptinews.com/news/7531712_India–US-to-expand-economic-cooperation–break-down-trade-barriers-.html

Japan banks enter ranks of biggest energy lenders

JapanJapanese banks, known for the risk-aversion that spared them the worst of the credit crisis, have quietly grown into some of the world’s largest energy lenders.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc (MUFG), Japan’s largest bank, disclosed last month it has become one of the biggest oil and gas lenders with 9.2 trillion yen, or about $85 billion, in exposure – $45 billion more than it had reported at the end of the year. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc is not far behind with about $77 billion and Mizuho Financial Group Inc has about $48 billion, calculations based on the companies’ websites show.

The megabanks sought profits in the oil patch during the boom as Japan’s shrinking population and years of economic stagnation sapped the profitability of domestic lending. While energy is only a fraction of their business, souring loans have been a drag on earnings. MUFG sees full-year profit falling 11 per cent as negative interest rates squeeze loan profitability and bad-loan costs increase.

“Japanese banks were thought to have no exposure at all and all of a sudden they’re some of the most exposed companies around the world,” said Nicholas Smith, a strategist at brokerage CLSA Ltd in Tokyo who has covered Japanese equities for over 25 years. “Perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised, given their scramble to get overseas exposure.”

The longer oil remains around $50 a barrel, the worse it gets. MUFG and Sumitomo Mitsui reported in May that the cost of bad energy loans rose in the past 12 months to a combined $994 million. Sumitomo Mitsui said that number could rise in the next year. Mizuho didn’t disclose energy-related credit costs.

Brent gained 14 cents, or 0.3 per cent, to $52.65 a barrel on the London-based ICE Futures Europe exchange at 12:28 pm Singapore time.

“Considering that we have downgraded more than 100 rated energy companies globally since December 2015, the banks’ energy and resource-related exposures in this uncertain environment could create losses that would reduce their capital,” Raymond Spencer, an analyst for Moody’s Investors Service in Tokyo, wrote in a May 19 note.

With defaults on the rise, bank investors around the world have been demanding more information about energy lending. MUFG’s exposure jumped after the bank expanded its most recent disclosure to include refineries and pipelines, borrowers that were left out of previous reports.

“I don’t believe that proactively lending to the natural resource and energy sector is in itself a mistake,” said Nobuyuki Hirano, president of MUFG, at a May 16 briefing discussing the company’s financial results. He said the company has prepared “appropriately” for potential losses. One concern for Japanese lenders is the deteriorating finances of the US shale industry. During the boom, drillers that outspent cash flow even when oil was $100 a barrel tapped credit from Japanese banks that were pushing to expand overseas lending.

Then prices plummeted below $30. Since the start of 2015, 142 oilfield service companies and oil and gas producers have gone bankrupt, owing almost $62 billion, according to law firm Haynes & Boone.

Sumitomo Mitsui is among the lenders to Stone Energy Corp., which is in restructuring talks. MUFG and Mizuho are among Linn Energy LLC,’s creditors, company records show. Linn owed $2.55 billion on two credit lines when it filed for bankruptcy May 11. Mizuho was also a lender to Breitburn Energy Partners LP, which owed $1.2 billion on its credit line when it filed for bankruptcy May 15.

While these credit lines are split up among a dozen or more lenders, and collateral in the form of oil and gas reserves may mitigate any losses, the risk is adding up. MUFG said in April that its North American subsidiary has made $5.52 billion in loans to exploration and production companies. Almost half of those loans are now marked as “criticised,” a regulatory designation that means that, at best, the loans exhibit potential weaknesses and at worst will result in losses.

The size of Sumitomo Mitsui’s total oil and gas-related exposure to non-Japanese borrowers, which is the area most vulnerable to changes in oil prices, is 6 per cent of its total portfolio, Koichi Miyata, president of the group holding company, said at a results briefing in Tokyo on May 13. “And this is a diverse mix including oil majors, 85 per cent of which I think is fair to say is extremely good credit,” he said.

Mizuho said its bad debts in the energy and resource sector totalled about $279 million as of March. “Even based on oil prices at the moment, we’re absolutely not seeing the recording of any major concentration of credit costs,” Mizuho’s President Yasuhiro Sato said at a May 13 briefing on the bank’s financial results.

“I don’t think we need to be worried at the current point in time,” said Nana Otsuki, chief analyst at Monex Group Inc, a Tokyo-based online securities firm. “But we’ll need to watch risks more carefully next year, particularly if there are any movements in the price of oil.”

 

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/article/international/japan-banks-enter-ranks-of-biggest-energy-lenders-116060901307_1.html

SEBI to make it easier for fund managers to move to India

To make it easier for the foreign fund managers keen to relocate to India, markets regulator SEBI is considering allowing them to function as ‘Portfolio Managers’ under an easier regulatory regime.

The move assumes significance in the wake of the government already having announced taxation incentives for the offshore fund managers willing to relocate to India.

A new section in the Income Tax Act provides that the fund management activity carried out through an Eligible Fund Manager (EFM) located in India and acting on behalf of an Eligible Investment Fund (EIF) would not constitute business connection in India of such a fund.

Following the issuance of notification by the tax department in this regard, SEBI held meetings with various stakeholders to discuss the registration framework for EFMs, during which several impediments were pointed out in the existing regulations for Investment Advisers and Portfolio Managers.

Subsequently, SEBI has decided to initiate a consultation process for changes to its norms for Portfolio Managers while putting in place a framework for allowing EFMs to act as Portfolio Managers to their EIFs.

A proposal in this regard would be put up for approval of SEBI’s board next week, a senior official said.

Among the proposed measures, an existing SEBI-registered Portfolio Manager will also be allowed to act as EFM with prior intimation from SEBI and subject to certain conditions.

SEBI also plans to put in place a procedure for registration of an existing foreign-based fund manager desirous of relocating to India, or as a fresh applicant.

Such applicants will be granted registration as Portfolio Managers to act as an EFM, provided they meet existing eligibility norms of being a body corporate, having net worth of Rs 2 crore, appointment of a Principal Officer and minimum two employees with requisite credentials.

The EFMs would be required to segregate the funds and securities of the EIFs from that of other clients, provide information to Sebi on a half-yearly basis, ensure compliance to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and other regulations.

However, EFMs would be exempted from several provisions of the PMS Regulations with respect to the EIF, and would have to comply with the applicable regulatory and disclosure requirements of the jurisdiction of the EIF.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/52640330.cms

SEBI warns investors against barred entities

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) on Monday warned unlisted companies and their directors who fraudulently raised money and asked investors not to be lured by their schemes.

The market regulator has listed out 235 unlisted companies that have lured retail investors by issuing securities such as non-convertible debentures/non-convertible preference shares in the garb of private placement. Orders against these firms were passed between April 2003 and May 2016.

“Companies are cautioned not to issue securities to public without complying with provisions of law. Failing which Sebi will be constraint to take stringent action against such companies and their directors,” Sebi noted.

The companies against which action has been taken include Jeevan Suraksha Real Estate, Roofers Infra Projects, Shankalp Food and Beverages, Silicon Projects, Pious Agro Industries, Ravi Kiran Realty, Angela Agrotech, Amrit Projects, MARS Agrofarm Developers, and Golden Heaven Agro Project India.

In another note, Sebi also warned investors against collective investment schemes (CIS) of entities barred by the market regulator from raising money.  The regulator passed orders against 100 entities and its directors carrying on unregistered CIS.

“As part of interim directions, Sebi directs the entities and its directors to stop collecting further money under existing / new schemes, not to launch any new scheme or float any new companies/firm to raise fresh money, not to divert or alienate any assets or money collected.”

Apart from Gift Collective Investment Management Company Limited, no other entity is registered with Sebi. Hence, investors are advised to do due diligence before investing in such schemes, said Sebi in its note.

http://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/sebi-warns-investors-against-barred-entities-116060601204_1.html

Listed company’s documentation may get simpler

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) is learnt to be finalising a new mechanism to simplify the documentation process for listed companies wishing to issue new securities. Sources told FE that the concept of an ‘annual information memorandum’ will be introduced by the regulator, replacing the traditional offer document, if a company plans subsequent public issues via an offer for sale (OFS) or a follow-on public offering (FPO).

This memorandum is expected to provide exhaustive information about a company including financials, pending litigations and risk factors. Companies will have to file the document once a year. To incorporate the new mechanism, Sebi will amend Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirement (LODR) regulations.

As per the current LODR regulations, a company needs to file an offer document whenever it comes up with a public offering. However, offer documents are not mandatory in the cases of private placement like preferential issue, qualified institutional placements (QIPs), etc. The documentation is also not mandatory in case of rights issue where the company plans to tap existing shareholders.

Offer documents are usually drafted by merchant bankers in coordination with legal advisers. Post introduction of annual information memorandum, a company will be able to cut on the fees paid to merchant bankers and lawyers for the issue.

“Currently, we have the concept of annual reports. The new mechanism is a step forward. Annual information memorandums would provide additional details like pending litigations, etc. The regulator would come up with a format for the memorandum soon. This will also help investors get all the information about a company at a single place,” said an investment banker who is part of the primary markets advisory committee (PMAC) of Sebi.

As per the current LODR regulations, a company needs to upload an annual report which should contain audited financial statements, cash flow statements,directors report and management discussion and analysis report. The top 500 listed entities in terms of market capitalisation should also disclose business responsibility report describing initiatives taken by them from an environmental, social and governance perspectives.

In October 2015, Sebi had introduced the concept of abridged prospectus that companies need to file for public offers. Under this mechanism, any company going for an IPO needs to file an abridged prospectus along with the regular draft red herring prospectus (DRHP). The abridged prospects would be a 10-page document which would provide all the key information to the investor about the company. The decision was taken in the interest of investors as the full DRHP of a company runs into 400-500 pages.

Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/article/industry/companies/listed-companys-documentation-may-get-simpler/273624/

Tanzania plans to invest $1.9 billion each year in energy projects by 2025

“Tanzania’s electricity sector faces another important challenge. As it is heavily dependent on hydropower, energy provision cannot be ascertained in times of drought,” Tanzania’s prime minister, Kassim Majaliwa, said.

Tanzania plans to invest $1.9 billion each year by 2025 in energy projects in a bid to end power shortages and boost industrial growth in East Africa’s second-biggest economy, its prime minister said.

Tanzania aims to boost power generation capacity to 10,000 megawatts from around 1,500MW at present, using natural gas and coal and reducing its dependence on hydro power sources.

“Tanzania’s electricity sector faces another important challenge. As it is heavily dependent on hydropower, energy provision cannot be ascertained in times of drought,” Tanzania’s prime minister, Kassim Majaliwa, said in a statement late on Tuesday.

“Severe and recurrent droughts in the past few years triggered a devastating power crisis as electricity generation in most of the hydropower stations have progressively been declining in recent years, occasionally resulting in long hours of power black outs.”

Majaliwa said the government wants to see more private capital investment in the energy sector.
“The projected power projects funding exceeds the existing government fiscal space,” he said. “To attract private capital, the government is improving institutional set up, legal and regulatory frameworks.”

Investors have long complained that lack of reliable power was one of the obstacles of doing business in Tanzania.

Tanzania said last week Japan’s Koyo Corporation plans to invest $1 billion in a gas-fired power plant near big offshore natural gas fields off the African country’s southern shore.
Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/52432817.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst